Correlating Notch Signaling with Thymocyte Maturation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
c-Myc expression in response to pre-TCR stimulation.
Advertisements

Figure 2. Positive selection of J15 TCR transgenic T cells specific for H60. (A) CD4 by CD8 profiles (left) of thymocytes and numbers (right) of each thymic.
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Overexpression of suppressor of cytokine signaling-1 impairs pre-T-cell receptor–induced proliferation but not differentiation of immature thymocytes by.
Nienke van der Stoep, James R Gorman, Frederick W Alt  Immunity 
Activation of the Erythropoietin Receptor Is Not Required for Internalization of Bound Erythropoietin by Diana L. Beckman, Lilie L. Lin, Mary E. Quinones,
Exacerbated colitis associated with elevated levels of activated CD4+ T cells in TCRα chain transgenic mice  Immo Prinz, Uwe Klemm, Stefan H.E. Kaufmann,
Differentiation of CD4+ T Cells to Th1 Cells Requires MAP Kinase JNK2
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Volume 12, Issue 13, Pages (July 2002)
Differential influence of tyrosine residues of the common receptor β subunit on multiple signals induced by human GM-CSF  Tohru Itoh, PhD, Rui Liu, MSc,
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (January 1998)
Marc Hertz, David Nemazee  Immunity 
by Shrikanth P. Hegde, JingFeng Zhao, Richard A. Ashmun, and Linda H
The Roles of Fas/APO-1 (CD95) and TNF in Antigen-Induced Programmed Cell Death in T Cell Receptor Transgenic Mice  Huey-Kang Sytwu, Roland S Liblau, Hugh.
Biochemical Mechanisms of IL-2–Regulated Fas-Mediated T Cell Apoptosis
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (December 1999)
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Durbaka V.R Prasad, Sabrina Richards, Xoi Muoi Mai, Chen Dong  Immunity 
Thorsten Buch, Frédéric Rieux-Laucat, Irmgard Förster, Klaus Rajewsky 
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
Local Expression of TNFα in Neonatal NOD Mice Promotes Diabetes by Enhancing Presentation of Islet Antigens  E.Allison Green, Elizabeth E. Eynon, Richard.
Volume 87, Issue 3, Pages (November 1996)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (August 2004)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages (April 2000)
Intrathymic δ Selection Events in γδ Cell Development
Fyn Can Partially Substitute for Lck in T Lymphocyte Development
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (March 1999)
Acquisition of a Functional T Cell Receptor during T Lymphocyte Development Is Enforced by HEB and E2A Transcription Factors  Mary Elizabeth Jones, Yuan.
Differential Roles of ERK and p38 MAP Kinase Pathways in Positive and Negative Selection of T Lymphocytes  Takehiko Sugawara, Tetsuo Moriguchi, Eisuke.
Joel R. Neilson, Monte M. Winslow, Eun Mi Hur, Gerald R. Crabtree 
Notch1 Signaling Promotes the Maturation of CD4 and CD8 SP Thymocytes
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
The CD8α Gene Locus Is Regulated by the Ikaros Family of Proteins
Positive Selection of Dendritic Epidermal γδ T Cell Precursors in the Fetal Thymus Determines Expression of Skin-Homing Receptors  Na Xiong, Chuhlo Kang,
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (December 1997)
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (July 1999)
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2002)
Cécile Bouneaud, Philippe Kourilsky, Philippe Bousso  Immunity 
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (March 1997)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (August 2004)
Volume 34, Issue 1, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 1998)
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (February 2001)
The Shaping of the T Cell Repertoire
Volume 6, Issue 7, Pages (July 1996)
Volume 29, Issue 5, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
B7h, a Novel Costimulatory Homolog of B7. 1 and B7
Multiple Developmental Stage–Specific Enhancers Regulate CD8 Expression in Developing Thymocytes and in Thymus-Independent T Cells  Wilfried Ellmeier,
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (July 2003)
Rodney P. DeKoter, Hyun-Jun Lee, Harinder Singh  Immunity 
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (September 1999)
Thomas M. Schmitt, Juan Carlos Zúñiga-Pflücker  Immunity 
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (September 2002)
Negative Selection at the Pre-BCR Checkpoint Elicited by Human μ Heavy Chains with Unusual CDR3 Regions  Yoshiyuki Minegishi, Mary Ellen Conley  Immunity 
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Notch 1 Signaling Regulates Peripheral T Cell Activation
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (September 1998)
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (October 1999)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
David A Schwarz, Carol D Katayama, Stephen M Hedrick  Immunity 
PU.1 Expression Delineates Heterogeneity in Primary Th2 Cells
RORγt, a Novel Isoform of an Orphan Receptor, Negatively Regulates Fas Ligand Expression and IL-2 Production in T Cells  You-Wen He, Michael L Deftos,
Presentation transcript:

Correlating Notch Signaling with Thymocyte Maturation Michael L Deftos, You-Wen He, Ethan W Ojala, Michael J Bevan  Immunity  Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages 777-786 (December 1998) DOI: 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80643-3

Figure 1 Identification of NotchIC as a Mediator of Resistance to Glucocorticoids in T Cells (A) Schematic representation of the mNotch-1 amino acid sequence. Labeled are the transmembrane domain (TM), residues 1724–1746; the RAM domain, residues 1751–1806; the ankyrin domain, residues 1865–2075; and the PEST domain, residues 2481–2503 (del Amo et al. 1993; Tamura et al. 1995). The majority of the extracellular domain has been omitted. (B) Schematic representation of the coding regions of mNotch-1 cDNAs identified by expression cloning. Numbers indicating the amino- and carboxyl-terminal amino acid residues are based on conceptual translation of the cDNA sequences. The initiation methionine for these cDNAs has not been determined. RH, US, and OT refer to clones derived from these respective thymocyte cDNA libraries. (C) Schematic representation of the regions of mNotch-1 cloned into the pMI retroviral vector and transferred into the AKR1010 and 2B4.11 T cell lines for functional assays. NotchIC begins at the first amino acid of the RAM domain. NotchIC/mM2-2 contains a mutation in the RAM domain that disrupts RBP/Su(H) binding (Tamura et al. 1995). NotchIC/ΔAnk begins immediately amino terminal to the third ankyrin repeat of Notch. Immunity 1998 9, 777-786DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80643-3)

Figure 2 Expression of NotchIC Confers Resistance to Glucocorticoid-Induced Apoptosis and Cell Cycle Arrest in T Cells (A) Expression of NotchIC in AKR1010 and 2B4.11 confers resistance to dexamethasone. AKR1010 and 2B4.11 were infected with retrovirus derived from the pMI/NotchIC vector. Following infection, transgene-expressing cells were identified by FACS analysis for IRES-driven hCD2 expression. The cells were then cultured in medium alone or in medium containing 10−7 M dexamethasone for 7 days followed by staining for hCD2 expression. Numbers represent the percentage of transgene-expressing cells in the indicated gates. (B) Expression of NotchIC confers resistance to glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis and cell-cycle arrest in AKR1010. Control cells and polyclonal AKR1010 cells expressing NotchIC were cultured in the presence of 10−7 M dexamethasone for the indicated times and analyzed for DNA content by FACS. Numbers represent the percentage of cells in the indicated gates. (C) Expression of NotchIC confers resistance to glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in 2B4.11. Control cells and polyclonal 2B4.11 cells expressing NotchIC were assayed for sensitivity to glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis and cell cycle arrest as in (B). Immunity 1998 9, 777-786DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80643-3)

Figure 3 NotchIC-Mediated Resistance to Glucocorticoids Correlates with Activation of the Notch Signaling Pathway and Maps to the RAM Domain of Notch (A) Expression of NotchIC upregulates endogenous mNotch-1 expression in AKR1010 and 2B4.11. Vector control cells and polyclonal AKR1010 and 2B4.11 cells expressing NotchIC were analyzed for endogenous mNotch-1 expression by Western blot analysis. (B) Resistance to glucocorticoids in T cells is mediated by the RAM and ankyrin domains of mNotch-1. Polyclonal 2B4.11 cell lines expressing the different NotchIC constructs diagrammed in Figure 1C were incubated in increasing concentrations of dexamethasone for 24 hr and their proliferation measured by 3H thymidine incorporation during an additional 12 hr of culture. Expressed is the percentage of proliferation relative to cells cultured in the absence of dexamethasone. Counts incorporated in the absence of dexamethasone are 62158 ± 2686 cpm for NotchIC; 65778 ± 3759 cpm for NotchIC/mM2-2; 72343 ± 4864 cpm for NotchIC/ΔAnk; and 89784 ± 2942 cpm for vector alone. Immunity 1998 9, 777-786DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80643-3)

Figure 4 Western Blot Analysis of Bcl-2 and Bcl-XL Expression in AKR1010 and 2B4.11 Cells Expressing NotchIC Lysates from the indicated cell lines were analyzed by Western blot analysis for Bcl-2 expression. The blots were then stripped and reprobed for Bcl-XL. Analysis of two additional dexamethasone-resistant AKR1010 clones isolated by expressing cloning gave identical results to the RH4 clone. Immunity 1998 9, 777-786DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80643-3)

Figure 5 Expression of NotchIC Upregulates TCR Expression (A) Expression of NotchIC in AKR1010 induces TCR surface expression. AKR1010 was infected with retrovirus prepared from control vector or the pMI/NotchIC vector. Two days following infection, the cells were assayed for IRES-driven hCD2 expression and CD3 expression by FACS analysis. Gates on uninfected and infected cells were established based on hCD2 expression (top panels). Cells falling in these gates were then analyzed for CD3 expression (lower panels). Identical results were obtained using the H57-597 MAb directed against the αβTCR. (B) Dose-dependent relationship between the level of NotchIC expression and TCR expression. Vector control and polyclonal AKR1010 cell lines expressing NotchIC were stained simultaneously for hCD2 expression and CD3 expression. Gates for different levels of hCD2 expression were established, and cells within these were analyzed for CD3 expression. The dotted line represents background staining levels. (C) Upregulation of TCR expression maps to the RAM domain of Notch. Polyclonal AKR1010 cell lines expressing NotchIC, NotchIC/mM2-2, or control vector were analyzed for CD3 expression as in (B). The graph represents the percentage of cells expressing CD3 relative to the level of transgene expression. Immunity 1998 9, 777-786DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80643-3)

Figure 6 Deltex Is Positively Regulated by Notch Signaling and Is Expressed at High levels in DN and CD4+ and CD8+ SP Thymocytes and Low Levels in DP Thymocytes (A) NotchIC expression upregulates Deltex expression. AKR1010, the RH4 dexamethasone-resistant clone, and polyclonal AKR1010 expressing NotchIC were analyzed for Deltex expression by Northern blot analysis. (B) Expression of Deltex in thymocyte subpopulations. cDNA prepared from FACS-sorted thymocyte subpopulations was serially diluted at 3-fold and amplified by PCR with primers specific for Deltex. The PCR products were analyzed by Southern blot using a Deltex-specific probe. Amplification of the same cDNA using primers specific for HPRT was performed to control for template quality. Immunity 1998 9, 777-786DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80643-3)

Figure 7 Expression of NotchIC Confers Resistance to Glucocorticoids in DP Thymocytes from Transgenic Mice Thymocytes from NotchIC-9 and littermate control mice were incubated in medium alone or medium supplemented with 10−8 M dexamethasone for the indicated times and analyzed by FACS for viability and CD4 and CD8 expression. The graph shows the percentage of viable DP thymocytes in cultures containing dexamethasone relative to viable DP thymocytes in cultures containing medium alone. Similar results were obtained in three independent experiments. Immunity 1998 9, 777-786DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80643-3)