International Standards for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights: Trademarks and Geographical Indications Cynthia Henderson, Attorney-Advisor.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
International Plant Protection Convention CPM 7, Rome March 2012
Advertisements

2 Industrial Property 1. Introduction: notion of industrial property 2. International legal framework 3. Main substantive treaties in the field of industrial.
Looking Good: Appeal of Designs in Getting Noticed by the Customer Dr. Kristina Janušauskaitė Advocate (Lithuania) WIPO TOT Program for SMEs Damascus,
WIPO NATIONAL SEMINAR ON OMANI TRADITIONAL VALUES IN A GLOBALIZED WORLD Muscat, February 13 and 14, 2005 International Legal Framework for the Protection.
Geographical indications and their use to promote local products Damascus, May 2007 Octavio Espinosa WIPO.
Vivien Irish, WIPO and TPI, Istanbul January 2005 Marketing and Branding Strategies ( Trade Marks and Designs) Vivien Irish Consultant Patent Attorney.
INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARK ASSOCIATION INTA GI TRIPS 23.4 Multilateral Register Proposal CLARK W. LACKERT, Chair, INTA GI Committee and Partner, King & Spalding.
INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARK ASSOCIATION Global Protection and Enforcement of Trademarks.
Industrial Designs Tamara Nanayakkara Counsellor Small and Medium Sized Enterprises Division World Intellectual Property Organization.
International Registration of Geographical Indications and Appellations of Origin Matthijs Geuze, WIPO National Seminar on the Use of Industrial Property.
Dr. Özlem Döğerlioğlu IŞIKSUNGUR Yaşar Üniversity Lecture Notes
Comparison and overlap between trademark and design rights and the protection by unfair competition rules Presentation for IBA Conference, European Forum.
Worldwide Symposium on Geographical Indications Parma, June International Registration Burkhart Goebel Partner, Lovells, Madrid Chair of the INTA.
Marcus Höpperger Acting Director
CYBERSQUATTING: PREVENTION AND REMEDIATION STRATEGIES NET2002 – Washington, DC April 18, 2002 Scott Bearby NCAA Associate General Counsel Copyright Scott.
IP Border Detention with a Patent Topping Jasper Helder Severin de Wit.
DS 174 – Trademarks & Geographical Indications
International Intellectual Property Law
THE PROTECTION OF INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY AND TREATIES ADMINISTERED BY WIPO TK.
Geographical Indications (GIs) Global Intellectual Property Academy
By Prof. A. Damodaran Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore
RED DE PROPIEDAD INTELLECTUAL E INDUSTRIAL EN LATINOAMÉRICA PILA-Network is a project co-funded by the European Union in the framework of the ALFA programme.
Dr. Özlem Döğerlioğlu IŞIKSUNGUR Yaşar Üniversity Lecture Notes
Worldwide. For Our Clients. Trademark Dilution Law in the United States September 14, 2004.
Trademark Issues in Current Negotiations Prof. Christine Haight Farley American University.
Intellectual Property
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 30, 2009 Trademark – Infringement.
Perspectives for Geographical Indications Teresa Mera June, 2009.
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
FUNDAMENTALS OF TRADEMARK LAW THE HONORABLE BERNICE B. DONALD U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ISLAMABAD, PAKISTAN SEPT. 18, 2013 LAHORE, PAKISTAN.
The U.S. Geographical Indications System: Building GI Brands
1 International Legal Framework for the Protection of Geographical Indications Warsaw, 26 April 2006 Denis Croze Acting Director Advisor Economic Development.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AND COLLECTIVE MARKS
S P O O R & F I S H E R ENFORCEMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN SOUTH AFRICA: THE COUNTERFEIT GOODS ACT Mohamed Khader Spoor & Fisher November 2005.
Chapter 25 Intellectual Property Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written.
TRADEMARKS Introduction and International Regime Victor H. Bouganim WCL, American University.
IPO-PAKISTAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION OF PAKISTAN 1 GIs as Economic Tool for SMEs Development: Current Status of Protection in Pakistan; Future.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS. AN OVERVIEW TRADEMARKS DESIGNS COPYRIGHT UTILITY PATENT UTILITY MODEL IP & ENFORCEMENT - HOW SWAROVSKI HANDLES CONTENT.
Importance of Intellectual Property Central issue in multilateral trade relations –Need for organization to see that there are intellectual property procedures.
THE PROTECTION OF PATENTS, TRADEMARKS, INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AND THEIR ROLE IN TRADE AND COMMERCE TK.
Trademark II Infringement. Article 57 Infringement Article 57 Any of the following conduct shall be an infringement upon the right to exclusively use.
IPR-INSIGHTS CONSULTING AND RESEARCH 1116 BUDAPEST, KONDORFA U. 10. TEL.: (+36-1) FAX: (+36-1)
16 Intellectual Property © Oxford University Press, All rights reserved.
Russian Federation, September 2012 Susan Hainsworth, ITTC.
LECTURE XI. INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS Copyright Law and Media Law JUDr. Eva Ondřejová, LL.M. 1.
EPA Negotiations: Intellectual Property and Sustainable Development for ECOWAS Countries By Catherine Grant Director: Trade Policy Business Unity South.
Practical Aspects of IP Arbitration: Improving the negotiating position Olav Jaeger September 14, 2009.
1 Twinning Project “Strengthening the Protection and Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights in Ukraine” TRADEMARKS IN EU Monica POP, Prosecutor IPR.
Hussain Abbasi.  Definitions  Types and Rights  Legal Protections  Their use in the industry Software/Hardware production  Cases  Questions.
World Intellectual Property Organization International Protection of Geographical Indications Overview and Recent Developments Tbilisi, October 28, 2009.
A: Copy –Rights – Artistic, Literary work, Computer software Etc. B: Related Rights – Performers, Phonogram Producers, Broadcasters etc. C: Industrial.
Olivier Rukundo. Copyright provisions Article 6 A work, except a broadcast, programme-carrying signal or a traditional work, shall not be eligible for.
© Melanie Fiedler, Attorney at law 2005 Sofia The Community Trade Mark The functions of a trade mark distinguishing the goods or services of one undertaking.
Recently Established Registration Systems for Geographical Indications JAMAICA Loreen Walker Executive Director Jamaica Intellectual Property Office.
Milano, TRADEMARK. A trademark is a sign capable of distinguishing the goods or services produced or provided by one company from those of.
WELCOME TO ALL DELEGATES WELCOME TO ALL DELEGATES By Dr. S. N. Maity Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks Office of The Controller General.
Lisbon System Built-in Flexibilities of the Lisbon System Forum on Geographical Indications and Appellations of Origin Lisbon, October 30 and 31, 2008.
Ip4inno 1 A.Copyright B. ‘Reputation’ and common law trade marks C. Unregistered designs D. Semiconductor topography right.
Registering your brand
Geographical Indications
Existing Approaches on the National and International Levels
Geographical Indications
International IP Roundtable UNLV, 8 April Seizure of Goods in Transit
Intellectual Property, Patents, Trademarks, Copyright, and Franchising
THE SCOPE OF PROTECTION OF WELL-KNOWN TRADEMARKS
IP Protection under the WTO
Intellectual property
Geographical Indications Symposium Beijing, China June 26-28, 2007
Presentation transcript:

International Standards for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights: Trademarks and Geographical Indications Cynthia Henderson, Attorney-Advisor U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (571)

Trademarks and Geographical Indications – TRIPs Trademark Subject Matter (TRIPs) Well-known marks (TRIPs) Geographical Indications (TRIPs)

Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of International Property Rights (the TRIPs Agreement) The most detailed and comprehensive multilateral agreement on intellectual property yet negotiated

TRIPs – Whats the big deal? –In a single agreement, it establishes minimum standards of protection for the most important forms of intellectual property, including trademarks and geographical indications. –It establishes standards for enforcement of those forms of intellectual property. –It provides a binding, enforceable dispute settlement mechanism.

TRIPS Substantive Provisions Articles 15 – 21 Trademarks Articles 22 – 24 Geographical Indications

Article 15 Any sign, or combination of signs, capable of distinguishing the goods or services of one undertaking from those of other undertakings, shall be capable of constituting a trademark. Such signs, in particular words including personal names, letters, numerals, figurative elements and combinations of colours as well as any combination of such signs shall be eligible for registration as trademarks.

Eligible Subject Matter In the U.S., trademarks can be slogans, letters, numbers, logos, three dimensional designs, colors, scents, and sounds that indicate the source of a good or service to consumers.

Eligible Subject Matter, cont. Slogans: Plop, Plop, Fizz, Fizz, Oh What a Relief it is.. for medicine for stomach upset Letters: IBM for personal computers or FRISBEE for flying discs. Numbers: 311 for entertainment services – the name of a rock band. Logos: Nike Swoosh for athletic apparel. Three dimensional designs:Hersheys Kisses for chocolate candy Colors: Pink for Fiberglass Insulation Scents: Cherry scented motor oil Sounds: NBC chimes for TV programming

Trademarks are linked to a good or service Coca-Cola is a trademark for soft drinks. Nike is a trademark for athletic shoes and clothing. Marlboro is a trademark for cigarettes. ESPN is a service mark for television sports shows.

Article 15 Any sign, or combination of signs, capable of distinguishing the goods or services of one undertaking from those of other undertakings, shall be capable of constituting a trademark.

Capable of Distinguishing Goods or Services?

TRIPS Article 16 The owner of a registered trademark shall have the exclusive right to prevent all third parties not having the owners consent from using in the course of trade identical or similar signs for goods and services which are identical or similar to those in respect of which the trademark is registered where such use would result in a likelihood of confusion.

Trademark Rights Based on Use In the United States, this means that the first user of a mark has the ability to prevent later unauthorized users of the same or similar marks for the same or similar (or related – discussed later) goods or services from continuing the use of the mark. This is not an absolute and exclusive right to use the trademark, just to prevent unauthorized users. Fair uses of the mark by others are allowed. Note user, not registrant.

Likelihood of Confusion The United States Trademark Act, the Lanham Act, says that the USPTO must refuse registration of an application for a mark when it is likely--when the mark is used on or in connection with the goods of the applicant--to cause confusion, to cause mistake, or to deceive. 15 USC Section Two main considerations: Similarity of marks and relatedness of the goods/services.

Related Goods or Services Confusion is not determined based on the same Nice Classification but on the nature of the goods or services and their relatedness. Shoes (Class 25) and Shoelaces (Class 26) – Related Goods but Different Classes. Computers (Class 9) and life-saving buoys (Class 9) - Unrelated Goods but the same Class.

Well-Known Marks Paris Convention Article 6bis Members must protect well-known marks from infringement whether registered or unregistered. This obligation is incorporated into Article 16 of the TRIPS Agreement

Well-Known Marks and Relatedness Relatedness of goods and services is less important in infringements well-known marks. TRIPs Article 16(3): A well-known mark will be found to be infringed even if used on unrelated goods if consumers would be confused and the well-known mark holder would likely be damaged. Buick Aspirin Kodak Shoes

Well-Known Marks – Non-exhaustive List of Factors for Judges to Consider Degree of Distinctiveness Duration and extent of use of the mark Duration and extent of advertising of the mark Extent of geographical trading area Channels of trade Degree of recognition of the mark in those channels of trade Nature and extent of use of the same or similar marks by third parties Whether the mark is registered

WIPO Joint Recommendation on Well-Known Marks Adopted in 1999 by WIPO Member States Guidelines for use by Member States: a non-exhaustive and non-exclusive list of factors to use in determining whether a mark is well-known.

GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS (GIs) TRIPs Arts

TRIPs Article 22 GIs are… Indications which identify a good as originating in the territory of a Member, or a region or locality in that territory, where a given quality, reputation or other characteristic of the good is essentially attributable to its geographic origin. Idaho potatoes, Napa Valley wine, Washington State apples

Geographical Indications as Certification Marks The U.S. view is that GIs are a subset of trademarks because they are both: source- identifiers, guarantees of quality, and business interests. In the U.S., GIs are protected within the trademark system as certification or collective marks.

Certification Marks Can certify: 1)geographic origin; 2) materials used, quality, method of manufacture, and accuracy; or 3)products made under the auspices of, or by members of a specific trade union or organization

Opposition and Cancellation Available to anyone: –1) domestic or foreign, –2) who would be damaged by the registration, or the continued existence of a U.S. registration. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB or Board), of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).

Common Law Geographical Indications Protected through common law trademark law without registration. COGNAC protected as a common-law (unregistered) certification mark in the United States. Institut National Des Appellations v. Brown- Forman Corp, 47 USPQ2d 1875, (TTAB 1998).

Examples of Geographical Indications Protected in the U.S. Roquefort Cheese (France) - U.S. Registration No Idaho Potatoes (U.S.) - U.S. Registration No. 1,735,559 Stilton Cheese (U.K.) - U.S. Reg. No Parma Ham (Italy) - U.S. Reg. No Cognac (France) – common law certification mark

Benefits of the U.S. System Efficiency – utilizes the existing trademark regime Meets TRIPs obligations. System is self-policing - no additional enforcement resources necessary.

Trademark information: Trademark Examination Search System (TESS) is available online at TESS contains all pending applications for registration and all registered marks..tess.uspto.gov

Thank you!