Crystal structure of Omp32, the anion-selective porin from Comamonas acidovorans, in complex with a periplasmic peptide at 2.1 Å resolution  K Zeth, K.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 1998)
Advertisements

Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages (January 1999)
Volume 8, Issue 12, Pages (December 2000)
Structure of β2-bungarotoxin: potassium channel binding by Kunitz modules and targeted phospholipase action  Peter D Kwong, Neil Q McDonald, Paul B Sigler,
Crystal structure of the chemotaxis receptor methyltransferase CheR suggests a conserved structural motif for binding S-adenosylmethionine  Snezana Djordjevic,
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
by Andrew D. Ferguson, Eckhard Hofmann, James W
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1995)
Crystallographic Structure of SurA, a Molecular Chaperone that Facilitates Folding of Outer Membrane Porins  Eduard Bitto, David B. McKay  Structure 
Volume 87, Issue 2, Pages (October 1996)
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (April 1999)
Transmembrane Signaling across the Ligand-Gated FhuA Receptor
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
The Binding of Antibiotics in OmpF Porin
Volume 3, Issue 12, Pages (December 1995)
Crystal structure of human mitochondrial NAD(P)+-dependent malic enzyme: a new class of oxidative decarboxylases  Yingwu Xu, Girija Bhargava, Hao Wu,
Chaperone-Assisted Crystallography with DARPins
Crystal Structure of the Soluble Form of Equinatoxin II, a Pore-Forming Toxin from the Sea Anemone Actinia equina  Alekos Athanasiadis, Gregor Anderluh,
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 85, Issue 7, Pages (June 1996)
UG Wagner, M Hasslacher, H Griengl, H Schwab, C Kratky  Structure 
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 3, Issue 11, Pages (November 1995)
The three-dimensional structure of PNGase F, a glycosyl asparaginase from Flavobacterium meningosepticum  Gillian E Norris, Timothy J Stillman, Bryan.
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages (November 2003)
Catalytic Center Assembly of HPPK as Revealed by the Crystal Structure of a Ternary Complex at 1.25 Å Resolution  Jaroslaw Blaszczyk, Genbin Shi, Honggao.
Crystal Structure of the MHC Class I Homolog MIC-A, a γδ T Cell Ligand
Structure of mammalian ornithine decarboxylase at 1
Volume 14, Issue 10, Pages (October 2006)
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
N Khazanovich, KS Bateman, M Chernaia, M Michalak, MNG James  Structure 
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 84, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Stacy D Benson, Jaana K.H Bamford, Dennis H Bamford, Roger M Burnett 
The Monomeric dUTPase from Epstein-Barr Virus Mimics Trimeric dUTPases
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (August 1999)
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 2, Issue 8, Pages (August 1994)
Structure of the Catalytic Domain of Human DOT1L, a Non-SET Domain Nucleosomal Histone Methyltransferase  Jinrong Min, Qin Feng, Zhizhong Li, Yi Zhang,
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (March 1998)
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Crystal Structure of the DegS Stress Sensor
Crystallographic Analysis of the Recognition of a Nuclear Localization Signal by the Nuclear Import Factor Karyopherin α  Elena Conti, Marc Uy, Lore Leighton,
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
The basis for K-Ras4B binding specificity to protein farnesyl-transferase revealed by 2 Å resolution ternary complex structures  Stephen B Long, Patrick.
Structural Basis for FGF Receptor Dimerization and Activation
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages (February 1998)
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages (December 2001)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Solution Structure of a TBP–TAFII230 Complex
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Structure of a water soluble fragment of the ‘Rieske’ iron–sulfur protein of the bovine heart mitochondrial cytochrome bc1 complex determined by MAD phasing.
Tzanko Doukov, Javier Seravalli, John J Stezowski, Stephen W Ragsdale 
Volume 5, Issue 10, Pages (October 1997)
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
The 2.0 å structure of a cross-linked complex between snowdrop lectin and a branched mannopentaose: evidence for two unique binding modes  Christine Schubert.
OmpT: Molecular Dynamics Simulations of an Outer Membrane Enzyme
Human glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase: the crystal structure reveals a structural NADP+ molecule and provides insights into enzyme deficiency  Shannon.
Stacy D Benson, Jaana K.H Bamford, Dennis H Bamford, Roger M Burnett 
Volume 3, Issue 12, Pages (December 1995)
Pingwei Li, Gerry McDermott, Roland K. Strong  Immunity 
Volume 6, Issue 8, Pages (August 1998)
Crystal Structure of Hyaluronidase, a Major Allergen of Bee Venom
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
The 1.4 Å Crystal Structure of Kumamolysin
Electrostatic activation of Escherichia coli methionine repressor
Luhua Lai, Hisao Yokota, Li-Wei Hung, Rosalind Kim, Sung-Hou Kim 
Presentation transcript:

Crystal structure of Omp32, the anion-selective porin from Comamonas acidovorans, in complex with a periplasmic peptide at 2.1 Å resolution  K Zeth, K Diederichs, W Welte, H Engelhardt  Structure  Volume 8, Issue 9, Pages 981-992 (September 2000) DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00189-1

Figure 1 Porin Omp32 from C. acidovorans in crystal forms CF1 and CF2. (a) Contact between porin molecules in a view perpendicular to the lattice z direction. According to space group R3 there are three laterally shifted and repetitive protein layers of successive abc–abc building the protein crystal. Crystal layers are color-coded: orange (a), blue (b) and magenta (c). (b) The lateral arrangement of Omp32 trimers. The distance between two points that are related by translational symmetry (marked with double arrows) is 107.3 Å in CF1 and 87.1 Å in CF2 in the x and y direction. (c) The Omp32 trimer displayed in side and top view together with the partly ordered and co-crystallized peptide of 54 amino acids. Only eight residues were modeled (gray stick model) owing to experimentally phased electron density. The remaining, but non-interpretable, portion of electron density is indicated in yellow at a 1σ cutoff calculated to 2.9 Å. Figures were produced using the programs MOLSCRIPT [49] and RASTER3D [50]. Structure 2000 8, 981-992DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00189-1)

Figure 2 Overall fold of the monomeric Omp32 together with part of the bound peptide. (a) The complex is viewed perpendicular to the trimeric symmetry axis of the porin and illustrates the course of the polypeptide chain and protein–peptide interactions. The colour ramp starts at the N terminus (blue) and ends at the C terminus (red). Strands are labeled with β1–β16 and loops with L1–L8. Note that ‘loops’ L5–L7 are actually β turns. The bound Ca2+ is marked in black. Eight amino acids (DNWQNGTS; in single-letter amino acid code) of the attached peptide are shown in ball-and-stick representation. The position of the bound SO42– within the channel is shown in CPK representation. P1 is a protrusion of six amino acid residues in the middle of β-strand 2 (β2) that points towards the channel interior. P2 is a protrusion of L3 towards the external face of the molecule. The model was drawn with MOLSCRIPT [50] and RASTER3D [51]. (b) Stereoview close-up showing a surface representation of the contact region between porin (magenta) and the peptide (green). Amino acids involved in the formation of hydrogen bonds (marked as broken lines) are Val4 and Leu6 from Omp32 and glutamine from the peptide. (c) Stereoview of the Fo–Fc map calculated at 3.5σ using the porin model phases. The map shows residual electron density. Two of the peptides related by crystallographic symmetry that were modeled using experimental SIRAS and difference model maps are displayed in ball-and-stick representation. The N-terminal (NT) and C terminal (CT) ends of the porin monomer are marked. The figures in (b,c) were produced with DINO (http://www.bioz.unibas.ch/∼xray/dino). Structure 2000 8, 981-992DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00189-1)

Figure 3 Folding model of the β-barrel structure of Omp32. View from the membrane-exposed side of the 16-stranded β barrel, which is unrolled (β strands β1–β16). The C-terminal β strand is repeated to indicate the cyclic structure of the barrel. Amino acids located in β strands are boxed, other structural features are highlighted. L1–L8, external loops; P1 and P2, protrusions; NT, N-terminal amino acid; CT, C-terminal amino acid. Numbers indicate amino acid positions in the sequence. Structure 2000 8, 981-992DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00189-1)

Figure 4 Porin pore sizes illustrated by central sections. (a) OmpF from E. coli (PDB code 2OMF), (b) Omp32 from C. acidovorans and (c) the porin from R. capsulatus (PDB code 2POR) were superimposed and corresponding sections calculated. Horizontal sections (left panels) through the narrowest site and vertical sections (right panels), showing the progression of the channels, illustrate the channel size inside the molecules and in the constriction zone in particular. Omp32 possesses the narrowest pore cross-section. The structures were superimposed using TOP and the figures were generated using the program DINO (http://www.bioz.unibas.ch/∼xray/dino). Structure 2000 8, 981-992DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00189-1)

Figure 5 The surface of Omp32 oriented towards the outer membrane. A girdle of ten lysine residues and one arginine is enveloped by eight visible, oppositely charged aspartate residues and one glutamate residue. The β strands are indicated in yellow. The surface was calculated using the program MSMS [51], and the representation was produced using the program DINO (http://www.bioz.unibas.ch/∼xray/dino). Structure 2000 8, 981-992DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00189-1)

Figure 6 GRASP molecular surface representations of Omp32. (a) The porin is shown from the top (external face) and bottom (periplasmic face) of the molecule. The molecular surface is colored according to electrostatic potential: blue, positive; red, negative; and white, uncharged. The positions of positively charged residues that make a significant contribution to the surface potential are indicated. For comparison, the electrostatic surface potentials of OmpF (2OMF) and the R. capsulatus porin (2POR) are displayed. (b) Longitudinal sections along the middle of the Omp32 channel. Left side: View onto the back side of the channel (wall facing the membrane). Right side: view onto the inner side of the channel (wall facing the symmetry axis in the trimeric complex). Note the particularly strong positive potential in the constriction site, representing the charge filter created by residues Arg133, Arg75 and Arg38. The figures were generated using the program GRASP [52]. Structure 2000 8, 981-992DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00189-1)

Figure 7 Sulfate-binding site inside the channel of Omp32. Stereo plot of the final electron density of sulfate, water molecules and the surrounding protein. The 2Fo–Fc map is contoured at 1.0σ and calculated at 2.1 Å. The channel section is shown from the periplasmic side of the constriction zone. Protein and sulfate are displayed in ball-and-stick representation (color-coded by atom type). Three conserved arginine residues (Arg38, Arg75 and Arg133) are indicated. The sulfate ion is bound to Arg38. Thr36 located in the small protrusion P1 is marked to illustrate its contribution to channel constriction. Structure 2000 8, 981-992DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00189-1)

Figure 8 Amino acid sequence alignment of homologous porins selected from the β-subdivision of proteobacteria. Omp32 from C. acidovorans (GenBank accession code P24305), the outer membrane protein of B. pertussis (Q04064), the major outer membrane protein PI.A from N. gonorrhoeae (P05430) and major outer membrane protein P.IB from N. meningitidis (P30690) are compared. The numbers refer to the sequence of Omp32. Highly conserved residues are highlighted in red type. Secondary structure elements are indicated: β strands are indicated by yellow bars, β bulges B1 and B2 are marked with green bars and the protrusions P1 and P2 are marked in red. Amino acids that contribute to the positive surface potential within the pore and the two girdles of aromatic amino acids are marked as described in the figure. Pairwise sequence alignments were generated using ToPLign (http://cartan.gmd.de/ToPLign.html). Structure 2000 8, 981-992DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00189-1)