Polarization Time 1 33 Liberals 34 Moderates 33 Conservatives Time 2 50 Liberals 0 Moderates 50 Conservatives Time 1 33 Democrats 34 Independents 33 Republicans.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DC Responses Received WA OR ID MT WY CA NV UT CO AZ NM AK HI TX ND SD NE KS OK MN IA MO AR LA WI IL MI IN OH KY TN MS AL GA FL SC NC VA WV PA NY VT NH.
Advertisements

The 2002 Challenge June 4, 2002 The Honorable Kenneth B. Mehlman Deputy Assistant to the President and Director of Political Affairs.
2008 and Beyond: A new electoral landscape? Todd Donovan Western Washington University.
Primary elections. Basics What is a primary? When did states start adopting primaries? Do all states use them today? What are some variations in primary.
Presidential Nominations. Who selects the nominee? Historically… Members of Congress State party leaders Primary voters –(Or just those in Iowa and New.
Understanding the Electoral College 4 elections won without Popular Majorities Understanding the Electoral College the popular vote has meshed.
Presidential Nominations. Who selects the nominee? Historically… Members of Congress State party leaders Primary voters –(Or just those in Iowa and New.
Strategic Consequences of the Electoral College. Rules Each state appoints “Electors” equal to the number of combined seats in the House and Senate Electors.
Electing a President. Caucuses - meetings of party members to nominate candidates Used in the earliest elections Iowa is traditionally the first state.
Mobility Update as of February 15, WA OR CA NV ID MT ND SD WY UT CO AZ NM AK HI TX OK KS NE MN IA MO AR LA MS ALGA FL WI IL MI IN KY TN SC NC VA.
National Journal Presentation Credits Producers: Katharine Conlon Director: Jessica Guzik Senate Committee Maps Updated: January 15, 2015.
Super Tuesday: A Look Ahead From Hotline Editor Kyle Trygstad and National Journal Political Editor Josh Kraushaar February 22, 2016 Producer: Katharine.
1 Political Update: The National Elections of 2010 David F. Damore University of Nevada, Las Vegas Department of Political Science Prepared for 2010 ALA.
National Journal Presentation Credits Producers: Katharine Conlon Director: Afzal Bari House Committee Maps Updated: March 19, 2015.
2014 Midterm Election Results Doug Sosnik November 6, 2014.
Medicaid Enrollment of New Eligibles in Expansion States, by Party Affiliation of Governor New Eligibles as a Percent of Total Medicaid Enrollment, FY.
House Price
The Honorable Kenneth B. Mehlman
Mark Glerum – Sales Director
CIE 274 Civil and Environmental Systems
Medicaid Enrollment of New Eligibles in Expansion States, by Party Affiliation of Governor New Eligibles as a Percent of Total Medicaid Enrollment, as.
Medicaid Enrollment of New Eligibles in Expansion States, by Party Affiliation of Governor New Eligibles as a Percent of Total Medicaid Enrollment, as.
House price index for AK
The State of the States Cindy Mann Center for Children and Families
Avaya Consultant Relations Program
BUSINESS DEVELPOMENT TEAM DIRECTOR, STRATEGIC MPS BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT
Medicaid Costs are Shared by the States and the Federal Government
2018 State of State Speeches: Policy Dialogue Analysis
Expansion states with Republican governors outnumber expansion states with Democratic governors, May 2018 WY WI WV◊ WA VA^ VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK.
Expansion states with Republican governors outnumber expansion states with Democratic governors, January WY WI WV◊ WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA.
Share of Births Covered by Medicaid, 2006
Non-Citizen Population, by State, 2011
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Share of Women Ages 18 – 64 Who Are Uninsured, by State,
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA1 OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NJ NH2
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA OR OK OH1 ND NC NY NM NJ NH NV
Mobility Update and Discussion as of March 25, 2008
Current Status of the Medicaid Expansion Decision, as of May 30, 2013
IAH CONVERSION: ELIGIBLE BENEFICIARIES BY STATE
WAHBE Brokers / QHPs across the country as of
619 Involvement in State SSIPs
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2015
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2018
HHGM CASE WEIGHTS Early/Late Mix (Weighted Average)
PRACTICA & ONLINE ED AUTHORIZATION STATUS
Status of State Participation in Medicaid Expansion, as of March 2014
Percent of Women Ages 19 to 64 Uninsured by State,
The Road to the 2012 U.S. National Elections
Sampling Distribution of a Sample Mean
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2017
S Co-Sponsors by State – May 23, 2014
Seventeen States Had Higher Uninsured Rates Than the National Average in 2013; Of Those, 11 Have Yet to Expand Eligibility for Medicaid AK NH WA VT ME.
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Average annual growth rate
Estimated Total U.S. ESRD Costs, 1997
Sampling Distribution of a Sample Mean
Percent of Children Ages 0–17 Uninsured by State
Executive Activity on the Medicaid Expansion Decision, May 9, 2013
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
How State Policies Limiting Abortion Coverage Changed Over Time
Post-Reform: Projected Percent of Adults Ages 19–64 Uninsured by State
United States: age distribution family households and family size
Primary elections.
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Percent of Adults Ages 18–64 Uninsured by State
States including quality standards in their SSIP improvement strategies for Part C FFY 2013 ( ) States including quality standards in their SSIP.
Current Status of State Individual Marketplace and Medicaid Expansion Decisions, as of September 30, 2013 WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK.
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NJ NH NV
Presentation transcript:

Polarization Time 1 33 Liberals 34 Moderates 33 Conservatives Time 2 50 Liberals 0 Moderates 50 Conservatives Time 1 33 Democrats 34 Independents 33 Republicans Time 2 50 Democrats 0 Independents 50 Republicans

Party Sorting  Party Polarization Time 1 Democrats Independents Republicans 50 liberals 25 liberals 25 moderates 50 moderates 25 moderates 25 conservatives 50 conservatives Time 2 Democrats Independents Republicans 75 liberals 75 conservatives 25 moderates 50 moderates 25 moderates

Change in ID by Region from 1980 to 1990 Democratic Republican South -16.1 [-12.1, -20.1] +14.5 [9.5, 19.5] New England -12.1 [-3.8, -20.4] +7.5 [-3.2, 18.2] Border (KY, MD, MO, WV) -8.5 [-1.8, 15.2] +5.1 [-3.5, 13.7] Mid-Atlantic (NY, NJ, PA, DE) -11.2 [-7.2, -15.2] +9.4 [3.7, 15.1] Midwest (OH, MI, IN, IL, WI, MN) -8.8 [-5, -12.6] +9.2 [3.8, 14.6] Plains (IA, ND, SD, NE, KS) -3.5 [-11.9, 4.9] +6.5 [-4.5, 17.5] Rocky (MT, CO, ID, WY, UT, NV) -0.6 [-12.6, 11.2] +5.9 [-5.2, 17] Pacific (CA, OR, WA) -11.8 [-7, -16.6] +7.9 [1.6, 14.2] Southwest (TX, AZ, NM, OK) -14.4 [-7.5, -21.3] +13.6 [6.7, 20.5] 95% CI in brackets

Party Identification for Liberals

Party Identification for Conservatives

Sorting by Ideology into Parties: 1980 -2018 Blue =Dem Red =Rep Grey =Indp 41% moderate 40% 34% conservative 32% 25% liberal 28%

Party and Ideology in 2018

No Decline in Moderates Source: GSS

Issue Centrists Still Dominate Source: 2016 ANES

Figure 4: Abortion Should be Legal--Sometimes Source: The Gallup Organization

For any candidate Source: ANES

Gave Money to a Campaign ANY campaign Source: ANES

The Current Party Parity System has had several consequences related to U.S. Politics 1.Partisan voting in Congress 2. elections are more competitive 3. presidents who are dividers, not unifiers 4. partisans of both parties misperceiving the other 5. era of unstable majorities

Determining Partisan Overlap in Congress Democrat

Partisan Convergence in the House, DW-Nominate Scores, 1867-1999

Partisan Convergence in the Senate, DW-Nominate Scores, 1867-1999

Elections 1950-1992 Post 1992 President Congress President Congress Won by. 10+ points H- 85 + seats ave. w/out 64 ,72 8+ points 20 of 21 Dem. 5 of 11 55% + 5 had 100 + Dem 8 of 11. 50% or more S- 57 to 43 margin Dems 34 of 42 yrs. Less than 3 percent. H- 35 seat margin In two popular vote 10 of 12 Rep.* winner lost 0 won with 55% S-53 to 47 margin Reps 16 0f 24 yrs.* * Partially result of rural states plus majority- minority districts

Trump 1 86 9 77 2 88 8 80

2014 2012 2016 President House House Senate Senate House Senate

Will 2018 be a Wave Election ?

Only three things matter in Predicting Off Year Congressional Elections 1.Margin of the vote– How many Republicans will vote Republican, How many Democrats voting Democrat and how will Independents vote ? 2. Exactly How many Democrats, Republicans and Independents are there ? 3.Who will turn out to vote in the mid-term Margin is easier now because much less split ticket voting Estimating the number of Democrats, Republicans and Independents Is reasonably straight forward The single most difficult thing to do is to determine who will vote

Off Year Voter Turnout by 7 Point Party Identification: 1958-2014

Voter Turnout by Partisan Strength:1982-2014

1982 86 90 94 98 2002 06 10 14

Democratic advantage in identification is partially offset by stronger Republican turnout

1982 86 90 94 98 2002 06 10 14

1982 86 90 94 98 2002 06 10 14 Democratic advantage in identification is again partially offset by stronger Republican turnout

Dem Vote Prediction = 52.9% of two-party vote Rep Vote Prediction = 47.1% of two-party vote Democratic win by 4.8% That translates into a 225-30 seat Democratic margin Minus the Republican bonus(efficient voting) its close.

2016

Trump Job Approval by Strength Want Trump to Run in 2020 of Party Identification Approve Disapprove Don’t know

New Jersey will be in play by November with Hugin having a chance

Whatever happens in 2018 the parties will be changing: If Republicans hold House and Senate then Trump is the new Republican party If they lose the House and/or Senate then the establishment party will rise to oppose Because there will be no policy gains Democrats are already in battle over the direction of the party Ocasio-Cortez. Sanders Warren Vs. Biden Clinton Connor Lamb

However, to quote a famous politician:

The End