Drosophila fushi tarazu

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How did differences in morphologies between animal phyla evolve if Hox gene expression patterns are so uniform across species?  Changes in Hox-protein.
Advertisements

Genetics of Axis Specification in Drosophila: Segment Polarity Genes & Hox Genes Gilbert - Chapter 9.
Bifocal Is a Downstream Target of the Ste20-like Serine/Threonine Kinase Misshapen in Regulating Photoreceptor Growth Cone Targeting in Drosophila  Wenjing.
Evolution of TNF Signaling Mechanisms
Leslie Dunipace, Abbie Saunders, Hilary L. Ashe, Angelike Stathopoulos 
D-cbl, a Negative Regulator of the Egfr Pathway, Is Required for Dorsoventral Patterning in Drosophila Oogenesis  Li-Mei Pai, Gail Barcelo, Trudi Schüpbach 
Marc Furriols, Sarah Bray  Current Biology 
Marios Agelopoulos, Daniel J. McKay, Richard S. Mann  Cell Reports 
Tony DeFalco, Nicole Camara, Stéphanie Le Bras, Mark Van Doren 
Persistent Expression of Genes of the Enhancer of Split Complex Suppresses Neural Development in Drosophila  Keiko Nakao, José A. Campos-Ortega  Neuron 
Mutual Repression by Bantam miRNA and Capicua Links the EGFR/MAPK and Hippo Pathways in Growth Control  Héctor Herranz, Xin Hong, Stephen M. Cohen  Current.
Evolution of the interaction between Hox genes and a downstream target
Volume 22, Issue 17, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (March 2005)
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages (June 2006)
Partner of Numb Colocalizes with Numb during Mitosis and Directs Numb Asymmetric Localization in Drosophila Neural and Muscle Progenitors  Bingwei Lu,
Persistent Expression of Genes of the Enhancer of Split Complex Suppresses Neural Development in Drosophila  Keiko Nakao, José A. Campos-Ortega  Neuron 
Rho-LIM Kinase Signaling Regulates Ecdysone-Induced Gene Expression and Morphogenesis during Drosophila Metamorphosis  Guang-Chao Chen, Patrycja Gajowniczek,
Act up Controls Actin Polymerization to Alter Cell Shape and Restrict Hedgehog Signaling in the Drosophila Eye Disc  Aude Benlali, Irena Draskovic, Dennis.
Volume 91, Issue 6, Pages (December 1997)
Kim F. Rewitz, Naoki Yamanaka, Michael B. O'Connor  Developmental Cell 
Distinct Protein Domains and Expression Patterns Confer Divergent Axon Guidance Functions for Drosophila Robo Receptors  Bettina Spitzweck, Marko Brankatschk,
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Sightless has homology to transmembrane acyltransferases and is required to generate active Hedgehog protein  Jeffrey D. Lee, Jessica E. Treisman  Current.
Proteolysis of the Hedgehog Signaling Effector Cubitus interruptus Requires Phosphorylation by Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 and Casein Kinase 1  Mary Ann.
Stephen A. Thacker, Peter C. Bonnette, Robert J. Duronio 
Volume 7, Issue 8, Pages (August 1997)
Myoblast Diversification and Ectodermal Signaling in Drosophila
Evolution of Ftz protein function in insects
Cofactor-Interaction Motifs and the Cooption of a Homeotic Hox Protein into the Segmentation Pathway of Drosophila melanogaster  Ulrike Löhr, Leslie Pick 
Muscles in the Drosophila second thoracic segment are patterned independently of autonomous homeotic gene function  Sudipto Roy, L.S. Shashidhara, K VijayRaghavan 
Kami Ahmad, Steven Henikoff  Cell 
Drosophila sickle Is a Novel grim-reaper Cell Death Activator
Volume 19, Issue 16, Pages (August 2009)
Joanna Chen, Esther M. Verheyen  Current Biology 
BTB/POZ-Zinc Finger Protein Abrupt Suppresses Dendritic Branching in a Neuronal Subtype-Specific and Dosage-Dependent Manner  Wenjun Li, Fay Wang, Laurent.
The LRR Proteins Capricious and Tartan Mediate Cell Interactions during DV Boundary Formation in the Drosophila Wing  Marco Milán, Ulrich Weihe, Lidia.
Dendrites of Distinct Classes of Drosophila Sensory Neurons Show Different Capacities for Homotypic Repulsion  Wesley B. Grueber, Bing Ye, Adrian W. Moore,
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (September 2003)
Pattern formation: Wingless on the move
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Mark Van Doren, Anne L. Williamson, Ruth Lehmann  Current Biology 
Volume 14, Issue 19, Pages (October 2004)
Short-Range Cell Interactions and Cell Survival in the Drosophila Wing
Carlos Sánchez-Higueras, Sol Sotillos, James Castelli-Gair Hombría 
Volume 91, Issue 2, Pages (October 1997)
Volume 96, Issue 4, Pages (February 1999)
Yoshinori Tomoyasu, Yasuyuki Arakane, Karl J. Kramer, Robin E. Denell 
Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 98, Issue 2, Pages (July 1999)
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (October 2002)
Recruitment of Ectodermal Attachment Cells via an EGFR-Dependent Mechanism during the Organogenesis of Drosophila Proprioceptors  Adi Inbal, Talila Volk,
Trimeric G Protein-Dependent Frizzled Signaling in Drosophila
Drosophila atonal Fully Rescues the Phenotype of Math1 Null Mice
Justin P. Kumar, Kevin Moses  Cell 
Magalie Lecourtois, François Schweisguth  Current Biology 
Lisa Connell-Crowley, Maude Le Gall, Duc J. Vo, Edward Giniger 
Volume 8, Issue 16, Pages (July 1998)
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Volume 11, Issue 21, Pages (October 2001)
The LRR Proteins Capricious and Tartan Mediate Cell Interactions during DV Boundary Formation in the Drosophila Wing  Marco Milán, Ulrich Weihe, Lidia.
The sterol-sensing domain of Patched protein seems to control Smoothened activity through Patched vesicular trafficking  Verónica Martı́n, Graciela Carrillo,
Producing Cells Retain and Recycle Wingless in Drosophila Embryos
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (May 2003)
Cosuppression of Nonhomologous Transgenes in Drosophila Involves Mutually Related Endogenous Sequences  Manika Pal-Bhadra, Utpal Bhadra, James A. Birchler 
Volume 86, Issue 3, Pages (August 1996)
Marelle Acts Downstream of the Drosophila HOP/JAK Kinase and Encodes a Protein Similar to the Mammalian STATs  Xianyu Steven Hou, Michael B Melnick, Norbert.
Different Levels of the Homeodomain Protein Cut Regulate Distinct Dendrite Branching Patterns of Drosophila Multidendritic Neurons  Wesley B Grueber,
E93 Directs Steroid-Triggered Programmed Cell Death in Drosophila
Evolution of TNF Signaling Mechanisms
Presentation transcript:

Drosophila fushi tarazu Ulrike Löhr, Miyuki Yussa, Leslie Pick  Current Biology  Volume 11, Issue 18, Pages 1403-1412 (September 2001) DOI: 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00443-2

Figure 1 The Tribolium ftz gene has homeotic potential. The ability of ftz genes from Drosophila and Tribolium to cause homeotic transformations during larval and embryonic development was assessed. (a–d) Adult phenotypes induced by ectopic expression of ftz genes. Antennal segments A1, A2, A3, and arista (Ar) are indicated. (a) Heat treatment of ry− larvae had no effect on antennal development. (b) Dm-Ftz had no effect on antennal morphology. (c) Tc-Ftz caused the transformation of arista to tarsus, similar to (d) Scr. (e–h) Homeotic transformations of the larval cuticle. (e) Heat treatment of yw control embryos had no effect on larval cuticles. T1, T2, T3, and A1 denticle belts are indicated. The arrowhead indicates the T1 ventral beard, which marks this segment. (f) Dm-Ftz caused no alteration in larval cuticles. (g) Tc-Ftz caused head involution defects and transformation of T1 toward T2, marked by reduction in the T1 ventral beard (asterisk). This phenotype resembles that caused by (h) Antp. All heat treatments were performed in parallel to ensure that results could be compared across lines carrying different expression constructs. Similar results were obtained when ftz genes were expressed with Gal4-UAS using an armadillo driver (data not shown). (i–l) Tc-Ftz activates the homeotic target gene tsh. Expression of Tsh is shown at stage 11. The anterior is directed toward the left. (i) Heat treatment of yw embryos had no effect on Tsh localization, which is restricted to the trunk region of the embryo. (j) Dm-Ftz did not alter Tsh expression. (k) Ectopic Tsh was induced in the head by Tc-Ftz (k; arrowhead) and similarly by Antp (l; arrowhead) Current Biology 2001 11, 1403-1412DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00443-2)

Figure 2 Primitive ftz genes cause antenna-to-leg transformations. Ftz proteins were expressed in imaginal discs using the Dll-GAl4 driver. (a)lacZ had no effect on antennal formation (A1, A2, A3, and arista [Ar] are indicated). (b) Dm-Ftz caused deletion of the arista and malformation of A3; A2 and A1 developed normally. (c) Tc-Ftz caused the transformation of arista to complete tarsus; all five tarsal segments are indicated, including claw (arrow). (d) Sg-Ftz caused the transformation of the arista into two tarsal segments, including claw (arrow) Current Biology 2001 11, 1403-1412DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00443-2)

Figure 3 Dm-ftz influences cell survival, not segmental identity. Ftz proteins were expressed in the same manner as for Figure 2. Acridine orange was used to determine cell viability after persistent expression of ftz genes. (a)lacZ had no effect on cell viability. (b) Dm-Ftz caused massive cell death. (c) Tc-Ftz or (d) Sg-Ftz induced minimal cell death Current Biology 2001 11, 1403-1412DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00443-2)

Figure 4 Tc-ftz functions in a homeotic manner to repress hth. Dm-ftz or Tc-ftz were expressed using a dpp-Gal4 driver linked to a UAS-GFP transgene. (a,b)lacZ had no effect on Hth. Where lacZ expression, indicated by GFP (green), overlaps Hth (red), Hth expression remained uniform. (c,d) Dm-Ftz had no effect on Hth. Note the uniform expression of Hth and the overlap of Dm-Ftz and Hth (yellow). (e,f) Tc-Ftz repressed Hth. Hth immunoreactivity was not observed in regions of the antennal disc expressing Tc-Ftz. Sg-Ftz had no effect on Hth (data not shown) Current Biology 2001 11, 1403-1412DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00443-2)

Figure 5 Ftz orthologs repress ss in the antennal disc. Ftz proteins were expressed in antennal discs using the Dll-Gal4 expression system. ss expression was observed with in situ hybridization. (a)lacZ expression had no effect on ss expression in the antennal disc. ss is expressed in the distal domain from late second instar larva onward. (b) In the leg discs, ss is expressed transiently from late second to early third larval instar in a ring. ss expression in the leg disc was not altered by lacZ expression. (c) The expression of ss was altered by Tc-Ftz to resemble ss expression in the leg disc (compare to [b]). This expression is transient, as it is in the leg disc. (d) Sg-Ftz repressed expression of ss in the center of the antennal disc. Uniform ss expression in the antennal disc was transformed to a transient ring similar to that seen in leg discs (compare to [b]) Current Biology 2001 11, 1403-1412DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00443-2)

Figure 6 Ftz proteins from Schistocerca and Tribolium have weak segmentation properties. (a–d)ftz genes induce an anti-ftz phenotype. The ability of primitive ftz genes to mediate segmentation functions was assessed by ectopic expression at the blastoderm stage. (a) yw embryos developed normally. Denticle belts of all thoracic (T) and abdominal (A) segments were formed. Denticles of the ftz-dependent parasegments are marked. (b) Dm-Ftz caused an anti-ftz phenotype in >80% of embryos: odd-numbered parasegments were deleted. The remaining denticle belts are indicated. (c) Tc-Ftz caused anti-ftz phenotypes. Most of the ftz-independent parasegments are deleted. In this cuticle, a small portion of A4 and A8 remain. Approximately 30%–40% of embryos were affected by ectopic Tc-Ftz; complete anti-ftz phenotypes were rarely observed. (d) Sg-Ftz caused weak pair-rule-like defects. A cuticle in which only anterior ftz-independent parasegments were deleted is shown. Only 5%–9% of embryos were affected; complete anti-ftz phenotypes were never observed. All heat treatments were performed in parallel to ensure that results could be compared across lines carrying different expression constructs. Results were confirmed in at least three separate experiments. (e–g) Tc-Ftz and Sg-Ftz interact with the segmentation-specific cofactor Ftz-F1. (e,f) GST pull-down assays. GST-fusion proteins were expressed in pGex5X-1. Approximately equivalent amounts of 35S-labeled protein were incubated with 10 μg GST-fusion proteins bound to beads. Reactions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. (e) 35S-labeled Dm-Ftz interacted strongly with GST-Ftz-F1. The interaction between 35S-labeled Tc-Ftz and Ftz-F1 was weaker, while an interaction between 35S-labeled Sg-Ftz was not observed. No interaction between 35S-labeled proteins and GST alone was observed. GST-Ftz-F1did not interact with 35S-labeled luciferase. (f) 35S-labeled Ftz-F1 interacted with GST-Dm-Ftz and GST-Tc-Ftz (1.5 hr exposure time). The weak interaction between 35S-labeled Ftz-F1 and GST-Sg-Ftz was detectable after a longer exposure (>24 hr) Current Biology 2001 11, 1403-1412DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00443-2)

Figure 7 Distinct protein domains mediate the interaction between Ftz proteins and cofactors. Amino acid sequences of cofactor interaction domains of Ftz and homeotic proteins are shown. N-terminal regions of Dm-Ftz and Tc-Ftz share an LRALL sequence that is not found anywhere in Sg-Ftz. This sequence conforms to an “LXXLL” motif [47] and mediates protein-protein interaction between Dm-Ftz and the Ftz-F1 [44, 45]. Tc-Ftz and Sg-Ftz retain the YPWM motif found in homeotic Hox proteins, which interacts with Exd [17, 49, 50, 51]. This motif has degenerated in Dm-Ftz. The homeodomains of Dm-Ftz, Tc-Ftz, and Sg-Ftz are virtually identical, including the N-terminal arm of the HD, which confers specificity in vivo [10–12]. This portion of the Ftz-HD distinguishes this gene family from neighboring homeotic genes, Scr and Antp Current Biology 2001 11, 1403-1412DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00443-2)