JEM-SMILES Instrumental Capabilities

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Temperature Measurements in the Lower Thermosphere Utilizing the RAIDS Near Infrared Spectrometer Physical Sciences Laboratories May 19, 2010 A. B. Christensen.
Advertisements

Characterization of ATMS Bias Using GPSRO Observations Lin Lin 1,2, Fuzhong Weng 2 and Xiaolei Zou 3 1 Earth Resources Technology, Inc.
SWD 2005, Taormina, Jun,19-26 An EUV Imaging Detector of Space Solar Telescope Qian Song, Binxun Ye, Zhaowang Zhao National Astronomical Observatories,
Pre-launch Characterization of the CERES Flight Model 5 (FM5) Instrument on NPP S. Thomas a, K. J. Priestley b, M. Shankar a, N. P. Smith a, M. G. Timcoe.
Doppler Wind and Temperature Sounder: A breakthrough technique GATS Proprietary Larry Gordley, GATS Inc. Dave Fritts, GATS Inc. Tom Marshall, GATS Inc.
3mm amplitude test by Cheng-Jiun Ma. Observation Source : Orion SiO Frequency: GHz 256 channels within 64MHz bandwidth Ant 3 & Ant 4 no Tsys correction.
Lesson 7: Remote Sensing Dr Andrew Ketsdever MAE 5595.
COST 723 UTLS Summerschool Cargese, Corsica, Oct. 3-15, 2005 Stefan A. Buehler Institute of Environmental Physics University of Bremen
Microwindow Selection for the MIPAS Reduced Resolution Mode INTRODUCTION Microwindows are the small subsets of the complete MIPAS spectrum which are used.
1 숙명여자대학교 지구환경연구소 Ground-Based Microwave Observation of Stratospheric Ozone April 3, 2003 Jung Jin Oh Sookmyung Women’s University Seoul, South Korea.
Lecture 2 Photographs and digital mages Friday, 7 January 2011 Reading assignment: Ch 1.5 data acquisition & interpretation Ch 2.1, 2.5 digital imaging.
Radio Telescopes. Jansky’s Telescope Karl Jansky built a radio antenna in –Polarized array –Study lightning noise Detected noise that shifted 4.
SLAC, May 12th, 2004J.L. Puget PLANCK J.L. Puget Institut d'Astrophysique Spatiale Orsay.
SDW2005, juin, Taormina The Corot Space instrument.
The Atacama B-mode Search: A TES-Based CMB Polarization Instrument CMBpol Workshop, Chicago July 2, 2009 Joe Fowler Princeton University.
Lecture 1 By Tom Wilson.
Earth Observation, Navigation & Science Page 1 Capacity Final Presentation, , Estec, Noordwijk Report for WP 3300 WP 3300.
Solar observation modes: Commissioning and operational C. Vocks and G. Mann 1. Spectrometer and imaging modes 2. Commissioning proposals 3. Operational.
4-d Digital Camera: Horizontal: Horizontal: Large area format Focal Plane detector Arrays Vertical: Vertical: Fourier Transform Spectrometer Time: Time:
ATCA synthesis workshop - May ATCA – Calibration at mm wavelengths Rick Forster University of California, Berkeley Hat Creek Radio Observatory Berkeley-Illinois-Maryland.
Remote Sensing and Image Processing: 7 Dr. Hassan J. Eghbali.
Making MOPRA go! Lucyna Kedziora-Chudczer Friend of the telescope (UNSW)
:TELIS meeting N.Suttiwong Status of 1.8 THz Channel TELIS (TErahertz and submm LImb Sounder) by Nopporn Suttiwong, Remote Sensing Technology.
1 An Observatory for Ocean, Climate and Environment SAC-D/Aquarius HSC - Radiometric Calibration H Raimondo M Marenchino 7th SAC-D Aquarius Science Meeting.
VERIFICATION OF POINTING AND ANTENNA PATTERN KNOWLEDGE OF SUPERCONDUCTING SUBMILLIMETER- WAVE Limb-EMISSION SOUNDER (SMILES) Makoto Suzuki 1, Satoshi Ochiai.
1 Leonardo Pinheiro da Silva Corot-Brazil Workshop – October 31, 2004 Corot Instrument Characterization based on in-flight collected data Leonardo Pinheiro.
COST 723 Training School - Cargese October 2005 OBS 3 Radiative transfer for thermal radiation. Instruments Bruno Carli.
University of Wisconsin - Madison Space Science and Engineering Center (SSEC) High Spectral Resolution IR Observing & Instruments Hank Revercomb (Part.
Optical & Radiometric Conceptual Design of EMAS Thermal Port Upgrade Kickoff Meeting June 29, 2010 Roy W. Esplin.
Optimisation of the PACS Chopper Markus Nielbock Ulrich Klaas Jeroen Bouwman Helmut Dannerbauer Jürgen Schreiber Ulrich Grözinger.
Superconducting Submillimeter-Wave Limb-Emission Sounder (SMILES) - Middle Atmospheric Observations from the International Space Station Masato Shiotani.
NAST-I Development History Developed by MIT Lincoln Laboratory in 18 months for NPOESS using a COTS BOMEM (now ABB) interferometer, detectors, and optics.
Kinetic Temperature Retrievals from MGS TES Bolometer Measurements: Current Status and Future Plans A.A. Kutepov, A.G. Feofilov, L.Rezac July 28, 2009,
Extended Detector Cutoff Considerations WFIRST Project Office May
An electron/positron energy monitor based on synchrotron radiation. I.Meshkov, T. Mamedov, E. Syresin, An electron/positron energy monitor based on synchrotron.
GSFC/Spinhirne 03/13/2002 Multispectral and Stereo Infrared Cloud Observations by COVIR (Compact Visible and Infrared Imaging Radiometer) J. Spinhirne,
Ocean Color Research Team Meeting May 1, 2008 NPOESS Preparatory Project (NPP) Status Jim Gleason NPP Project Scientist.
ISUAL Design Concept S. Mende. SDR 7 Jun NCKU UCB Tohoku ISUAL Design Concept S. Mende Sprite Example Sprite Image obtained by Berkeley/NCKU 1999.
Electro-optical systems Sensor Resolution
Introduction to JEM/SMILES
Cassini Huygens EECS 823 DIVYA CHALLA.
Paper under review for JGR-Atmospheres …
Pre-launch Characteristics and Calibration
G. Mevi1,2, G. Muscari1, P. P. Bertagnolio1, I. Fiorucci1
RENISH THOMAS (GPM) Global-Precipitation- Mapper
Introduction to SMILES
Beam Measurement Characterization and Optics Tolerance Analysis of a 900 GHz HEB receiver for the ASTE telescope Alvaro Gonzalez, K. Kaneko, Y. Uzawa.
SMILES: Superconducting Submillimeter-wave Limb-emission Sounder
3-coordinate Coastal Radar with Multi-beam Active Phased Array
超伝導サブミリ波サウンダ (SMILES)の開発
Junji INATANI JEM/SMILES Mission Team
Observing Strategies for the Compact Array
Calibration Activities of GCOM-W/AMSR2
G. Mevi1,2, G. Muscari1, P. P. Bertagnolio1, I. Fiorucci1
AIRS (Atmospheric Infrared Sounder) Instrument Characteristics
Instrument Characterization: Status
System Considerations for Submillimeter Receiver
Instrument Considerations
“SMILES” aboard the ISS-JEM “KIBO”
Changchun Institute of Optics Fine Mechanics and Physics
New Tool to Understand Ozone Depletion
SMILES Superconducting Submillimeter-wave Limb-emission Sounder
Lecture 2 Photographs and digital mages
X-Y Planar Precision Scanner
Junji Inatani and SMILES Mission Team (NASDA & CRL)
Early calibration results of FY-4A/GIIRS during in-orbit testing
MAMBO PRE-LAUNCH CALIBRATION CONSIDERATIONS
New Tool to Understand Ozone Depletion
CHEOPS - CHaracterizing ExOPlanet Satellite
Junji Inatani, Teruhito Iida, Ryouta Satoh
Presentation transcript:

JEM-SMILES Instrumental Capabilities Junji INATANI Space Utilization Research Program NASDA Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

“Mission Plan” Chapter 3 Introduction ISS and JEM SMILES Payload Field of View (FOV) Altitude Scanning of the Antenna Global Coverage Interference with FOV Antenna Response Pattern ISS Orbit and Attitude Variations Tangent Height Calibration Spectral Regions and Sensitivity Observation Frequency Bands Frequency Down-conversion Acousto-optic Spectrometer Sensitivity Brightness Temperature Calibration Conclusion Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

Introduction ISS and JEM SMILES Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

Japanese Experiment Module: “KIBO” SMILES Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

Instruments SMILES: Superconducting Submillimeter-wave Limb-emission Sounder View in the Cryostat Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

Signal Flow Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

Receiver Sensitivity: SIS vs SBD SBD mixer receiver SIS mixer receiver hf/k: Quantum Limit Superconductive SIS mixer receivers have some 20 times higher sensitivity than conventional Schottky-diode mixer receivers for frequencies less than 700 GHz. Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

Inside the SIS Mixer Mount Developed by NASDA in-house activity. 640 GHz SIS Mixer Inside the SIS Mixer Mount Developed by NASDA in-house activity. 0.4 mm Nb/AlOx/Nb Mixer Device Fabricated at NAOJ, Nobeyama Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

Cryostat Radiation Shield: MLI (40 layers) Signal Input Window: IR Filters (‘Zitex’) Support for 100 K Stage: S2-GFRP Straps (12 pieces) Support for 20 K Stage: GFRP Pipes (4 pieces) Support for 4 K Stage: CFRP Pipes (4 pieces) Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

4 K Mechanical Cooler Cooling to 100 K & 20 K: Cooling Capacity: 20 mW @ 4.5 K 200 mW @ 20 K 1000 mW @ 100 K Power Consumption: 300 W @ 120 VDC Mass: Cooler 40 kg Cryostat 26 kg Electronics 24 kg Total 90 kg Cooling to 100 K & 20 K: Two-stage Stirling Cooler Cooling to 4.5 K: Joule-Thomson Cooler Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

Mechanical Components of Coolers Cold-head and Compressor for Two-stage Stirling Cooler Two Compressors for Joule-Thomson Cooler Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

Sub-mm Receiver Subsystem To Antenna Ambient Temperature Optics AOPT Cryostat To Cold-Sky Terminator AAMP Single Sideband Filter CREC Sub-mm LO Source He Compressor (JT) He Compressor (ST) Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

Acousto-Optical Spectrometer Bandwidth: 1200 MHz x 2 units IF: 1.55 - 2.75 GHz / unit Focal Plane: 1728-ch. CCD array x 2 units Frequency Resolution: 1.8 MHz (FWHM) Channel Separation: 0.8 MHz / ch. AD Conversion: 12-bit, 2-CCD readouts in 4.9 msec Adder Output: 16 bits x 1728 ch. x 2 units in 500 msec AOS (Astrium & OPM) Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

Field of View (FOV) Altitude Scanning of the Antenna Global Coverage Interference with FOV Antenna Response Pattern ISS Orbit and Attitude Variations Tangent Height Calibration Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

Atmosphere Scanning A single spectral profile is acquired in every 0.5 sec, in which the antenna moves 0.056 deg in six angular steps. Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

Antenna Response Pattern Effective Pattern: Integrated over AZ angles Averaged for six consecutive EL points involved in a unit data Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

Height Resolution (Antenna) Angular Width (or Interval) [deg] Linear Width (or Interval) at Tangent Point Heights: 10 – 60 km [km] ISS: 350 km ISS: 400 km ISS: 460 km HPBW 0.096 3.82 – 3.24 4.08 – 3.51 4.41 – 3.82 Sampling Interval 0.05625 2.25 – 1.92 2.42 – 2.10 2.60 – 2.26 A refraction effect is included, which is significant for TPH < 20 km. Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

Global Coverage Trajectory for 24 Hours The Arctic Region Covered Latitudes: 68N – 35S (ISS Yaw: +15 deg) 65N – 38S (ISS Yaw: 0 deg) 61N – 42S (ISS Yaw: -15 deg) Horizontal Sampling Interval: about 360 km in orbital direction Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

Direction of Line-of-sight Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

FOV Interference Blue: with Main Beam by Solar Paddle Orange: with CST by SUN Red: with Main Beam by SUN FOV Interference Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

ISS Orbit Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

ISS Attitude Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

How to Determine Tangent Point Height HCS: Heliocentric Coordinate System GCS: Geocentric Coordinate System Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

Errors in Tangent Point Height (1-s level) Causes of Errors Bias [km] Random [km] Errors in Attitude: Sub-mm beam offset errors 5.02 - Mechanical driving errors 0.27 Thermal bending errors 0.12 Mechanical alignment errors STT measurement errors 0.06 Time synchronization errors 0.50 0.18 Errors in Altitude: ISS positional errors 0.30 0.10 Overall Error with the beam offset 5.07 0.34 Overall Error w/o the beam offset 0.76 Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

Spectral Regions and Sensitivity Observation Frequency Bands Frequency Down-conversion Acousto-optic Spectrometer Sensitivity Brightness Temperature Calibration Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

Expected Spectra: Band-A Limb Scanning A Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

Expected Spectra: Band-B Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

Expected Spectra: Band-C Limb Scanning C Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

Frequency Down-conversion Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

Single Sideband Filter Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

Effect of Image Band (1) Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

Effect of Image Band (2) Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

AOS: Differential Non-linearity Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

Standing Waves Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

Expected Sensitivity Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

Sensitivity and Accuracy Causes Sensitivity Accuracy of Absolute Brightness Excess Brightness Radiometric Noise Gain Variation Gain Non-linearity Standing Waves DNL* in AOS Knowledge Errors** * Differential non-linearity of the A/D converter. ** Concerning antenna characteristics and temperature measurement errors. Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

Accuracy of Absolute Brightness Temp. Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

Conclusions (1) Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

Conclusions (2) Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES

Conclusions (3) Feb. 21, 2001, Kyoto JEM-SMILES