Regional Seminar on Enforcement of Plant Variety Rights

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ESA European Seed Association Do the legal tools meet the needs of the breeders? Judith Blokland Lawyer – Plantum NL Member Task Force Farm Saved Seed.
Advertisements

Trademark Enforcement through Administrative Agencies April 30, 2013, New York IP in China.
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Dispute Settlement and Effective Enforcement of IP.
1 Patent Practice and Litigation in China John Huang Partner of AllBright Law Offices.
Enforcement Directive and Software Protection Joost Verbeek Partner ULYS Law Firm Brussels, 26th of April 2006.
Liability and Procedure in European Antitrust Law The EU Damages Directive Does the European Union overstep the mark again?
Strengthening the Protection and Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights in Ukraine Activity October 2014.
CHAPTER 10 Legal Purpose and Proper Form
1 China IP Enforcement in the Entertainment Industries Dr. James Luo Managing Partner Lawjay Partners Berkeley, Oct 2012.
Enforcement measures of GIs through sui generis protection, unfair competition and consumer protection law GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AND TRADEMARKS: A GLOBAL.
Handling IP Disputes in a Global Economy Huw Evans Norton Rose Fulbright LLP.
Trademark II Infringement. Article 57 Infringement Article 57 Any of the following conduct shall be an infringement upon the right to exclusively use.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Public Procurement Review and Remedies in the Member States.
Eli Mufisovski SNB-REACT Balkan Skopje 1 April 2009 European Anti – Counterfeiting Network.
Tackling IT crime in a global context: the Convention on Cybercrime 3 years after Julio Pérez Gil University of Burgos, Spain.
Discussion “International Cooperation: Service of Documents, Taking of Evidence” – Practical Implementation of Regulations No 1393/2007 and No 1206/2001.
Case Study Comparing the V4 with the new EU(6) & EU(2) Cross border meeting - Visegrad Countries Chris Corbin ePSIplus Analyst Beckov, Slovakia, 11 th.
CAPACITY BUILDING TRAINING PROGRAMME ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AND RELATED WTO ISSUES April 28-May 2, 2008 Session 3 Enforcement under the TRIPS.
CIOPORA International Community of Breeders of Asexually Reproduced Ornamental and Fruit Tree Varieties Regional Seminar on Enforcement of Plant Variety.
1 Digital Spark September 2010 Remedies and Sanctions under the IP Enforcement Directive Enrico Bonadio - Lecturer in Law Dundee Business School.
ENFORCEMENT OF PATENT RIGHTS IN EUROPE The Hungarian way Zsolt SZENTPÉTERI S.B.G.&K. Patent and Law Offices, Budapest International Seminar Intellectual.
EEMAN & PARTNERS Border Measures WIPO seminar for judges and enforcement institutions Sofia, 22 & 23 November 2012 Marius Schneider Attorney-at-law Eeman.
What is the Law? Courts Service Pilot: Lesson 4. Learning Outcomes O To be able to work with your partner to formulate a definition of the law. O To understand.
SNB - REACT Business Perspective IPR Protection April 1, 2009 Presentation Eli Mufisovski.
Enforcement under the TRIPS Agreement [Shortened version of presentation] Regional Conference – IP Enforcement Cairo, November 9, 2008 Ms. Louise van Greunen.
WARSAW May 2006 Seminar on Enforcement of Property Variety Rights.
Regional Seminar on Enforcement of IP rights Enforcement of IPR Hungarian implementation László Vass Legal and International Department HIPO.
Welcome and Thank You © Gordon & Rees LLP Constitutional Foundation Article 1; Section 8 Congress shall have the Power to... Promote the Progress.
An Overview of Intellectual Property by John Slaughter September 26, 2009 © John Slaughter All Rights Reserved.
1 Implementation and Enforcement Issues 20 November 2003 Hideki Kanda University of Tokyo.
Enforcing Quality New methods of strengthening the IP-Systems in Europe Peter R. Slowinski, Mediator (CVM) Max-Planck-Institute for Intellectual Property,
Three Pillars of the Copyright System Any efficient copyright system must include: 1) appropriate legislation 2) management mechanisms 3) enforcement.
The Directive on Enforcement and The Customs Regulation Warsaw May 2006 Martin Ekvad Community Plant Variety Office Head of Legal Affairs.
12/16/07/10 – Preparatory Measures before Trade Fairs in DE HG Preparatory/Preventive Measures before Exhibiting at Trade Fairs in Germany Heinz.
Patent Enforcement & Forum Shopping in China Liu, Shen & Associates: Jun Qiu September 2014.
Article 4 [Obligations of Applicant] 4.1. As a sole and exclusive owner of the Application, Applicant warrants that.
TAIEX INTERNAL MARKET WEEK IN BUDAPEST November 2004 Co-operation of Customs Administrations Presentation by: Sandro Le Noci – Italian Customs.
Key challenges in implementing access to justice
Seminar on EU Service Directive Budapest, 3 May 2007 Thibaut Partsch
MGT601 SME MANAGEMENT.
Heinz Goddar and Carl-Richard Haarmann Boehmert & Boehmert
ANTI-COUNTERFEITING TRADE AGREEMENT
International IP Roundtable UNLV, 8 April Seizure of Goods in Transit
INTRODUCTION TO EU PROCEEDINGS by Prof
ENFORCEMENT OF PATENT RIGHTS IN EUROPE The Hungarian way
The OHIM Sabina Rusconi, institutional affairs and external relations department, OHIM Roving Seminar on the Conmunity Trade Mark System in China,
SME's and Trademarks OHIM's initiatives for raising of awarenes on the importance of Trade Mark protection Beate Schmidt – Cancellation and Litigation.
Introduction to asset recovery in Poland and Wielkopolska region, along with the presentation of the invited guests and discussion of thematic areas presented.
Don’t get Burned: How to Protect Your Intellectual Property
Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council
A Comparative Legal and Economic View of Global Trade Secret Regimes
Munich Intellectual Property Law Center (MIPLC)
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND CYBER PIRACY
City of London School – extra materials
The Mutual Recognition Regulation
ICN | The interplay between private enforcement and leniency policy
Brussels, Centre Borschette
HERBERT SMITH FREEHILLS
Trade Secrets 2018: International
Agenda for 8th Class Admin stuff Handouts Slides Easements Nuisance
Audiovisual Sector Social Dialogue Committee
Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights in the Community Benoît Lory European Commission, DG Internal Market and Services Enforcement of Intellectual.
Injunctions: Still the right remedy?
The International Legal Framework
CROSS BORDER GATHERING EVIDENCE
Jean Bergevin European Commission GROW.F5 –
What You Didn’t Know That You Didn’t Know About Patents
Regional Workshop aimed at Addressing Aspects and Obstacles to the Process of Ratification of or Accession to the Basel Protocol on Liability and Compensation.
Fraud and corruption in international commercial arbitration
Jonathan D’Silva MMI Intellectual Property 900 State Street, Suite 301
Presentation transcript:

Regional Seminar on Enforcement of Plant Variety Rights CIOPORA International Community of Breeders of Asexually Reproduced Ornamental and Fruit Tree Varieties Regional Seminar on Enforcement of Plant Variety Rights Warsaw, Poland 11 and 12 May 2006

Do the legal enforcement tools meet the needs of the breeders? Enforcement of PBR Do the legal enforcement tools meet the needs of the breeders?

Important questions Do right holders have access to premises of the supposed infringer and can they take samples? Do they have the right to information? What about the barriers to get a preliminary injunction? What about damages and punitive damages Who pays the cost for the court procedures? Which courts are competent for our cases? Do the judges know what PBR are? What about customs procedures?

Access to greenhouses and samples Article 6 and 7 of the Enforcement Directive deal with evidence and its preservation Right holders must be granted access to greenhouses to count and inspect plants and collect samples There is only a short period between an infringement of a PBR (e.g. illegal propagation) and the sales of the infringing plants, thus fast provisional measures to preserve evidence are necessary.

Right to information The trade with ornamental and fruit plants is very international and so there are widespread sources of propagating material Right holders must be able to get access to information on the illegal sources of propagating material and about the recipients of illegal material, as it is provided for in Articles 6 II and 8 of the Enforcement Directive

Provisional measures The trade with ornamental and fruit plants is a very fast business Often huge intermediaries, providing services and market space to the sellers, are involved in the chain Right holders must be able to stop alleged infringements quickly on the spot of the sellers or the intermediaries, as it is provided for in Article 9 of the Enforcement Directive

Damages Infringers weigh their profit against their risk The risk to be caught and the damages payable must overweight the potential profits Damages must be deterrent to the infringer and must make up for the losses of the right holder The Enforcement Directive does not prevent the EC member states from imposing punitive damages on an infringer

Legal costs Amounts in dispute in the ornamental and fruit business are often low Right holders should not suffer from high legal costs when they win a case There should be no “artificial” increases of the costs Article 14 of the Enforcement Directive has to be interpreted in an IP-holder-friendly way: There is no reason apparent that equity not allows the infringer bearing all the costs incurred

Criminal law Article 16 of the Enforcement Directive allows the member states to apply other appropriate sanctions than civil sanctions in cases where intellectual property rights have been infringed Infringement of Plant Breeders´ Rights should be a criminal act as it is comparable with theft, misappropriation and fraud.

Specialised Courts The Enforcement Directive does not mention the setting up of specialized courts In Latvia, Lithuania and Poland no courts specialized on PBR exist, in Germany 11 courts of first instance exist Without specialized courts judges cannot build up experience and expertise in PBR matters

Customs procedures Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia have borders to non-EC-member countries An increasing number of imports of ornamentals and fruits cross these borders The national customs authorities need to have sufficient knowledge on plants and Plant Breeders´ Rights to be able to support the breeders effectively

Breeders´ responsibility Breeders are responsible to enforce their rights They should see to it that they have proper and valid rights Breeders should see that they have legal advise to make use of the legal tools available CIOPORA and its Anti-Infringement group support breeders in their fight against PBR- infringments

Thank you CIOPORA Phone: +49 40 555 63 702 Rothenbaumchaussee 78 Fax: +49 40 555 63 703 D – 20148 Hamburg info@ciopora.org GERMANY www.ciopora.org