Energy Calibration of the SPS with Proton and Lead Ion Beams

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transparent Re-alignment of the Diamond Storage Ring M. Apollonio – Diamond Light Source Ltd ESLS – XXII Workshop, ESRF Grenoble, November 25 th /11/2014M.
Advertisements

Dr. Zafer Nergiz Nigde University THE STATUS OF TURKISH LIGHT SOURCE.
A. Bay Beijing October Accelerators We want to study submicroscopic structure of particles. Spatial resolution of a probe ~de Broglie wavelength.
Lattice calculations: Lattices Tune Calculations Dispersion Momentum Compaction Chromaticity Sextupoles Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP) 17 January 2012 Rende.
Paul Derwent 30 Nov 00 1 The Fermilab Accelerator Complex o Series of presentations  Overview of FNAL Accelerator Complex  Antiprotons: Stochastic Cooling.
Searching for Quantum LOVE at the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Eugene Tan On behalf of Rohan Dowd 120/10/2010Eugene Tan – IWLC 2010, Genega ASLS.
Basic Mathematics Rende Steerenberg BE/OP CERN Accelerator School Basic Accelerator Science & Technology at CERN 3 – 7 February 2014 – Chavannes de Bogis.
Accelerator Physics with Relativity By Mark, Jack and Frances (Designing the LHC in an hour and a half)
Recycler Status and Plans Shekhar Mishra MID/Beams Division Fermilab AAC Review 2/4/03 Introduction to the Recycler Ring Recycler Improvements and status.
LCLS-II Magnet Error Sensitivities. Sensitivities of dipole magnets, from injector output (95 MeV) to SXR undulator input (4 GeV), where each plotted.
Update of 3.2 km ILC DR design (DMC3) Dou Wang, Jie Gao, Gang Xu, Yiwei Wang (IHEP) IWLC2010 Monday 18 October - Friday 22 October 2010 Geneva, Switzerland.
Energy calibration at LHC J. Wenninger. Motivation In general there is not much interest for accurate knowledge of the momentum in hadron machines. 
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
R. Assmann - LHCCWG Two Beam Operation R.W. Aßmann LHCCWG Acknowledgements to W. Herr, V. Previtali, A. Butterworth, P. Baudrenghien, J. Uythoven,
Beam Loss Simulation in the Main Injector at Slip-Stacking Injection A.I. Drozhdin, B.C. Brown, D.E. Johnson, I. Kourbanis, K. Seiya June 30, 2006 A.Drozhdin.
LHC Beam Energy 1 J. Wenninger CERN Beams Department Operation group / LHC.
Lecture 5 Damping Ring Basics Susanna Guiducci (INFN-LNF) May 21, 2006 ILC Accelerator school.
Vertical Emittance Tuning at the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Rohan Dowd Presented by Eugene Tan.
28-May-2008Non-linear Beam Dynamics WS1 On Injection Beam Loss at the SPring-8 Storage Ring Masaru TAKAO & J. Schimizu, K. Soutome, and H. Tanaka JASRI.
1 Alternative Bunch Compressor 30 th Sep KNU Eun-San Kim.
1 Experience at CERN with luminosity monitoring and calibration, ISR, SPS proton antiproton collider, LEP, and comments for LHC… Werner Herr and Rüdiger.
The SPS as a Damping Ring Test Facility for CLIC March 6 th, 2013 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN CLIC Collaboration Working meeting.
H. Bartosik, Y. Papaphilippou. PS2 meant as potential replacement of existing PS PS2 main characteristics given by LHC requirements – Circumference defined.
By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Present MEIC IR Design Status Vasiliy Morozov, Yaroslav Derbenev MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Lecture 4 Longitudinal Dynamics I Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis Directorate Office, CERN Department of Physics, University of Oxford ACAS School for Accelerator.
Parameter scan for the CLIC damping rings July 23rd, 2008 Y. Papaphilippou Thanks to H. Braun, M. Korostelev and D. Schulte.
Thomas Roser SPIN 2006 October 3, 2006 A Study of Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC A.U.Luccio, M.Bai, T.Roser Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton,
Beam Diagnostics Seminar, Nov.05, 2009 Das Tune-Meßverfahren für das neue POSI am SIS-18 U. Rauch GSI - Strahldiagnose.
Professor Philip Burrows John Adams Institute for Accelerator Science Oxford University ACAS School for Accelerator Physics January 2014 Longitudinal Dynamics.
HF2014 Workshop, Beijing, China 9-12 October 2014 Challenges and Status of the FCC-ee lattice design Bastian Haerer Challenges.
A RHIC Low-Energy Test Run With Protons Todd Satogata (W. Fischer, T. Roser, J. DeLong, M. Brennan, D. Bruno, and others) April 11, 2006 Driven by discussions.
PS2 beam parameters and proposal for aperture strategy M. Benedikt , PS2 meeting1Beams and apertures, M.Benedikt.
1 LHC Beam Energy J. Wenninger CERN Beams Department Operation group / LHC Acknowledgments: E. Todesco.
AXEL-2017 Introduction to Particle Accelerators
A.Lachaize CNRS/IN2P3 IPN Orsay
Design study of CEPC Alternating Magnetic Field Booster
FiDeL: the model to predict the magnetic state of the LHC
P. Chevtsov for the ELIC Design Team
Space charge studies at the SPS
Emmanuel Tsesmelis TS/LEA 26 January 2007
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Coupling Correction at the Australian Synchrotron
Beam-beam Effects in Hadron Colliders
Lecture 2 Live Feed – CERN Control Centre
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
Discussion on Emittance Evolution through FCC-e+e-
Real-time orbit the LHC
Synchrotron Ring Schematic
CEPC Booster Design Dou Wang, Chenghui Yu, Tianjian Bian, Xiaohao Cui, Chuang Zhang, Yudong Liu, Na Wang, Daheng Ji, Jiyuan Zhai, Wen Kang, Cai Meng, Jie.
FFAG Accelerator Proton Driver for Neutrino Factory
J. Uythoven, W. Venturini Delsolaro, CERN, Geneva
LHC Momentum in 2008 J. Wenninger December 2008.
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
Electron Rings Eduard Pozdeyev.
Thursday 04/11 - Morning Access until ~13:00 Pre-cycle Proton checks:
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
I-LHC NOMINAL ions beam in 2007
AXEL-2011 Introduction to Particle Accelerators
From commissioning to full performance…
Transverse instability in the AD?
Damping Ring parameters with reduced bunch charge
Main Design Parameters RHIC Magnets for MEIC Ion Collider Ring
Yu.N. Filatov, A.M. Kondratenko, M.A. Kondratenko
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
Presentation transcript:

Energy Calibration of the SPS with Proton and Lead Ion Beams   J. Wenninger, G. Arduini, C. Arimatea, T. Bohl, P. Collier, K. Cornelis (CERN, Geneva) Introduction Since the shutdown of LEP at the end of 2000, the SPS machine is modified and adapted to its role as injector for the LHC collider. As LHC injector, the SPS must deliver very bright beams with high efficiency and without emittance degradation to both LHC rings. The machine model is re-measured in details and as part of this effort, the beam momentum at the extraction energy of 450 GeV/c was calibrated in order to obtain the best possible initial energy setting when the LHC will be commissioned. n target n beam to Gran Sasso SPS Calibration principle The speed bpc of the proton beam is related to its momentum P, the main parameter of interest, and its rest mass mp by The speed of the particles bc, where c is the speed of light, can be related to the revolution frequency frev and the corresponding RF frequency fRF through An ion beam of charge Z, injected into the same magnetic machine and on the same orbit than the proton beam has a momentum Pi= Z P. We define the proton equivalent momentum of the ion as P = Pi/Z. The speed bic of the ions is given by where h is the harmonic number of the RF system, h = 4620 for the SPS. C is the machine circumference. To determine the speed b and therefore the momentum, both C and frev must be known. To determine momentum and machine circumference at the same time, frev is measured for two particles with different masses (or charge over mass ratio) that are injected into exactly the same magnetic machine and on the same orbits. In our case the measurements are performed for a proton and an lead ion beam. The two equations can be solved for the proton beam momentum P: (p = proton, i = ion) Central RF frequency measurement technique Horizontal chromaticity scans The goal of the energy calibration is the determination of the beam momentum on the central orbit, where the beam is centered on average in the machine quadrupoles. On this orbit the momentum is entirely determined by the dipole field and the measurement of the beam momentum under such conditions provides a calibration of the integrated field of the main dipoles. In practice the central RF frequency is determined by centering the beams in the machine sextupoles. For that RF frequency value, the transverse tune no longer depends on the setting of the chromaticity. For a sufficiently large number of sextupoles and a correct alignment of the sextupoles with respect to the quadrupoles, the beam should be centered in the sextupoles and quadrupoles at the same time. Systematic alignment effects can be probed by performing the measurement for the horizontal plane and for the vertical plane independently. Hor. tune Vertical chromaticity scans Ver. tune In this example the central frequencies obtained by changing the horizontal and vertical chromaticity differ !!

Energy Calibration of the SPS with Proton and Lead Ion Beams   J. Wenninger, G. Arduini, C. Arimatea, T. Bohl, P. Collier, K. Cornelis (CERN, Geneva) Central frequency for protons and lead ions (Pb53+) Tidal distortions The effect of local gravity changes due to Earth tides on the circumference is well known from the LEP machine. Hor. tune Hor. tune The change of circumference / central RF frequency is proportional to the change in gravity, for the SPS : Vert. tune Vert. tune Horizontal and vertical chromaticity scans for proton and lead ion beams Tidal corrections must be applied because the measurements were spread over a 48 hours period Measurements Gravity change Pb53+ was used instead of Pb82+ to increase Df Local gravity change due to Earth tides between October 17th and 24th 2002 Central RF frequency difference Pb53+-p : Df = 6194.3  1.6 Hz Horizontal chrom. scan Df = 6200.4  2.7 Hz Vertical chrom. scan The difference between H and V scans is 6.1  3.1 Hz (corrected for tidal effects) October 2002 Proton beam momentum Momentum for proton beam : The momentum is –0.18% lower than the nominal value of 450 GeV/c. p = 449.18  0.16 GeV (error dominated by H/V difference) Machine circumference : C = 6’911.566  0.002 m  R = 1100.0099  0.0004 m measured C = 6’911.504 m  R = 1100.0000 m model Systematic studies The difference in central frequency between H and V corresponds to a difference in radial position between the two SPS sextupole families of: DR = 0.8 mm at 450 GeV/c !! This unexpected difference was studied, and was found to depend on the momentum, vanishing at injection energy. A mechanical movement has been excluded, a possible source may be shifts of the magnetic center of the sextupole magnets. Corresponds to a radial offset of 0.8 mm between sextupole families