Implementation of quality indicators in STS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
8-11-Jul-07 How to increase quality of Principal European Economic Indicators? Roberto Barcellan, Brian Newson, Klaus Wurm Eurostat.
Advertisements

Recent Developments of the OECD Business Tendency and Consumer Opinion Surveys Portal coi/coordination
Development of metadata in the National Statistical Institute of Spain Work Session on Statistical Metadata Genève, 6-8 May-2013 Ana Isabel Sánchez-Luengo.
4 May 2010 Towards a common revision for European statistics By Gian Luigi Mazzi and Rosa Ruggeri Cannata Q2010 European Conference on Quality in Official.
CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE 1 The Quality Metadata System In the Czech Statistical Office Work Session on Statistical Metadata (METIS)
25 th April 2012 SASG Monitoring ESS Guidelines on Seasonal Adjustment Implementation Pilar Rey del Castillo Unit B1 Quality, Methodology and Research.
20 May 2009 Indicators for long-term developments Unit D5 - Key Indicators for European policies Ottawa, May, 2009 Pieter Everaers, Eurostat.
Handbook on Precision Requirements and Variance Estimation for ESS Household Surveys Denisa Florescu, Eurostat European Conference on Quality in Official.
A Proposal for a revisions policy of Principal European Economic Indicators (PEEIs) OECD STES WP June 2008.
13 November, 2014 Seminar on Quality Reports QUALITY REPORTS EXPERIENCE OF STATISTICS LITHUANIA Nadiežda Alejeva Head, Price Statistics.
1 General Recommendations of the DIME Task Force on Accuracy WG on HBS, Luxembourg, 13 May 2011.
Implementation of Quality indicators for administrative data
Discussion: Timely estimates of economic indicators – Session C3 –
State of the art on quality report
GDP growth estimates for Europe at 30 days – is that feasible?
Capacity Conversion – 616s
Document STD/CSTAT/WPNA(2006)6
Artur Andrysiak Economic Statistics Section, UNECE
Carsten Boldsen Hansen Economic Statistics Section, UNECE
Presentation by Eurostat
Seminar on ESA 2010 Metadata
Revision Analysis for General Economic Statistics
Regional Workshop on Short-term Economic Indicators and Service Statistics September 2017 Chiba, Japan Alick Nyasulu SIAP.
Estimation of Flash GDP at T+30 days for EU28 and EA18/EA19
Quality assessment criteria
Quality Aspects and Approaches in Business Statistics
Documentation of statistics
Thomas Jaegers and Håkan Linden
LAMAS Working Group January 2016
Item 5.3 Feasibility studies
Estimation of Flash GDP at T+30 days for EU28 and EA18/EA19
Euro-indicators Working Group
Education and Training Statistics Working Group – June 2014
GDP growth estimates for Europe at 30 days – is that feasible?
TF meeting 7 October '15 Luxembourg
Quarterly GDP at t+30 days for EU and euro area
Item 10 – Conclusions of the meeting
Euro-indicators Working Group
LAMAS Working Group January 2016
ESS Standardisation State of play
LAMAS Working Group June 2017
Item 9.3 – 2014 release of the Europe 2020 education indicators
Euro-indicators Working Group
Quality Criteria Initial Ideas.
Item 3.2 ESS guidelines on temporal disaggregation by Dario Buono (Eurostat) WG Methodology 5 April 2017.
GDP Flash estimates at t+30 days Conclusions June TF meeting
LAMAS Working Group June 2017
Sub-Regional Workshop on International Merchandise Trade Statistics Compilation and Export and Import Unit Value Indices 21 – 25 November Guam.
ESTP course on International Trade in Goods Statistics
Task Force on GDP Flash estimates at t+30 days
European Central Bank – DG Statistics
WORKING PARTY ON NATIONAL ACCOUNTS 12 – 15 October 2004
Short-term business statistics (STS)
ESS.VIP ADMIN EssNet on Quality in Multi-source Statistics, progress report 19TH WORKING GROUP ON QUALITY IN STATISTICS, 6 December 2016 Fabrice Gras,
ESQRS implementation in the in Labour Force Survey
Mapping Data Production Processes to the GSBPM
Quality Reporting in CBS
ESTP course on International Trade in Goods Statistics
LAMAS Working Group 6-7 December 2017
The Swedish survey on turnover in the service sector
LAMAS Working Group 6-7 December 2017
Prodcom Working Group Item Quality reporting and indicators
2.7 Annex 3 – Quality reports
ESTP course on 'Advanced issues in International Trade in Goods Statistics' 2-4 April 2014 QUALITY HANDBOOK.
Passenger Mobility Statistics 21 May 2015
Guy Van Gyes CAWIE-meeting 23-24/01/2012
Item 3.1 – Europe 2020 education headline indicators
ESS conceptual standards for quality reporting
Item 4.1: Annual labour market flows
Meeting Of The European Directors of Social Statistics
Presentation transcript:

Implementation of quality indicators in STS Quality WG, 6 December 2016

Objective To monitor through a limited set of quality indicators a few key data quality aspects of STS time series complementing the existing data compliance assessments.

e-TF set up To work out 3-5 indicators to be prioritised To provide additional guidance on the calculation To discuss principles and timetable for implementation

Criteria for the quality indicators Relevance for the STS PEEIs Feasibility to be produced on a regular basis at both national and EU level Meaningfulness for both producers and users

Prioritised quality indicators The same revision policy applied to STS data released nationally and transmitted to Eurostat Mean Absolute Revision (MAR) Mean Revision (MR) Coefficient of variation Data availability for first results => Unit non- response rate for first releases

The same revision policy… A qualitative indicator To ensure coherence in disseminated national data and European data Precondition: a revision policy in place The revision policy needs to be described "ESS guidelines on revision policy for PEEIs" Part of the STS metadata enrichment in 2015

MAR and MR For all STS PEEIs (except Prices) Growth rates for original data series (YoY) Growth rates for calendar/ working day adjusted (YoY) Breakdown: only TOTALs Reference periods: 20 values for quarterly data and 36 for monthly data "Latest value" in the year T ESMS reports: Dec or Q4 year T. Eurostat proposal: to provide also the MaxAR

MAR and MR

Coefficient of variation Only for Retail Trade when possible (if probability sampling used) To be provided for estimates of turnover Activity breakdown: only TOTALs Temporal breakdown: twelve monthly CV in the reference year T ESMS report Part of the STS metadata enrichment in 2016

Unit non-response for first releases Proposal: to replace data availability for first estimates For all STS PEEIs (except Prices) Size weighted unit non-response rate Non-response = no information or not usable information Weighting variable: turnover or other variable(s) known for the whole population Breakdown: only TOTALs Reference period: Q2 for quarterly data and June for monthly data in the reference year T ESMS report.

Implementation of the QI's - principles The STS ESMS files should be the source To be included in the ESMS files for year T updated in April year T+1 The additional guidelines to be included in the Vademecum on STS National Reference Metadata MS's responsible for providing QI's for their national data sent to Eurostat and Eurostat responsible for providing QI's for the European aggregates The annual quality monitoring should be presented to the STS WG

Implementation of the QI's - timetable Metadata reporting year Metadata Type STS quality indicators 2017 Descriptive The same revision policy applied to STS data released nationally and transmitted to Eurostat. 2018 Quantitative Coefficient of variation (if applicable) 2018 -2019 MAR and MR for the STS PEEIs on Construction. MAR and MR for the STS PEEIs on Industry. 2020 Unit non-response for first releases 2020+ MAR and RMAR for the STS PEEIs on Retail Trade and Services.

Conclusions The STS WG 21-22 Nov. 2016 approved the set of prioritised quality indicators (with MaxAR only to be included as a complementary indicator if considered useful). The STS WG 21-22 Nov. 2016 agreed to the proposed timetable and principles for the implementation of the STS quality indicators.