Ingvars Birznieks, Richard M. Vickery  Current Biology 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lixia Gao, Kevin Kostlan, Yunyan Wang, Xiaoqin Wang  Neuron 
Advertisements

Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Volume 21, Issue 18, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages (April 2017)
Predicting Every Spike
Volume 52, Issue 6, Pages (December 2006)
Araceli Ramirez-Cardenas, Maria Moskaleva, Andreas Nieder 
Mark S. Blumberg, Cassandra M. Coleman, Ashlynn I. Gerth, Bob McMurray 
Vincent Jacob, Julie Le Cam, Valérie Ego-Stengel, Daniel E. Shulz 
Pre-constancy Vision in Infants
Responses to Spatial Contrast in the Mouse Suprachiasmatic Nuclei
The Generation of Direction Selectivity in the Auditory System
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages (February 2016)
Beauty Requires Thought
Volume 66, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Selective Attention in an Insect Visual Neuron
Injecting Instructions into Premotor Cortex
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Transformation of Perception from Sensory to Motor Cortex
Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages (May 2001)
Ben Scholl, Xiang Gao, Michael Wehr  Neuron 
Volume 86, Issue 1, Pages (April 2015)
Jason Samaha, Bradley R. Postle  Current Biology 
Differential Impact of Behavioral Relevance on Quantity Coding in Primate Frontal and Parietal Neurons  Pooja Viswanathan, Andreas Nieder  Current Biology 
Feature- and Order-Based Timing Representations in the Frontal Cortex
A Role for the Superior Colliculus in Decision Criteria
Young Children Do Not Integrate Visual and Haptic Form Information
Volume 49, Issue 3, Pages (February 2006)
Jianing Yu, David Ferster  Neuron 
Adaptation Disrupts Motion Integration in the Primate Dorsal Stream
Volume 27, Issue 23, Pages e3 (December 2017)
Volume 28, Issue 15, Pages e5 (August 2018)
Volume 65, Issue 4, Pages (February 2010)
Origin and Function of Tuning Diversity in Macaque Visual Cortex
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
A Scalable Population Code for Time in the Striatum
Uma R. Karmarkar, Dean V. Buonomano  Neuron 
Feng Han, Natalia Caporale, Yang Dan  Neuron 
Volume 84, Issue 2, Pages (October 2014)
Spatiotopic Visual Maps Revealed by Saccadic Adaptation in Humans
Sensory Convergence Solves a Motion Ambiguity Problem
Ryan G. Natan, Winnie Rao, Maria N. Geffen  Cell Reports 
Nicolas Mathevon, Caroline Casey, Colleen Reichmuth, Isabelle Charrier 
Mark S. Blumberg, Cassandra M. Coleman, Ashlynn I. Gerth, Bob McMurray 
Volume 23, Issue 21, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 78, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Robust Selectivity to Two-Object Images in Human Visual Cortex
Gilad A. Jacobson, Peter Rupprecht, Rainer W. Friedrich 
Attention Reorients Periodically
Sébastien Marti, Jean-Rémi King, Stanislas Dehaene  Neuron 
Short-Term Memory for Figure-Ground Organization in the Visual Cortex
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (March 2008)
Supervised Calibration Relies on the Multisensory Percept
Encoding of Oscillations by Axonal Bursts in Inferior Olive Neurons
Tuning to Natural Stimulus Dynamics in Primary Auditory Cortex
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages e6 (August 2018)
Environmental Consistency Determines the Rate of Motor Adaptation
When Correlation Implies Causation in Multisensory Integration
Daniela Vallentin, Andreas Nieder  Current Biology 
Lixia Gao, Kevin Kostlan, Yunyan Wang, Xiaoqin Wang  Neuron 
Volume 21, Issue 23, Pages (December 2011)
Christoph Kayser, Nikos K. Logothetis, Stefano Panzeri  Current Biology 
Supratim Ray, John H.R. Maunsell  Neuron 
Christophe Micheyl, Biao Tian, Robert P. Carlyon, Josef P. Rauschecker 
Motion Adaptation and the Velocity Coding of Natural Scenes
Jacqueline R. Hembrook-Short, Vanessa L. Mock, Farran Briggs 
A Temporal Channel for Information in Sparse Sensory Coding
Visual Crowding Is Correlated with Awareness
Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff in Olfaction
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (June 2013)
Presentation transcript:

Spike Timing Matters in Novel Neuronal Code Involved in Vibrotactile Frequency Perception  Ingvars Birznieks, Richard M. Vickery  Current Biology  Volume 27, Issue 10, Pages 1485-1490.e2 (May 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.04.011 Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Time-Controlled Afferent Spike Trains Created by Short Pulsatile Mechanical Stimuli (A) Schematic representation of a set of four pulsatile vibrotactile stimuli intended to evoke spike trains with the same repetition rate (base periodicity) but strikingly different mean spike rates. Each vertical line indicates the time of the mechanical pulse. (B) Illustrative recording of spike trains evoked in a single human FA-I tactile afferent, demonstrating a perfect match with the temporal pattern of pulsatile stimuli as shown in (A) (one spike per stimulus pulse). Identified single spikes are highlighted in red. Cycle histograms on the right show binned spike count over the 1-s stimulation period, recorded in four consecutive 1-s stimulation periods each consisting of 23 bursts. Each mechanical pulse generated a single action potential without failing on a single occasion. The dashed horizontal line corresponds to the count of 23 spikes. One bin corresponds to 1/40th of the period (∼1.1 ms; the cycle histogram is truncated at 30 ms). The onset latency is the time from when the command was sent to the stimulator at the beginning of each burst to when the spike was recorded from the median nerve at the wrist level; spike jitter was less than 1 ms. See also Figure S1. Current Biology 2017 27, 1485-1490.e2DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.04.011) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Spike Rate Does Not Predict the Perceived Frequency in Psychophysical Tests of Complex Tactile Stimuli (A) Boxplots with whiskers represent the point of subjective equality (PSE) data obtained with stimuli illustrated in Figure 1. The box extends from the 25th to 75th percentiles; the whiskers extend to minimum and maximum values, and circle symbol indicates median. The horizontal dashed line indicates mean (n = 12). Predicted PSE values if the frequency judgment was based on mean spike rate code are indicated using green arrowheads; burst rate, purple arrowheads, reciprocal of burst gap 1/tL, blue arrowheads. The experimentally obtained PSE values indicate that neither the mean spike rate code nor burst rate code can explain the perceived frequency; the closest match is the reciprocal of tL. (B) The reciprocal of burst gap tL provides good match with PSEs. The solid black line connects data points obtained by averaging all of the individual subject data, which are shown by thin gray lines (n = 12). The dotted red line represents the line of identity. See also Figure S2. Current Biology 2017 27, 1485-1490.e2DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.04.011) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Number of Spikes within the Burst Does Not Affect the Perceived Frequency (A) Schematic representation of the stimuli used in the second experiment. The index “d,” standing for “doublet,” is added to the stimulus number to distinguish corresponding stimuli from those in experiment 1. (B) PSE values for the perceived frequency of stimuli shown in (A) (blue line with diamonds; with 95% confidence intervals are shown; n = 12). PSEs for the stimuli depicted in Figure 1 are plotted for comparison (orange line with squares, slightly horizontally shifted). The dashed black lines indicate PSE values predicted by the burst gap code model. Despite the different number of spikes in the two sets of corresponding stimuli, the perceived frequencies were similar. See also Table S1. Current Biology 2017 27, 1485-1490.e2DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.04.011) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Relationship between the Shortest Inter-spike Interval Duration and the Perceived Vibrotactile Frequency (A) Schematic representation of pulsatile vibrotactile stimuli consisting of a repeating pattern of one shorter interval constituting a doublet followed by an 87-ms-long interval. (B) PSE values obtained in psychophysical tests shown with 95% confidence level shaded in gray (n = 12). Individual data points indicated by orange squares and three linear segments as determined by joinpoint regression model indicated by three connected orange lines. Predicted PSE values if the frequency judgment was based on: mean spike rate code (green line); the burst gap code (blue line). Current Biology 2017 27, 1485-1490.e2DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.04.011) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions