Unsupervised statistical learning in newly hatched chicks

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Binocular rivalry Colin W.G. Clifford Current Biology Volume 19, Issue 22, Pages R1022-R1023 (December 2009) DOI: /j.cub Copyright ©
Advertisements

RNA-Directed DNA Methylation: Getting a Grip on Mechanism
Biological components of sex differences in color preference
Volume 24, Issue 23, Pages R1109-R1111 (December 2014)
Positive emotional contagion in a New Zealand parrot
Volume 18, Issue 15, Pages R651-R652 (August 2008)
Plant Growth: Jogging the Cell Cycle with JAG
Spatial Memory: Mice Quickly Learn a Safe Haven
Nuclear envelope Current Biology
Ocean Depths: The Mesopelagic and Implications for Global Warming
Unsupervised statistical learning in newly hatched chicks
Victoria F. Ratcliffe, David Reby  Current Biology 
Volume 19, Issue 22, Pages R1022-R1023 (December 2009)
Eye position predicts what number you have in mind
Natalia Zaretskaya, Andreas Bartels  Current Biology 
Aaron R. Seitz, Praveen K. Pilly, Christopher C. Pack  Current Biology 
Pre-constancy Vision in Infants
Generalizable Learning: Practice Makes Perfect — But at What?
Comparative Cognition: Action Imitation Using Episodic Memory
Visual Categorization: When Categories Fall to Pieces
Whistled Turkish alters language asymmetries
Visual Development: Learning Not to See
Linguistic Relativity: Does Language Help or Hinder Perception?
Sexual Selection: Roles Evolving
Infant cognition Current Biology
Depth Affects Where We Look
Volume 23, Issue 23, Pages R1025-R1026 (December 2013)
Molecular rulers? Current Biology
Volume 22, Issue 17, Pages R668-R669 (September 2012)
Volume 25, Issue 23, Pages R1114-R1116 (December 2015)
Visual Attention: Size Matters
Asymmetric tail-wagging responses by dogs to different emotive stimuli
The FEAR network Current Biology
Elephant cognition Current Biology
Honeybee Communication: A Signal for Danger
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages R60-R61 (January 2014)
Volume 18, Issue 15, Pages R651-R652 (August 2008)
Children, but Not Chimpanzees, Prefer to Collaborate
Better Fruits and Vegetables through Sensory Analysis
Evolution: Mirror, Mirror in the Pond
Volume 25, Issue 19, Pages R815-R817 (October 2015)
Dichoptic training enables the adult amblyopic brain to learn
Why do birds sleep with one eye open
What We Know Currently about Mirror Neurons
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages R262-R263 (March 2014)
Volume 16, Issue 21, Pages R906-R910 (November 2006)
Non-cortical magnitude coding of space and time by pigeons
Figs and fig wasps Current Biology
Planar Cell Polarity: Microtubules Make the Connection with Cilia
Visual Sensitivity Can Scale with Illusory Size Changes
Honeybee buzz attenuates plant damage by caterpillars
Daniel Hanus, Josep Call  Current Biology 
Volume 15, Issue 13, Pages R483-R484 (July 2005)
Volume 23, Issue 21, Pages R963-R965 (November 2013)
Jannath Begum Ali, Charles Spence, Andrew J. Bremner  Current Biology 
Visual Development: Learning Not to See
Centrosome Size: Scaling Without Measuring
FOXO transcription factors
Category Selectivity in the Ventral Visual Pathway Confers Robustness to Clutter and Diverted Attention  Leila Reddy, Nancy Kanwisher  Current Biology 
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages R353-R355 (May 2009)
The challenge of measuring long-term positive aftereffects
Conservation Biology: The Importance of Wilderness
The Interaction between Binocular Rivalry and Negative Afterimages
Grasping Weber's law Current Biology
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages R58-R60 (January 2018)
Basal bodies Current Biology
Ctenophores Current Biology
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages R198-R202 (March 2008)
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages R508-R510 (June 2014)
Presentation transcript:

Unsupervised statistical learning in newly hatched chicks Chiara Santolin, Orsola Rosa-Salva, Giorgio Vallortigara, Lucia Regolin  Current Biology  Volume 26, Issue 23, Pages R1218-R1220 (December 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.10.011 Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Illustration of stimuli and apparatus used in Experiments 1 and 2. (A) Left: test-version of the familiar sequence and representation of the unfamiliar random stimulus used in Experiment 1. Right: test-version of the familiar sequence and test-version of the unfamiliar structured sequence used in Experiment 2. (B) Representation of runway and computer screens used during testing. (C) Proportion of time spent by each chick near the screen presenting the familiar stimulus, for both Experiment 1 and Experiment 2. Error bars show standard errors of the means. Asterisks indicate significant departures from chance level (0.5, marked by the dotted line). Current Biology 2016 26, R1218-R1220DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2016.10.011) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions