Volume 2, Issue 5, Pages (November 1998)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Alain Verreault, Paul D Kaufman, Ryuji Kobayashi, Bruce Stillman  Cell 
Advertisements

BRCA1 Is Associated with a Human SWI/SNF-Related Complex
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (June 2000)
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Apaf-1, a Human Protein Homologous to C
Kre1p, the Plasma Membrane Receptor for the Yeast K1 Viral Toxin
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 94, Issue 1, Pages (July 1998)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 87, Issue 1, Pages (October 1996)
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages (June 2007)
RSC, an Essential, Abundant Chromatin-Remodeling Complex
Replication-Independent Histone Deposition by the HIR Complex and Asf1
Jin Yang, Hal P. Bogerd, P.Jeremy Wang, David C. Page, Bryan R. Cullen 
Volume 35, Issue 5, Pages (September 2009)
John T. Arigo, Kristina L. Carroll, Jessica M. Ames, Jeffry L. Corden 
Volume 87, Issue 2, Pages (October 1996)
ATP-Dependent Positive Supercoiling of DNA by 13S Condensin: A Biochemical Implication for Chromosome Condensation  Keiji Kimura, Tatsuya Hirano  Cell 
Volume 8, Issue 24, Pages S (December 1998)
Volume 111, Issue 3, Pages (November 2002)
Stabilization of Chromatin Structure by PRC1, a Polycomb Complex
Volume 89, Issue 3, Pages (May 1997)
Alain Verreault, Paul D Kaufman, Ryuji Kobayashi, Bruce Stillman  Cell 
The Nuclear Hat1p/Hat2p Complex
The complex containing actin-related proteins Arp2 and Arp3 is required for the motility and integrity of yeast actin patches  Dirk Winter, Alexandre.
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Volume 91, Issue 4, Pages (November 1997)
The Cdk-Activating Kinase (CAK) from Budding Yeast
Class C Vps Protein Complex Regulates Vacuolar SNARE Pairing and Is Required for Vesicle Docking/Fusion  Trey K. Sato, Peter Rehling, Michael R. Peterson,
Rng2p, a protein required for cytokinesis in fission yeast, is a component of the actomyosin ring and the spindle pole body  Karen Eng, Naweed I Naqvi,
Volume 122, Issue 5, Pages (September 2005)
A Branched Pathway Governing the Activation of a Developmental Transcription Factor by Regulated Intramembrane Proteolysis  Nathalie Campo, David Z. Rudner 
Cdc7-Dbf4 Phosphorylates MCM Proteins via a Docking Site-Mediated Mechanism to Promote S Phase Progression  Yi-Jun Sheu, Bruce Stillman  Molecular Cell 
Histone-like TAFs Are Essential for Transcription In Vivo
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (March 2002)
p53 Protein Exhibits 3′-to-5′ Exonuclease Activity
Hyunsuk Suh, Dane Z. Hazelbaker, Luis M. Soares, Stephen Buratowski 
Volume 99, Issue 7, Pages (December 1999)
Mediator–Nucleosome Interaction
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (April 2005)
The DnaK Chaperone System Facilitates 30S Ribosomal Subunit Assembly
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (April 2001)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
S. pombe cdc11p, together with sid4p, provides an anchor for septation initiation network proteins on the spindle pole body  Andrea Krapp, Susanne Schmidt,
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (October 1998)
Replication-Independent Histone Deposition by the HIR Complex and Asf1
A Suppressor of Two Essential Checkpoint Genes Identifies a Novel Protein that Negatively Affects dNTP Pools  Xiaolan Zhao, Eric G.D Muller, Rodney Rothstein 
Cdc18 Enforces Long-Term Maintenance of the S Phase Checkpoint by Anchoring the Rad3-Rad26 Complex to Chromatin  Damien Hermand, Paul Nurse  Molecular.
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 61, Issue 2, Pages (January 2016)
Condensins, Chromosome Condensation Protein Complexes Containing XCAP-C, XCAP-E and a Xenopus Homolog of the Drosophila Barren Protein  Tatsuya Hirano,
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 87, Issue 5, Pages (November 1996)
Evaluation of a Diffusion-Driven Mechanism for Substrate Ubiquitination by the SCF- Cdc34 Ubiquitin Ligase Complex  Matthew D. Petroski, Gary Kleiger,
Histone H2A.Z Regulates Transcription and Is Partially Redundant with Nucleosome Remodeling Complexes  Maria Soledad Santisteban, Tatyana Kalashnikova,
J.Russell Lipford, Stephen P Bell  Molecular Cell 
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Jessica S. Williams, Takeshi Hayashi, Mitsuhiro Yanagida, Paul Russell 
Volume 87, Issue 5, Pages (November 1996)
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)
Transcriptional Termination Factors for RNA Polymerase II in Yeast
Elva Dı́az, Suzanne R Pfeffer  Cell 
D.Michelle Brady, Kevin G. Hardwick  Current Biology 
Minoru Funakoshi, Robert J. Tomko, Hideki Kobayashi, Mark Hochstrasser 
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (December 1998)
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (January 2003)
The Engagement of Sec61p in the ER Dislocation Process
A SWI/SNF–Related Chromatin Remodeling Complex, E-RC1, Is Required for Tissue- Specific Transcriptional Regulation by EKLF In Vitro  Jennifer A Armstrong,
Volume 84, Issue 2, Pages (January 1996)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 2, Issue 5, Pages 639-651 (November 1998) Two Actin-Related Proteins Are Shared Functional Components of the Chromatin- Remodeling Complexes RSC and SWI/SNF  Bradley R Cairns, Hediye Erdjument-Bromage, Paul Tempst, Fred Winston, Roger D Kornberg  Molecular Cell  Volume 2, Issue 5, Pages 639-651 (November 1998) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80162-8

Figure 1 SWI/SNF and RSC Complexes Contain Two Proteins Similar to Actin (A) Purified SWI/SNF and RSC. For SWI/SNF, the immune eluate from an anti-Snf6 immuno-affinity column (described in Cairns et al. 1994) is shown stained with silver. For RSC, Fraction #36 from from Mono S (described in Cairns et al. 1996c) is shown stained with Coomassie. (B) Actin is divided into four structural domains. The locations of ATP and the divalent ion (large bullet) are indicated. Adapted from Kabsch et al. 1990 with permission. (C) Alignments of actin (S. cerevisiae Act1) with Arp7, Arp9, and human Baf53 reveal similarity of the yeast Arp proteins to actin in domains 1 and 3, but not 2 or 4. At left is a diagram showing the order of the domains shown in (B) as the actin main chain is traced through the alignments. The locations of the mutations conferring temperature sensitivity (isolated by random mutagenesis) are shown as bullets (·), and the locations chosen for site-directed replacements with asterisks (*). Positions showing amino acid similarity are shaded Molecular Cell 1998 2, 639-651DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80162-8)

Figure 2 Arp7 and Arp9 Cofractionate with RSC or SWI/SNF For both SWI/SNF and RSC purification, yeast extracts were initially fractionated on Bio-Rex 70, DEAE Sephacel, hydroxylapatite, and Mono Q (Cairns et al. 1994, Cairns et al. 1996c) prior to resolution on the columns indicated. (A) Arp7 and Arp9 cofractionate on Mono S and TSK-heparin, and coelute with the RSC. For TSK-heparin (upper panel), adsorbed proteins were eluted in a buffer with a linear gradient of 200–800 mM potassium acetate. For Mono S (lower panel), adsorbed proteins were eluted in a buffer with a linear gradient of 100–800 mM potassium acetate. For each, fractions (approximately 2.5 μg per lane) were separated in an SDS-10% acrylamide gel and immunoblotted with anti-Rsc6p, anti-Arp7, and anti-Arp9 antiserum. (B) Arp7 and Arp9 cofractionate on TSK-heparin with SWI/SNF complex. Adsorbed proteins were eluted in a buffer with a linear gradient of 200–800 mM potassium acetate. For each, fractions (approximately 2.0 μg per lane) were separated in an SDS-10% acrylamide gels and immunoblotted separately with anti-Snf6, anti-Arp7, or anti-Arp9 antiserum. Molecular Cell 1998 2, 639-651DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80162-8)

Figure 3 Arp7 Antibodies Immunodeplete Arp9 Protein and Other Members of RSC (A) Arp7 and Arp9 antibodies are specific for their antigen. Pure RSC (Mono S fraction #36, 250 ng) was separated on two neighboring lanes of a SDS-10% acrylamide gel and immunoblotted with anti-Rsc6 antiserum and either anti-Arp7 antiserum (lane 1) or anti-Arp9 antiserum (lane 2). (B) Immunoprecipitation of RSC with anti-Arp7 antibodies. A fraction containing highly purified RSC (heparin fraction #38, 1 μg) was treated with either Anti-Arp7 antibodies or anti-Snf6 antibodies conjugated to protein A–Sepharose. The following were separated in a SDS-10% acrylamide gel and immunoblotted: pure RSC (Mono S fraction #36, 250 ng, lane 1), heparin RSC (Fraction #38, 500 ng, lane 2), half of the anti-Arp7 supernatant (lane 3), half of the anti-Arp7 immune eluate (lane 4), half of the anti-Snf6 supernatant (lane 5), or half of the anti-Snf6 immune eluate (lane 6). (C) Immunoprecipitation of RSC with anti-Arp9 antibodies. RSC (heparin fraction #38, 1 μg) was treated with either Anti-Arp9 antibodies or anti-Snf6 antibodies conjugated to protein A–Sepharose. The following were separated in a SDS-10% acrylamide gel and immunoblotted: pure RSC (Mono S fraction #36, 250 ng, lane 1), heparin RSC (500 ng, lane 2), half of the anti-Arp9 supernatant (lane 3), half of the anti-Arp9 immune eluate (lane 4), half of the anti-Snf6 supernatant (lane 5), or half of the anti-Snf6 immune eluate (lane 6). Molecular Cell 1998 2, 639-651DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80162-8)

Figure 4 ARP7 and ARP9 Are Essential for Mitotic Growth in S288C Genetic Background and Important for Growth in W303 Genetic Background Diploids heterozygous for either an arp7Δ mutation or an arp9Δ mutation were sporulated and dissected. Four representative tetrads are shown, with the four spores (A–D) from each tetrad in a horizontal row. (A) ARP7 and ARP9 are essential in S288C background. Dissections of the S288C heterozygous diploids YBC16 (arp7Δ::LEU2/ARP7, top panel) and YBC20 (arp9Δ::LEU2/ARP9, lower panel). More extensive growth of S288C tetrads (ten days) did not reveal microcolonies with an arpΔ genotype. (B) ARP7 and ARP9 are not essential for growth in W303 background. Dissections of W303 heterozygous diploids BCY340 (arp7Δ::LEU2/ARP7, top panel) and BCY330 (arp9Δ::LEU2/ARP9, lower panel). Tetrads were grown for eight days at 30°C. Molecular Cell 1998 2, 639-651DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80162-8)

Figure 5 Temperature-Sensitive Mutations in ARP7 and ARP9 (A) Growth of arp7 Ts− strains at permissive (30°C) and nonpermissive (37°C) temperatures. Strains: WT, BY4727; or YBC726 transformants harboring 2 μm ARP7 (pY24LIB.ARP7), ARP7 (pNCT.ARP7) (wild type); those bearing arp7 Ts− mutations contain pNCT.arp7–122 (YBC776), pNCT.arp7–161 (YBC777), and pNCT.-arp7–162 (YBC778). (B) Growth of the Ts− arp9–661 strain at permissive (30°C) and nonpermissive (37°C) temperature. Strains: WT, BY4727; arp9–661, YBC775 harboring pNCT.arp9–661; arp9Δ, YBC790 harboring pNCT.ARP9. All strains are S288C derivatives. Molecular Cell 1998 2, 639-651DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80162-8)

Figure 6 Ts− Mutations in ARP7 and ARP9 Confer a Moderate Spt− Phenotype (A) Growth of strains bearing Ts− arp7 mutations and the δ element insertion alleles his4–912δ and lys2–128δ. Strains were grown as patches on YPD, replica-plated to synthetic media lacking either histidine or lysine and grown for five days at 30°C. Strains: all are YBC726 harbouring plasmids with the indicated arp7 Ts− mutations except wild type (WT, FY120) and spt6–14 (FY957). (B) Growth of the Ts− arp9–661 strain. YBC780 harboring the plasmid pNCT.arp6–661 or pNCT. ARP9. The wild-type (WT) strain is FY2. All strains are S288C derivatives. Molecular Cell 1998 2, 639-651DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80162-8)

Figure 7 ARP7 Mutations and Their Phenotypes Superimposed on the Crystal Structure of Actin The locations of the alterations in Arp7 and Arp9 are based on the sequence alignments presented in Figure 1C. Red dots identify the locations of the arp7 Ts− substitutions. Green dots identify the locations of site-directed replacements performed with both ARP7 and ARP9 that were designed to impair ATP hydrolysis (all of which conferred no phenotype). The large blue dot identifies the location of the divalent cation. Adapted from Kabsch et al. 1990 with permission. Molecular Cell 1998 2, 639-651DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80162-8)