Why do BLMs need to know the Quench Levels?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Alexandr Drozhdin March 16, 2005 MI-10 Injection.
Advertisements

LHC Collimation Working Group – 19 December 2011 Modeling and Simulation of Beam Losses during Collimator Alignment (Preliminary Work) G. Valentino With.
Critical beam losses during Commissioning & Initial Operation Guillaume Robert-Demolaize (CERN and Univ. Joseph Fourier, Grenoble) with R. Assmann, S.
LHC Commissioning WG 27/03/ Commissioning of BLM system L. Ponce With the contribution of B. Dehning, E.B. Holzer, M. Sapinski, C. Zamantzas and.
Collimation MDs LHC Study Working Group Daniel Wollmann for the Collimation-Team, BLM-Team, Impedance-Team, … LHC Study Working Group,
Loss maps of RHIC Guillaume Robert-Demolaize, BNL CERN-GSI Meeting on Collective Effects, 2-3 October 2007 Beam losses, halo generation, and Collimation.
LSWG day, Sept. 2, 2014, B. Auchmann for the BLMTWG Collaboration of many teams: OP, RF, BI, Collimation, LIBD, FLUKA, etc. T. Baer, M. Bednarek, G. Bellodi,
Eva Barbara Holzer IEEE NSS, Puerto Rico October 26, Beam Loss Monitoring System of the LHC Eva Barbara Holzer, CERN for the LHC BLM team IEEE Nuclear.
Loss problems associated with the acceleration of radioactive beams and what we can do about it A.Jansson f fermilab Loss issues (and ideas for solutions)
Beam-induced Quench Tests of LHC Magnets Beam-induced Quench Tests of LHC Magnets, B.Dehning 1 B. Auchmann, T. Baer, M. Bednarek, G. Bellodi, C. Bracco,
LER Workshop, CERN, October 11-12, 2006Detector Safety with LER - Henryk Piekarz1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac Accelerator & Detector.
Status of FLUKA Simulations for Collimation BLM Thresholds 6 th BLM Threshold Working Group 10/02/2015 E.Skordis On behalf of the FLUKA team Sixtrack input.
Ion operation and beam losses H. Braun, R. Bruce, S. Gilardoni, J.Jowett CERN - AB/ABP.
DS Heat Load Scenarios in Collision Points and Cleaning Insertions. Prepared by F. Cerutti, A.Lechner and G. Steele on behalf of the FLUKA team (EN-STI)
Review of Quench Limits FermilabAccelerator Physics Center Nikolai Mokhov Fermilab 1 st HiLumi LHC / LARP Collaboration Meeting CERN November 16-18, 2011.
Bus-Bar Quench Studies Summary of Available Calculations LMC Meeting August 5 th 2009 Bus-Bar Quench Studies Summary of Available Calculations LMC Meeting.
Lecture 9: Inelastic Scattering and Excited States 2/10/2003 Inelastic scattering refers to the process in which energy is transferred to the target,
Updates on FLUKA simulations of TCDQ halo loads at IR6 FLUKA team & B. Goddard LHC Collimation Working Group March 5 th, 2007.
1 Question to the 50GeV group 3GeV からの 54π と 81π 、 6.1π の関係 fast extraction 部の acceptance (81π?) Comments on neutrino beamline optics?
IEEE NSS 2007 D.Kramer 1 Very High Radiation Detector for the LHC BLM System based on Secondary Electron Emission Daniel Kramer, Eva Barbara.
LHC Beam Loss Monitors, B.Dehning 1/15 LHC Beam loss Monitors Loss monitor specifications Radiation tolerant Electronics Ionisation chamber development.
Simulation comparisons to BLM data E.Skordis On behalf of the FLUKA team Tracking for Collimation Workshop 30/10/2015 E. Skordis1.
An electron/positron energy monitor based on synchrotron radiation. I.Meshkov, T. Mamedov, E. Syresin, An electron/positron energy monitor based on synchrotron.
Chamonix 2006, B.Dehning 1 Commissioning of Beam Loss Monitors B. Dehning CERN AB/BDI.
Beam Induced Quench Session 2: quench test at LHC B. Dehning, C. Bracco.
Case study: Energy deposition in superconducting magnets in IR7 AMT Workshop A.Ferrari, M.Magistris, M.Santana, V.Vlachoudis CERN Fri 4/3/2005.
Beam collimation in the transfer line from 8 GeV linac to the Main Injector A. Drozhdin The beam transfer line from 8 GeV Linac to the Main Injector is.
LHC Radiation Day, B. Dehning1 Beam Loss Monitors B. Dehning.
Energy Deposition Issues in LHC IR Upgrades LHC IR Upgrades Workshop Pheasant Run, St. Charles, IL October 3-4, 2005 Fermilab LHC IR 2005 Nikolai Mokhov,
Collimation design considerations at CERN (with some applications to LHC) R. Bruce on behalf of the CERN LHC collimation project R. Bruce,
E.B. Holzer BLM Meeting: Q & A March 20, Questions and Answers.
J-Parc Neutrino Facility Primary Proton Beam Design A. K. Ichikawa(KEK), Y.Iwamoto(KEK) and K.Tanabe(Tokyo) et.al. 7 th Nov. 2003,
Ranko Ostojic AT/MEL 1.Beam heat loads 2.Magnet design issues related to heat loads.
Status of the electron cloud test-bench in LSS5 G. Arduini SL/OP Crash programme in collaboration with LHC/VAC,SL/AP,SL/BI,SL/MR,SL/MS,SL/OP,…
R.W. Assmann, V. Boccone, F. Cerutti, M. Huhtinen, A. Mereghetti
Overview of LHC Beam Loss Measurements
BEAM LOSS MONITORING SYSTEM
Tracking simulations of protons quench test
MD2036: UFO dynamics studies and UFO fast detection
Injection region BLMs – ECR
BEAM LOSS MONITORING SYSTEM
DEBRIS IMPACT IN THE TAS-TRIPLET-D1 REGION
Status of energy deposition studies in IR3
Interpretation and use of BLM Data
Remote setting of LHC BLM thresholds?
Beam loss monitoring requirements and system description
Beam-Induced Energy Deposition Studies in IR Magnets
The 4th International Particle Accelerator Conference, IPAC13
Verification of the Beam Loss studies at start-up
Proton Beam Diagnostics
Assessment of BLM thresholds at cold magnets
C.Octavio Domínguez, Humberto Maury Cuna
BLM changes HV software interlock (SIS)
Sensitivity tests of BLM_S chamber in PSB dump
Commissioning of BLM system
Commissioning of BLM system
Beam Loss Monitoring Eva Barbara Holzer, CERN
LHC Collimation Requirements
Optic design and performance evaluation for SPPC collimation systems
1st HiLumi LHC / LARP Collaboration Meeting 2011 Nov 17th
Commissioning of BLM system
Collision bump amplitudes for the 450 GeV run
Beam Loss Simulations LHC
Warm Magnet Thresholds
Discussion of High Energy Proton Losses in Arc 7
Muon Collider SR and IR Magnets
Report on Beam Loss Monitors
FLUKA Energy deposition simulations for quench tests
Review of Quench Limits
G.H. Wei, V.S. Morozov, Fanglei Lin Y. Nosochkov, M-H. Wang (SLAC)
Presentation transcript:

Why do BLMs need to know the Quench Levels? Measurement principle BLM design consideration Loss locations Response time, dynamic range (quench level vs loss duration or vs energy) Detector locations Particle shower development 03.03.2005 Why do BLMs need to know the Quench Levels, B.Dehning

Measurement Principle Detection of shower particles outside the cryostat to determine the coil temperature increase due to particle losses => comparison with thresholds => beam dump if exceeded Relation between loss rate and temperature increase quench levels: (J.B. Jeanneret et al., LHC Project Report 44) Relation between loss rate and particle flux outside the cryostat fluence: (A. Arauzo Garzia et al., LHC Project Note 238, see: http://ab-div-bdi-bl-blm.web.cern.ch) 03.03.2005 Why do BLMs need to know the Quench Levels, B.Dehning

Loss Levels and Required Accuracy Relative loss levels 450 GeV 7 TeV Damage to components 320/5 tran./slow 1000/25 tran./slow Quench level 1 Beam dump threshold for quench prevention 0.3 0.3/0.4 tran./slow Warning 0.1 0.1/0.25 Specification: Absolute precision (calibration) < factor 2 initially: < factor 5 Relative precision for quench prevention < 25% Accurately known quench levels will increase operational efficiency 03.03.2005 Why do BLMs need to know the Quench Levels, B.Dehning

Simulation Results on Longitudinal Proton Loss Distribution Tracking of tertiary halo particles, E.B. Holzer and V. Kain (end of 2003), complete aperture model (DS and arc right of IR7), (halo particles simulated by R. Assmann), ideal alignment. Longitudinal losses strongly peaked at the beginning of the quadrupoles, bin width = 1 m (dipoles not shown). 03.03.2005 Why do BLMs need to know the Quench Levels, B.Dehning

Location of Proton Losses along the LHC Q11 Q8 Q7 p lost / p on primary collimator Dispersion suppressor and beginning of arc right of IR7, z [m] 03.03.2005 Why do BLMs need to know the Quench Levels, B.Dehning

Change of Aperture at Quadrupoles Tertiary halo tracking => proton loss location (talk G. Robert-Demolaize) => location of highest energy density in coil 03.03.2005 Why do BLMs need to know the Quench Levels, B.Dehning

LHC Bending Magnet Quench Levels, LHC Project Report 44 38 mJ/cm3 = 5 mJ/g 5 mW/cm3 = 0.6 mW/g 0.8 mJ/cm3 = 0.09 mJ/g, (RHIC=2 mJ/g, Tevatron=0.5mJ/g) (RHIC = 8 mW/g, Tevatron = 8mW/g) 03.03.2005 Why do BLMs need to know the Quench Levels, B.Dehning

Approximation of Quench Levels Dump level tables are loaded in a non volatile RAM Any curve approximation possible Loss durations Energy dependence Relative error kept < 20 % 03.03.2005 Why do BLMs need to know the Quench Levels, B.Dehning

Quench Levels and Energy Dependence Fast decrease of quench levels between 0.45 to 2 TeV 03.03.2005 Why do BLMs need to know the Quench Levels, B.Dehning

Operational Range of BLMs Quench level and observation range 450 GeV 7 TeV Damage levels Arc 2.5 ms Ionisation chamber 1 turn SEM Dynamic Arc: 108 BLMS*: 3.2E13 protonen (nominal SPS injection) lost in about 10E-5 seconds. 03.03.2005 Why do BLMs need to know the Quench Levels, B.Dehning

BLM locations in the arcs – longitudinal 3 loss locations simulated: shower development in the cryostat, GEANT 3. The positions of the BLMs are chosen to: minimize crosstalk reduce difference between inside and outside loss difference with and without MDCO. BLM position Loss location 03.03.2005 Why do BLMs need to know the Quench Levels, B.Dehning

Shower Development in Dispersion Suppressor Magnets Shower maximum: 1m after impact location Shower width: FWHM  0.5m 03.03.2005 Why do BLMs need to know the Quench Levels, B.Dehning

Beam and Magnetic Field Directions 4 combinations of beam directions and magnetic fields. 3 loss locations: inside and outside of beam screen and top of beam screen (bottom is about the same as top). 03.03.2005 Why do BLMs need to know the Quench Levels, B.Dehning

Shower Development in Dispersion Suppressor Magnets Angles theta (angle to the x-axis) and phi of charged particles at detector location: mostly in horizontal plane and with an angle of 45 degrees to the x-axis. 03.03.2005 Why do BLMs need to know the Quench Levels, B.Dehning

Shower Development in Arc Magnets BLM position Loss location Different corrector magnet layouts simplified to two cases (with and without MDCO in front of the dipole magnet). Dependence on energy studied: Factor of 10 to 25 in signal for a 7 TeV proton compared to a 450 GeV proton. 10-4 MIPs/ p cm2 03.03.2005 Why do BLMs need to know the Quench Levels, B.Dehning

Why do BLMs need to know the Quench Levels, B.Dehning Location of Detectors Installation with a small support and straps or cables on the cryostats Chamber (89 mm) + fixation (8 mm) just fits between the cryostat and the transport space (2 mm space left). 03.03.2005 Why do BLMs need to know the Quench Levels, B.Dehning

Why do BLMs need to know the Quench Levels, B.Dehning Detector Signal Chain Threshold Comparator: Losses integrated in 12 time intervals to approximate quench level curve. 03.03.2005 Why do BLMs need to know the Quench Levels, B.Dehning

Why do BLMs need to know the Quench Levels, B.Dehning Subjects to be Studied? 3700 monitors need threshold values (11 time slots and 30 energy slots) Loss locations and their variations Quench levels as function of time and energy for the different magnet types Transient loss values Quench levels between few ms to 10 s (heat flow in magnet) Steady state values (heat flow) Identification of error margins 03.03.2005 Why do BLMs need to know the Quench Levels, B.Dehning

Why do BLMs need to know the Quench Levels, B.Dehning Beam Loss Display 03.03.2005 Why do BLMs need to know the Quench Levels, B.Dehning