TIM Compression for No Buffered Unicast Traffic

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /1550r1 Submission Nov 2011 Zander, I2R SingaporeSlide 1 Extension of AID and TIM to Support 6000 STAs in ah Date:
Advertisements

ZTE corporation doc.: IEEE /1086r2 September 2012 Submission TIM Compression for No Buffered Unicast Traffic Date: Slide 1 Authors:
TIM Compression Date: Authors: January 2012 Month Year
Short MAC Header Date: Authors: John Doe, Some Company
Doc.: IEEE /2897r3 Submission May 2008 Qi Wang, Broadcom CorporationSlide 1 Efficient TIM element supporting multiple BSSIDs Date:
Doc.: IEEE /388r2 Submission TGah Efficient TIM Encoding Date: Authors: May 2012 Minyoung Park, et. al. Intel Corp.Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1357r3 Nov Slide 1 Dynamic TIM and Page Segmentation Date: Authors: Weiping Sun, Seoul National University.
Doc.: IEEE /0370r3 Submission TIM Compression November 2012 Slide 1 Date: Haiguang Wang, I2R.
Doc.: IEEE /0089r0 Submission Listen interval update Jan 2013 Slide 1 Date: Authors: Jinsoo Choi, LG Electronics.
Doc.: IEEE /117r0 Submission January 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1 TGah TIM Operation Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /388r1 SubmissionMinyoung Park, et. al. Intel Corp.Slide 1 TGah Efficient TIM Encoding Date: Authors: March 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /0102r2 SubmissionLiwen Chu Etc.Slide 1 TGah Power Saving Date: Authors: Date: Jan, 2012.
Submission Jul 2012 doc.: IEEE 11-12/0842r0 ZTE CorporationSlide 1 Short Beamforming Report Poll Frame Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1204r1 ZTE CorporationSlide 1 Power saving mechanism consideration for ah framework Date: Authors: Sept 2011.
Doc.: IEEE /0370r0 Submission January 2012 Haiguang Wang et. al, I2R, SingaporeSlide 1 TIM Compression Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0618r0 Submission Listen interval for sensor devices May 2012 Slide 1 Date: Authors: Jinsoo Choi, LG Electronics.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0353r1 March 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 MU-RTS/CTS for TWT Protection Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0961r0 July 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 Consideration on Multi-STA BlockAck Optimization Date:
Multi-STA BA Design Date: Authors: March 2016 Month Year
Bandwidth signaling for EDMG
Signalling Support for Full Bandwidth MU-MIMO Compressed SIG-B Mode
Multi-TID Aggregation for 11ay
WUR Acknowledgement Indication
WUR frame format follow-up
WUR frame format follow-up
Wakeup Frame Format Date: Authors: Sept 2017 Liwen Chu
Considerations on VL WUR frames
Wake Up Frame to Indicate Group Addressed Frames Transmission
Further considerations on WUR frame format
Advertising WUR Discovery Frame Related Info for Fast Scanning
11az NDP Announcement Date: July 2008
Consideration on WUR frame for Fast Scanning
UL OFDMA-based Random Access Parameter Set (RAPS) element
Further considerations on WUR frame format
TGah Efficient TIM Encoding
Wakeup Frame Format Date: Authors: Sept 2017 Liwen Chu
STA wake up using BSS Parameter Update Counter
Wake Up Response mode to WUR frame
TIM Offset of Page Segments
WUR frame format follow-up
Regarding HE fragmentation
Discussion on Group ID Structure
WUR Action Frame Format
WUR frame format follow-up
AP Power Down Notification
Further considerations on WUR frame format
Flexible Group ID Allocation
Multi-WID Addressed WUR Frame
WUR frame format follow-up
AID Reassignment Protocol
Power saving mechanism consideration for ah framework
TIM and Page Segmentation
Considerations on VL WUR frames
Efficient TIM element supporting multiple BSSIDs
Considerations on VL WUR frames
CR for CID 1115 Date: Authors: May 2019
Block Addressed WUR Frame
TD Control field with Response indication in WUR frame
Discussion on Group ID Structure
Regarding HE fragmentation
WUR Action Frame Format
Efficient TIM element supporting multiple BSSIDs
STA wake up using BSS Parameter Update Counter
Dynamic TIM and Page Segmentation
Considerations on VL WUR frames
Virtual AP Presentation
Clarification of WUR frame related to group addressed frame
Reducing Overhead in Active Scanning
Reducing Overhead in Active Scanning
Multi-WID Addressed WUR Frame
Presentation transcript:

TIM Compression for No Buffered Unicast Traffic Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 TIM Compression for No Buffered Unicast Traffic Date: 2012-09-17 Authors: ZTE corporation

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 ZTE corporation

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 ZTE corporation

Introduction In order to support a large number of STAs,Block-level TIM encoding method [1] was accepted as the baseline of TIM structure in TGah specification framework document (SFD). We propose to further promote the design by clarifying how to encode the TIM when there is no buffered individually addressed data for any STA with the same page index, and when there are buffered group addressed data.

What’s that done in 11n? As defined in 802.11-2012, the TIM element contains four fields: DTIM Count, DTIM Period, Bitmap Control, and Partial Virtual Bitmap. Bit 0 of the Bitmap Control field contains the Traffic Indicator bit for group addressed MSDUs/MMPDUs buffered at the AP. The remaining 7 bits of the Bitmap Control field form the Bitmap Offset. When there is no buffered individually addressed data for any STA, The TIM element has to be sent to update DTIM count and to broadcast DTIM Period. The Partial Virtual Bitmap field is encoded as a single octet equal to 0, which informs the receivers of no buffered unicast traffic. The Bitmap Offset subfield is 0, and the Length field is 4.

A brief of accepted TIM format in TGah SFD Block-level TIM encoding method[1] Block bitmap encoding: The n-th bit position of the Block Bitmap indicates whether the n-th Sub-Block Bitmap is present in the Sub-Block field The m-th bit position of the Sub-Block Bitmap indicates whether the m-th STA has data buffered at the AP Single AID: When there is a single AID in a Block, 6 bits of the Block Bitmap field is used to indicate the 6 LSBs of the AID Inverse bitmap: if there are many 1s in the bitmap of a Block, inverse the bitmap and encode the inversed bitmap Offset+Length+Bitmap: encodes more than 8 Sub-Block Bitmaps The Block Bitmap field is used to indicate the length of Sub-Block Bitmaps following the Block Bitmap field.

Why 802.11-2012 method cannot be reused for indicating no buffered unicast traffic? Based on the Block-level TIM encoding method[1], Block bitmap encoding mode might be used where there is no buffered individually addressed data for any STA within the same page If reuse 802.11-2012 method to indicate no buffered unicast traffic, both Block control and Block offset subfield should be encoded as a single octet equal to 0 which may cause ambiguity. As defined in current Block-level TIM encoding method, 3-bit block Control subfield is set to 0 to indicate bitmap encoding mode, 5-bit block offset subfield is set to 0 to indicate block with offset “0”.

Proposed TIM Encoding Based on accepted TIM format, 2 options could be used to indicate no buffered unicast traffic for any STA with the same page index : Option 1: Using dedicated Length field value in TIM so that the TIM does not include the encoded TIM bitmap Option 2: Define one new mode in block control field Further, current 802.11 method can be reused to indicate group addressed buffered data Bit 0 of the bitmap control field is set to 1 with a value of 0 in the DTIM Count field when one or more group addressed MSDUs/MMPDUs are buffered

Option 1 of indicating no buffered unicast traffic (Preferred) TIM does not include the encoded TIM bitmap and use a dedicated Length field value for indicating no buffered unicast traffic in TIM No partial virtual bitmap field will be carried in TIM ,the length field in TIM shall be set to a dedicated value (eg. Set to 3) to indicate no buffered data. Pros : smallest overhead. Cons:Introducing the functionality of no buffered unicast traffic indication to the length field of the TIM

Option 2 of indicating no buffered unicast traffic Define one new mode for indicating no buffered unicast traffic in TIM In current concept of Block-level TIM encoding method,3 encoding modes have been proposed The block control field indicates which mode is used for the TIM element Add one new mode to indicate there is no buffered unicast traffic The block control field is set to ‘XXX’ for “no buffered data” mode. Eg. “101” One more byte Overhead than option 1.

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 Conclusions Bit 0 of the bitmap control field is used to indicate group addressed MSDUs/MMPDUs buffered at the AP. Two options to indicate no buffered unicast traffic in slide 9 and 10 respectively are proposed for group decision. Option1 (slide 9) is preferred. ZTE corporation

Straw Poll 1 Do you support to add the texts below in the TGah SFD 4.3.3 TIM encoding: R.4.3.3.B: the Group Addressed Buffered Data field (Bit 0 of the Bitmap Control field) is set to 1 when one or more group addressed MSDUs/MMPDUs are buffered at the AP.

Straw Poll 2 Do you support to add the texts below in the TGah SFD 4.3.3 TIM encoding: R.4.3.3.C: If there is no bit in the traffic indication bitmap set to 1 in the TIM IE, the Encoded TIM Bitmap field is not present and the Length field is set to 3

References [1] TGah Spec Framework document, 11-11/1137r10

Thank you!