Design Discovery: Task Analysis

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SIMS 213: User Interface Design & Development Marti Hearst Thurs, Jan 30, 2003.
Advertisements

Task Scenarios and Sketches IS 485, Professor Matt Thatcher.
SIMS 213: User Interface Design & Development Marti Hearst Tues, Jan 29, 2002.
1 Contextual Inquiry. 2 Hall of Fame or Hall of Shame? Gas pump display.
Stanford hci group / cs376 research topics in human-computer interaction Fieldwork / Prototyping Scott Klemmer 11 October 2005.
Task Analysis and Contextual Inquiry IS 485, Professor Matt Thatcher.
Team Project IS 485, Professor Matt Thatcher. 2 Agenda l Review l Team project –project overview –team feedback –milestones l Questions?
SIMS 213: User Interface Design & Development Marti Hearst Thurs, Jan 22, 2004.
SIMS 213: User Interface Design & Development Marti Hearst Thurs, Jan 18, 2007.
SIMS 213: User Interface Design & Development Marti Hearst Thurs, Jan 27, 2005.
1 Design Discovery. 2 Interface Hall of Shame or Fame?
SIMS 213: User Interface Design & Development Marti Hearst Thurs, Jan 29, 2004.
Prof. James A. Landay University of Washington Autumn 2008 Design Discovery: Task Analysis October 7, 2008.
HCI 특론 (2010 Spring) Design Discovery: Video Prototyping.
Stanford hci group / cs376 u Scott Klemmer · 10 October 2006 Fieldwor k & Prototyp ing.
June 2004 User Interface Design, Prototyping, and Evaluation 1 Design Discovery.
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
James A. Landay Jason I. Hong Berkeley Summer Engineering Institute 14 – 16 June 2004 Design Discovery.
Requirements Engineering Requirements Elicitation Process Lecture-8.
©2001 Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville All rights reserved. Today Interview Techniques (Hand-in partner preferences) Thursday In-class Interviewing.
Prof. James A. Landay University of Washington Autumn 2006 Design Discovery October 10, 2006.
Task Analysis Methods IST 331. March 16 th
Prof. James A. Landay University of Washington Autumn 2007 Video Prototyping October 16, 2007.
Task Analysis Lecture # 8 Gabriel Spitz 1. Key Points  Task Analysis is a critical element of UI Design  It describes what is a user doing or will.
Task Analysis Lecture # 8 Gabriel Spitz 1. Key Points  Task Analysis is a critical element of UI Design  It specifies what functions the user will need.
Iterative Design & Knowing Your Customers Professor James A. Landay University of Washington CSE 490L – Web Design, Prototyping, & Implementation Spring.
LB160 (Professional Communication Skills For Business Studies)
Medium-fi Prototyping
Pepper modifying Sommerville's Book slides
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
SIE 515 Design and Usability
What does Success mean to you?
The Office Today.
CMPE 280 Web UI Design and Development August 29 Class Meeting
User-centred system design process
Task Analysis – Input to Interaction
Chapter 10 Understanding Work Teams
Chapter 2 Introduction to Computer User Support
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
Chapter 1 The Systems Development Environment
COMP 208/214/215/216 Lecture 2 Teams and Meetings.
Chapter 3 The Project Manager © 2012 John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Developing Tasks This slide deck was adapted by Caitlin Kelleher based on the original by Saul Greenberg. (Thank you Saul)
Professor John Canny Spring 2004 Jan 30
Lesson 5 Computer-Related Issues
Unit 6: Application Development
Professor John Canny Spring 2003 Feb 3
Design Discovery (User Centered Design & Task Analysis)
Hard Skills vs. Soft Skills
Requirements Engineering Processes
User interface design.
Chapter 9 Understanding Work Teams
Navigating SWIS Webinar
Early Career 2013: Satisying Life
Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI) for Parents and Community
Roles and Responsibilities of a Project Manager
Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI) for Parents and Community
Computer Literacy BASICS
COMP444 Human Computer Interaction Usability Engineering
Applying Use Cases (Chapters 25,26)
IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction
User ScenarIOS.
Software Testing Lifecycle Practice
Chapter 3: Project Integration Management
THE PROCESS OF INTERACTION DESIGN
Chapter 3 The Project Manager © 2012 John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Early Stage (lo-fi & med-fi) Prototyping
Lesson 3.2 Product Planning
Navigating SWIS Webinar
Task Analysis IST 331 – Organization and Design of Information Systems: User and System Principles Instructor: Mithu Bhattacharya Spring 2011.
Presentation transcript:

Design Discovery: Task Analysis Cust some redundant slides – 10 minutes too long… needs more interaction

Hall of Fame or Hall of Shame?

Hall of Fame! Flexible sort Icons change if saved a house Understands “neighborhoods”

Design Discovery : Task Analysis

Outline Review Task analysis Selecting tasks Using tasks in design Caveats to user-centered design

Review ESM is used to get self-report data where? Know thy user by ? involving them in design Contextual inquiry is for? How do we do it? way to answer the task analysis questions interview & observe real customers use master-apprentice model to get them to teach you ESM stands for? Experience Sampling Method ESM is used to get self-report data where? in situ

Task Analysis Find out Observe existing work practices who customers are what tasks they need to perform Observe existing work practices Create scenarios of actual use This allows us to try out new ideas before building software! get rid of problems early in the design process

Why Task Analysis? System will fail if it does not do what the customer needs is inappropriate to the customer “the system must match the customer’ tasks” Can’t we just define “good” interfaces? “good” has to be taken in context of users might be acceptable for office work, not for play infinite variety of tasks and customers guidelines are too vague to be generative e.g.,“give adequate feedback”

Task Analysis Questions Who is going to use the system? What tasks do they now perform? What tasks are desired? How are the tasks learned? Where are the tasks performed? What’s the relationship between customer & data?

Task Analysis Questions (cont.) 7. What other tools does the customer have? 8. How do users communicate with each other? 9. How often are the tasks performed? 10. What are the time constraints on the tasks? 11. What happens when things go wrong?

1. Who? Identity Background Skills Work habits and preferences in-house or specific customer is easy need several typical users for broad product Background Skills Work habits and preferences Physical characteristics height?

Who (BART)? Identity? Background? Skills? people who ride BART business people, students, disabled, elderly, tourists Background? may have an ATM or credit card have used other fare machines before Skills? may know how to put cards into ATM know how to buy BART tickets

Who (BART cont.)? Work habits and preferences? use BART 5 days a week Physical characteristics? varying heights  don’t make it too high or too low!

Talk to Them Find some real customers Talk to them Are they too busy? find out what they do how would your system fit in Are they too busy? buy their time t-shirts, coffee mugs, etc. find substitutes medical students in training

2&3. What Tasks? Important for both automation and new functionality Relative importance of tasks? Observe customers, see it from their perspective on-line billing example small dentists office had billing automated assistants were unhappy with new system old forms contained hand-written margin notes e.g., patient A’s insurance takes longer than most, etc.

4. How are Tasks Learned? What does the customer need to know? Do they need training? academic general knowledge / skills special instruction / training

5. Where is the Task Performed? Office, laboratory, point of sale? Effects of environment on customers? Users under stress? Confidentiality required? Do they have wet, dirty, or slippery hands? Soft drinks? Lighting? Noise?

6. What is the Relationship Between Customers & Data? Personal data always accessed at same machine? do users move between machines? Common data used concurrently? passed sequentially between customers? Remote access required? Access to data restricted?

7. What Other Tools Does the Customer Have? More than just compatibility How customer works with collection of tools Ex. automating lab data collection how is data collected now? by what instruments and manual procedures? how is the information analyzed? are the results transcribed for records or publication? what media/forms are used and how are they handled?

8. How Do Customers Communicate with Each Other? Who communicates with whom? About what? Follow lines of the organization? Against it? Example: assistant to manager installation of computers changes communication between them people would rather change their computer usage than their relationship [Hersh82] Harry Hersh 1982 Electronic Mail Usage Analysis At the inter-personal l e v e l , we found that users saw the EMS system as providing increased f l e x i b i l i t y in inter-personal communication through t h i s additional, welcomed communication mode. I t avoids the real-time, two-party requirements for telephone usage while preseving the phone's t i m e l i n e s s . I n t e r e s t i n g l y , 49% of the respondents access the mail system from locations in addition to t h e i r o f f i c e s , with h a l f of these people accessing the system from t h e i r homes. Also at the inter-personal l e v e l , we found that users were adjusting the intended purpose of the system in order to preserve e x i s t i n g organizational relations. For example, within the current organization there is t y p i c a l l y manager. Secretaries often produce and distribute outgoing mail, as well as screen incoming mail. As a result, the secretary is often an integral part of the communications loop involving the manager. The EMS system, however, only recognizes one type of user, and messages only go to designated users. I f a manager is an official user of the EMS system, but the secretary is not, the secretary is effectively cut out of the communiications loop. In response to this situation, a significant number of the respondents (29%) reinserted the secretary into the communications loop by making the secretary an unofficial, but actual, user. The result is that many of the respondents never go near the system, but send and receive their messag- es through an intermediary. Becoming an indirect user of the EMS system accomplishes several objec- tives from the user's perspective: (a) The secretary is now put back in the communications loop, (b) the secretary retains the job function of producing and distributing internal mail, and (c) the manager can continue to interact with paper copies of messages, as was previously done.

9. How Often Do Customers Perform the Tasks? Frequent customers remember more details Infrequent customers may need more help even for simple operations make these tasks possible to do Which function is performed most frequently? by which customers? optimize system for these tasks will improve perception of good performance

10. What are the Time Constraints on the Task? What functions will customers be in a hurry for? Which can wait? Is there a timing relationship between tasks?

11. What Happens When Things Go Wrong? How do people deal with task-related errors? practical difficulties? catastrophes? Is there a backup strategy?

Involve Customers to Answer Task Analysis Questions Customers help designers learn what is involved in their jobs what tools they use i.e., what they do Developers reveal technical capabilities builds rapport & an idea of what is possible customer’s can comment on whether ideas make sense How do we do this? observe & interview prospective users in work place, home, or in the field!

Selecting Tasks Real tasks customers have faced collect any necessary materials Should provide reasonable coverage compare check list of functions to tasks Mixture of simple & complex tasks easy task (common or introductory) moderate task difficult task (infrequent or for power customers)

What Should Tasks Look Like? Say what customer wants to do, but not how allows comparing different design alternatives Be very specific – stories based on facts! say who customers are (use personas or profiles) design can really differ depending on who name names (allows getting more info later) characteristics of customers (job, expertise, etc.) forces us to fill out description w/ relevant details example: file browser story Some should describe a complete job forces us to consider how features work together example: phone-in bank functions “Wixon and colleagues were developing an interface for a file management system. It passed lab tests with flying colors, but bombed as soon as customers got it. The problem was that it had a scrolling file list that was (say) twenty characters wide, but the file names customers used were very long, and in fact often identical for more than twenty characters (the names were made up by concatenating various qualifiers, and for many names the first several qualifiers would be the same.) Customers were not amused by needing to select from a scrolling list of umpty-ump identical entries that stood for different files. And this wasn't an oddball case, it was in fact typical. How had it been missed in the lab tests? Nobody thought it would matter what specific file names you used for the test, so of course they were all short.” – from Chapter 2 of TASK-CENTERED USER INTERFACE DESIGN A Practical Introduction by Clayton Lewis and John Rieman.

Using Tasks in Design Write up a description of tasks formally or informally run by customers and rest of the design team get more information where needed Manny is in the city at a club and would like to call his girlfriend, Sherry, to see when she will be arriving a the club. She called from a friends house while he was on BART, so he couldn’t answer the phone. He would like to check his missed calls and find the number so that he can call her back.

Using Tasks in Design (cont.) Rough out an interface design discard features that don’t support your tasks or add a real task that exercises that feature major screens & functions (not too detailed) hand sketched Produce scenarios for each task what customer has to do & what they would see step-by-step performance of task illustrate using storyboards sequences of sketches showing screens & transitions

Scenarios (cont.) Scenarios are design specific, tasks aren’t Scenarios force us to show how various features will work together settle design arguments by seeing examples only examples  sometimes need to look beyond Show users storyboards get feedback

Caveats of User-Centered Design Techniques Politics “agents of change” can cause controversy get a sense of organization & bond w/ interviewee important to get buy-in from all those involved Customers are not always right cannot anticipate new technology accurately job is to build system customers will want not system customers say they want be very careful about this (you are outsider) if you can’t get customers interested in your hot idea, you’re probably missing something Design/observe forever without prototyping rapid prototyping, evaluation, & iteration is key

Teams vs. Groups Teams & good performance are inseparable Groups Teams a team is more than the sum of its parts Groups strong leader individual accountability organizational purpose individual work products efficient meetings measures performance by influence on others delegates work Teams shared leadership individual & mutual accountability specific team purpose collective work products open-ended meetings measures performance from work products does real work together

Keys to Team Success Common commitment Specific performance goals requires a purpose in which team members believe “prove that all children can learn”, “revolutionizing X…” Specific performance goals comes directly from the common purpose “increasing the scores of graduates form 40% to 95%” helps maintain focus – start w/ something achievable A right mix of skills technical/functional expertise (programming/design/writing) problem-solving & decision-making skills interpersonal skills Agreement who will do particular jobs, when to meet & work, schedules

Team Action Items(참고) Keep meeting & get used to each other Figure out strengths of team members Assign each person a role responsible for seeing work is organized & done not responsible for doing it themselves Names/roles listed on next assign. turned in Roles group manager (coordinate - big picture) documentation (writing) design (visual/interaction) user testing

Summary Task Analysis questions ? Selecting tasks ? Who is going to use the system? What tasks do they now perform? What tasks are desired? How are the tasks learned? Where are the tasks performed? What’s the relationship between customer & data? What other tools does the customer have? How do users communicate with each other? How often are the tasks performed? What are the time constraints on the tasks? What happens when things go wrong? Selecting tasks ? real tasks with reasonable functionality coverage complete, specific tasks of what customer wants to do