Lateral capacity = 300 MDth/d

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Shipper AShipper B Shipper C New 50 MDth/d Firm Load MDO = 100 MDth/d CMQ = 80 MDth/d MDO = 200 MDth/d CMQ = 50 MDth/d Lateral capacity = 300 MDth/d Given:

Advertisements

Lottery Method in BPA’s Simultaneous Submission Windows and Potential Application to the Simultaneous Defender Matching Process NAESB Meeting 05/01/13.

TransCanada Mainline O.E.B. STAR Presentation 5/20/2008.

Regulations Governing the Conduct of Open Seasons for Alaska Natural Gas Transportation Projects Federal Energy Regulatory Commission February 9, 2005.

Hybrid freight market: storyline -E-markets for freight capacity now rely mostly on volume information and are rather static (function within the existing.

Chapter 4: Corporate Nonliquidating Distributions

Commercial Terms in Pipeline Transportation & Gas Processing Agreements Dwight Howes Partner Reed Smith LLP

1 Finance School of Management Chapter 9. Valuation of Common Stocks Objective Explain equity evaluation Using discounting Dividend policy and wealth.

General Equilibrium and Efficiency. General Equilibrium Analysis is the study of the simultaneous determination of prices and quantities in all relevant.

Transportation Models Transportation problem is about distribution of goods and services from several supply locations to several demand locations. Transportation.

Post-16 Funding Allocations 2015/16 Allocations Timeline and Process Colin Stronach – Head of Allocations November 2014.

CSEP Transportation Charges 11 th August Background Action NEX0604 from 18 th June PN UNC requested Xoserve to provide a presentation on how Supply.

Nominations and Scheduling Questar Gas Company Annual Account Management Customer Meeting Will Schwarzenbach Director, Gas Supply.

UNC Modification Proposal 0116 Reform of the NTS Offtake Arrangements Transmission Workstream 5 th October 2006.

Entry Capacity Release Methodology Statement Transmission Workstream, 4 th May 2006.

® July 30 th, 2014 Utah PSC Technical Conference.

Supply Chain Management Location of Inventory General Idea: Store as little inventory as possible while still being responsive to customer. Approaches:

OSC Meeting April 27, Transmission Cost Allocation Overview.

Changes to the Network Emergency Co-ordinator (NEC) Safety Case resulting from Exit Reform UNC Workgroup 0412 Meeting – 1 st March 2012.

Chapter 25 Short-Term Business Decisions

Mod 214 – Reservation of firm NTS Exit Capacity at new NTS Exit Points in the transitional period Steve Rose.

Distribution Network Interruption - Initialisation 28 September 2010.

DNPC08 Review of Standard LDZ System Charges 6 September 2010.

1 Review Group 264 Rules & Options Analysis for BSSOQ Methodology Changes Post MOD th September 2009.

Exit Capacity Release Methodology Statement - ExCR Transmission Workstream – 5 th March 2009.

Project Nexus : Funding Arrangements Joel Martin - 30 April 2009.

Time Remaining 20:00.

CMP PROPOSAL FOR HARMONISATION Madrid 11 th July 2011.

Exit Capacity Release Methodology Statement - ExCR Transmission Workstream – 5 th Feb 2009.

Energy SectorEnergy Automation: Shafiu © Siemens AG 2010 Page 1 HV and EHV allocation of harmonic rights.

© 2011 The Williams Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Consolidated Nominations Jeramie Kilpack Mary White.

Allocation of capacities. 2 Allocation of Capacities Determination of capacities Calculation of pipeline capacities is based on the physical laws governing.

Nominations PEA Meeting October Why ask for Nominations? In a common carriage system gas flows must be approved in advance to keep them within pipeline.

Congestion Management

Daniel DeWees Justin Widjaja Samuel Djahanbani April 5, 2012

Supply Point Capacity BSSOQ and Supply Point ratchets

Example for 1:n bundling with three TSOs

Conclusions STC Core Group 8 September 2009 The Hague

BPA Formal Comments Overview to NAESB OS

Capacity Conversion – 616s

Workshop on transportation routes Region South-South East

Microeconomics I Perfect Competition

DISCRETIONARY GRANTS UPDATE 04 – 13 OCTOBER 2017

مدیریت استراتژيک منابع انسانی

THE ECONOMY: THE CORE PROJECT

Counting & Comparing Money 2 $ $ $ $.

Counting & Comparing Money $ $ $ $.

LDZ System Charges – Structure Methodology 26 July 2010

I PRO' -.._ r.. f FOLLOW I 0.

Rich Hydzik, Avista NWPP RSGC Vice-Chair

Capacity Methodology Statements: Impact of Mod 452

Developing capacity & connection processes: A long term non firm capacity product? 27th June 2012.

Reduction of Exit Capacity at DM Supply Points

Unit 4 Problem Set Rubric

Questions for Consultation

Background to National Grid’s Baseline analysis

0476 Alignment of DN Charging Methodology with RIIO-GD1 Arrangements

Supply Point Capacity BSSOQ and Supply Point ratchets

MOD Deemed applications – User pays initial thoughts.

Ռազմավարական կառավարում

Wales & West Utilities Mod 0671 User Commitment

Discussions The MPC is A) the change in consumption divided by the change in income. B) consumption divided by income. C) the change in consumption divided.

Every number has its place!

Further Investigations on Averages

PRISMA General Information

Two-Tier Firm Curtailment Overview

Costs and Benefits of a Tariff

Shippers’ Meeting 29 June 2005

Capacity validation, renominations and within-day capacity purchase

Enabling Large Scale Utilisation of Class 3

Presentation transcript:

Lateral capacity = 300 MDth/d Shipper C New 50 MDth/d Firm Load Shipper A Shipper B MDO = 100 MDth/d CMQ = 80 MDth/d MDO = 200 MDth/d CMQ = 50 MDth/d Lateral capacity = 300 MDth/d Given: Shipper A and Shipper B CMQ and MDO’s as stated above (no other shippers on lateral) New Shipper C requesting firm 50 MDth/d load at a new delivery adjacent to Shipper A and Shipper B delivery points Total of Shipper A and Shipper B MDO’s equal to lateral capacity Determine: Shipper A and Shipper B MDO reductions to accommodate new Shipper C firm transportation request of 50 MDth/d Methodology: Determine total MDO in excess of total CMQ. Excess MDO Shipper A = (100-80) MDth/d = 20 MDth/d; Excess MDO Shipper B = (200-50) MDth/d = 150 MDth/d Total Excess MDO Shipper A + Shipper B = (20+150) = 170 MDth/d Determine total MDO available after 50 MDth/d firm transportation request. MDO Available after request = Total Excess MDO – Firm Transportation Request = (170-50) MDth/d = 120 MDth/d Determine allocation of remaining MDO to Shipper A and Shipper B based on pro-rata CMQ Shipper A allocation of MDO in excess of CMQ = (CMQ Shipper A/Total CMQ)*Available MDO = (80/(80+50))*120 = 74 MDth/d Shipper B allocation of MDO in excess of CMQ = (CMQ Shipper B/Total CMQ)*Available MDO = (50/(80+50))*120 = 46 MDth/d Determine new MDO’s for Shipper A and Shipper B (subject to the limitation that new MDO cannot exceed original MDO) New Shipper A MDO = CMQ+Shipper A allocation of MDO = (80+74) MDth/d = 154 MDth/d. New MDO cannot be greater than existing MDO, implying new MDO Shipper A = 100 MDth/d (unchanged). Therefore all MDO reductions will come from Shipper B. New Shipper B MDO = (200-50) MDth/d = 150 MDth/d

Lateral capacity = 300 MDth/d Shipper C New 50 MDth/d Firm Load Shipper A Shipper B MDO = 100 MDth/d CMQ = 80 MDth/d MDO = 200 MDth/d CMQ = 150 MDth/d Lateral capacity = 300 MDth/d Given: Shipper A and Shipper B CMQ and MDO’s as stated above (no other shippers on lateral) New Shipper C requesting firm 50 MDth/d load at a new delivery adjacent to Shipper A and Shipper B delivery points Total of Shipper A and Shipper B MDO’s equal to lateral capacity Determine: Shipper A and Shipper B MDO reductions to accommodate new Shipper C firm transportation request of 50 MDth/d Methodology: Determine total MDO in excess of total CMQ. Excess MDO Shipper A = (100-80) MDth/d = 20 MDth/d; Excess MDO Shipper B = (200-150) MDth/d = 50 MDth/d Total Excess MDO Shipper A + Shipper B = (20+50) = 70 MDth/d Determine total MDO available after 50 MDth/d firm transportation request. MDO Available after request = Total Excess MDO – Firm Transportation Request = (70-50) MDth/d = 20 MDth/d Determine allocation of remaining MDO to Shipper A and Shipper B based on pro-rata CMQ Shipper A allocation of MDO in excess of CMQ = (CMQ Shipper A/Total CMQ)*Available MDO = (80/(80+150))*20 = 7 MDth/d Shipper B allocation of MDO in excess of CMQ = (CMQ Shipper B/Total CMQ)*Available MDO = (150/(80+150))*20 = 13 MDth/d Determine new MDO’s for Shipper A and Shipper B New Shipper A MDO = CMQ+Shipper A allocation of MDO = (80+7) MDth/d = 87 MDth/d. New Shipper B MDO = CMQ+Shipper B allocation of MDO = (150+13) MDth/d = 163 MDth/d