Dr Sarah Alix, Deputy Head of Education (Chelmsford)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Is improving feedback like herding cats? One School's approaches for enhancing feedback to students Steve Rutherford
Advertisements

Drafting an Improvement Plan Using NSS Data Catherine Rendell – Deputy Director Academic Quality Assurance and Enhancement, University of Hertfordshire.
Plantation Primary School
Feedback/feedforward: a view from the Law School Dr Jane Bryan.
Turnitin GradeMark FHSCE experiences over academic year 2011/2012.
Law School 1 Using Blackboard Assignment tool for e-submission, e-marking, e-feedback Jane Daly 21 st March 2013.
NSS 2013 Strategic Meeting of Senate 11 September 2013 Dr Veena O’Halloran Director of Student Experience and Enhancement Services.
Realising Opportunities at the University of York: A case study Tamlyn Ryan Tony Wilson University of York.
Operation of Central Progression and Award Boards Laurence Fuller Head of Student Records and Examinations Planning and Academic Administration.
Analysis of Scottish NSS Results 29 th April 2010 Dr Alex Buckley The Higher Education Academy.
Brunel University Briefing for External Examiners February 2013
Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development Student assessment: lightening the load while increasing the learning Dr Chris Rust Head, Oxford Centre.
School of something FACULTY OF OTHER Faculty of Arts ‘Fair, prompt & detailed’ – matching staff and student expectations on assessment and feedback in.
Food for thought: The students’ perspective of assessment and feedback Rita Headington, Hetty Barron, Michael Smith, Duncan Callnon.
UEL Guidelines for External Examiners Philip Brimson Quality Manager (Validation & Review)
Perceptions of the Role of Feedback in Supporting 1 st Yr Learning Jon Scott, Ruth Bevan, Jo Badge & Alan Cann School of Biological Sciences.
Cardiff v Malaysia: a comparison of students’ academic experience in a first year MPharm module Dr Steve Hiscox PHRMY PCUTL Module 2 September 2011.
The Student Experience Project Overview for Kosovo Higher Education visit Mark Wilkinson October 2014.
1 What Students Need to Know from The National Student Survey 17 June 2010 Sami Benyahia, Director.
Key features of the University of Manchester Professor Cathy Cassell Deputy Director (Academic) Sarah Featherstone Head of Undergraduate Services Original.
UEL Guidelines for External Examiners Philip Brimson Quality Manager (Validation & Review)
Marking Leslie Croxford & Kevin Millam. Purpose To help you to… mark consistently assess consistently develop robust assessment systems …in line with.
External examiner induction Alison Coates QA Manager (Validation & Review)
Clare Saunders and Danielle Lamb Subject Centre for Philosophical and Religious Studies.
The Learning and Teaching Conference 22 nd April 2015.
Access to HE Standardisation Event Add title of the event e.g. Health Date and time.
Student Expectations of Assessment and Feedback Linda Juleff, Sam Ling and Becky Stone Southampton Solent University.
UCL Arena Exchange Seminar Improving assessment and feedback scores.
Marking/Second Marking & Feedback Dr Robert Hamilton AD(T) Loughborough University.
Lesson Objectives 1.Receive the assignment 2 brief and guidance 2.Work on assignment 2.
UEL – London’s leading university for civic engagement John Headley Director of Financial Services Vice-Chancellor’s Group November 2015 External Examiners.
Assessment & Feedback Working Group Developing Departmental Assessment & Feedback Practices The ‘Quick Wins’ Paper.
An Introduction to External Examining Procedures at Bangor University
Student feedback Your feedback provides real insight into the student experience and feeds into university processes and policies Feedback helps us:
Expectations of Our External Examiners
Can a grade based approach improve our assessment practice?
UEL Guidelines for External Examiners
Leading Enhancement in Assessment and Feedback in Medical Sciences
 Be prepared Be positive Be respectful Value the process
Prof Nora Colton Deputy Vice-Chancellor, Academic November 2016
School of Health, Care & Early Years/ Learning Resources/HELMs
Quality and Standards An introduction.
EXPECTATIONS AND COURSE OUTLINE
2. Quality Assurance Unit (QAU)
Partnership Forum 2017 Partner Institution Survey 2016 :
SCHOOL OF ART DESIGN & MEDIA NSS POSITIVITY 2016
Dr. Peter Hills, Kara Peterson, Simon Croker, and Dr. Rachel Manning
A department-wide approach to Feedback
e-Feedback for formative assessment:
An Introduction to External Examining Procedures at Bangor University
Director of Quality and Educational Development
Responsibilities and engagement of an external examiner
Tutor Induction, 22 September 2018 Lawrence Dritsas and Marie Craft
Using student representatives to increase engagement
The School Point of View
Using rubrics in Turnitin: a more consistent approach to assessment and feedback Jenny Woof 22 March 2018.
A department-wide approach to Feedback
External Examiner Induction
Important information about your assessment in 2017/18
External Examiner Briefing Session
Assessing the value of rubrics in online assessment
Alasdair Blair & Sam McGinty
Food for thought: The students’ perspective of assessment and feedback
External Examiners Induction Edge Hill University
External Examiners Induction Welcome to UEL
Partnership Moderation Report,
College of Social Sciences
Brunel University Briefing for External Examiners March 2014
Summer timetable Period 3
Presentation transcript:

Dr Sarah Alix, Deputy Head of Education (Chelmsford) Improving NSS scores in the area of assessment and feedback through the review of assessment processes, introduction of a standardisation day, and explicit communication closing the loop with students. Dr Sarah Alix, Deputy Head of Education (Chelmsford)

Issues Poor NSS performance Particularly around areas of assessment

Assessment Pilot grademark annotation (feedback from students and EEs) Developed the feedback form suitable for regional colleges Still issues with inconsistency of feedback

Standardisation day Occurs around the day of main hand-in Everyone in same room, across campus, new staff and regional partners Input; feedback form, expectations for this, annotation/close marking, different years/gradebands. Processes, EEs. Then courses work in groups to standardise work Course leaders then look across modules ‘this has been incredibly useful to ensure that we are all doing the same, can discuss any issues and examine work with module leaders before the ongoing marking, this has been so much better for us and the students’.

Close the loop with students Email to each student year group outlining strengths in their assignments and quotes from external examiners Use language of NSS eg EEs commented that marking process were robust Remind them of 20WD for feedback and this was timely/achieved/better

Clear processes EEs are informed in September of work they will see, when they will receive it etc Expectations for completion of marking Time booked/diarised for moderation Gives clear time – 1 week for EEs to look at work

  Assessment & feedback 2016 Early Years Playwork and Education 88 Education Studies 80 Education & Childhood 69 Early Childhood Studies/ ECPS 84 Some course improved as much as 30%. Most courses achieved higher than ARU average (79) and HEI average (73). ‘what have you done differently? I can see no inconsistency in marking and feedback across all of the markers on the Undergraduate Major Project, this is really outstanding’

Areas still to work on! Feedback on my work has helped me to clarify things I did not understand Clarity of processes will support us in the next steps of unpicking the further detail