Measuring Upper Limb Capacity in Patients After Stroke: Reliability and Validity of the Stroke Upper Limb Capacity Scale Annemieke Houwink, PT, MSc, Leo D. Roorda, MD, PT, PhD, Wendy Smits, OT, Ivo W. Molenaar, PhD, Alexander C. Geurts, MD, PhD Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Volume 92, Issue 9, Pages 1418-1422 (September 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.03.028 Copyright © 2011 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions
Fig 1 Graphic representation of the 2 measurements of the SULCS at t2 and t3 by 2 different raters. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2011 92, 1418-1422DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2011.03.028) Copyright © 2011 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions
Fig 2 Cross-sectional correlation of the SULCS with the ARAT at t1 (Spearman rank correlation coefficient ρ=.91); the SULCS (range, 0–10) and the ARAT (range, 0–57) are presented on the x and y axis, respectively. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2011 92, 1418-1422DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2011.03.028) Copyright © 2011 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions
Fig 3 Cross-sectional correlation of the SULCS with the RMA at t1 (Spearman rank correlation coefficient ρ=.85); the SULCS (range, 0–10) and the RMA (range, 0–15) are presented on the x and y axis, respectively. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2011 92, 1418-1422DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2011.03.028) Copyright © 2011 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions