Table 2. Characteristics of the prepared activated carbons

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Parameters BD PP CP TC (mg. dl-l) ± * ± 5.8

Advertisements

and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 1. Empirical MSE to estimate the CP distribution parameter λ

Table 1. Change in parameters during fermentation in Hydrolysate A

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education

Tested % of gas and FMENV

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Physical properties of Portland cement

SON Nurse Practitioner Blackboard Community

Total Energy Consumed (%)

Tensile Test after Firing

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 4. Physicochemical properties of cyclone fly ash

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Marshall characteristics

Titratable acidity (g/100g)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Management Philosophy

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

Table 4. women involvement in environmental management

Table 3. Educational Qualification of Respondance

Table 4. Percentage of post-harvest waste reported by the farmers

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 6. Control sample industry distribution

Table 1. The radial spheroidal functions

Total CO2 Emissions (Electricity + Fossil Fuel)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Waste characterization in Port Harcourt, Source [1]

Rating of Water Quality

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 8. Income and expenditure of CFUGs in Nepal

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

Table 1. Rice yield in MT (Source-USDA, Foreign Agricultural Service)

Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)

Table 1. Characteristics (age, height, and weight) of the participants

Table 2. Modal parameters estimated by Pulse Reflex®

Table 7. Status of CF in Nepal as of 2009

Entrapment Efficiency (%) ± S.D.

Table 3. Main properties of the thin brass electrode

Table 1. Characterization Result of Leaded Petrol and Blends

Simulation Frequency(Hz)

Number of questionnaires sent out

Table 1. Descriptive Statistics

Table 6. The effect of porosity on pore velocity

Behavioral strategies

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 4. Summary of Multi ways ANOVA results

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 3. Correlation of PC, MC, RC & IC at the Supervisory level

chemistry that are involved in peer group

Table 5. Water quality A3 well during pumping test

Table 9. Water quality of DiSi- Mudawarra groundwater resources

Table 3. (d) Summary of two way ANOVA for overall adjustment

Category Quantity Secondary school 3 Student participant

Moisture content (wt. %)

Cashew juice stored for 30 days

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Data from present research

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Figure 2. Changes in each parameter

Education, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, doi: /wjce-4-1-4

Presentation transcript:

Table 2. Characteristics of the prepared activated carbons Parameters BAC LAC PAC SAC CAC Ph 6.5±0.10a 6.8±0.10b 7.0±0.10c 7.0±0.10b 6.8±0.20c pHpzc 6.6±0.10a 6.8±0.20b 7.0±0.01c 6.5±0.11a 7.1±0.10c Ash (%) 5.0±0.01 b* 5.0±0.01 a* 5.2±0.01 c* 6.2±0.01 e* 5.4±0.01 d Bulk density (kg/m3) 0.8±0.00 c* 0.7±0.001 a 0.8±0.01 d* 0.8±0.01 b* 0.6±0.01 a Porosity (kg/m3) 0.7±0.01 c* 0.6±0.01 a* 0.7±0.01 b* 0.8±0.01 d Surface Area (m2/g) 486.1±0.01b* 524.7±0.01c* 625.6±0.01 e* 530.7±0.01d* 200.4±0.01a Carboxylic 0.1±0.01a* 0.1±0.01b Phenolic 0.2±0.01b* 0.3±0.01c 0.1±0.0 a* Lactones 0.6±0.01c 0.5±0.01a* 0.6±0.01b 0.6±0.01d* Acidic 0.9±0.01b* 0.9±0.01b 0.8±0.01a* 10.0±0.01c Basic 0.6±0.01c* 0.5±0.01b All data were mean ± standard deviation of triplicate determinations a,b,c,d,e are means from least to the highest. Means of the same row with the same alphabet(s) are not significantly different. Means within the same row with the different alphabet(s) are significantly different at P<0.05 * = The mean difference is significant at the 0.05level. A.T. Adeolu et al. Adsorption of Chromium Ion from Industrial Effluent Using Activated Carbon Derived from Plantain (Musa paradisiaca) Wastes. American Journal of Environmental Protection, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 7-20. doi:10.12691/env-4-1-2 © The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing.