Differentiation in the Statewide System of Support

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Designing School Level Professional Development. Overview Assessing prior knowledge of professional development Defining professional development Designing.
Advertisements

Global Congress Global Leadership Vision for Project Management.
The NDPC-SD Intervention Framework National Dropout Prevention Center for Students with Disabilities Clemson University © 2007 NDPC-SD – All rights reserved.
PRIORITY AND FOCUS SCHOOLS: INCREASING CAPACITY FOR IMPROVEMENT USING THE INDISTAR ® ACTION-PLANNING TOOL June 11, 2014 OSPI’s Office of Student and School.
SAM REDDING CENTER ON INNOVATION & IMPROVEMENT Indistar managing change.
MODULE 8: PROJECT TRACKING AND EVALUATION
Local Control and Accountability Plan: Performance Based Budgeting California Association of School Business Officials.
Please be sure that your audio is working properly. Go to: Tools Audio Audio Setup Wizard Differentiation in the Statewide System of Support Distance Learning.
Next Generation of Accountability Differentiated Recognition, Accountability, and Support Summer 2012.
Comprehensive Literacy Program Louisiana Department of Education
Louisiana School Turnaround Specialist Program
Academy of Pacesetting Districts Developing a District Operations Manual For a District System of Support.
Understanding District Corrective Action Michael A. Ford Federal Programs Director December 8, /8/2010.
Managing Change Principal Leadership Academy November 2012.
Rubrics-Based Evaluation of a Statewide System of Support A Tool to Enhance Statewide Systems of Support.
Rubrics-Based Evaluation of a Statewide System of Support A Tool to Enhance Statewide Systems of Support.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Leading the Learning The Role of the Instructional Leadership Team ESC, West Instructional Directors July 30, 2014.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
The 2013 Legislative Session and You – Statute Changes Affecting Schools Iowa Department of Education.
To use this PowerPoint you will need the following documents found in this module: OIP Stage 3 for the BLT The BLT 5-Step Process Visual The BLT 5-Step.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
© 2003 IBM Corporation July 2004 Technology planning for not-for-profit organizations IBM volunteer name Title, organization.
Linking Systems: State, District, School, Classroom: The Virginia Project Chairs: Nancy Protheroe, Center on Innovation & Improvement Kathleen Smith, Virginia.
MONITORING INDISTAR® STATE-DETERMINED IMPROVEMENT PLANNING TOOL.
The Academy of Pacesetting Districts Introducing...
Indistar-NC Structures and Support George Hancock, School Improvement Grants Coordinator, NCDPI Diane Antolak, School Transformation Coach, NCDPI.
2 The combination of three concepts constitutes the foundation for results: 1) meaningful teamwork; 2) clear, measurable goals; and 3) regular collection.
Connecting with the SPP/APR Kansas State Personnel Development Grant.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
State Support System for Districts New Hampshire Department of Education.
Draft TIP for E-rate. What is E-rate? The E-rate provides discounts to assist schools and libraries in the United States to obtain affordable telecommunications.
Tier 2/ Tier 3 Planning for Sustainability Rachel Saladis WI PBIS Network/Wi RtI Center Katrina Krych Sun Prairie Area School District.
Iowa Support System for Schools in Need of Assistance (SINA) Overview and Audit Iowa Department of Education and AEA 267 August 2011.
Suggested Components of a Schoolwide Reading Plan Part 1: Introduction Provides an overview of key components of reading plan. Part 2: Component details.
Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.
1 Title IA Online Coordinator Training Parent Involvement
July 2007 National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee & Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Role of Action Planning in The Developmental.
Quality Management Systems FIETA Providers Herman Letoka ETQA MANAGER.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Our Theory of Action and Multi-Tiered Framework are anchored in the Vision and Mission for the Superintendent of Public Instruction. Office of Student.
0 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute While there is no prescribed format for a good delivery plan, it should answer 10 questions What a good delivery.
Annie McLaughlin, M.T. Carol Davis, Ed.D. University of Washington
Number: TR/06/B/F/PP/ WASTE-TRAIN VOCATIONAL TRAINING, EDUCATION, CONVEYING INFORMATION ON UP-TO-DATE WASTE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES TO DECISION MAKERS/STAFF.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Office of Service Quality
Response to Intervention: The Georgia Student Achievement Pyramid of Interventions October 22, 2008.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Oregon Statewide System of Support for School & District Improvement Tryna Luton & Denny Nkemontoh Odyssey – August 2010.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
February 25, Today’s Agenda  Introductions  USDOE School Improvement Information  Timelines and Feedback on submitted plans  Implementing plans.
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model Oakland Schools 3 Tier Literacy Leadership Team Training November
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
Lead Evaluator for Principals Part I, Series 1
Statewide Systems of Support
Miblsi.cenmi.org Helping Students Become Better Readers with Social Skills Necessary for Success Steve Goodman Funded through OSEP.
Roswell North Elementary School
Framework for an Effective Statewide System of Support
Mountain Park Elementary School
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
North Iowa Community Action
Build Capacity to Train TBTs in Ohio 5-Step Process
Mountain Park Elementary School
February 21-22, 2018.
Schoolwide Programs.
Strategic Plan: Heards Ferry Elementary
Roswell North Elementary School
Mountain Park Elementary School
Presentation transcript:

Differentiation in the Statewide System of Support Academy of Pacesetting States

Operational Efficiency and Coordination SSOS Operational Manual clearly describes the process for Identifying, Diagnosing, Prescribing, Planning, Providing, Monitoring, and Reporting differentiated services Roles of personnel Coordination of system Timelines

Identifying Districts and Schools in Need of Support Strong Assessment System Unified or Simplified Accountability System (NCLB, State, Accreditation Associations, Etc.) Multiple Data Sources Trajectory Tracking and Projection Transparent Criteria for Categorization Timely and Helpful Reporting Tools for District and School Self-Tracking Training for Districts and Schools on Accountability System, Use of Data

Diagnosing Specific Needs of Districts and Schools Analysis if outcome data—student subgroups, trajectories Analysis of operational data—based on standards and indicators of effective practice Self-assessment by district and school teams Coached self-assessment by district and school teams (with guidance from state or other coach) Site review (program audit) by external reviewers with district or school participation Site review (program audit) by external reviewers alone

Improvement Trajectory Means of Diagnosis and Planning Current Performance Capacity for Change Improvement Trajectory Means of Diagnosis and Planning Adequate and steadily improving Strong Continuous Self-assessment and planning or coached self-assessment and planning Inadequate and not improving or improving at slow rate Moderate Rapid Coached self-assessment and planning and/or external review Chronically inadequate and not improving Weak Turnaround External review to determine turnaround method; leader-directed and coached self-assessment and planning thereafter in district-managed turnarounds Null Closure

Prescribing Supports By district or school team in improvement plan, aligned with self-assessment By district or school team in improvement plan, with coaching from state or other coach, aligned with coached self-assessment By external reviewers with district or state participants in reviews, aligned with review findings By external reviewers, aligned with review findings

Aligning Plans and Supports Service Plan to align state supports (direct or through provision of resources) with district/school improvement plan and standards and indicators of effective practice The Service Plan includes: Standards and Indicators of Effective Practice to be Addressed Objectives to be Achieved Person(s) or Organizations Responsible for Delivering Service School Staff to Receive Service Description of Service Timeline for Services Delivered Criteria for Determining Effectiveness of Services Received

Providing Supports State provides Menu of Available Services Aligned with standards and indicators of effective practice; improvement plan, Service Plan Provided directly by state Provided by providers approved by state, with state resources (funding) Provided by other providers with state resources (funding) Provided by other providers with local resources

Type of Support Planning Consultation Training Professional Development Coaching Data Systems and Web Systems Evaluation Other

Intensity and Duration Sufficient initial “dose” Sufficient duration so as not to end until improvements are sustainable Determined by current performance, desired trajectory for improvement, diagnosis of need

Monitoring and Reporting Progress Monitoring of both improvement plan and Service Plan Is district/school meeting expectations in improvement plan? Are services provided as expected, with quality, with results? Periodic reporting (at least twice a year) Adjustments in course (When? By whom?)