Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Advertisements

Cotranscriptional Recruitment of the mRNA Export Factor Yra1 by Direct Interaction with the 3′ End Processing Factor Pcf11  Sara Ann Johnson, Gabrielle.
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 23, Issue 14, Pages (July 2013)
Regulation and Destabilization of HIF-1α by ARD1-Mediated Acetylation
Volume 50, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
The Sterile 20-like Kinase Tao-1 Controls Tissue Growth by Regulating the Salvador- Warts-Hippo Pathway  Carole L.C. Poon, Jane I. Lin, Xiaomeng Zhang,
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (November 2007)
DELLAs Modulate Jasmonate Signaling via Competitive Binding to JAZs
Volume 41, Issue 1, Pages e4 (April 2017)
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages (January 2016)
A Truncated Arabidopsis NUCLEOSOME ASSEMBLY PROTEIN 1, AtNAP1;3T, Alters Plant Growth Responses to Abscisic Acid and Salt in the Atnap1;3-2 Mutant  Liu.
Phytochrome A Negatively Regulates the Shade Avoidance Response by Increasing Auxin/Indole Acidic Acid Protein Stability  Chuanwei Yang, Famin Xie, Yupei.
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Nithya Raman, Elisabeth Weir, Stefan Müller  Molecular Cell 
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages (August 2002)
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (June 2017)
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages (April 2010)
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
SUMO Promotes HDAC-Mediated Transcriptional Repression
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 67, Issue 4, Pages e4 (August 2017)
Volume 134, Issue 5, Pages (September 2008)
Yutian Peng, Lois S. Weisman  Developmental Cell 
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e5 (May 2017)
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 66, Issue 5, Pages e4 (June 2017)
Volume 41, Issue 5, Pages e5 (June 2017)
Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages e3 (July 2017)
A Critical Role for Noncoding 5S rRNA in Regulating Mdmx Stability
Yi Tang, Jianyuan Luo, Wenzhu Zhang, Wei Gu  Molecular Cell 
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Cotranscriptional Recruitment of the mRNA Export Factor Yra1 by Direct Interaction with the 3′ End Processing Factor Pcf11  Sara Ann Johnson, Gabrielle.
Volume 21, Issue 8, Pages (August 2014)
Plant TRAF Proteins Regulate NLR Immune Receptor Turnover
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages (May 2016)
SUMOylation of Psmd1 Controls Adrm1 Interaction with the Proteasome
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (July 2011)
RLE-1, an E3 Ubiquitin Ligase, Regulates C
Arabidopsis WRKY45 Interacts with the DELLA Protein RGL1 to Positively Regulate Age-Triggered Leaf Senescence  Ligang Chen, Shengyuan Xiang, Yanli Chen,
Two Functional Modes of a Nuclear Receptor-Recruited Arginine Methyltransferase in Transcriptional Activation  María J. Barrero, Sohail Malik  Molecular.
Arabidopsis NF-YCs Mediate the Light-Controlled Hypocotyl Elongation via Modulating Histone Acetylation  Yang Tang, Xuncheng Liu, Xu Liu, Yuge Li, Keqiang.
Mst1 Is an Interacting Protein that Mediates PHLPPs' Induced Apoptosis
HOS1 Facilitates the Phytochrome B-Mediated Inhibition of PIF4 Function during Hypocotyl Growth in Arabidopsis  Ju-Heon Kim, Hyo-Jun Lee, Jae-Hoon Jung,
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (November 2012)
Structure of the Siz/PIAS SUMO E3 Ligase Siz1 and Determinants Required for SUMO Modification of PCNA  Ali A. Yunus, Christopher D. Lima  Molecular Cell 
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (July 2011)
Proteasome-Mediated Degradation of p21 via N-Terminal Ubiquitinylation
In Vitro Analysis of Huntingtin-Mediated Transcriptional Repression Reveals Multiple Transcription Factor Targets  Weiguo Zhai, Hyunkyung Jeong, Libin.
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (April 2004)
Volume 25, Issue 7, Pages e4 (November 2018)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (June 2017)
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Stabilization of Cell Polarity by the C. elegans RING Protein PAR-2
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (May 2008)
DELLA Proteins Promote Anthocyanin Biosynthesis via Sequestering MYBL2 and JAZ Suppressors of the MYB/bHLH/WD40 Complex in Arabidopsis thaliana  Ye Xie,
Wang Long , Mai Yan-Xia , Zhang Yan-Chun , Luo Qian , Yang Hong-Quan  
c-IAP1 Cooperates with Myc by Acting as a Ubiquitin Ligase for Mad1
The bHLH Transcription Factors MYC2, MYC3, and MYC4 Are Required for Jasmonate- Mediated Inhibition of Flowering in Arabidopsis  Houping Wang, Yang Li,
Chih-Yung S. Lee, Tzu-Lan Yeh, Bridget T. Hughes, Peter J. Espenshade 
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages (July 2018)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages 102-110 (January 2014) Small Ubiquitin-like Modifier Protein SUMO Enables Plants to Control Growth Independently of the Phytohormone Gibberellin  Lucio Conti, Stuart Nelis, Cunjin Zhang, Ailidh Woodcock, Ranjan Swarup, Massimo Galbiati, Chiara Tonelli, Richard Napier, Peter Hedden, Malcolm Bennett, Ari Sadanandom  Developmental Cell  Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages 102-110 (January 2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2013.12.004 Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 OTS1 and OTS2 Modulate Growth on Salt through a DELLA-Dependent Mechanism (A) Image of representative 10-day-old seedlings grown in petri dishes in the presence of salt (NaCl). Bar = 5 mm. (B) Mean root growth of 10-day-old seedlings in the presence of 100 mM NaCl expressed as growth (%) relatively to the untreated controls. Error bar = SEM. n = 20–24. (C) Accumulation of endogenous RGA (top) and GAI (bottom) proteins in 10-day-old seedlings grown in petri dishes in the absence (−) or presence (+) of 100 mM NaCl. Number indicates molecular mass (kDa). Coomassie Blue filter staining (C. Blue) serves as a loading control. (D) Mean levels of Gibberellic Acid (GA) isoforms in ots1 ots2 double mutants compared with wild-type (Col-0). Error bars = SD of three biological replicates. See also Figure S1. Developmental Cell 2014 28, 102-110DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2013.12.004) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 SUMOylation Is a DELLA Peptide Modification Affecting DELLA Accumulation (A) Immunoprecipitations (IP aGFP) of total proteins (input) derived from pRGA::GFP:RGA or wild-type (Ler WT) seedlings. Proteins were probed with GFP (WB aGFP) or AtSUMO1 (WB aAtSUMO1/2) antibodies. Arrow indicates GFP:RGA protein, vertical bars, the SUMOylated forms (S1-GFP:RGA) of GFP:RGA protein. (B) Immunoprecipitation (IP aGFP) of total proteins (input) derived from 35S::GFP or 35S::GFP:NPR1 seedlings sprayed with 1 mM Salicylic acid (+ SA) or control (−SA). Arrowheads indicate the GFP:NPR1 or GFP proteins. Ponceau staining of the Rubisco large subunit afforded a loading control. (C) In vitro deSUMOylation assay of SUMOylated GFP:RGA proteins with recombinant SUMO protease subunits of SENP1 (GST:SENP1), SENP2 (GST:SENP2), or buffer control. (D) In vitro deSUMOylation SUMOylated GFP:RGA proteins after incubation with His:OTS1 or His:OTS1C526S recombinant proteins. (E) Cross-species alignment of the DELLA domain. The conserved lysine residue is shown in bold characters. The shaded area represents a noncanonical SUMOylation motif. (F) His:RGA SUMOylation assay in the presence of activating (E1) and conjugating (E2) enzymes and active (His:AtS1GG) or inactive (His:AtS1AA) AtSUMO1. Arrows indicate the SUMOylated forms of His:RGA protein. Western blot is conducted with RGA antibodies (WB aRGA). (G) GST:GAI SUMOylation assay. A GST pull-down of total E. coli extracts (input) is shown. The SUMOylated forms of GST:GAI are shown on the right. An asterisk indicates the predominant SUMOylated band of GAI detected with GAI (left) and AtSUMO1 (right) antibodies. The extra bands revealed by AtSUMO1 antibodies likely derive from the nonspecific proteolysis of GST:GAI or other SUMOylated forms of GST:GAI. (H) Pattern of GAI:GFP accumulation in 35S::GAI:GFP seedlings grown for 10 days in the absence (−) or presence (+) of NaCl (100 mM). (I) Pattern of SUMOylated GFP:RGA accumulation in pRGA::GFP:RGA seedlings grown for 10 days in the absence (−) or presence (+) of NaCl (100 mM). (J) Immunoprecipitation (IP aGFP) of total proteins (input) derived from pRGA::GFP:RGA seedlings, harvested at different hours after being sprayed with GA3 (100 μM), and compared to untreated control (ctrl). (K) Accumulation of GFP:RGA protein in 8-day-old seedlings. Proteins derived from pRGA::GFP:RGA ots1 ots2 and pRGA::GFP:RGA OTS1 OTS2 lines. Proteins are loaded in duplicated lanes. (L) Immunoprecipitation (IP aGFP) from total proteins (input) derived from pRGA::GFP:RGA seedlings in the wild-type (OTS1 OTS2) or mutants (ots1 ots2) backgrounds. (M) Accumulation of GFP:RGA protein in 8-day-old pRGA::GFP:RGA seedlings transferred to liquid cultures containing Cycloheximide (CHX; 100 μM), (+), or mock control (DMSO), (−), for 1 hr. (N) Accumulation of GFP:RGA proteins in 10-day-old pRGA::GFP:RGA seedlings grown in petri dishes in the presence of different concentrations of NaCl. Nontransgenic (Col-0) plants serve as a negative control. Developmental Cell 2014 28, 102-110DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2013.12.004) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 DELLA deSUMOylation Impairs DELLA Accumulation (A) Image of 20-day-old seedlings grown in petri dishes. (B) Accumulation of endogenous RGA or GAI proteins in 9-day-old wild-type (Ler), ga1-5, or three independent transgenic (T2) 35S::4Xmyc:OTS2 ga1-5 lines seedlings. Western blot is conducted with RGA or GAI antibodies (WB aRGA, aGAI). RGA∗ indicates a cross-reaction of the GAI antibody with RGA protein. (C) Real-time PCR analysis of RGA, GAI, and OTS2 transcripts levels. Total RNA derived from the same material as in (B). Bars indicate the expression levels as fold change variations relatively to ga1-5 (arbitrarily set as one). ACTIN was used for normalization; error bars = SD of two technical replicates. (D) Image of representative 16-day-old transgenic (T4) seedlings of the indicated genotypes (Col-0 background) grown in control or 100 mM NaCl-containing medium for 8 days. (E) Mean root growth of 16-day-old seedlings of the indicated genotypes expressed as absolute values ± SD (left) or as growth (%) relatively to the untreated controls ± SE. Seedlings were transferred to 100 mM NaCl or control plates 8 days after germination. Root length was measured 8 days after transfer. The mean value for three biological replicates is shown; n = 3–4 plants per replicate. (F) Accumulation of GAI:GFP or gaiK49R:GFP proteins in 16-day-old transgenic seedlings grown in petri dishes. Nontransgenic plants serve as a negative control. An asterisk indicates a cross-reacting band detected by the GFP antibody. (G) RT-PCR analysis of GFP transcript levels in transgenic plants shown in (F). ACTIN was used for normalization. (H) Mean rosette leaves number (RLN) in long day-grown plants scored after bolting. See also Figure S2. Developmental Cell 2014 28, 102-110DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2013.12.004) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 SUMOylated DELLA Binds GID1 through a SIM and Independently from GA (A) Cross-species alignment of SIM B (shaded amino acids) in the GID1 protein amino terminal extension (gray). (B) Far-western assay with peptides corresponding to SIM A and SIM B, located in the GID1a N-terminal extension. SIMs central hydrophobic core is shown in bold character. (C) Top view of the GID1a N-terminal extension (purple). The SIM B motif (yellow) resides at the interface between GID1a (lavender) and the GAI DELLA domain (green). The position of the GAI SUMOylation site (K49) is shown with a red dot. (D) Sensorgram of interaction between SUMO1 (AtS1) with GID1a. Shaded area = SEM. (E) Interaction between RGA alone with GID1a (red) and RGA and SUMO1 (AtS1, blue) with GID1a, both in the presence of GA3. Shaded area = SEM. (F) GST pull-down assay between His:AtSUMO1 and GST:GID1a or GST in the presence (+) or absence (−) of GA3 (10 μM). Asterisk indicates a cross-reacting band. (G) GST pull-down assay of GFP:RGA proteins with recombinant GST:GID1a or GST in the presence (+) or absence (−) of GA3 (10 μM). (H) Accumulation of GID1a:TAP proteins derived from independent T3 transgenic 35S::GID1a:TAP young seedlings. (I) Mean germination rates under different PAC concentrations of wild-type (WT, Col-0), ots1 ots2 double mutants and six independent 35S::GID1a:TAP transgenic lines (T4). Error bars = SD of three biological replicates. (J) Images of representative 10-day-old seedlings grown in petri dishes in the presence or absence of 100 mM salt (NaCl). (K) Mean root growth of 10-day-old seedlings in the presence of 100 mM NaCl expressed as a percentage (%) relatively to the untreated controls. Error bar = SEM; n = 16 for each genotype/treatment combination. (L) Images of representative 8-day-old seedlings grown in petri dishes in the presence or absence of 100 mM salt (NaCl). (M) Mean root growth of 8-day-old seedlings in the presence of 100 mM NaCl. The two experiments were run in parallel. Error bar = SEM; n = 32 for each genotype/treatment combination. (N) Model for the SUMOylation-dependent DELLA accumulation in Arabidopsis. In the absence of GA, the SUMOylated (S1, red) pool of DELLA (green) sequester the GA receptor GID1 (purple) through interaction with the SIM motif (yellow), located in the lid region of GID1 (lavender). This allows accumulation of DELLA proteins. In the presence of GA, the GID1-GA complex binds DELLA, and in the presence of SLEEPY1 (SLY), it targets DELLAs for Ubiquitin (Ub)-mediated proteasomal degradation. Developmental Cell 2014 28, 102-110DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2013.12.004) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions