CCTI Year Three Research Findings League for Innovation Atlanta, GA March 20, 2006 1/17/2019

Who is JBL Associates? Called in to help after previous contractor had to withdraw because of change in ownership We have worked on similar projects 1/17/2019

What are we Trying to Do? Provide continuation and improvement of the data collection and reporting in the current project Provide help to colleges in using the data for internal management purposes Develop a model based on longitudinal student-level data that other colleges can use 1/17/2019

Third Year Evaluation 1/17/2019

Building a Culture of Evidence 1/17/2019

More Ways to go Wrong than Right Good Implementation Good Pathway Design Bad Implementation Bad Pathway Design 1/17/2019

Objectives Decrease Remediation Improve Enrollment Persistence Improve Academic Achievement Increase the Number of Postsecondary Degrees Increase Progress in Education or Work 1/17/2019

Objective 1: Decrease Remediation Measures Indicators of achievement of objective Rate remediation decreases Percentage decrease Number of students in pathway Total CCTI Summary for all Partner sites Total number of CCTI and high school students in CCTI pathways Key indicators 2004-2005 Percent needing remediation: Math: 34.5% Reading: 25.6% Writing: 26.5% 2005-2006 Math: 34.2% Reading: 18.5% Writing: 21.4% 1/17/2019

Objective 2: Enrollment Persistence Measures Indicators of achievement of objective Number and percentage persisting Completion rates NSSE/CESSE data on engagement Total CCTI Summary for all Partner sites Total number of CCTI pathway students persisting Key indicators 2004-2005 Total enrollment 2,672 2005-2006 Total enrollment: 4,997 Up 87% Site persistence: 70.7% HS persistence: 38.7% 1/17/2019

Objective 3: Academic Achievement Measures Indicators of achievement of objective Remedial test results Improvement on GPA and course grades over time College-level credit earned by high school students Total CCTI Summary for all Partner sites Total number of CCTI pathway students tested & entered pathways Key indicators 2004-2005 65.5% of HS students earned college credit 2005-2006 67.3% of HS students earned college credit 1/17/2019

Objective 4: Postsecondary Degrees Measures Indicators of achievement of objective Number of postsecondary degrees, certificates, or licenses earned Pathway degrees vs. non-pathway degrees earned Total CCTI Summary for all Partner sites Total number of CCTI pathway students receiving degrees or certificates Key indicators 2004-2005 No degrees yet awarded 2005-2006 1/17/2019

Objective 5: Further Education or Work Measures Indicators of achievement of objective Transfer rates into further higher education Job attainment numbers Pathway student achievement vs. non-Pathway Total CCTI Summary for all Partner sites Total number of CCTI pathway students transferred, job entry Key indicators 2004-2005 No graduates to date 2005-2006 1/17/2019

Aggregate Measures of Success 1/17/2019

Number of Participating High Schools 40 48 55 20 60 Year Number Fall 2003 Fall 2004 Fall 2005 1/17/2019

Number of Enrollees at CCTI Partner High Schools by Grade (2004 and 2005) 888 903 1,145 1,627 466 524 743 758 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 Number Fall 2004 Fall 2005 9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade 12th Grade 2004 Total HS Enrollment 2,491 2005 Total HS Enrollment Percent Increase 4,563 +83% 1/17/2019

Persistence from Spring 2005 to Fall 2005 EDUCATION AND TRAINING Cohort 2 Percent HS Graduates Spring 2005 Students in CCTI Sites Fall 2005 (No. of Enrollees/ No. of Graduates) Anne Arundel Community College 44 17 38.6% Maricopa Community Colleges 74 95 128.4% Lorain County Community College 122 39 32.0% Subtotal 240 151 62.9% 1/17/2019

Persistence from Spring 2005 to Fall 2005 HEALTH SCIENCE Cohort 2 Percent HS Graduates Spring 2005 Students in CCTI Sites Fall 2005 (No. of Enrollees/ No. of Graduates) Ivy Tech CC of Indiana 30 6 20.0% Miami Dade College 100.0% Northern Virginia CC 33 3 9.1% Subtotal 69 15 21.7% 1/17/2019

Persistence from Spring 2005 to Fall 2005 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Cohort 2 Percent HS Graduates Spring 2005 Students in CCTI Sites Fall 2005 (No. of Enrollees/ No. of Graduates) Central Piedmont CC 87 10 11.5% Corning Community College 43 3 7.0% Southwestern Oregon CC 1 0.0% Subtotal 131 13 9.9% 1/17/2019

Persistence from Spring 2005 to Fall 2005 LAW, PUBLIC SAFETY AND SECURITY Cohort 2 Percent HS Graduates Spring 2005 Students in CCTI Sites Fall 2005 (No. of Enrollees/ No. of Graduates) Fox Valley Technical College 53 15 28.3% Prince George's CC 11 2 18.2% San Diego CC District 82 34 41.5% Subtotal 146 51 34.9% 1/17/2019

Persistence from Spring 2005 to Fall 2005 SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING AND MATHEMATICS Cohort 2 Percent HS Graduates Spring 2005 Students in CCTI Sites Fall 2005 (No. of Enrollees/ No. of Graduates) Lehigh Carbon Community College 45 32 71.1% Sinclair Community College 121 44 36.4% St. Louis Community College 39 0* 0.0% Subtotal 205 76 37.1% TOTAL 791 306 38.7% 1/17/2019

CCTI Enrollment Summary 2004 2005 High School Enrollment 2,491 4,563 Cohort 1 College Enrollment 181 128 Cohort 2 College Enrollment NA 306 Total CCTI Enrollment 2,672 4,997 1/17/2019

Remediation in Reading Cohort 1 (Fall 2004) Versus Cohort 2 (Fall 2005): % of CCTI Students Requiring Remedial Courses 25.6% 18.5% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Percent Fall 2004 (32 of 125 students) Fall 2005 (43 of 232 students) 1/17/2019

Remediation in Writing Cohort 1 (Fall 2004) Versus Cohort 2 (Fall 2005): % of CCTI Students Requiring Remedial Courses 26.5% 21.4% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Percent Fall 2004 (32 of 121 students) Fall 2005 (50 of 234 students) 1/17/2019

Remediation in Mathematics Cohort 1 (Fall 2004) Versus Cohort 2 (Fall 2005): % of CCTI Students Requiring Remedial Courses 33.8% 41.1% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Percent Fall 2004 (27 of 80 students) Fall 2005 (81 of 197 students) 1/17/2019

Remediation in Algebra Cohort 1 (Fall 2004) Versus Cohort 2 (Fall 2005): % of CCTI Students Requiring Remedial Courses 36.1% 14.5% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Percent Fall 2004 (13 of 36 students) Fall 2005 (10 of 69 students) 1/17/2019

Remediation by Occupational Cluster, 2005  %/# of Students Requiring Remediation Math/Algebra Reading Writing Education and Training 41.6% 7.2% 15.2% (57 of 137) (9 of 125) (19 of 125) Health Science 31.6% 44.4% (6 of 19) (4 of 9) Information Technology 88.9% (8 of 18) (8 of 9) Law, Public Safety and Security 42.1% (8 of 19) Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics 16.4% 19.7% 15.1% (12 of 73) (14 of 71) (11 of 73) Total Percentage/ 34.2% 18.5% 21.4% Number of Students (91 of 266) (43 of 232) (50 of 234) 1/17/2019

Primary Type of Improvement Plan 21.86% 18.58% 17.49% 12.57% 8.20% 6.01% 5.46% 3.28% 2.19% 1.64% 0.55% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% Curriculum Alignment and/or Articulation Professional Development Enrollment Remediation Career Educational Persistence Employment/Work Opportunities Skills Guidance Counseling Student Perceptions New Credential Financial Aid Primary Type of Improvement Percent 1/17/2019

Summary Small numbers of students in cohorts reduce reliability of findings Most indicators show improvement Enrollment is up, and remediation is down Attention should be paid to remedial math Aligning curriculum and professional development are the primary strategies being used by project sites 1/17/2019

Next steps Collect next year’s data and develop report Consider new data elements to track improvement Benchmark your improvements Find ways for other colleges to participate Help colleges integrate student tracking data into their management decisions 1/17/2019

For Further Help and Information John Lee JBL Associates, Inc. jbl@jblassoc.com or Sue Clery sclery@jblassoc.com 1/17/2019

Any Questions or Comments? 1/17/2019