Telomere-End Processing

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 10: Genetic Engineering- A Revolution in Molecular Biology.
Advertisements

Semiconservative DNA replication Each strand of DNA acts as a template for synthesis of a new strand Daughter DNA contains one parental and one newly synthesized.
Clinical Laboratory Analysis of Immunoglobulin Heavy Chain Variable Region Genes for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Prognosis  Philippe Szankasi, David.
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages (September 2007)
A Novel Method for Multiplex Genotyping in a Single Reactor Using GTPlex-PyroSeq  Myungsok Oh, Benjamin Douglass Hoehn, Youngho Moon, Taejeong Oh, Youngbok.
Expanding the Biologist’s Toolkit with CRISPR-Cas9
Volume 67, Issue 1, Pages e3 (July 2017)
mRNA Sequencing Sample Preparation
Suppression of Wild-Type Amplification by Selectivity Enhancing Agents in PCR Assays that Utilize SuperSelective Primers for the Detection of Rare Somatic.
Molecular diagnosis of viral hepatitis
Telomere Replication: Mre11 Leads the Way
Volume 56, Issue 6, Pages (December 2014)
The impact of next-generation sequencing technology on genetics
Engineering the End: DNA Processing at Human Telomeres
Saving the Ends for Last: The Role of Pol μ in DNA End Joining
Volume 60, Issue 3, Pages (November 2015)
More Division of Labor at the Eukaryotic Replication Fork
High-Throughput Sequencing Technologies
High-Throughput Sequencing Technologies
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages (August 2008)
Michelle Sabourin, Creighton T. Tuzon, Virginia A. Zakian 
Human Senataxin Resolves RNA/DNA Hybrids Formed at Transcriptional Pause Sites to Promote Xrn2-Dependent Termination  Konstantina Skourti-Stathaki, Nicholas J.
Clinical Laboratory Analysis of Immunoglobulin Heavy Chain Variable Region Genes for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Prognosis  Philippe Szankasi, David.
ATLAS: A System to Selectively Identify Human-Specific L1 Insertions
Virginie Faure, Stéphane Coulon, Julien Hardy, Vincent Géli 
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Analysis of Telomerase Processivity
Ben B. Hopkins, Tanya T. Paull  Cell 
Sequence Diversity, Metal Specificity, and Catalytic Proficiency of Metal-Dependent Phosphorylating DNA Enzymes  Wei Wang, Lieven P Billen, Yingfu Li 
Volume 64, Issue 4, Pages (October 2003)
Gracjan Michlewski, Sonia Guil, Colin A. Semple, Javier F. Cáceres 
Single-Stranded DNA Cleavage by Divergent CRISPR-Cas9 Enzymes
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (October 2009)
Rosemary C Dietrich, Robert Incorvaia, Richard A Padgett 
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (February 2006)
The Immortal Strand Hypothesis: Segregation and Reconstruction
Jung-Ok Han, Sharri B Steen, David B Roth  Molecular Cell 
Volume 132, Issue 5, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 60, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Ryan C. Wilson, Meghan A. Jackson, Janice D. Pata  Structure 
Beth Elliott, Christine Richardson, Maria Jasin  Molecular Cell 
Regulation of Telomere Elongation by the Cyclin-Dependent Kinase CDK1
Frank P Leu, Roxana Georgescu, Mike O'Donnell  Molecular Cell 
Sequence Diversity, Metal Specificity, and Catalytic Proficiency of Metal-Dependent Phosphorylating DNA Enzymes  Wei Wang, Lieven P Billen, Yingfu Li 
The DNA Damage Machinery and Homologous Recombination Pathway Act Consecutively to Protect Human Telomeres  Ramiro E. Verdun, Jan Karlseder  Cell  Volume.
Helena Celesnik, Atilio Deana, Joel G. Belasco  Molecular Cell 
DEAD-Box Proteins Unwind Duplexes by Local Strand Separation
Escape from Telomere-Driven Crisis Is DNA Ligase III Dependent
Volume 56, Issue 4, Pages (November 2014)
Julien Soudet, Pascale Jolivet, Maria Teresa Teixeira  Molecular Cell 
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Apollo—Taking the Lead in Telomere Protection
Division of Labor at the Eukaryotic Replication Fork
Genomic DNA Sample Preparation
Volume 42, Issue 3, Pages (May 2011)
Volume 138, Issue 3, Pages (August 2009)
Steven West, Nicholas J. Proudfoot, Michael J. Dye  Molecular Cell 
Giorgio Sirugo, Kenneth K. Kidd  The American Journal of Human Genetics 
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages (January 2011)
Adaptation in CRISPR-Cas Systems
Scott J Diede, Daniel E Gottschling  Current Biology 
Cary K. Lai, Michael C. Miller, Kathleen Collins  Molecular Cell 
Michael J. McIlwraith, Stephen C. West  Molecular Cell 
Simon W.-L Chan, Elizabeth H Blackburn  Molecular Cell 
CRISPR Immunological Memory Requires a Host Factor for Specificity
Volume 1, Issue 5, Pages (September 2008)
Xiaorong Wang, Peter Baumann  Molecular Cell 
Presentation transcript:

Telomere-End Processing Agnel J. Sfeir, Weihang Chai, Jerry W. Shay, Woodring E. Wright  Molecular Cell  Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages 131-138 (April 2005) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.02.035 Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Strategy for Primer Ligation Assay to Determine the Identity of the C Strand Terminal Nucleotide (A) Six oligonucleotides are annealed to the overhang at the chromosome end. Each contains a permutation of the telomeric sequence (AATCCC). Only the linker that anneals in correct register and adjacent to the last base of the C strand terminal nucleotide can be ligated. The six oligonucleotides contain four AATCCC repeats followed by a tail containing two known sequences that are used for PCR amplification. Each permutation of the sequence AATCCC is paired with a different length spacer between the two PCR primer sequences. The first three nucleotides of the labels represent the terminal nucleotides of the G-rich strand with the last base in bold and underlined, whereas the boxed sequence represents the sequence of the ligated nucleotide. (B) Two artificially generated telomeric overhangs possessing either one specific terminal nucleotide (top) or a mix of six nucleotides representing all permutations of the telomeric repeat (AATCCC) (bottom) showed the predicted patterns of band distribution and intensities on an acrylamide gel. The background appearing in the later cycles is due to the failure to remove all unligated primers. (C) The primer ligation assay was applied to genomic DNA from BJ cells. Semiquantitative PCR utilizing 32P-labeled primers and an increasing number of cycles was performed. (Ca) is a negative control (ligase). (Cb) shows major preference for the oligonucleotide possessing a 3′-CCAATC end, indicating that the C strand most frequently ends in CCAATC-5′. (D) Primer Ligation assay applied to DNA from BJ cells (a) or treated with T7 exonuclease to randomize the ends (b). A minor bias for the top and bottom oligonucleotides was observed in the ends randomized by T7 exonuclease treatment. Molecular Cell 2005 18, 131-138DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.02.035) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Identifying the C Strand Terminal Nucleotide by STELA on the XpYp Telomere (A) Strategy: Six individual C telorettes are ligated in separate reactions to the same amount of DNA and then amplified by using a forward XpYp chromosome-specific subtelomeric primer and a reverse Teltail primer. Only the C telorette annealing adjacent to the last base of the C strand will be ligated to the telomere end and can produce a PCR product. (B) STELA adaptations with telorette concentration ranging from 10−2 to 10−5 μM were individually ligated to DNA from BJ cells. Multiple amplifications using the XpYp E2 forward primer and the Teltail reverse primer show that 80% of the bands appear when using telorette 3 (ends in 3′-CCAATC). The first three nucleotides of the labels represent the terminal nucleotides of the C-rich telomeric strand with the last base in bold and underlined, whereas the boxed sequence represents the sequence of the ligated oligonucleotide. (C) STELA was performed on BJ DNA that was pretreated with T7 exonuclease. This randomized the terminal nucleotide, and all telorettes (10−3 μM) gave similar numbers of amplification products. The panel numbers (1–6) match the numbers in Figure 2B. (D) STELA was applied to leading and lagging DNA by using six individual ligation reactions possessing different C telorettes at 10−3 μM concentration. Both daughter telomeres have a major preference for C strands terminating in CCAATC-5′. Molecular Cell 2005 18, 131-138DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.02.035) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 The Identity of the G Strand Terminal Nucleotide for Individual Chromosomes (A) Annealing a guide template to the overhang provides a platform for subsequently ligating G telorettes to the 3′ end of the G-rich strand. Six individual telorettes are ligated in separate reactions to the same amount of DNA and then PCR amplified by using a forward chromosome-specific primer and a reverse Teltail primer. (B) STELA adaptation with G telorettes individually ligated to DNA from BJ cells. Multiple amplifications show that G telorettes that ligate in register to AGGGTT-3′, GGGTTA-3′, and GGTTAG-3′ generate 70% of the total number of bands. The first three nucleotides of the labels represent the terminal nucleotides of the G-rich strand with the last base in bold and underlined, whereas the boxed sequence represents the sequence of the ligated nucleotide. (C) STELA adaptation was applied to DNA from telomerase positive HeLa cells. Results show further enrichment for the G-telorette ligation to overhangs ending in GGTTAG-3′. (D) Percentage for each terminal nucleotide from 3B (BJ cells) and 3C (HeLa cells). 990 telomeric molecules were analyzed for BJ cells and 330 telomeres for HeLa cells. The dotted line shows what would be expected for a random distribution. The difference in the frequency of the GGTTAG-3′ ends in HeLa versus BJ cells is highly significant by the Student’s t test. (E) The pattern of variability observed for the G-terminal nucleotide is consistent with the replication complex sometimes generating a blunt end (leaving a GGTTAG-3′ end) or dissociating one or two nucleotides prior to the terminus. Molecular Cell 2005 18, 131-138DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.02.035) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Comparison of the Telomeric-End Structures The size of the G-rich single-stranded overhang and the terminal nucleotides for each strand are shown for two ciliates and humans. Euplotes (Fan and Price, 1997) and Tetrahymena (Jacob et al., 2001) have short, precisely defined overhangs with specific C and G termini. Humans have heterogeneous overhang lengths with a specific C-terminal end and a less precise G terminus. Molecular Cell 2005 18, 131-138DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.02.035) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions