Alexander Loewer, Eric Batchelor, Giorgio Gaglia, Galit Lahav  Cell 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Deborah L. Berry, Eric H. Baehrecke  Cell 
Advertisements

TIA-1 Self-Multimerization, Phase Separation, and Recruitment into Stress Granules Are Dynamically Regulated by Zn2+  Joseph B. Rayman, Kevin A. Karl,
Jaya Sahni, Andrew M. Scharenberg  Cell Metabolism 
Dual Modes of Cdc42 Recycling Fine-Tune Polarized Morphogenesis
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (May 2017)
Negative Regulation of Vps34 by Cdk Mediated Phosphorylation
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages (October 2015)
Anthony J. Cesare, Makoto T. Hayashi, Laure Crabbe, Jan Karlseder 
Quantitative Live Cell Imaging Reveals a Gradual Shift between DNA Repair Mechanisms and a Maximal Use of HR in Mid S Phase  Ketki Karanam, Ran Kafri,
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 40, Issue 4, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages (May 2013)
Dynamic Response Diversity of NFAT Isoforms in Individual Living Cells
John G. Albeck, Gordon B. Mills, Joan S. Brugge  Molecular Cell 
Schedule-dependent interaction between anticancer treatments
Ciara Metcalfe, Noelyn M. Kljavin, Ryan Ybarra, Frederic J. de Sauvage 
Oocytes Progress beyond Prophase in the Presence of DNA Damage
Benoit Sorre, Aryeh Warmflash, Ali H. Brivanlou, Eric D. Siggia 
Conservation and Divergence of p53 Oscillation Dynamics across Species
Dissecting Timing Variability in Yeast Meiosis
Kif15 Cooperates with Eg5 to Promote Bipolar Spindle Assembly
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (May 2017)
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages (May 2008)
Distinct Interactions Select and Maintain a Specific Cell Fate
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages e5 (July 2018)
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages e5 (November 2017)
Jungmook Lyu, Vicky Yamamoto, Wange Lu  Developmental Cell 
Volume 48, Issue 2, Pages (October 2012)
Volume 16, Issue 22, Pages (November 2006)
Dual Modes of Cdc42 Recycling Fine-Tune Polarized Morphogenesis
Volume 53, Issue 5, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e5 (May 2017)
HDAC5, a Key Component in Temporal Regulation of p53-Mediated Transactivation in Response to Genotoxic Stress  Nirmalya Sen, Rajni Kumari, Manika Indrajit.
A Genetic Screen Identifies TCF3/E2A and TRIAP1 as Pathway-Specific Regulators of the Cellular Response to p53 Activation  Zdenek Andrysik, Jihye Kim,
Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages e5 (July 2017)
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (October 2011)
Laura Lande-Diner, Jianmin Zhang, Howard Cedar  Molecular Cell 
Stabilization of Cartwheel-less Centrioles for Duplication Requires CEP295-Mediated Centriole-to-Centrosome Conversion  Denisse Izquierdo, Won-Jing Wang,
Ramiro E. Verdun, Laure Crabbe, Candy Haggblom, Jan Karlseder 
Septins Regulate Actin Organization and Cell-Cycle Arrest through Nuclear Accumulation of NCK Mediated by SOCS7  Brandon E. Kremer, Laura A. Adang, Ian.
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages e3 (July 2018)
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
Control of Centriole Length by CPAP and CP110
Volume 99, Issue 8, Pages (October 2010)
P53 Pulses Diversify Target Gene Expression Dynamics in an mRNA Half-Life- Dependent Manner and Delineate Co-regulated Target Gene Subnetworks  Joshua R.
Volume 48, Issue 2, Pages (October 2012)
Telomeric Noncoding RNA TERRA Is Induced by Telomere Shortening to Nucleate Telomerase Molecules at Short Telomeres  Emilio Cusanelli, Carmina Angelica Perez.
New Histone Incorporation Marks Sites of UV Repair in Human Cells
Urtzi Garaigorta, Francis V. Chisari  Cell Host & Microbe 
Volume 67, Issue 6, Pages e9 (September 2017)
Jacob Stewart-Ornstein, Galit Lahav  Cell Reports 
DNA Damage Foci at Dysfunctional Telomeres
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 162, Issue 4, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 129, Issue 2, Pages (April 2007)
Yap1 Phosphorylation by c-Abl Is a Critical Step in Selective Activation of Proapoptotic Genes in Response to DNA Damage  Dan Levy, Yaarit Adamovich,
TIA-1 Self-Multimerization, Phase Separation, and Recruitment into Stress Granules Are Dynamically Regulated by Zn2+  Joseph B. Rayman, Kevin A. Karl,
Volume 52, Issue 2, Pages (October 2013)
Timing and Checkpoints in the Regulation of Mitotic Progression
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
Volume 49, Issue 5, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (April 2015)
Nuclear Repulsion Enables Division Autonomy in a Single Cytoplasm
Marijn T.M. van Jaarsveld, Difan Deng, Erik A.C. Wiemer, Zhike Zi 
Jörg Hartkamp, Brian Carpenter, Stefan G.E. Roberts  Molecular Cell 
Volume 33, Issue 3, Pages (May 2015)
Yun-Gui Yang, Tomas Lindahl, Deborah E. Barnes  Cell 
Presentation transcript:

Basal Dynamics of p53 Reveal Transcriptionally Attenuated Pulses in Cycling Cells  Alexander Loewer, Eric Batchelor, Giorgio Gaglia, Galit Lahav  Cell  Volume 142, Issue 1, Pages 89-100 (July 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.031 Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Cell 2010 142, 89-100DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.031) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 p53 Levels Vary in Populations of Nonstressed Cells (A) Diagram showing key species of the p53 signaling network. (B and C) p53 levels in nonstressed conditions (B) or after DNA damage induced by neocarzinostatin (NCS, 400 ng/ml) (C) as measured by fluorescence microscopy. (D and E) Distributions of p53 levels in HCT116 (D) and MCF10A (E) cells in nonstressed conditions and after damage (400 ng/ml NCS, >2 × 104 cells per condition; dashed line, normal distribution as a guideline). Most cells show low p53 levels in nonstressed conditions; the long right-sided tail represents cells with high p53 levels that overlap with those after DNA damage. The p53 signal was specific and the measured distributions were independent of the p53 antibody used (Figures S1G and S1H). (F–F″) p53 levels in a section of normal human epidermis as measured by fluorescence microscopy. Cell nuclei were stained with DAPI (F′). Overlay of both channels is shown in (F″). See also Figure S1. Cell 2010 142, 89-100DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.031) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 p53 Dynamics in Living Cells (A and B) Time-lapse microscopy images of cells expressing p53-Venus after treatment with NCS (200 ng/ml, A) or in nonstressed conditions (B). (C and D) Individual cells were tracked and the average fluorescence was measured. Normalized trajectories of p53-Venus levels are shown. The vertical dashed line indicates the time of cell division. (E–H) The trajectories were analyzed computationally to identify p53 pulses and measure their properties (see the Extended Experimental Procedures). (E) The mean relative amplitudes of p53 pulses in nonstressed or damaged (200 ng/ml NCS) cells are shown (n > 80; error bars indicate the standard deviation [SD]). (F) Histogram of p53 pulse width measured as full width at half maximum. (G) The fraction of cells showing no pulse, one or two pulses, or three or more pulses in a 24 hr period. (H) Histograms showing the time of the first pulse maxima. See also Figure S2. Cell 2010 142, 89-100DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.031) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 p53 Induction in Nonstressed Conditions Correlates with the Cell Cycle and Depends on the Activity of Upstream Kinases (A–C) Cells were imaged for 48 hr in nonstressed conditions and synchronized in silico (see the Extended Experimental Procedures). The cumulative distribution function of the timing of the first pulse is shown in relation to cell-cycle progression (A). About 90% of the cells show at least one pulse during one cell cycle, with most cells showing the first pulse during G1 phase (dashed line). The distributions of the timing of the first (B) and second (C) pulses are shown (n > 80). (D and E) Cells were imaged either untreated or during G2 cell-cycle arrest induced by the Cdk1 inhibitor RO3306 (9 μM). (D) Sample trajectory of normalized p53 levels before and after treatment (solid line, drug addition; dashed line, cell division). (E) Average number of pulses are shown for proliferating and arrested cells (error bars indicate the standard error of the mean [SEM]). (F) Upstream kinases were inhibited either by siRNA or small molecules and cells were imaged for 24 hr in nonstressed conditions. The mean number of p53 pulses was extracted from single-cell trajectories and normalized to the number of pulses in control cells. “Mix” indicates cells simultaneously treated with ATM, DNA-PK, and Chk2 inhibitor (error bars indicate the SEM; ∗∗ indicates p values of < 0.01 in t test). (G and H) Distribution of basal p53 (G) and Lamin A (H) in MCF10A cells untreated (solid line) or treated with a mix of ATM, DNA-PK and Chk2 inhibitors (dashed line). See also Figure S3. Cell 2010 142, 89-100DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.031) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 p53 Pulses Are Triggered by an Excitable Mechanism (A–D) Cells expressing p53-Venus were damaged with 400ng/ml NCS and imaged for 6 hr. Wortmannin (wm, 100 μM) was added at the indicated time points and subsequently refreshed every hour. p53 dynamics were analyzed in single-cell trajectories (n > 100). (A) A sample trajectory is shown where wortmannin was added after 30 min (vertical line). (B) Treatment with wortmannin reduced the number of cells showing a p53 pulse. (C and D) The amplitude of p53 pulses (C) and their duration (D) were unchanged (error bars indicate the SD). (E) Cells were imaged in nonstressed conditions for a total of 8 hr; after 3 hr, 100 μM wortmannin was added. Trajectories of normalized p53 levels from two cells are shown (vertical line, addition of wortmannin). Cells that initiated a p53 pulse before inhibitor addition continued to show a full pulse. Cell 2010 142, 89-100DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.031) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 p53 Pulses in Nonstressed Conditions Do Not Activate p21 Expression (A) Schematic drawing of the p53 and p21 reporter constructs. (B and C) Time-lapse images of cells expressing the p53 and p21 reporters after damage (400 ng/ml NCS, B) or in nonstressed conditions (C). (D and E) Single-cell trajectories from the cells depicted above showing p53 dynamics (solid line) and the p21 reporter (dashed line). (F and G) Integrated fluorescence intensity of p53-Venus versus the fold induction of the p21 reporter for damaged (F) and nonstressed (G) cells. Integrated p53 intensities were calculated from trajectories prior to normalization. Dashed line indicates median of non-stressed cells + 1.5 SD as a guideline. (H–H″′) p21 and p53 levels in normal human tissues. Sections of formaldehyde-fixed paraffin-embedded normal human epidermis were stained with p53 (H) and p21 (H′) antibodies and DAPI (H″). An overlay of the p21 (red) and p53 (green) channels is shown in (H″′). Arrows indicate cells with high levels of p53. See also Figure S4. Cell 2010 142, 89-100DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.031) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Posttranslational Modifications Control p53 Activity in Nonstressed Cells (A) Schematic drawing of the p53 protein domains including selected posttranslational modifications in the N- and C-terminal domains. The modified residues and the responsible enzymes are indicated. (B and C) Cells expressing p53-Venus and the p21 reporter were damaged with 400 ng/ml NCS and imaged for 6 hr. Wortmannin (100 μM) was added at the indicated time points and subsequently refreshed every hour. p53 dynamics were analyzed in single-cell trajectories (n > 100). (B) A sample trajectory is shown, where wortmannin was added after 30 min (vertical line). Although a full p53 pulse is induced (solid line), no activation of p21 can be detected (dashed line). (C) p21 induction in cells inducing a full p53 pulse. The analyzed cells showed the same mean p53 amplitude (see Figure S5A). When wortmannin was added 30 min after damage, no induction of p21 was detected. Only if the upstream kinases were active for longer, more cells induced p21 expression. (D) MCF7 cells were damaged with γ-IR (10 Gy) and harvested at the indicated time points. After 30 min, wortmannin (100 μM) was added to one half of the samples and subsequently refreshed every hour. Western blot analysis showed that sustained kinase input led to acetylation of p53. However, addition of wortmannin prevented the change in the C-terminal modifications, even though total p53 level continued to increase. Since not all cells have excited a p53 pulse by 30 min (Figure 4B), the peak levels of p53 are lower in this condition. (E) MCF7 and MCF7+p53shRNA cells were treated with the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor JW1521 and analyzed by western blot. (F) Integrated fluorescence intensity of p53-Venus versus the fold induction of the p21 reporter for control cells and cells treated with JW1521. About a third of the treated cells show induction of the reporter (dashed line = median of control + 1.5 SD). In cells stably infected with a p53shRNA retrovirus, no induction of p21 was detected in response to JW1521 treatment. (G–I) SET8 knockdown leads to induction of p21 in nonstressed conditions. (G) SET8 mRNA levels were measured by RT-qPCR in cells stably expressing specific or control shRNA. SET8 levels were normalized first to GAPDH mRNA levels and then to the level in cells without shRNA. (error bars indicate the SD). (H) Single-cell trajectory of a cell in nonstressed conditions after SET8 knockdown (p53 reporter, solid line; p21 reporter, dashed line). (I) The fraction of cells inducing the p21 reporter above a threshold (median of control + 1.5 SD) are shown (mean of three independent experiments; error bars indicate the SD). See also Figure S5. Cell 2010 142, 89-100DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.031) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 p53's Dynamics and Regulation in Response to Sustained and Transient Damage (A) A highly sensitive mechanism activates p53 in response to low transient DNA damage during normal growth and in response to severe damage caused by irradiation or drugs. In both cases, p53 shows pulses of similar amplitude and duration. Transient low damage is insufficient to relief the suppression on p53 activity, resulting in no induction of p21 or cell-cycle arrest. Sustained severe damage changes the modification state of p53 to an active form, leading to p21 accumulation and cell-cycle arrest. (B) A persistence detector based on a feed-forward motif. An excitable mechanism leads to accumulation of p53 protein independent of the duration of the upstream signal. A second mechanism, which depends on sustained signaling, is required to convert p53 to its active form, allowing expression of its target genes. Transient damage excites p53 but is insufficient to engage the second arm of the response. Therefore, the accumulated p53 protein remains inactive. Cell 2010 142, 89-100DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.031) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S1 p53 Levels in Non-stressed Conditions, Related to Figure 1 (A–D) p53 levels were measured by immunofluorescent microscopy in different cancer (HCT116 (A) and MCF7 (B)) and untransformed (RPE-hTERT (C) and MCF10A (D)) cell lines. For automated analysis of individual nuclei, the images were segmented on the DAPI channel (DNA marker) using an algorithm from CellProfiler (Carpenter et al., 2006), which is based on automatic thresholding and watershedding. The segmented images were further processed to exclude partially segmented cells or cell aggregates. The images show p53 staining; red circles represent the final segmentation. (E and F) Distributions of p53 levels. Most cells have low p53 levels in non-stressed conditions, but a long right tail represents cells with high p53 levels that overlap with those observed after DNA damage by NCS. (G) Distribution of p53 levels in non-stressed conditions and after DNA damage induced by NCS in HCT116 p53+/+ and p53−/− cells. (H) p53 levels in non-stressed conditions in HCT116 cells were measured with two distinct p53 antibodies, DO1 (mouse monoclonal) and FL393 (rabbit polyclonal). The resulting distributions overlap. (I–L) p53 levels in normal human tissues. Tissue sections of formaldehyde-fixed paraffin-embedded normal small intestine (Jejunum, (I-J)), breast epithelium (K) or cerebral cortex (L) were stained with a p53 antibody and a nuclear marker (I′-L′). (I″-L″) show the overlay of both channels: p53 in red and the nuclear marker in blue. (J) is a detail of the area marked by the dashed box in (I). In these normal tissue sections, p53 levels varied between individual cells in non-stressed conditions, similar to tissue culture cells, with a subset of cells having high levels of p53 (indicated by arrows). Asterisks indicate unspecific signal in the p53 staining. Cell 2010 142, 89-100DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.031) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S2 Analysis of p53 Dynamics in Single Cells, Related to Figure 2 (A and B) Trajectories of dual reporter cells expressing both MT-p53-Venus (blue line) and MT-d2ECFP (green line) in non-stressed conditions. Specific p53 pulses and nonspecific pulses (appearing in both channels) can be seen. Using a custom pulse detection algorithm, only p53 specific pulses are recorded (red and green dots, see Extended Experimental Procedures, “Analysis of p53 Trajectories from Individual Cells”). (C–G) Frequency analysis of p53 pulses in non-stressed conditions and post-damage. The frequency was analyzed by pitch detection using the autocorrelation function. The pitch is defined as the time of the first maximum of the autocorrelation function. The pitch score is the value of the function at this time point. The higher the pitch score is, the more regular the pulses are, i.e., they occur with a determinable frequency. For example, a perfect sine wave would have a pitch score of 1. Trajectories from a 24h time-lapse experiment in non-stressed conditions and post-damage (200ng/ml NCS) were analyzed. The mean pitch score shows that the pulses are more regular after induction of damage (C, error bars = SEM), with a common pitch of around 5h (E). In non-stressed conditions, no common pitch can be determined (D). F-G) Cells were treated with different amounts of NCS and imaged for 48h. Increasing DNA damage led to increasing number of regular p53 pulses (F), with a gradual increase in their pitch score (G) (error bars = SEM). Note that longer trajectories (48h versus 24h) lead to higher overall pitch scores (compare C to G). Cell 2010 142, 89-100DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.031) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S3 p53 Pulses in Non-stressed Conditions Correlate with Cell Cycle Progression, Related to Figure 3 (A–E) Mapping of p53 dynamics to cell cycle progression (for details, see Extended Experimental Procedures, “In Silico Synchronization and Mapping of p53 Dynamics to Cell Cycle Phases”). p53 reporter cells were imaged for 48h in non-stressed conditions, dashed lines indicate cell divisions (A). The time of division was determined and trajectories of complete cell cycles were isolated (B). The x axis was converted to percent of cell cycle and the peak timing (red dots) mapped accordingly (pointed lines). C) The DNA content distribution of asynchronously growing reporter cells was determined by FACS (purple line) and the distribution of cell cycle phases was fitted (blue line and shaded areas). D) Distributions were converted to time spent in each cell cycle phase. E) During division, changes in cell shape and cell morphology lead to higher auto-fluorescence in the YFP channel and to the detection of false-positive p53 peaks (red bars). The p53 levels around the time of mitosis were masked (blue bars). See Extended Experimental Procedures, “Masking of Cell Divisions,” for details. (F and G) Cells were imaged for 40h either untreated or during G2 cell cycle arrest induced by the Cdk1 inhibitor RO3306 (9μM). Sample trajectories of normalized p53 levels in untreated cells (F) and in cells before and after treatment with RO3306 (G). Time of the drug addition is indicated by a solid vertical line, cell division is indicated by a dashed line. Cell 2010 142, 89-100DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.031) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S4 p53 Pulses in Non-stressed Conditions Do Not Activate p21 Expression, Related to Figure 5 Single cell trajectories showing the dynamics of p53 (blue line) and the p21 reporter (green line). After damage, the p21 reporter was induced by p53 pulses (A). In non-stressed conditions, it remained at basal levels even in cells that show multiple p53 pulses (B). Dashed vertical bars indicate time of division. Cell 2010 142, 89-100DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.031) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S5 A Modification-Based Filtering Mechanism Prevents p53 Pulses in Non-stressed Conditions from Activating p21, Related to Figure 6 (A) Cells were damaged with NCS (400ng/ml) and the kinase inhibitor wortmannin was added at the indicated time points post damage. In cells that initiated a p53 response, the inhibitor did not affect p53's amplitude (error bars = SD). (B–D) High levels of p53 are not sufficient for activating p21 expression B) The amplitude of p53 pulses in response to NCS, in non-stressed conditions, and after induction of MTp-p53 expression by 25μM ZnCl2 were measured by time-lapse microscopy. Induced expression of p53 by ZnCl2 led to pulses with higher amplitude than those after DNA damage induction. Data originates from the same experiment as shown in Figure 2 (error bars = SD). C) Single cell trajectories of the p53 (blue line) and p21 reporters (green line) after p53 induction with 25μM ZnCl2. D) The integrated fluorescence intensity of p53-Venus versus the fold-induction of the p21 reporter is shown. Although higher total levels of p53 were measured after Zn-induced expression compared to DNA damage (B), the p21 reporter was not activated in these conditions (dashed line = median of control + 1.5 SD). (E) Cells were synchronized for 16h with the Cdk1 inhibitor RO3306 and then either released from the arrest, or damaged with 10Gy γ-IR (see Extended Experimental Procedures, “Cell Synchronization”). Protein levels were analyzed by Western blot using the indicated antibodies. p21 mRNA levels were measured by RT-qPCR and normalized first to GAPDH mRNA levels and then to p21 level after 16h RO (error bars = SD). (F) MCF7 cells were damaged with γ-IR (10Gy) and harvested at the indicated time points. After 60min, wortmannin (100μM) was added to one half of the samples and subsequently refreshed every hour. Western blot analysis showed that sustained kinase input led to acetylation of p53. However, transient kinase input (artificially caused by wortmannin addition), led to a fast decay in p53 acetylation, even though total p53 level continued to increase. This shows that while accumulation of total p53 is excitable, changes in its C-terminal modifications are not excitable and depend on sustained kinase input. (G) Single cell trajectory after JW1521 treatment showing normalized p53 levels (blue) and fold induction of the p21 mCherry reporter (green). (H) p53 and p21 reporter cells expressing control or SET8 shRNA were imaged for 48h. Integrated fluorescence intensity of p53-Venus versus the fold induction of the p21 reporter is shown (dashed line = median of control + 1.5 SD). (I–K) A second SET8 knock-down cell line was established using a lentiviral vector (pLKO) from the TRC-HS1.0 library (TRCN130036). I) SET8 mRNA levels were measured by RT-qPCR in cells stably expressing specific or control shRNA. SET8 levels were normalized first to GAPDH mRNA levels and then to the level in cells without transgene (error bar = SD). J) The fraction of cells inducing the p21 reporter above the median + 1.5 SD of the control are shown. K) Integrated fluorescence intensity of p53-Venus versus the fold induction of the p21 reporter are shown (dashed line = median of control +1.5 SD). (L) Control and SET8-shRNA (pSUPER) expressing cells were imaged for 48h after treatment with NCS (400ng/ml). Individual cells were tracked and the integrated fluorescence intensity of p53-Venus was plotted versus the fold induction of the p21 reporter. Cell 2010 142, 89-100DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.031) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions