LIGO Advanced System Test Interferometer

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LIGO-G M May 17, 2006 Installation (INS) Requirements and Design Breakout Presentation NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Project Dennis Coyne, Caltech.
Advertisements

LIGO-G D Comments: Staged implementation of Advanced LIGO Adv LIGO Systems 17 may02 dhs Nifty idea: a way to soften the shock, spread cost, allow.
Andrea Paoli AdV 1 st Project Review Cascina, November 3 rd, 2008 IME – infrastructure modifications for environmental noise reduction.
G R LIGO Laboratory1 Advanced LIGO Research and Development David Shoemaker LHO LSC 11 November 2003.
G R LIGO Advanced System Test Interferometer LIGO Advanced R&D Review M. Zucker 8 October, 2002.
LIGO-G D Suspensions Update: the View from Caltech Phil Willems LIGO/Caltech Livingston LSC Meeting March 17-20, 2003.
LIGO-G W Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning Frederick J. Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G D partial ADVANCED LIGO1 Optical Layout Cavity Lengths Input Mode Cleaner (IMC) »IMC FSR = ~9 MHz »Length = ~16.6 m = ~HAM1 to HAM3 separation.
LIGO-G M 1 Conceptual Design Review: Initial LIGO Seismic Isolation System Upgrade Introduction Dennis Coyne April 12, 2002.
LIGO-G0200XX-00-M LIGO Laboratory1 Pre-Isolation Dennis Coyne LIGO Laboratory NSF LIGO Annual Review, at MIT 23 October 2002.
LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory1 Adv. LIGO Installation (INS) Plans, Schedule, Costs, Team Plan, Schedule Costs Team.
Dennis Coyne Excomm Jan 26, 2004
G M Advanced R&D1 Seismic Isolation Retrofit Plan for the LIGO Livingston Observatory Dennis Coyne 29 Nov 2001.
LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory1 Pre-Isolation Dennis Coyne LIGO Laboratory NSF LIGO Annual Review, at MIT 23 October 2002.
LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory1 Adv. LIGO Seismic Isolation (SEI) Plans, Schedule, Costs, Team Schedule »through R&D, including near-term plans »project.
LIGO-G M LIGO Status and Plans Barry Barish LSC Meeting 19-Aug-02.
LIGO-G M Overview of LIGO R&D and Planning for Advanced LIGO Detectors David Shoemaker NSF Operations Review Hanford, 26 February 2001.
LIGO-G D 1 Requirements Environment and constraints Performance requirements Functional requirements.
LIGO-G D partial ADVANCED LIGO1 Development Plan R&D including Design through Final Design Review »for all long lead or high risk subsystems »LIGO.
LIGO-G M 1 Initial LIGO Seismic Isolation System Upgrade Dennis Coyne LIGO Seminar March 29, 2002.
LIGO-G D Suspensions Design for Advanced LIGO Phil Willems NSF Review, Oct , 2002 MIT.
Generation of squeezed states using radiation pressure effects David Ottaway – for Nergis Mavalvala Australia-Italy Workshop October 2005.
LSC Meeting August ‘04 1 LIGO ADVANCED SYSTEMS TEST INTERFEROMETER (LASTI) Program Update: LSC Meeting, Hanford Dave Ottaway for the LASTI team August.
G R Advanced LIGO Seismic Isolation R&D Dennis Coyne 8 Oct 2002.
LIGO-G W Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning Frederick J. Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G D Installation and Commissioning Status Stan Whitcomb Program Advisory Committee 14 June 2001 Caltech.
4/25/11 G v3 1 Facility Modifications and Preparations (FMP) Technical Status Annual NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Project April , 2011 John.
LIGO-G M May 31-June 2, 2006 Input Optics (IO) Cost and Schedule Breakout Presentation NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Project David Reitze UF.
Conceptual Design for Advanced LIGO Suspensions Norna A Robertson University of Glasgow and Stanford University for the GEO suspension team +contribution.
LIGO-G M 1 Conceptual Design Review: Initial LIGO Seismic Isolation System Upgrade Development, Implementation Plan & Schedule Dennis Coyne April.
G M 1 Advanced LIGO Update David Shoemaker LSC/Virgo MIT July 2007.
LIGO- G D The LIGO Instruments Stan Whitcomb NSB Meeting LIGO Livingston Observatory 4 February 2004.
LIGO-G R The LIGO Advanced System Test Interferometer Mike Zucker, David Shoemaker, Ken Mason LLO LSC 16 March 2001.
G M 1 HAM-SAS CCB information 22 Feb 06 Coyne, Shoemaker, Wilkinson.
G Z LIGO R&D1 Input Optics Definition, Function The input optics (IO) conditions light from the pre- stabilized laser (PSL) for injection into.
G M MIT LIGO David Shoemaker LIGO PAC 27 June 02.
G Consideration of HAM SAS for Advanced LIGO David Shoemaker LIGO Excomm 30 April 07.
G R 1 Advanced LIGO Update David Shoemaker LSC LHO March 2006.
LIGO-G D LIGO R&D1 Advanced LIGO R&D Review The PSL Peter King & Rich Abbott October 8, 2002.
LSC-March  LIGO End to End simulation  Lock acquisition design »How to increase the threshold velocity under realistic condition »Hanford 2k simulation.
Update on Activities in Suspensions for Advanced LIGO Norna A Robertson University of Glasgow and Stanford University LSC meeting, Hanford, Aug 20 th 2002.
LSC Meeting March ‘05 1 LIGO ADVANCED SYSTEMS TEST INTERFEROMETER (LASTI) Program Update: LSC Meeting, LLO Dave Ottaway for the LASTI team March 2006 LIGO-G Z.
LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory1 Adv. LIGO Installation (INS) Plans, Schedule, Costs, Team Plan, Schedule Costs Team.
LIGO-G M Advanced LIGO Cost, Schedule and Management Gary H Sanders NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Caltech, June 11, 2003.
LIGO-G M LIGO Status Gary Sanders GWIC Meeting Perth July 2001.
LIGO-G M Overview of LIGO R&D and Planning for Advanced LIGO Detectors Gary Sanders NSF R&D Review Caltech, January 29, 2001.
LSC Meeting March ‘07 1 LIGO ADVANCED SYSTEMS TEST INTERFEROMETER (LASTI) LASTI Progress and Plans LSC Meeting, LLO Dave Ottaway/Richard Mittleman March.
LIGO-G D Commissioning at Hanford Stan Whitcomb Program Advisory Committee 12 December 2000 LIGO Livingston Observatory.
LIGO-G M Overview of the LIGO Continuing Operations (FY FY2006) Proposal Gary Sanders LIGO PAC9 Meeting December 2000.
G R LIGO R&D1 Advanced LIGO Update David Shoemaker LSC LHO August 2004.
LIGO-G M State of the LIGO Laboratory Gary Sanders LIGO/Caltech LSC Meeting, LLO March 16, 2004 State of LIGO.
LIGO- G M LIGO Status Stan Whitcomb Oversight Committee 20 October 2004.
LIGO-G D Advanced LIGO Systems & Interferometer Sensing & Control (ISC) Peter Fritschel, LIGO MIT PAC 12 Meeting, 27 June 2002.
Page 1 Coles – Operating the Observatories PAC 9 Dec. 13, 2000 G L Operating the Observatories Mark Coles.
G R 2004 Plan Update LIGO Systems meeting 22 Jan 04 dhs.
LIGO LAB R&D PROGRAM TECHNICAL REVIEW, OCT 02
LIGO ADVANCED SYSTEMS TEST INTERFEROMETER (LASTI)
Reaching the Advanced LIGO Detector Design Sensitivity
LCGT Seismic Attenuation System LCGT-SAS
BSC HEPI Pier Amplification
Advanced LIGO Quad Prototype Janeen Romie LSC, March 2004
Installation and Commissioning Status Stan Whitcomb
Nergis Mavalvala MIT IAU214, August 2002
UK RFD Pre-Series cryomodule
Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning
R&D Highlights Seismic Isolation Suspensions ISC/40m
Stan Whitcomb LSC meeting Livingston 21 March 2005
P Fritschel LSC Meeting LLO, 22 March 2005
Improving LIGO’s stability and sensitivity: commissioning examples
Auxiliary Optics System (AOS)
Presentation transcript:

LIGO Advanced System Test Interferometer LIGO Advanced R&D Review M. Zucker 8 October, 2002

Specific Advanced LIGO Program Tasks (‘01 - ‘06+): LASTI Mission Test LIGO components & systems at full mechanical scale Practice installation & commissioning Minimize delays & downtime for advanced LIGO upgrades Qualify design mods & retrofits for initial LIGO Specific Advanced LIGO Program Tasks (‘01 - ‘06+): Qualify advanced isolation & suspension systems and associated controls at full scale Develop detailed SEI/SUS installation & commissioning handbook Look for unforeseen interactions & excess displacement noise Test LASER and Input Mode Cleaner together at full power

LASTI Advanced R&D Program Commission infrastructure (vacuum, cleanrooms, cranes…)  Commission PSL & controls  Commission initial seismic stack, suspensions & 1m test cavity in HAM chamber  Develop & test EPI for LLO seismic remediation Qualification test of early pre-prototype triple pendulum Integrate/test active HAM SEI pathfinder Integrate/test active BSC SEI pathfinder Integrate/test Quad and Triple suspensions Integrate/test sapphire & fused silica core optics Qualify for low displacement noise with sensitive interferometer system Integrate/test AdLIGO 180 Watt PSL & Mode Cleaner In each step, develop installation & test procedures to optimize AdLIGO upgrade

Status Infrastructure complete; mods considered/in work Now turbopumped; upgrade to IP’s planned, not budgeted Relocation of TP and RGA stations to lower-traffic area Cleanroom “mezzanine” for integrated SEI/SUS cartridge assembly AWG hw/sw for stimulus/response test capability (on order) added DAQ channel capacity PSL complete, working well (supporting site PSL’s) HAM SEI, SOS test cavity installed & under control Currently >90% effort on EPI MEPI (HAM) mechanically & electrically complete sensors/actuators in service for plant characterization & SysID; DSPACE controller ready for loop closure HEPI (BSC instance) components & installation tooling coming in

Vacuum Envelope

Vacuum Performance

Prestabilized Laser (PSL) J. Rollins aligning PMC cavity D. Ottaway (r.) w/ J. Rollins commissioning controls

HAM Seismic Stack

1m Suspended Test Cavity

Hydraulic External Pre-Isolators (HEPI) Working fluid is low-viscosity mineral oil Bellows hydraulic pistons apply force without sliding friction, moving seals Laminar-flow differential valves control forces Stabilized “power supply” is remote hydraulic pump with fluid-equivalent “RC” pressure filtering Technology adapted from precision machine tool applications K. Mason, MIT

Magnetic EPI (MEPI) Uses commercial voice-coil actuator ‘Pin-compatible’ mechanically Simpler electronics ‘Soft’ mechanical back impedance K. Mason, MIT

MEPI Installed on HAM13

Technical Risks All those inherited from subsystems under test, plus Added constraints from MIT lab environment installation & swing space, lifting capacities, etc. ambient vibration cleanliness/access mostly managed through intelligent engineering (so far...)

AdLIGO Schedule Feeds/Constraints EPI testing (LIGO I LLO retrofit) was expected to finish 9/02, now anticipate completion ~ 1/03 - 2/03 EPI pushes back integration of HAM SUS test (itself a new task w.r.t. baseline) Still shown finishing before earliest AdLIGO HAM SEI delivery (use float; PSL testing made concurrent) No net impact on subsequent milestones, IF EPI finishes OK and activity moves to site as planned HAM SUS control test finishes OK and moves into final design No further slip in AdLIGO SEI deliveries

Updated schedule: LLO seismic remediation interleaved with Advanced LIGO R&D (ref. M020121-C, 9/25/02) task baseline act/proj comments vacuum envelope commissioned 4Q99 SEI external structures installed 1Q00 3Q01 infrastructure complete 1Q02 (EPICS, DAQ, GDS, SEI, PSL, SOS) BSC stack installed N/A 4Q01 needed for EPI/LLO retrofit EPI development for LLO seismic retrofit 1Q03 LIGO I support PSL intensity noise/FSS testing 2Q03 HAM triple pendulum “controls” proto test 3Q03 held off by EPI completion AdL HAM SEI standalone test compl. 4Q02 1Q04 paced by earliest SEI delivery (AdL SEI delayed by LLO/EPI) AdL BSC SEI standalone test compl. 3Q02 2Q04 paced by earliest delivery AdL SUS standalone tests compl. 4Q04 paced by triple SUS delivery AdL TM optics integrated 3Q05 paced by COC, quad SUS delivery IFO noise testing compl. 2Q05 1Q06 AdLIGO PSL/IO integration test compl. 3Q06 next: SEI prod. first article tests

Cost baseline and issues FY ‘03 LASTI budget: all people, about $10k for misc. supplies and expenses (bootie fund) Engineering, management, admin. support and certain M&S drawn from Operations MIT institute grant of ~$0.5M was invested in EPI equipment during FY’01-’02; now exhausted Future material, equipment and infrastructure investments to be provided by R&D subsystem accounts (‘users’) Significant recycling of LIGO I site tooling & equipment has kept costs low & will continue

‘03 staffing baseline and issues Dedicated LASTI staff (per ‘03 work plan) .5 FTE scientist .5 FTE postdoc .5 FTE sr. tech specialist 2 FTE grad, 0-2 FTE undergrad Shared resources (per ‘03 work plan) EE, ME, SysAdmin, senior scientist shared within lab E-tech, M-tech < MIT CSR (about 0.1 FTE total, bridging peaks) Critically dependent on visitors Mechanical & installation: peaks sporadic, visits have worked well Electronics & software: continuous & unpredictable workload, competes with LIGO commissioning --> need to beef up Plan to increase shared EE from current 0.5 FTE to 1 FTE

Summary: Plans for 2003 Complete EPI program & support LLO retrofit Complete PSL ISS/FSS support investigations Install “control test” triple pendulum prototype in HAM13 and begin characterization requires SOS test cavity removal, shortening of passive SEI stack also requires increase in electronics infrastructure Install AdLIGO HAM SEI & begin testing (if ready)