Volume 4, Issue 11, Pages (November 1996)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Enzyme flexibility, solvent and weak interactions characterize thrombin–ligand interactions: implications for drug design Richard A Engh, Hans Brandstetter,
Advertisements

Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages (August 2002)
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Structure of β2-bungarotoxin: potassium channel binding by Kunitz modules and targeted phospholipase action  Peter D Kwong, Neil Q McDonald, Paul B Sigler,
The 1.4 Å Crystal Structure of Kumamolysin
Structural Basis for the Highly Selective Inhibition of MMP-13
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
by Andrew D. Ferguson, Eckhard Hofmann, James W
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages (August 2002)
Structure and Protein Design of a Human Platelet Function Inhibitor
Volume 11, Issue 10, Pages (October 2004)
by Alexey Dementiev, Abel Silva, Calvin Yee, Zhe Li, Michael T
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages (August 2007)
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2001)
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 3, Issue 6, Pages (June 1995)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 85, Issue 7, Pages (June 1996)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Betaine-Homocysteine Methyltransferase
Shane J. Caldwell, Yue Huang, Albert M. Berghuis  Structure 
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 1997)
Volume 8, Issue 12, Pages (December 2001)
The three-dimensional structure of PNGase F, a glycosyl asparaginase from Flavobacterium meningosepticum  Gillian E Norris, Timothy J Stillman, Bryan.
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (March 2000)
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2001)
Catalytic Center Assembly of HPPK as Revealed by the Crystal Structure of a Ternary Complex at 1.25 Å Resolution  Jaroslaw Blaszczyk, Genbin Shi, Honggao.
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (July 1998)
Crystal Structure of the MHC Class I Homolog MIC-A, a γδ T Cell Ligand
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Crystal Structure of the λ Repressor C-Terminal Domain Provides a Model for Cooperative Operator Binding  Charles E. Bell, Paolo Frescura, Ann Hochschild,
Volume 9, Issue 7, Pages (July 2001)
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Collagen Stabilization at Atomic Level
Structure of the DNA-Bound T-Box Domain of Human TBX3, a Transcription Factor Responsible for Ulnar-Mammary Syndrome  Miquel Coll, Jonathan G Seidman,
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (October 1997)
Edith Schlagenhauf, Robert Etges, Peter Metcalf  Structure 
Functional Plasticity in the Substrate Binding Site of β-Secretase
The sequence, crystal structure determination and refinement of two crystal forms of lipase B from Candida antarctica  Jonas Uppenberg, Mogens Trier Hansen,
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (March 1998)
Crystal Structure of the Borna Disease Virus Nucleoprotein
Structural Basis for the Highly Selective Inhibition of MMP-13
The basis for K-Ras4B binding specificity to protein farnesyl-transferase revealed by 2 Å resolution ternary complex structures  Stephen B Long, Patrick.
The structure of an RNA dodecamer shows how tandem U–U base pairs increase the range of stable RNA structures and the diversity of recognition sites 
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages (December 2003)
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Volume 7, Issue 7, Pages (July 2000)
How glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase selects glutamine
Neali Armstrong, Eric Gouaux  Neuron 
Crystal Structure of the N-Terminal Domain of Sialoadhesin in Complex with 3′ Sialyllactose at 1.85 Å Resolution  A.P. May, R.C. Robinson, M. Vinson,
Structure of a water soluble fragment of the ‘Rieske’ iron–sulfur protein of the bovine heart mitochondrial cytochrome bc1 complex determined by MAD phasing.
The Structure of the Mammalian 20S Proteasome at 2.75 Å Resolution
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (April 2000)
Hideki Kusunoki, Ruby I MacDonald, Alfonso Mondragón  Structure 
The 2.0 å structure of a cross-linked complex between snowdrop lectin and a branched mannopentaose: evidence for two unique binding modes  Christine Schubert.
Human glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase: the crystal structure reveals a structural NADP+ molecule and provides insights into enzyme deficiency  Shannon.
Structure of a HoxB1–Pbx1 Heterodimer Bound to DNA
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages (January 1999)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
The Structure of Sortase B, a Cysteine Transpeptidase that Tethers Surface Protein to the Staphylococcus aureus Cell Wall  Yinong Zong, Sarkis K Mazmanian,
The 1.4 Å Crystal Structure of Kumamolysin
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages (March 2004)
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (May 2000)
Tertiary structure of an immunoglobulin-like domain from the giant muscle protein titin: a new member of the I set  Mark Pfuhl, Annalisa Pastore  Structure 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 4, Issue 11, Pages 1353-1362 (November 1996) Enzyme flexibility, solvent and ‘weak’ interactions characterize thrombin–ligand interactions: implications for drug design  Richard A Engh, Hans Brandstetter, Gudrun Sucher, Andreas Eichinger, Ulrich Baumann, Wolfram Bode, Robert Huber, Thomas Poll, Rainer Rudolph, Wolfgang von der Saal  Structure  Volume 4, Issue 11, Pages 1353-1362 (November 1996) DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00142-6

Figure 1 Chemical formulas and binding constants (μM units) of the inhibitors used in this study BM51.1011, BM14.1248, BM12.1700; and of inhibitors N-(2-naphthyl-sulphonyl-glycyl)-DL-p-amidinophenylalanyl-piperidine (NAPAP) and N-(4-toluene-sulphonyl)-DL-p-amidinophenylalanyl-piperidine (TAPAP). The structure of a chloromethylketone analogue, D-Phe-Pro-Arg which acts as a covalent inhibitor, is also shown. All of the inhibitors have a basic group for binding in the specificity pocket S1 via hydrogen bonds/salt bridges to Asp189 (shown at the bottom of the structures). The remaining groups are designed to fit the S2 and aryl (or S4) binding sites; NAPAP, TAPAP, BM51.1011, and BM12.1700 by appropriate branching, and BM14.1248 as an unbranched inhibitor utilizing the close proximity of the S2 and aryl binding sites. The glycine residues of BM51.1011, and NAPAP and the P1 equivalent backbone in TAPAP bind in an antiparallel hydrogen bonding pattern to Gly216; this site (sometimes referred to as S3) remains unbound and solvent accessible in BM12.1700 and BM14.1248. In thrombin, BM12.1700 binds only in the S1 and S2 sites, and the phenoxypyrrolidine is disordered. Structure 1996 4, 1353-1362DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00142-6)

Figure 2 BM51.1011 (thick-stick model) with bridging water molecule and its superposition with NAPAP (blue ball-and-strick model) and TAPAP (green stick model). While the general binding arrangements of NAPAP, TAPAP and BM51.1011 agree, detailed interactions vary, and the solvent structure involved in binding is different. BM51.1011 binds via a bridging water molecule (red sphere with distances) connecting Ser214CO, Ser195Oγ, the 4-amino group of BM51.1011, and a second water molecule. Structure 1996 4, 1353-1362DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00142-6)

Figure 3 Schematic summary of the binding interactions of the two binding modes. (a) Binding mode of the branched inhibitor BM51.1011. (b) Binding mode of the unbranched inhibitor BM14.248. The specificity pocket S1 of arginine/lysine specific serine proteinases is formed most prominently by Asp189 at its base, but a hydrophobic sleeve and an extended hydrogen bonding network are also characteristic. The hydrogen bonding network, shown with dashed lines (red for ‘weak’ interactions) extends to the active site triad (or tetrad if Ser214 is included [34]) and typically includes a CH–O interaction between His57Cϵ1 and Ser214CO [35]. Two water molecules usually present [2,37,43] are W1 between Asp189 and Tyr228, and W2 between Tyr228, Trp215CO and Phe227CO. The two binding modes of 4AP reported here affect all of these interactions. The binding of 4AP in the ‘linear’ inhibitors induces a rotation of the peptide plane of Ser214–Trp215. Water in the active site is clear in the electron density and has a close packing interaction with the 4AP ring in the plane of the ring. The rotation of the peptide plane disrupts a hydrogen bond normally (weakly) formed between Trp215NH and 227PheCO. Structure 1996 4, 1353-1362DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00142-6)

Figure 4 Detail of 4AP binding mode of BM14.1248. The 2Fo–Fc electron density map of the final model is superimposed with the Fo–Fc electron density map of the structure prior to the addition of water molecules. Polar hydrogen atom positions on the 4AP moiety are shown for clarity. The main characterizing features of this binding mode are evident: the pyridine nitrogen asymmetrically forms a hydrogen bond with one oxygen of Asp189, a water molecule is closely packed to the ring in the plane of the ring, and the peptide plane of Ser214–Trp215 is rotated to form a hydrogen bond between Ser214CO and the 4-amino group of 4AP. Structure 1996 4, 1353-1362DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00142-6)

Figure 5 Ramachandran plot showing the transitions of the peptide rotation accompanying 4AP binding. Triangles indicate Φ-Ψ angles of Ser214 and circles indicate Φ-Ψ angles of Trp215. Colors indicate the following: blue denotes Φ-Ψ angles for Ser214 of NAPAP, TAPAP, PPACK and BM51.1011 complexes; purple denotes Φ-Ψ angles for Ser214 of 4AP inhibitor bound thrombin complexes; pink denotes Φ-Ψ angles for Trp215 of NAPAP, TAPAP, PPACK and BM51.1011 complexes; and black denotes Φ-Ψ angles for Trp215 of 4AP bound inhibitor complexes. Lines connect the points for BM51.1011 and BM14.1248. The Ψ angle of Ser214 and the Φ angle of Trp215 are simultaneously altered, locally rotating the peptide plane without significant alteration elsewhere along the main chain. Contours showing the frequency distribution [50] of Φ-Ψ angles in the Brookhaven Data Base [51] show that the rotation of the peptide plane involves a transition across an energy barrier for Ser214. Structure 1996 4, 1353-1362DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00142-6)

Figure 6 Variations in the position of the insertion loop 60A–60D (YPPW), unique to thrombin, lead to a ‘breathing’ in the S2 binding pocket which can accommodate S2 groups of different sizes. The variations can be seen to form two clusters along the backbone and including the side chains of Trp60D and Asp60E. This clustering is related to the crystal symmetry, which in turn suggests that the identity of the inhibitor at the S2 site may influence the crystallization. Atoms shown here are in standard colors. Structure 1996 4, 1353-1362DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00142-6)

Figure 7 Thrombin structure as bound to BM12.1700 (yellow; atoms in standard colors). Thrombin structures as bound to NAPAP (blue), TAPAP (green), and BM12.1248 (red) are superimposed for comparison. The naphthamidine of BM12.1700 binds analogously to the benzamidine of NAPAP, with an identical hydrogen bond arrangement, but the orientations of the rings differ, and the naphthamidine group induces a constriction of the S1 pocket as the main chain of Glu 192 moves by up to 2 å. Structure 1996 4, 1353-1362DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00142-6)