Considerations for Spatial Reuse

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Channel Sensing in UL-OFDMA
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE Amin Jafarian, Newracom 1 CCA Regime Evaluation Revisited March 2015 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Amin
DL OFDMA Performance and ACK Multiplexing
Doc.: IEEE /1448r0 Submission November 2014 Considerations for Adaptive CCA Date: Authors: Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1580r0 Submission December 2014 Perspectives on Spatial Reuse in 11ax Date: Authors: Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE r1 Amin Jafarian, Newracom 1 CCA Regime Evaluation Revisited March 2015 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Amin
Doc.: IEEE /1420r1Nov 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Impact of Preamble Error on MAC System Performance Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1233r2 Submission Adaptive CCA for 11ax September 2014 Slide 1 Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Reza Hedayat.
Doc.: IEEE /1448r2 Submission November 2014 Considerations for Adaptive CCA Date: Authors: Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1448r1 Submission November 2014 Considerations for Adaptive CCA Date: Authors: Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0587r0 Submission May 2015 Uplink ACK and BA Multiplexing Date: Authors: Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Reza.
Doc.: IEEE r0 Amin Jafarian, Newracom 1 CCA Revisit May 2015 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Amin
Doc.: IEEE /1110r0 Amin Jafarian, Newracom 1 September 2015 BSS-TXOP NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Amin
Doc.: IEEE /1313r1 Submission November 2015 Considerations for Spatial Reuse Date: Authors: Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /86r0 Submission January 2015 Uplink MU Transmission and Legacy Coexistence Date: Authors: Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE /1348 Multiple NAVs for Spatial Reuse Date: Slide 1IITP Authors: Nov 2015 NameAffiliationAddressPhone Evgeny.
Reza Hedayat, Newracom doc.: IEEE /829r0 Uplink ACK and BA Multiplexing Authors: Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Reza Hedayat Young.
May 2015 doc.: IEEE /0586r1 Slide 1 Frequency Diversity Options in OFDMA Date: Authors: Reza Hedayat, Newracom NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1086r0 SubmissionSlide 1 Date: Authors: Improved Virtual Carrier Sensing Mechanism for 45GHz Sep ZTE Corp.
Doc.: IEEE /0212r3 Submission Feb 2016 TG ax Enterprise Scenario, Color and DSC Date: Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 1.
DL-OFDMA Procedure in IEEE ax
Secondary Channel CCA of HE STA
Uplink ACK and BA Multiplexing
MU BAR Frame Format Date: Authors: November 2015 Month Year
TG ax A Unified Approach to Spatial Reuse
TG ax Indoor Enterprise Scenarios, Color, DSC and TPC
Spatial Reuse Group Challenges
Channel Sensing in UL-OFDMA
Proposed response to 3GPP ED request
WUR and Efficiency Tradeoffs
TXOP Considerations for Spatial Reuse
TXOP Considerations for Spatial Reuse
OFDMA performance in 11ax
Recipient-aware Spatial Reuse
Uplink ACK and BA Multiplexing
Recipient-aware Spatial Reuse
Recipient-aware Spatial Reuse
Regarding UL MU protection
The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator
Channel Sensing in UL-OFDMA
Further Study of Time Varying Interference and PHY Abstraction
Uplink ACK and BA Multiplexing
WUR MAC and Wakeup Frame
WUR MAC and Wakeup Frame
Simulation Results for Box 5 Calibration
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
WUR MAC and Wakeup Frame
Adaptive CCA for 11ax Date: Authors: September 2014 Name
WUR MAC and Wakeup Frame
WUR and Efficiency Tradeoffs
Data field in HE PPDU Date: Authors: September 2015
SIG-B Structure Date: Authors: September 2015 Month Year
SIG-B Structure Date: Authors: September 2015 Month Year
Increased Network Throughput with Channel Width Related CCA and Rules
TG ax A Unified Approach to Spatial Reuse
Uplink MU Transmission and Coexistence
NGV Backward Interoperability: Follow-up
TXOP Considerations for Spatial Reuse
TXOP Considerations for Spatial Reuse
BSS Color Settings for a Multiple BSSID Set
WUR MAC and Wakeup Frame
Recipient-aware Spatial Reuse
MAC Calibration Results
Uplink MU Transmission and Coexistence
OBSS_PD simplification
TG ax A Unified Approach to Spatial Reuse
System Level Simulator Evaluation with/without Capture Effect
Consideration on System Level Simulation
Utilizing Unused Resources by Allowing Simultaneous Transmissions
Presentation transcript:

Considerations for Spatial Reuse Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 November 2015 Considerations for Spatial Reuse Date: 2015-11-08 Authors: Name Affiliations Address Phone email Reza Hedayat Amin Jafarian Young Hoon Kwon Yongho Seok Vida Ferdowsi Newracom 9008 Research Drive, Irvine, CA 92618 reza.hedayat at newracom.com amin.jafarian at newracom.com younghoon.kwon at newracom.com yongho.seok at newracom.com vida.ferdowsi at newracom.com Reza Hedayat, Newracom John Doe, Some Company

Outline The spatial reuse debate has focused mostly on November 2015 Outline The spatial reuse debate has focused mostly on (a) altering the CCA threshold, (b) special treatment of OBSS frames, … This contribution instead focuses on over-protection that current CCA rule has and proposes how to minimize it Reza Hedayat, Newracom

What is optimum CCA level; -82dBm, -72dBm, etc? November 2015 What is optimum CCA level; -82dBm, -72dBm, etc? One dominating perspective in majority of spatial reuse contributions is the topic of optimum CCA level As it’s been identified by some contributions, optimum CCA depends on multiple factors: frequency reuse, topology of BSS/OBSSs deployment, TX power, etc While there have been so many contributions dedicated on this question, there has not been a unique answer, mostly due to differences in deployment setup and system modeling In this contribution, we do not focus on the optimum CCA level. However the method provided here works with any CCA threshold Reza Hedayat, Newracom

Background on Color field and OBSS PD November 2015 Background on Color field and OBSS PD Spatial reuse motions passed in September 2015 meeting: “The STA determines whether the detected frame is an inter-BSS or an intra-BSS frame by using BSS color or MAC address in the MAC header. If the detected frame is an inter-BSS frame, under TBD condition, uses TBD OBSS PD level that is greater than the minimum receive sensitivity level. NOTE–Maybe extra rules need to be added to ensure that all 11ax STAs can make the decision in a consistent manner.” “A STA should regard an Inter-BSS PPDU with a valid PHY header and that has a receive power/RSSI below the OBSS PD level used by the receiving STA and that meets additional TBD conditions, as not having been received at all (e.g., should not update its NAV), except that the medium condition shall indicate BUSY during the period of time that is taken by the receiving STA to validate that the PPDU is from an Inter-BSS, but not longer than the time indicated as the length of the PPDU payload. The OBSS PD level is greater than the minimum receive sensitivity level.” “An 11ax STA regards a valid OBSS PPDU as not having been received at all (e.g., should not update its NAV), except that the medium condition shall indicate BUSY during the period of time that is taken by the receiving STA to validate that the PPDU is from an Inter-BSS, but not longer than the time indicated as the length of the PPDU payload if the RXPWR of the received PPDU is below the OBSS_PD threshold and TBD conditions are met, noting that the OBSS_PD threshold is accompanied by a TXPWR value and a reduction in the TXPWR may be accompanied by an TBD increase in the OBSS_PD threshold value.” Reza Hedayat, Newracom

CCA Threshold based in Presence of OBSS November 2015 CCA Threshold based in Presence of OBSS Recently 11ax SFD adopted presence of a Color field in HE SIG-A where STAs can use it to distinguish BSS and OBSS frames, where the STA may apply a less sensitive CCA threshold (OBSS PD) to OBSS frames Above procedure is most effective when coverage of OBSSs overlap minimally (such as apartment complex, simulation scenario 1), where in such cases boundary STAs back off often unnecessarily If overlap of the two OBSS is significant, applying less sensitive CCA thresholds (OBSS PD) may cause additional interference STAs from one OBSS ignore frames from the other OBSS while they are in close vicinity, hence adding interference to and receiving more interference from the OBSS That is why in the recent spatial reuse motions there is a consistent reference to a TBD condition under which applying OBSS PD should be allowed Reza Hedayat, Newracom

November 2015 Current CCA Rule Considering relative location of the BSS1 (AP A, STA B; Blue color) and BSS2 (AP C, STA D; Red color) shown in this figure, we realize that the current CCA rule offers: Right protection for the cases where OBSS STAs are within vicinity of each other, e.g. the cross-coverage areas This is the area where both colors are present Overprotection for the cases where an OBSS receiver is far from the transmitter of the other STAs This is the area where one color is present A’s coverage B BSS1 A BSS2 C D C’s coverage Reza Hedayat, Newracom

November 2015 Current CCA Rule Our previous contribution, 15/588r0, shows that there is a large percentage of reuse that current CCA rule prevents Even with CCA=-72dBm, there is significant spatial reuse that due to current CCA rule (being based on the received RSSI from the transmitter) is left unachieved Normalized distance between primary STAs Percentage of spatial reuse that CCA prevents Reza Hedayat, Newracom

How to consider potential interference to frames’ recipients? November 2015 How to consider potential interference to frames’ recipients? Currently the measured RSSI of a frame offers an approximate level of interference that a STA would make to the transmitter of the frame if the STA were to send a frame With a single frame exchange, there is no way to obtain any info about the interference made to the recipient of the frame However, considering a frame and its response frame it is possible to measure the RSSI of both frames and infer the potential interference made to the recipient of a frame Based on above concept, in the past IEEE meeting the following motion was passed: “The specification to consider a procedure that may revise the NAV depending on TBD conditions at the recipient of the ongoing OBSS frame.” Reza Hedayat, Newracom

Revising NAV During TXOP November 2015 Revising NAV During TXOP STA A and B exchange frames, e.g. RTS and CTS. STA C receives the frames and record the RSSI and TA/RA from the frame exchange During the short frame exchange, e.g. RTS/CTS, STA C may observe the legacy CCA rules and sets the NAV accordingly Given RSSI AC/BC, STA C may reset the NAV A B C D RSSI AC RSSI BC BSS1 BSS2 Response Frame Frame RTS STA A CTS STA B STA C RSSI AC RSSI BC TXOP Legacy CCA rules Given RSSI AC and BC, Reset NAV? Data ACK/BA … Reza Hedayat, Newracom

Revising NAV During TXOP November 2015 Revising NAV During TXOP The condition that allows for enhances spatial reuse is when RSSI_AC is larger than RSSI_BC plus a TBD delta i.e. STA B is farther from STA C compared to STA A to STA C RSSI _AC and RSSI_BC are lower than a threshold i.e. STAs A and B are far enough from STA C If some combination of above condition is met STA C may reevaluate the medium status, and/or reset the NAV status Various combinations of above conditions can be used to allow more spatial reuse Reza Hedayat, Newracom

Protection of Response Frames November 2015 Protection of Response Frames Spatial reuse topics always brings up the issue of protecting the response frames at the transmitter side For instance, referring to the previous example, a fair and robust spatial reuse need to make sure that the response frames (such as ACK, BA) at STA A side is affected minimally A B C D Response Frame Frame One solution is to use transmit power control (TPC) to reduce the amount of interference to STA A (and to STA B) Another solution is to use robust MCS for response frames (e.g. CTS, ACK, BA etc) which is a common practice E.g. MCS 0-2 offer larger than 10dB interference tolerance compared to MCS 6-9 Reza Hedayat, Newracom

Simulation Setup November 2015 Consider OBSS situation in previous slide, BSS1 (AP A, STA B) and BSS2 (AP C, STA D), where AP A and AP C are within coverage of each other Considering STA B’s RSSI into account, we simulate in what percentage of AP A’s coverage, both APs can simultaneously send frames Simulation parameters Path-loss exponent = 2 and after 5-meter breakpoint 3.5 TX power = 15dBm Antenna loss = 2dBi -82dBm coverage = 40 meter Reported measures Spectral efficiency without spatial reuse (A and B) Spectral efficiency with spatial reuse (A, B and B+D) Percentage of STA A’s coverage that would be allowed to do spatial reuse Reza Hedayat, Newracom

Simulation Results November 2015 Reza Hedayat, Newracom distance AB (meter) SNR wo SR Spectral Eff. Increased SR (%) with SR STA A STA B STA A or STA B STA D Reza Hedayat, Newracom

Simulation Results November 2015 Reza Hedayat, Newracom distance AB (meter) SNR wo SR Spectral Eff. Increased SR (%) with SR STA A STA B STA A or STA B STA D Reza Hedayat, Newracom

November 2015 Conclusion The optimum CCA level has been debated within TGax extensively and it seems it’d depend on the topology of the BSS and presence of OBSS A different treatment of OBSS frames vs BSS frames, e.g. based on Color field, might be a good solution but it’d also depend on topology and over of BSS and OBSS Current CCA rule offers needed protection when a set of STAs are within reach of each of each other. But it offers overprotection when some of the recipient STAs are farther from the rest This contribution proposes to evaluate the status of the medium based on RSSI from a frame and its response frame and revise the status of the medium or NAV Reza Hedayat, Newracom

Strawpoll Do you agree that the following to be added to 11ax SFD: November 2015 Strawpoll Do you agree that the following to be added to 11ax SFD: The specification to consider a procedure based on received RSSI of a pair of RTS and CTS frames to avoid updating the NAV after receiving the CTS frame if the measured RSSI of the RTS/CTS frames meet a TBD condition. Reza Hedayat, Newracom

November 2015 Appendix Reza Hedayat, Newracom

Revising NAV During TXOP November 2015 Revising NAV During TXOP Revising the medium status or NAV duration could happen in the middle of a TXOP, when a STA observes the RSSI of a frame and its response frame and checks for the right condition Data STA A ACK/BA STA B STA C RSSI AC RSSI BC TXOP Legacy CCA rules applies Revise NAV based on RSSI AC and RSSI BC? … STA C starts sensing the medium Reza Hedayat, Newracom