Gloucestershire Safeguarding Children Board

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Child Safeguarding Standards
Advertisements

Safeguarding children in Essex- making a difference together
Blackpool Safeguarding Children Board Core Group Training Trainers: Ian Wheeler Jo Edwards.
Being Part of a Core Group Jacqui Westbury – CP Chair/IRO Team Manager Kate Lawson - Safeguarding Nurse Specialist.
Halton Children’s Trust – Halton Safeguarding Children Board Joint Frontline Event 2014 Select Security Stadium May 1 st 2014.
Anti Bullying update What are we doing? Charlotte Brown Anti Bullying Strategy Support Officer Children’s Services Awarded October 2012.
An overview of the O-25 SEN and Disability Service in South Gloucestershire March 2015 Mark Nesden Service Manager 0-25 Disability Service.
INFORMATION SHARING: The Moral Imperative – Why Its Your Duty To Share Information. Sian Griffiths Independent Social Worker NORFOLK SAFEGUARDING CHILDREN.
Safeguarding children and interagency working The legal framework for children’s services Brayne & Carr: Law for Social Workers: 10e Chapter 6.
Children in Care - with additional needs These children will have partnerships with other agencies including: Speech and Language Therapists Physiotherapists.
Safeguarding Adults Care Act 2014.
Safeguarding Children Induction for Adults Working or Volunteering in Schools Produced by Gloucestershire Safeguarding Development Officers (education)
Equality, Diversity and Rights BTEC Care/Health Studies.
The Children’s Society Black Country Advocacy Service “The Children’s Society Black Country Advocacy Service is an independent, confidential service in.
The Common Assessment Framework (CAF) & Lead Professional (LP)
LLR LSCB MULTI-AGENCY SAFEGUARDING PROCEDURES 3.7 Escalation of Concerns and Resolving Practitioner Disagreements
Annual Update 2016 Protecting Children and Ensuring their Wellbeing.
Making the Escalation Policy work for you. Occasionally situations arise when a professional feels that the actions, inactions or decisions of another.
Designated Safeguarding Officer Group 12 th July 2016.
March 2015 Mark Nesden Service Manager 0-25 Disability Service
Multi-Agency Information Sharing Guidance
The role of the NYSCB.
Working Together to Safeguard Children 2015
3-MINUTE READ WORKING TOGETHER TO SAFEGUARD CHILDREN.
Boringdon Primary School
Hampshire Futures Safeguarding Update July 2017.
Learning objective Understand how to safeguard children in relation to legislation, frameworks, policies and procedures. Identify current.
SAFEGUARDING EDUCATION FORUM Revised Audit Tool for Schools
Sexting case study Every case is unique, taking risk factors into consideration to aid decision making. No clear definite answers but safeguarding the.
IF CHILD IS MISSING FROM HOME
Effective Support for Children and Families in Essex – July 2017
3-MINUTE READ WORKING TOGETHER TO SAFEGUARD CHILDREN.
Key Messages Supporting young people to stay safe on-line: Messages from Bradford SCR.
SEFTON MASH The Decision Making Process of MASH and how the current restructure will affect MASH.
1 November 2017 Serious Case Reviews
Consent, throughout the Early Help Journey
Working together to support children and families in Cambridgeshire
Effective Support for Children & Families in Essex
Escalating concerns.
Role & Responsibilities: Surrey Safeguarding Children Board (SSCB)
Welcome and Introductions
Safeguarding Update for Pharmacists
Croydon Safeguarding Adults Board
How to undertake an Early Help Strength based conversation
WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM COMPLETED SARS?
The Child’s Journey Forest of Dean GSCB Road shows 2012 Karen Goulding
Multi-agency Safeguarding Adults Policy and Procedure
Informal Resolution Your Name.
FIRST RESPONSE Making a good referral.
Revised Self-Neglect Policy and Best Practice Guidance
Management of Allegations Against Adults who work with Children Linda Evans (Head of Quality Assurance for Safeguarding) and Majella O’Hagan (Local Authority.
Safeguarding Adults local procedures
Update from the Boards and Community Safety Partnership
Academy Medical Centre
The Early Help Assessment Journey. How to Assure a Quality Journey.
Consent, throughout the Early Help Journey
Hampshire Futures Safeguarding Update July 2017.
The Early Help Assessment Journey. Request for Early Help Support Form. Support for OUR Early Help Partner Agencies.
Update from the Boards and Community Safety Partnership
Safeguarding and Volunteers Training
An Integrated Decision Making Process for Children with Complex Needs
How to undertake an Early Help Strength based conversation
Consent, throughout the Early Help Journey
The Early Help Assessment Journey. How to Assure a Quality Journey.
Making Safeguarding Personal
Helping children and young people put the pieces back together
Whole School Approach to Emotional Wellbeing and Mental Health
Consent, throughout the Early Help Journey
The Early Help Assessment Journey. Request for Early Help Support Form. Support for OUR Early Help Partner Agencies. ©Manchester City Council.
How to undertake an Early Help Strength based conversation
Presentation transcript:

Gloucestershire Safeguarding Children Board Using the Escalation Policy

On the Search Function Type in Escalation Escalation Policy – what is it and Escalation Policy when to use it ? GSCB Website: www.gscb.o https://www.gscb.org.uk On the Search Function Type in Escalation IMPORTANT: All staff working with children and young people need to be aware of this guidance and understand how to apply it in their own professional setting. Occasionally situations arise when workers within one agency feel that the actions or inaction or decisions of another agency do not adequately safeguard a child/young person. Disagreement based on a passion to improve outcomes for children is healthy professional practice. Resolution of disagreement is an integral part of professional co-operation and joint working to safeguard children. Effective working together is dependent on an open and honest relationship between agencies and professionals. This is not a policy to complain about social care practice. We are encouraging Children Social Care to use it to challenge other agencies if they have concerns. Its about the consistent application in the raising of concerns and healthy agency challenge to get the best outcome for children. A joint agency approach and threshold for managing interagency discussion. – if we all speak the same language things wont get lost in translation Word of warning – use of the escalation policy doesn’t mean you get what you want! What it should mean is that you get a professional response and rationale to consider You have been heard, you have a voice in the safeguarding process and this formalises that voice You have a record of challenge and response When you escalate you MUST follow it through to the end, do not give up, do not assume someone else is taking your concern forward. This is a structure to help you take forward and conclude your concerns. About the guidance: Effective working together depends on a culture of open and honest relationships between agencies and professional differences are welcomed by professionals who want the best outcomes for children Problem resolution is an integral part of professional co-operation and joint working to safeguard children What it means for you: In considering escalation, restorative practice principles are essential – these are high support and high challenge. In addition, at all times the focus should always be on improving outcomes for children.

Escalation Policy Flowchart PRINT THIS OFF AND PIN ON YOUR WALL Level 1 – Professional discussion between practitioners It is ok to challenge Social Workers and others like Health Professionals if you disagree – (Appropriately and under restorative practice principles, “high challenge - high support”). The aim is to foster productive multi agency relationships to safeguard children, to achieve the best outcomes for children. It’s a policy that should shape our practice and deliver a consistency in the conversation we are having as professionals. Level 2 – Professionals have not managed to come to a consensus. Escalate to your line manager who will instigate level 2. This is still an agency to agency conversation. This is still an opportunity to resolve practice issues together. Manager to Manager discussion to negotiate and mediate a resolution. Its not personal – it’s about outcomes for children Try to empathise with the position of the partner agency – HOWEVER - the welfare of the child is paramount As with level 1 its ok to challenge a social work manager, a Lead nurse or a police Inspector guess what its also ok to challenge a Head Teacher Do so professionally and following the restorative practice principles Remember if the child you are concerned about is subject of a CP plan you MUST notify the CP Chair or if a child looked after you must notify the IRO Level 3 – Managers have not been able to resolve their differences. At this level the escalation must be communicated to the GSCB Business. Please use the Escalation monitoring form and complete in as much detail setting out what you’ve done already and what the unresolved problem is. Please note: It is still your agencies responsibility to hold the escalation – The GSCB Business Unit Manager will not be mediating or trouble shooting You must still look for the appropriate method of resolution, you may want to escalate upwards in your organisation. You may want to call a multi agency meeting to resolve What the GSCB Business Manager will do is contact the Professional escalating with a summary of the escalation, copying in the manager in the agency being challenged. They will also send the escalation to the relevant Board members responsible for the two agencies. This is to inform, Give opportunity to intervene and prep for a possible level 4. There is a 5 day turn around, or sooner if the child is at risk – the escalating agency is as responsible for communicating in that timescale as much as the agency receiving the escalation. If there is no movement in the 5 days the Business Manger will escalate to Level 4 if the Escalating agency does not. Level 4 – No Resolution within the agency structures Independent Chair will convene an agency resolution meeting with relevant directors to resolve the issue with the interests of the child in mind. This is the nuclear option and agencies should work vigorously at all levels to avoid this. This meeting pulls in Directors to oversee, look at the process that’s happened and finaly resolve the issue. SERIOUS Risk of HARM Second Nuclear option – Escalation can go directly to level 3 or 4 if the escalating agency believes a child is at risk of harm. Get a senior manager to speak to a senior manager and outline why youre jumping to Level 3, copy to the GSCB Business Manager.

Escalation Policy Monitoring Form Level 3 Monitoring Form https://www.gscb.org.uk On the Search Function Type in Escalation This is the form to use when escalating to Level 3 or above Do not just email Do not phone Your escalation will only be accepted on this form Recommendation: Schools - Keep a record of escalation at level 1 and 2 on CPOMS or similar Others – Email trail. Good practice would be to use this form from level 1 and update as you go along.

Statistics - April 2018 To Date