Linking Transportation Infrastructure and Water Quality

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Money Matters Smarter Investment to Advance Clean Water.
Advertisements

Promoting Watershed-Based Stormwater Management for Linear Projects through the Green Highways Partnership Patrick Jeffers, U.S. Environmental Protection.
FARM BILL UPDATE. LAST FARM BILL: A LOT ACCOMPLISHED ON WORKING LANDS.
Vision For the Future of Water in Kansas. 1.Technology and Crop Varieties 2.Water Management 3.Water Conservation 4.New Sources of Supply Breakout Topic.
Overview of Mitigation Banking Program December 10, 2009 Robert M. Brown, Director Environmental Resource Regulation Department Robert M. Brown, Director.
Lake County Water Authority Nutrient Reduction Facility (NuRF) Lance Lumbard Water Resources Project Manager.
Legislative Changes Affecting Water Quality at a Local Level October 2011 Robert Kollinger, P.E. Water Resources Manager Polk County Parks and Natural.
Lower Hunter & Central Coast Regional Environmental Management Strategy.
Final Thoughts. Special Acknowledgments Board of Water & Soil Resources Local Soil & Water Conservation Districts County Environmental Services & Planning.
Randolph Community Forest Partnerships. R C F & Randolph Valley.
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF RESOURCE CONSERVATION DISTRICTS SHANNON SWEENEY, WATER RESOURCES MANAGER, CITY OF SANTA MARIA ANNE COATES, CACHUMA RESOURCE CONSERVATION.
Expedited Projects + Innovative Teamwork = Measurable Improvements to the Health of Lake Okeechobee and the St. Lucie and Caloosahatchee Estuaries.
City of Kimball Stormwater Re-use Project Protecting our Water Resources – a Forum Series for Policy Makers March 30, 2011.
Achieving Environmental Ends: Policy and its Implementation John Murlis UCL Department of Geography IUAPPA/BAEWAP Seminar São Paulo 22 October 2002.
2 1)Familiarize State agency staff with Water Plan Update 2013 information, tools and resources 2)Identify opportunities for State agencies to derive.
Illinois Department of Natural Resources. Illinois Coastal Management Program Illinois was officially approved as a Coastal Management Program on Jan.
Workshop on State and EPA Tools and Strategies for Implementing Performance-based Programs “Using Performance Partnership Agreements and Grants to Institutionalize.
Ann Swanson Executive Director Chesapeake Bay Commission May 2012 Market Solutions and Restoring the Chesapeake The Economics of Nutrient Trading.
1 U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Indian River Lagoon North Restoration Feasibility Study Public Meeting September.
Working together for clean air Central Puget Sound Diesel Emission Reduction Program Dave Kircher Manager, Air Resources Department June 7, 2007 Dave Kircher.
VOLUME CONTROL using Inter-Event Dry Periods by Marty Wanielista, Josh Spence, and Ewoud Hulstein Stormwater Management Academy UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA.
Governor’s Strategic Growth Plan Flood Protection and Clean, Safe, Reliable Water Supply Bond and Financing Acts of 2006 and 2010 Southern California Water.
Orange Creek Basin Management Action Plan Alachua County Commission December 11, 2007 Fred Calder, FL DEP (850)
Urban BMP Incentive Study (HJR 107) And Other Interesting Legislative Items Delegate David Bulova August 10, 2007.
NOAA Restoration Center Implementing the Gulf Regional Sediment Management Master Plan …responding to an ongoing emergency, improving responses to new.
VOLUME CONTROL using Inter-Event Dry Periods Stormwater Management Academy UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA.
Click to edit section. Needs for a Stormwater Management Program NFIP/CRS Emergency Response Flood Protection TMDLs Water Quality NPDES Development Review.
Laguna Creek Watershed Council Development of the Laguna Creek Watershed Management Action Plan & It’s Relevance to the Elk Grove Drainage Master Planning.
Future Directions* *As I See It Mark Robertson Federal Facilities Program Manager EPA Region 4 (Southeast) June 14, 2007.
Prepared for: Prepared by: Nutrient TMDLs and Their Effect on Dredging Operations in the Chesapeake Bay 24 October 2012 William J Rue- EA Engineering,
REPI Overview 11 September What is the Readiness and Environmental Protection Initiative? REPI supports partnerships authorized by 10 U.S.C. §
2006 Water Bond & the WRIF Flood Control, Water Reliability, and Water Quality Peer Swan Director, Southern California Water Agency.
New Development and Significant Development 12/21/20151 New Development & Significant Redevelopment.
GEFA Loan Programs CDBG Applicants Workshop Michael Roberts Program Manager Water Resources Division December 4, 2015.
Regionalism in Water Resources Management
California Water Plan Update Advisory Committee Meeting January 20, 2005.
HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Presentation John M. Carlock, AICP Deputy Executive Director, Physical Planning Hampton Roads.
SAGE GROUSE INITIATIVE OREGON IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY USDA – NRCS – Oregon.
MWRA WATER SOURCE TOWN MEETING OCTOBER 05, :30 PM NR HIGH SCHOOL PERFORMING ART CENTER.
Sharing Data: Issues and Opportunities Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting January 22, 2006 Leni Oman Director of Transportation Research Washington.
Presentation to City of Brea February 2, 2015 Mark Pisano.
Metropolitan Planning Organization Advisory Council Florida Department of TRANSPORTATION Carmen Monroy Director, Office of Policy Planning April 28, 2016.
TMDL Implementation: Now What?
Sustainable Water Infrastructure through Innovative Financing
* Background Image Courtesy of Kansas State Alumni Association *
Financial Needs for Water and Wastewater Infrastructure (2015)
DART Governance and Strategic Plan
Winning Dedicated Funding for California Transit
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Watershed Section Funding
Land Use Challenges In Maryland Today
Florida and Reclaimed Water
Texas Water Resources Institute
WIP Regional Meetings Jason Keppler
Linking Transportation Infrastructure and Water Quality
Building a Phase III WIP for Wastewater, Stormwater & Septic Systems
Finance Options: Funding Water Infrastructure Projects George Bryan South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control State Revolving Fund.
Funding from the Local Perspective
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
Source Water Collaboration Toolkit
Florida Water Forum Springs and Estuaries Drew Bartlett
AIF Florida Water Forum
Delivering a World Class Heartland:
MDE’s Phase III WIP Inventory 2018 Fall Regional WIP Meetings
Washington State Infrastructure Financing
Nebraska Water Infrastructure Funding and Financing Programs
Moving Our Coastal Lakes Into a Healthier and More Resilient Future
* Background Image Courtesy of Kansas State Alumni Association *
USACE infrastructure team update
Space Coast TPO State Road (S.R.) 528 Update
Targeted investment in roading
Presentation transcript:

Linking Transportation Infrastructure and Water Quality 2018 FLORIDA WATER FORUM Linking Transportation Infrastructure and Water Quality For years now, FDOT has been striving for more holistic stormwater management as part of its highway work program. It is time to ask some pointed questions: Where are we? Where do we want to be? How do we get there from here? Our initial conclusion is, [click] But don’t be dismayed: we will present a bigger boat in this presentation. October 4, 2018

How Do We Get There from Here? Ann and Carl have addressed the first two questions: Where are we? Where do we want to be? Most FDOT Projects – Traditional Roadside Ponds Champions Still Swimming Upstream - Occasional Extraordinary Projects Agencies Leadership: More FDOT innovative projects But, How do we get there from here? How do we do better? Our conclusion ? [click] But don’t be dismayed: we will present parts of the bigger boat in this presentation.

Needed Directions… (Part of the Bigger Boat) FDOT: Formal Process for Pursuing Innovation, Partner Search Tools, MUCH Earlier, Aggressive Pursuit of Stormwater Partnerships Florida Regulatory Agencies: Targeted Legislation to Enable Flexibility Federal Regulatory Agencies… Here is what we think is missing... [click] Formal processes for non-traditional stormwater solutions including building in more time for pursuit of stormwater innovation. Partner search tools to more easily locate partners for cooperative stormwater projects MUCH earlier and more aggressive pursuit of available innovative options and partnerships FDOT is crafting the formal process and is poised to develop the GIS tool. [click] What is missing on the state regulatory side? WMD reviewers need a clear, defensible path for ERP approval of innovative options. HB 599, passed in 2012, advocated flexibility for FDOT projects but never specifically addressed the regulatory impediments, for example, to regional ponds... more about this later. [click] Federal agencies? Well, we have a strategy there, also… [click] 17 January 2019

… What’s in Your Stormwater Program? Choices… … What’s in Your Stormwater Program? So, to help us find more of the “bigger boat”, let’s compare two publicly-funded programs of stormwater treatment and ask the question, [click] We will look briefly at Ann’s program & FDOT’s program. First, FDOT.

Study of FDOT Ponds – Costs Ponds Purchased, 2005 – 2009 (inclusive): R/W and Construction Costs R/W Costs Include Eminent Domain Costs Improvements Cost to Cure Business Damages Attorney Fees Experts’ Costs Relocation As part of support for HB 599 in 2012, CO Drainage looked at pond costs over a 5-year period just before the recession. The study was never published, but the results were presented to the Legislature by FDOT Secretary Ananth Prasad.

FDOT Pond R/W Costs per Acre What we found was shocking! We knew that constructing ponds in developed areas often results in significant costs, but we did not foresee this! How many of you out there would pay $10 - $20M for a 5-acre stormwater pond? Shocking enough to move the Legislature to act! Data Source: FDOT CO HB599 Cost Study 2005-2009

Study of FDOT Ponds – Nutrient Removal & Efficiency Estimated annual nutrient removal using… Basin area & characteristics Pond size Annualized up-front costs over 20 years of performance Since we had the cost data, we asked the districts for best estimates of basin and pond parameters to get cost/benefit data. [click] …what do you think? Now let’s see what Ann is up to… [click] TN C/B: $1,140/lb-N TP C/B: $5,037/lb-P

SJRWMD identified some stormwater projects in this 2017 publication. Here are some of her C/B numbers - [click] …do you see a difference?

Comparison of SJRWMD and FDOT Approaches TN Average: $1,140/lb-N TP Average: $5,037/lb-P SJRWMD Projects TN Range: $24 - $156/lb-TN TP Range: $148 - $1400/lb-TP So let’s summarize… [click] … so where would you rather your public dollars go? So how do we fix this? We need a bigger boat! [click] FDOT TN C/B: 13x Greater FDOT TP C/B: 7x Greater

Prudent Funding of Stormwater Improvements Wisdom Authority Funding So, what makes for a good program? [click] We must have funding. What else? [click] How about the wisdom to pick efficient projects! What else is missing? Its not as obvious… [click] We also need the authority to enact our public-interest stormwater decisions So how do we align funding, wisdom, and authority? [click]

Constrained to Adjacent R/W Prudent Locations, Matching Funds FDOT SJRWMD $100 M/yr $10M/yr Constrained to Adjacent R/W Prudent Locations, Matching Funds Money: The big money flows through FDOT Wise Project Selection: Where are the best projects?…[click] where good folks are free to choose what makes sense to do Authority: what is the vehicle for getting needed R/W? … but why not this: [click] Allow FDOT to satisfy ERP rules as currently written OR invest in other projects that produce more environmental benefit. So why NOT? …why shouldn’t we take our tax dollars to the best projects? FDOT is a state agency with environmental stewardship in its mission statement: why not treat FDOT as a state agency rather than a developer? Eminent Domain Willing Sellers or Existing Lands

Legislation Would Grant Authority for FDOT to… Satisfy pre/post water quality at the outlet of the MS4 to the downstream resource rather than the boundary of the FDOT R/W Fund local government, WMD, NEP type projects achieving more environmental improvement for the downstream resource Build or fund resource remediation efforts within the protected water Allows usage of intermediate conveyance facilities, within the MS4, to convey runoff to a downstream regional pond. Allows FDOT to fund projects within the MS4 watershed Allows FDOT to fund/construct improvements within the downstream resource

Examples of Other Environmental Improvements Take Septic Tanks Offline Dredge Legacy Sediments – Lake Toho, Lake O, etc. Improve Coastal Estuary or Lake Circulation/Flushing Additional Effluent Treatment for WTPs Agriculture Partnering Regional Treatment with Recharge and/or Reuse Here are the kinds of smart project FDOT could do IF FDOT could get to them. Results: MUCH more environmental benefit for less money – common sense investment FDOT is considering this legislation for this coming 2019 Session… stay tuned!

Thank you… 17 January 2019