What makes you an “American” citizen?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CHAPTER 16.3: THE DREDD SCOTT DECISION. FACTS 1.Dred Scott was a slave from Missouri. (MO) 2. Scott and his owner moved to Wisconsin for four years. 3.
Advertisements

Kansas-Nebraska Act Dred Scott Case Pages Workbook 88.
The Dred Scott Decision
II. Basis of Citizenship
Extending Rights to All present What documents and institutions protect the rights of Americans?
leading to the Civil War Lincoln/Douglas Debates
U.S. Citizenship Lesson 12.
 Dred Scott v. J. A. Sanford (1857).   Who was Dred Scott?  Events Affecting Dred Scott’s fate  Timeline of Events  The Two Sides of the Issue 
A Nation Divided Political Divisions Chapter 15, Section 3 Pages
The Court ruled that Scott's "sojourn" of two years to Illinois and the Northwest Territory did not make him free once he returned to Missouri.
Changing the Law of the Land
II. Basis of Citizenship. A. National Citizenship Founders let states decide who was a citizen Naturalization – Legal process by which a person is granted.
Objective: To examine the importance of the Lincoln – Douglas debates and the Dred Scott decision. Dred Scott Abraham Lincoln Stephen Douglas.
Griffin Honeycutt Block 2 October 29,  Official Name- Dred Scott v. John F. A. Sandford  The defendant’s name was actually Sanford, but was misspelled.
Bell Work In your notebooks, respond to the prompt: How can differences among students affect the school? What kinds of differences could lead to problems.
Chapter 15, Section 3 Challenges to Slavery.
By: Mireina Barrios. Dred Scott and Roger B. Taney Dred Scott, a slave who had his freedom at Illinois and the free territory of Wisconsin before moving.
Dred Scott v. Sandford. The Issues Could the Supreme Court rule on the matter? Did the lower courts have the right to hear and determine the case between.
APUSH – Spiconardi.   In the 1830s, Dred Scott, a slave, accompanied his owner from Missouri to Illinois and later the territory of Wisconsin  Scott.
Events and Compromises
Lesson 18: The Union in Peril part 7
Dred Scott Decision (1857).
APUSH Review: Dred Scott v. Sanford Everything You Need to Know About Dred Scott v. Sanford To Succeed In APUSH
Dred Scott v. Sandford By Chloe Sturges. Overview Dred Scott, a slave in the 1800s, was taken out of Missouri, a slave state, by his owner John Emerson.
Tyler Kennedy Nick Logan.  Born a slave to the Blow family  Sold to Army Surgeon named Dr. John Anderson  Owner died then got a new owner  Lived in.
By: Mireina Barrios. Dred Scott and Roger B. Taney Dred Scott, a slave who had his freedom at Illinois and the free territory of Wisconsin before moving.
Back to the 1850’s… Law in the 1850’s. Rights of African Americans Still the Fugitive Slave Act Whether free or slave you could NOT be citizen Still segregation.
Dred Scott v. Sandford A Supreme Court Decision in 1857.
Kansas-Nebraska Act (1854) 1854 Law that allowed for popular sovereignty in the Kansas and Nebraska Territories Devised by the “Little Giant” Stephen Douglas.
Dred Scott.  I can explain how the Dred Scott Court decision impacted African Americans during the time before the Civil War.
WhoA Missouri slave What When Where Why Concept Development: Dredd Scott was a slave who argued for his freedom to the Supreme Court. Dredd Scott vs. Sanford.
21.6 & 21.7: The Dred Scott Case & Decision Page
On your own and on the worksheet provided: 1) Write a definition for the word property. 2) List some examples of property.
Analyzing Documents for a DBQ (Document Based Question)
Political Divisions Chapter 15, Section 3.
Civil War Causes Quiz Reteach.
Uncle Tom’s Cabin and Dred Scott
Chapter 14 The Nation Divided Section 3: The Crisis Deepens
Dred Scott Decision 1857.
Ch:14 The Nation Divided
Objectives Explain why the Republican Party came into existence in the 1850s. Summarize the issues involved in the Dred Scott decision. Identify Abraham.
Pre-Civil War Events Ms.Bean.
Quote The best way to predict the future, is to create it.
Dred Scott.
Changing the Law of the Land
Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)
Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)
Opener – Copy into Notebook pp. 84
The Dred Scott Case and the Election of 1860
Chapter 14 Section 3 Objectives
Chapter 14 Section 3 Objectives
Background: Who was Dred Scott?
Challenges to Slavery 15-3
Famous Abolitionists.
ROGER TANEY, CHIEF JUSTICE OF SUPREME COURT DRED SCOTT
Happy 800th to the Magna Carta!!!!!!
Review from last week Kansas-Nebraska Act: Kansas is almost ready to be a state- To slave or not? Stephan Douglas looked to avoid more issues so he proposes.
What causes of sectional conflict led to the Civil War?
US History: Spiconardi
The Dred Scott Decision
Objective: To examine the importance of the Lincoln – Douglas debates and the Dred Scott decision. Abraham Lincoln Stephen Douglas Dred Scott.
The Divided States of America
Dred Scott Supreme Court Case 1857.
Dred Scott v. Sandford.
DRED SCOTT CASE.
Conflict over Slavery 1850s 2
Handout about Frederick Douglas
8X Tuesday Objective: Describe political developments in the US that led to Civil War. Agenda: Do Now: Explain the rise of the Republican Party.
The Divided States of America
Dred Scott Decision (1857).
Presentation transcript:

What makes you an “American” citizen? OBJECTIVE DO FIRST You will be able to analyze the Dred Scott case and explain its effects. What makes you an “American” citizen? How do you become an “American” citizen? Were African-Americans considered citizens during the 1850’s?

Anchor Babies & American Citizenship According to the 14th amendment, all people born in the U.S. are citizens. Some Americans believe that illegal immigrants have started to take advantage of this and come to the U.S. illegally only to have “anchor babies”— babies born in the U.S. who automatically become American citizens. There are some Americans who believe that this birthright citizenship should be taken away.

Anchor Babies & American Citizenship As we watch the following clip, think about this question: Why do some Americans want this right taken away? How does race play a role in this argument on citizenship? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ow5Z4w mRvIk&feature=fvsr

The Dred Scott Decision The 14th amendment was not added to the Constitution until after the Civil War. Today, we will learn about the Dred Scott Decision and find out how the Supreme Court ruled on whether or not African- Americans were considered American citizens.

Who was Dred Scott? In 1857, the Supreme Court was faced with a case that forced them to decide: are African Americans citizens of this country? Are they entitled to privileges that free white citizens enjoy? The Dred Scott case was about a slave named Dred Scott from Missouri. While working for his master, Dred Scott had traveled to and lived in the free territories of Wisconsin and Illinois. When he returned to Missouri, Scott decided to sue for his freedom—he argued that because his master had taken him to a free territory, he should now be a free man.

How did the Supreme Court Rule? The Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Roger Taney, had to make a decision. Was Dred Scott, a slave, allowed to sue his master for freedom? And if he was allowed to bring his case to court, did his time in free territory make him a free man? By a vote of five to four, the Supreme Court decided that Scott did not have the right to sue for his freedom in court because he was not a citizen. Justice Taney declared that no African American, whether slave or free, could ever be a citizen. He argued that giving African-Americans the same rights as white American citizens would lead to violence throughout the nation.

Reason for the Ruling The Supreme Court also ruled that Dred Scott’s time in free territory did not automatically make him a free man. Because slaves were “property,” white slave owners could take their property anywhere and the government had no right to take away that property . This right to property was protected by the 5th Amendment to the Constitution, and by that reasoning, Dred Scott was not a free man.

Response to the Ruling In the South, slaveholders were overjoyed to hear the Supreme Court’s ruling. This ruling made it possible for slave owners to take their slaves into any new territory of the U.S. without limits. In the North, people were stunned and outraged at Justice Taney’s ruling. The New York Tribune, the newspaper, called this decision a “wicked and false judgment.”

Check your Understanding Read the quote from Justice Taney after the ruling on the Dred Scott case. Complete the APPART analysis below using information from today’s class and the quote.   “If black people were entitled to the privileges [of]…citizens, it would … give the persons of the negro race…the fully liberty of speech… [freedom] to hold public meetings upon political affairs and to keep and carry arms wherever they went. And all of this would be done [by] both free and slaves…producing discontent and insubordination [disobedience] among them, and endangering the peace and safety of the state.” --Roger B. Taney, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court (1856)