Size constancy following long-term visual deprivation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
From: Metacontrast masking within and between visual channels: Effects of orientation and spatial frequency contrasts Journal of Vision. 2010;10(6):12.
Advertisements

Journal of Vision. 2011;11(10):16. doi: / Figure Legend:
Neuroscience: What You See and Hear Is What You Get
Annual 10-Month Aerial Life Phase in the Common Swift Apus apus
Unsupervised statistical learning in newly hatched chicks
Victoria F. Ratcliffe, David Reby  Current Biology 
Volume 26, Issue 21, Pages R1135-R1136 (November 2016)
Musical Consonance: The Importance of Harmonicity
Volume 27, Issue 14, Pages e5 (July 2017)
Aaron R. Seitz, Praveen K. Pilly, Christopher C. Pack  Current Biology 
Pre-constancy Vision in Infants
Visual Development: Learning Not to See
Chimpanzees Trust Their Friends
Tzvi Ganel, Eran Chajut, Daniel Algom  Current Biology 
G. Lorimer Moseley, Timothy J. Parsons, Charles Spence  Current Biology 
Volume 24, Issue 15, Pages (August 2014)
Visual Attention: Bottom-Up Versus Top-Down
Sergei Gepshtein, Martin S. Banks  Current Biology 
Ingvars Birznieks, Richard M. Vickery  Current Biology 
Unsupervised statistical learning in newly hatched chicks
Depth Affects Where We Look
Kevin R. Duffy, Donald E. Mitchell  Current Biology 
Matias J. Ison, Rodrigo Quian Quiroga, Itzhak Fried  Neuron 
Annual 10-Month Aerial Life Phase in the Common Swift Apus apus
Ayelet McKyton, Itay Ben-Zion, Ravid Doron, Ehud Zohary 
Jason Samaha, Bradley R. Postle  Current Biology 
Differential Impact of Behavioral Relevance on Quantity Coding in Primate Frontal and Parietal Neurons  Pooja Viswanathan, Andreas Nieder  Current Biology 
Visual Attention: Size Matters
Young Children Do Not Integrate Visual and Haptic Form Information
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages R453-R455 (June 2008)
Immediate susceptibility to visual illusions after sight onset
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages R265-R266 (April 2013)
Children, but Not Chimpanzees, Prefer to Collaborate
A Dedicated Binding Mechanism for the Visual Control of Movement
Twitter as a means to study temporal behaviour
Kevin R. Duffy, Donald E. Mitchell  Current Biology 
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages R262-R263 (March 2014)
Neuronal Response Gain Enhancement prior to Microsaccades
Spatiotopic Visual Maps Revealed by Saccadic Adaptation in Humans
Thomas S Collett, Paul Graham  Current Biology 
Attentive Tracking of Sound Sources
Planar Cell Polarity: Microtubules Make the Connection with Cilia
Visual Sensitivity Can Scale with Illusory Size Changes
Acrosomal Actin: Twists and Turns of a Versatile Filament
Volume 27, Issue 13, Pages R631-R636 (July 2017)
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages R188-R189 (March 2015)
Peng Zhang, Min Bao, Miyoung Kwon, Sheng He, Stephen A. Engel 
Stephen G. Lomber, Blake E. Butler  Current Biology 
Noa Raz, Ella Striem, Golan Pundak, Tanya Orlov, Ehud Zohary 
Meiosis: Checking Chromosomes Pair up Properly
Group Behaviour: Leadership by Those in Need
Visual Adaptation of the Perception of Causality
Computer Use Changes Generalization of Movement Learning
Motor Control: No Constant but Change
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (June 2013)
Attention Samples Stimuli Rhythmically
Retinal physiology: Adapting to the changing scene
Brain Stimulation: Feeling the Buzz
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages R353-R355 (May 2009)
Daniela Vallentin, Andreas Nieder  Current Biology 
Humans Can Continuously Optimize Energetic Cost during Walking
Sound Facilitates Visual Learning
Volume 21, Issue 23, Pages (December 2011)
Jenni Deveau, Daniel J. Ozer, Aaron R. Seitz  Current Biology 
Manuel Jan Roth, Matthis Synofzik, Axel Lindner  Current Biology 
A Visual Sense of Number
Experience in Early Infancy Is Indispensable for Color Perception
Zoology: A New Mouth for Amphioxus
Endosperm Imprinting: A Child Custody Battle?
Motion-Induced Blindness and Motion Streak Suppression
Presentation transcript:

Size constancy following long-term visual deprivation Elena Andres, Ayelet McKyton, Itay Ben-Zion, Ehud Zohary  Current Biology  Volume 27, Issue 14, Pages R696-R697 (July 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.05.071 Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Size constancy in the newly sighted. (A) Illustration of the experimental setup of the size constancy task. (B) Performance of three exemplary patients a few months after surgery. Their point of subjective equality (PSE) is shown by the arrows. (C) The PSE of all subjects (N = 23) at various times post-surgery. The hatched line indicates assessment based on the probe retinal size. Rhombuses represent the minimum value of probe overestimation of three subjects before surgery (due to a ceiling effect). (D) Picture of the dense cataract of p39 before surgery. (E) The contrast sensitivity function of the same patients from (B). Cutoff frequencies are denoted by arrows. (F) PSE plotted as a function of the cutoff frequency of each subject. The black contour indicates the running average (using 15 data-points). PSE values of controls (N = 20) are depicted on the right side, the open blue circle indicates the group mean value. (G) Illustration of the experimental setup of the visual size discrimination task. (H) An example psychometric function of one subject (p37) depicting the proportion of judgments that the probe cube was larger than the reference, as a function of the probe size. The distance between the two hatched vertical lines is the just noticeable difference (JND). (I) The PSE of the newly sighted patients (N = 22) as a function of their JND in the visual size discrimination task. Both tests were done on the same day. The black contour indicates the running average (using 10 data-points). In all graphs, filled circles mark tests performed pre-surgery. Tasks performend at different times by the same subject are connected by lines. Arrowheads point to the latest test. Current Biology 2017 27, R696-R697DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.05.071) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions