Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.
Instructional Decision Making
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
School Improvement Through Capacity Building The PLC Process.
How Can Using Data Lead to School Improvement?
1 Lodi Unified School District Monitoring and Accountability A District Program Improvement Update Board of Education Study Session August 19, 2008.
Issue Analyses RtI Yvette Benton Brad Baietto Brad Scarbrough.
Response to Intervention
Response to Intervention By: Angelique Gunderson.
Multidisciplinary Teams
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Waverly Community Schools Standards Overview AdvancED District Accreditation External Review Team Visit April 21-24, 2013Welcome.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Strategic Planning Board Update February 27, 2012 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only.
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Do Stage Implement Plan and Monitor Plan.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION A schoolwide, systematic, collaborative process in which ALL school resources are seamlessly integrated and singularly focused.
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
Effective Grade Level Teams Minnesota RtI Center Conference March 26, 2009 Kerry Bollman St Croix River Education District.
2 Differentiated Technical Assistance Team (DTAT) Video Series Elementary Scheduling Part I of II: First Steps Judy Johnston, LaVonne Kunkel, & Steve.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
Putting It All Together Diane Gross USD 261 8/11/06.
Response To Intervention Framework Greg Frederick 6/4/2011.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Southern Maine Area Resource Team (SMART) for Schools Rachel Brown-Chidsey, Ph.D., NCSP Response to Intervention: Schedules.
MTSS/CPST/RTI. District Priority Good News Griffin’s on Top of It!
Technology Action Plan By: Kaitlyn Sassone. What is Systemic Change? "Systemic change is a cyclical process in which the impact of change on all parts.
RtI Module 2: What is Response to Intervention (RtI)? The Academic and Behavior Systems. Poudre School District Student Success Coaches 2009.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Broward County Public Schools BP #3 Optimal Relationships
Response to Instruction & Intervention (RtI 2 ) Using Differentiation to Provide Equity and Access for All Students.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
BoQ Critical Element: Faculty Commitment. Critical Element: Faculty Commitment 4. Faculty are aware of behavior problems across campus (regular data sharing)
Family Engagement Framework Vicki Myers, Ph.D. Special Assistant Family and Community Engagement Office of Elementary and Secondary Education Monique Toussaint.
USING RTI TO IMPROVE STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT IN LITERACY A Report to Our Stakeholders TEMPLATE to fill in/ add to/ delete as you see fit! SCHOOL NAME– Board.
MTSS Architecture in Secondary Schools
Instructional Review and School improvement
New Jersey Tiered System of Supports (NJTSS)
Montgomery Township Board of Education
Problem Solving Process.
District Leadership Team Sustainability Susan Barrett Director, Mid-Atlantic PBIS Network Sheppard Pratt Health.
Building a Framework to Support the Culture Required for Student Centered Learning Jeff McCoy | Executive Director of Academic Innovation & Technology.
Local Control Accountability Plan
PLC Book Gro.
Florida’s MTSS Project: Self-Assessment of MTSS (SAM)
Issue Analyses RtI Yvette Benton Brad Baietto Brad Scarbrough.
ESE Blended Cafe Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) A Parent Guide
RtI Innovations: Evaluation Anna Harms & Jose Castillo
DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents
Lessons from Virginia: Growing a System of Support for
RESEARCH IMPLEMENTATION PRACTICE
Partnering for Success: Using Research to Improve the Lowest Performing Schools June 26, 2018 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.
Student centered learning
Please dial into the phone line:
PBIS PRACTICES.
Leadership for Standards-Based Education
Leveraging the Power of MTSS in your School
Gifted Education Integrated in RtI Instruction Systems
Instructional Review and School improvement
Mountain Park Elementary School
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
Mountain Park Elementary School
New Prospect Elementary School
Georgia’s Tiered System of Supports for Students Karen Suddeth, Project Director Carole Carr, Communications & Visibility Specialist
Strategic Plan: Heards Ferry Elementary
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
API- February Scheduling.
S.T.E.A.M. Focused Instruction:
Presentation transcript:

Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement Developing and Modifying Schedules to Maximize Time to Effectively Implement Tiered Levels of Instruction Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement Presented by: Amber Humm Patnode, Ph.D. (ahummpat@umn.edu) @CAREIUMN #CAREIMTSS

Learning Outcomes: Increase knowledge of… The philosophy, infrastructure and processes necessary for developing schedules to meet student needs. Resources available to help develop schedules to meet student needs. Knowledge: What do I need to know Skill: How to Behavior: Application 1. Increase participants knowledge of the infrastructure and processes necessary for effective problem solving teams 2. Increase participants knowledge of effective teaming practices 3. Increase participants knowledge of methods to identify problems within a problem-solving framework

Big Idea Our intentions and beliefs are not separate from our outcomes- Gay Hendricks

Formula for Learning Constant Constant Variable Variable Variable Targeted Instruction Time Learning Constant Constant Variable Variable Variable Constant Mattos, & Buffum, 2015

Poll If we put the belief that learning is constant when targeted instruction and time are variable into practice, what would that look like?

It is the window to the soul of the school.” “The master schedule is to a school what grading policies are to teachers and classrooms. It reveals the true beliefs, attitudes, values, and priorities of the school. The school’s master schedule is like looking at an MRI of the inner workings of a school. It is the window to the soul of the school.” “The Master Schedule: A Culture Indicator”, (NASSP)

Bad News/Good News What I don’t have… But I can give you…

Steps for Creating Schedules to Meet Student Need Develop a task force Dig into critical questions Determine the need Draft a plan Develop consensus & solicit feedback Decide how to communicate with stakeholders Determine how to monitor and revise Buffum, Mattos, Malone, 2018

Develop a Task Force It’s About Time- Buffum & Mattos, 2015 Action Steps Resources Workgroup that includes: Administrator Grade-level and/or department representatives ESE representative Student services Intervention staff Investigate options: Book study Online resources Contact other schools It’s About Time- Buffum & Mattos, 2015 Elementary, Secondary Project Resources www.AllthingsPLC.info/evidence Categories: Create systems for intervention & enrichment Time for collaboration Timeline January/February

Dig into Critical Questions Action Steps Resources Guiding Questions for Developing Master Schedules to Meet Student Needs Format Function NC Intervention Delivery Models 1. What will be the format? 2. What will be the function/purpose? 3. How does this align? Timeline January/February

Determine the Need/Logistics Action Steps Resources Guiding Questions for Developing Master Schedules to Meet Student Needs Needs Logistics Resource Map Project Resources Evaluate/collect data Identify common needs Identify available resources Determine gaps Consider other partners Timeline March/April

Poll 2 Take a moment to review the guiding questions for: Format Function Need Logistics How feasible is this process for schools to engage in? Not feasible Somewhat feasible Very feasible What support would be required? What questions do you have?

Draft a Plan Action Steps Resources Review fixed versus flexible 1 Review type, frequency, duration of interventions 2 Review example schedules 3 Draft schedule with interventions by grade 4 It’s About Time- Buffum & Mattos, 2015 Elementary, Secondary Project Resources www.AllthingsPLC.info/evidence Categories: Create systems for intervention & enrichment Time for collaboration Timeline April

Develop Consensus & Solicit Feedback Action Steps Resources Determine how to share draft plan with staff Decide what feedback is desired and acceptability criterion Collect feedback from staff Make adjustments if needed Guiding Questions for Developing Master Schedules to Meet Student Needs Develop Consensus/Feedback Consensus Ladder Concerns Based Adoption Model- Stages of Concern http://www.sedl.org/cbam/ Timeline April/May

Decide how to Communicate with Stakeholders Action Steps Resources Guiding Questions for Developing Master Schedules to Meet Student Needs Communicating with Stakeholders FL PBIS Family and Community Engagement Resources http://flpbis.cbcs.usf.edu/foundati ons/FACE.html Determine what and how specific information needs to be shared with: Staff Families Students Others Timeline May/June--August/Ongoing

Determine how to Monitor & Revise Action Steps Resources Expect hiccups Gather input from stakeholders Revise as needed Review at end of year Guiding Questions for Developing Master Schedules to Meet Student Needs Determine how to Monitor and Revise Timeline August/Ongoing

Poll 3 Take a moment to review the guiding questions for: Drafting Plan Developing Consensus & Solicit Feedback Communicating with Stakeholders Monitoring and Revising How feasible is this process for schools to engage in? Not feasible Somewhat feasible Very feasible What support would be required? What questions do you have?

Contact Information Amber Humm Patnode (Brundage) Associate Director for Innovation & Outreach Center for Applied Research & Educational Improvement ahummpat@umn.edu @CAREIUMN Pl

Additional Reading, Resources Buffum, A., Mattos, M. (2015). It’s about time: Planning interventions and extensions in elementary school. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press. Buffum, A., Mattos, M., & Malone, J. (2018). Taking Action: A handbook for RTI at work. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press. Mattos, M., Buffum, A. (2015). It’s about time: Planning interventions and extensions in secondary school. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.