Using RUSLE2 and the SCI in the Conservation Security Program

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What is Erosion? Erosion is a gravity driven process that moves solids (sediment, soil, rock and other particles) in the natural environment or their source.
Advertisements

Soil Erosion Estimation TSM 352 Land and Water Management Systems.
Evaluating Bids in the U.S. Conservation Reserve Program Ralph E. Heimlich Deputy Director for Analysis, Resource Economics Division, Economic Research.
BMP CHALLENGE ™ : Understanding the Mechanics Brian Brandt – Director American Farmland Trust – Agricultural Conservation Innovation.
Livestock Manure Management – The Basics on Why and How Coordinating Manure Utilization Plans With Crop Rotations Jon Stika, Area Agronomist USDA-NRCS,
1 Technical Service Provider Training National Association of Independent Crop Consultants January 20-23, 2010 Wyndham Orlando Resort 8001 International.
Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) Measuring the Environmental Benefits of Conservation Managing the Agricultural Landscape for Environmental.
Conservation Planning Existing Center Pivots Illinois NRCS Training December 6, 2011 Springfield, Illinois Runoff Assessment CPNozzle.
Soil Erosion and Conservation Developed 9/15/2000 by: Brian Matchett Sara Moyer.
Weed Management Strategies Lily Lake Organic Farm Maple Park, IL Dave Campbell.
What is RUSLE2 ? R evised U niversal S oil L oss E quation, Version 2 Estimates soil loss from rill and interrill erosion caused by rainfall and overland.
What makes the The Universal Soil Loss Equation Go ?
Planning Process for CNMPs Vicki S. Anderson Resource Conservationist Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Fruit & Vegetable Production Unit for Plant Science Core Curriculum Lesson 3: Site Evaluation Fruit & Vegetable Production Unit for Plant Science Core.
Soil and water resources  Certified farms are actively involved in long-term conservation of soil and water resources.
WIND EROSION EQUATION Recent Changes (NAM) USDA-NRCS.
Using Yield Data to Make Decisions. Reasons for Collecting Yield Data Document yields Conduct field experiments Bottom-line Considerations Variable Rate.
Green Payments Now—What’s Missing? WWF Workshop Building the Scientific Basis for Green Payments April 14-15, 2005.
West Hills College Farm of the Future The Precision-Farming Guide for Agriculturalists Chapter Eight Precision Farming – Issues to Consider.
1 RUSLE 2 Wisconsin Website da.gov/technical/cons plan/rusle Judy Derricks-WI RUSLE2 MANAGER.
Land Treatment and the Conservation Planning Process CNMP Core Curriculum Section 3 — Land Treatment Practices.
SOIL CONDITION INDEX – (SCI) AS AN INDICATOR OF THE SOIL ORGANIC MATTER DYNAMICS AT THE FARM BUTMIR NEAR SARAJEVO Prof. Dr. Hamid Čustović Tvica Mirza.
APPLYING CONSERVATION TO THE TEXAS LANDSCAPE Norman Bade, NRCS State Resource Conservationist Conservation Provisions of the 2002 Farm Bill (Farm Security.
PREDICTION OF SOIL LOSSES. EMPIRICAL WATER EROSION FORMULAS A= k s 0,75 L 1,5 I 1,5 (Kornev,1937) A= k s 1,49 L 1,6 (Zingg,1940) A= k s 0,8 p I 1,2 (Neal,1938)
Watershed Management Assessment Through Modeling: SALT and CEAP Dr. Claire Baffaut Water Quality Short Course Boone County Extension Office April 12, 2007.
BMP CHALLENGE Experience: Cannon River Watershed Partnership Information provided by: Dave Legvold Executive Director Cannon River Watershed Partnership.
Components of a Nutrient Management Plan Scott Sturgul Nutrient & Pest Management Program Soil & Water Management Farm & Industry Short Course Feb. 16,
Farm Field Record Keeping Jim Dunn Agricultural Economist Penn State University.
Using the Soil Conditioning Index to Assess Management Effects on Soil Carbon USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Quality National Technology.
Field Specific Decisions: N vs P CNMP Core Curriculum Section 5 – Nutrient Management.
Estimating Soil Erosion From Water Using RUSLE By: Andrea King USDA-Natural Resource Conservation Service.
Using GIS and the PSIAC Method to Predict Watershed Sediment Yield Rates Eric Berntsen.
SOIL SUITABILITY AND MANAGEMENT FOR POTATO PRODUCTION NextEnd.
Lecture 2. Agricultural Pollution Control in the Baltic Sea with Special Emphasis on Manure Management Prepared by Assoc. Prof. Philip Chiverton, SLU and.
™ Nutrient Management Planning ¨ Will these be mandated in your state?  An emerging national issue is how to account for agricultural non-point source.
West Hills College Farm of the Future The Precision-Farming Guide for Agriculturalists Chapter Seven Variable Rate Technologies.
1Updated April 2015 RUSLE2 Advanced Data Management Linda Scheffe, NSSC Agronomist (NRCS RUSLE2 database manager) Linda Scheffe, NSSC Agronomist (NRCS.
Ecological Sites on Rangeland
1 RUSLE2 Users Guide South Dakota September 2004.
1 CONSERVATION STEWARDSHIP PROGRAM (CSP) Continuous Sign-Up Kick-Off Steve Parkin Stewardship Program Team August 10, 2009.
SOIL DEGRADATION  When plants (trees & shrubs) are cleared from a site, soil is exposed to sunlight and the eroding effects of wind and water. Soil aeration.
P Index Fundamentals of Nutrient Management Training Course December 15, 2005 Isaac Wolford, West Virginia NRCS State Agronomist.
Let’s Begin! Writing Manure Management Plans!. Manure Management Manual DEP Manure Management Manual can be divided into 3 Parts: Part I Requirements/Guidelines.
MANURE MANAGEMENT PLAN SUMMARY – MMP NBS Completing a Manure Management Plan Workshop v
Soil and Water Resources WATER RESOURCES.
SOIL EROSION ASSESSMENT Measurement of Water Erosion Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) - predict annual soil loss by water – Wischmeier and Mannering,
Integrated Nutrient Management (Nutrient Management Plan ) A Series of Lecture By Mr. Allah Dad Khan.
Tillage and Planting Cost Comparisons
NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT POLICY NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
Soil Erodibility Prof. Dr. EHSANULLAH. Soil Erodibility Prof. Dr. EHSANULLAH.
and No-Tillage under Various Crop Rotations.
COVER CROP NITROGEN AVAILABILITY CALCULATOR
For Integrated Pest Management
Sustainable Agriculture
Soil Conservation.
2018 Louisiana Soil Health and Cover Crop Conference
Manure management plan summary – Rate tables
Off-Road Equipment Management TSM 262: Spring 2016
What Makes a Farm Work?.
Soil Conservation.
Efficient farm management has always been of prime importance to farmers. It has become even more important to the economic survival of farmers in recent.
Soil Conservation 6th Grade Science.
In-Field Soil Sampling
BMP CHALLENGE: Understanding the Mechanics
Using an Equine Pasture Evaluation Disk (EPED) to Document Canopy Cover and Evaluate Pasture Improvement Donna Foulk*, Ann Swinker, Marvin Hall, Helene.
Utility Billing Balancing the Accounts Receivable
Farm Service Agency (FSA) Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS)
Components of a Nutrient Management Plan
Nutrient Management Planning
Presentation transcript:

Using RUSLE2 and the SCI in the Conservation Security Program Dave Lightle Agronomist National Soil Survey Center Lincoln, Nebraska

Get Ready Ahead of Signup and Work Smart We cannot do specific field by field analysis with the limited TA we have. We cannot run analysis on a lot of fields to help the producer decide what to offer. Require the producer to have what he needs and to know what fields he is offering so one visit and one interview will do it. 1/17/2019 CSP Training 2006

Analyze the Watershed Identify several natural types of landscapes and develop “treatment groups” i.e., Flat bottomland Nearly level uplands Gently sloping uplands Moderately sloping uplands Steeply sloping uplands 1/17/2019 CSP Training 2006

1/17/2019 CSP Training 2006

Look at several soil properties such as: Slope ranges Soil Erodibility factor Soil Loss tolerance Yield potential Soil Texture Etc. 1/17/2019 CSP Training 2006

1/17/2019 CSP Training 2006

1/17/2019 CSP Training 2006

1/17/2019 CSP Training 2006

Decide on the typical treatment groupings for example: Flat bottomland and Nearly level uplands Gently sloping with Kf 0.20 to 0.28 Gently sloping with Kf 0.32 to 0.43 Moderately sloping uplands w/ Kf 0.2 to 0.28 Moderately sloping uplands w/Kf 0.32 to 0.43 Steeply sloping uplands w/Kf 0.32 to 0.43 1/17/2019 CSP Training 2006

Build and save the most common local cropping and tillage systems as local management files 1/17/2019 CSP Training 2006

Check management files for errors, for example: Trying to grow two crops at the same time. (The last one in “rules”) Adding manure or compost operations but neglecting to choose residue type or failing to enter amount of dry basis material or to adjust for 0.5 effectiveness of liquid and slurry materials. Entering field cultivators or harrows soon after planting that, in effect, “kill” the crop before it grows thus contributing no biomass. 1/17/2019 CSP Training 2006

1/17/2019 CSP Training 2006

1/17/2019 CSP Training 2006

Other common errors: Entering incorrect yields, especially with cover crops. Choosing the wrong planter, seeder or drill. Choosing the wrong harvest machine. Neglecting to check operation dates to insure they match the length of the rotation 1/17/2019 CSP Training 2006

Create and save RUSLE2 runs using the RUSLE2 Worksheet and utilize as “template runs” for each common treatment group This presets the following items in the heading to eliminate redundant key strokes and duplication Climate station Indicator soil Representative slope Each line represents a common management system combining: Crop rotation Tillage system Supporting practices 1/17/2019 CSP Training 2006

1/17/2019 CSP Training 2006

At the producer interview: Producer provides information about rotation and tillage system used, and etc. Producer indicates which fields are being offered. We locate the fields and review the maps and identify which treatment groups are involved. We group fields into management units having similar conditions. 1/17/2019 CSP Training 2006

1/17/2019 CSP Training 2006 2. Crop W.L. 5. Crop F.S. W.L. 4. Crop

At the producer interview: Use “Dominant Critical” soil selection approach In this case, fields 3, 5, and 9 are in the Gently sloping group and all others are in the moderately sloping group or steeply sloping group. 1/17/2019 CSP Training 2006

Dominant Critical Area Determination Fields rarely are comprised of a single soil map unit with uniform topography. To insure that the treatment system is adequate for the significant parts of the field or conservation management unit, the "dominant critical area" needs to be identified. The dominant critical area is used to represent the entire field or Conservation Management Unit “CMU” for the purpose of managing that field or CMU. The erosion estimate, Soil Conditioning Index and STIR values and decisions are based on this "dominant critical area". 1/17/2019 CSP Training 2006

1/17/2019 CSP Training 2006

Dominant Critical Area This dominant critical area is nether the average of the site or landscape characteristics of the field, nor the worst case scenario, unless it is significantly large enough on which to base the management of the field. 1/17/2019 CSP Training 2006

271C3 1/17/2019 CSP Training 2006

1/17/2019 CSP Training 2006

Dominant Critical Area It is improper to base determinations on the largest common (dominant by extent) landscape in cases where it is the flattest and least erosive or has the highest SCI.  If one chose this landscape, the more sloping areas will be over rated (under treated).  Additionally, basing the determination on weighted average slope in the field is improper since it also over rates more limiting areas.  1/17/2019 CSP Training 2006

271C3 1/17/2019 CSP Training 2006

Dominant Critical Area Some fields may have small insignificant areas of 10% or less of the field or less than a couple of acres that is much steeper and more erosive or have other resource issues. Such areas are critical but not dominant and it would be improper to base the eligibility determination for this area and apply it to the whole field. This would significantly under rate the field and would be impractical to the producer if we used this in Conservation Planning. 1/17/2019 CSP Training 2006

Dominant Critical Area In Conservation Planning, opportunities may exist to split out this area as a different conservation management unit and develop it as a wildlife area or recreation area with permanent cover or to apply additional supporting practices to the cropping and tillage practices planned for the critical significant area. (An enhancement opportunity) 1/17/2019 CSP Training 2006

1/17/2019 CSP Training 2006

At the producer interview: We select the closest matching management system and supporting practice(s) for the landscape group(s) in which the land falls and use the SCI and STIR values directly. (Optional for limited special cases or uncommon systems) We “boot” RUSLE2 and load the worksheets for the treatment groups on the farm in question. We “tweak” any necessary information select different crop adjust yield fine tune management Fine tune practices Run, save, and print 1/17/2019 CSP Training 2006

1/17/2019 CSP Training 2006