Volume 21, Issue 8, Pages (April 2011)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (May 2013)
Advertisements

The Genetic Basis of White Tigers
The Role of Recently Derived FT Paralogs in Sunflower Domestication
John F. Golz, Emma J. Keck, Andrew Hudson  Current Biology 
MicroRNAs Act as Cofactors in Bicoid-Mediated Translational Repression
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (May 2011)
Ribosome Evolution for Two Artificial Amino Acids in E. coli
Volume 19, Issue 23, Pages (December 2009)
Pericycle Current Biology
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (May 2010)
Revisiting Neuronal Cell Type Classification in Caenorhabditis elegans
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 16, Issue 14, Pages (July 2006)
The Evolution of Venom by Co-option of Single-Copy Genes
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages (June 2011)
Xiaochun Ge, Fang Chang, Hong Ma  Current Biology 
Volume 24, Issue 16, Pages (August 2014)
Mutual Repression by Bantam miRNA and Capicua Links the EGFR/MAPK and Hippo Pathways in Growth Control  Héctor Herranz, Xin Hong, Stephen M. Cohen  Current.
Temporal Control of Plant Organ Growth by TCP Transcription Factors
Rachael A. Bay, Stephen R. Palumbi  Current Biology 
Richard Sibout, Stéphanie Plantegenet, Christian S. Hardtke 
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (June 2010)
Volume 19, Issue 19, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 26, Issue 13, Pages (July 2016)
John F. Golz, Emma J. Keck, Andrew Hudson  Current Biology 
Reinforcement Can Overcome Gene Flow during Speciation in Drosophila
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages e5 (January 2018)
Mobile 24 nt Small RNAs Direct Transcriptional Gene Silencing in the Root Meristems of Arabidopsis thaliana  Charles W. Melnyk, Attila Molnar, Andrew.
Evolution of a Behavioral Shift Mediated by Superficial Neuromasts Helps Cavefish Find Food in Darkness  Masato Yoshizawa, Špela Gorički, Daphne Soares,
Joseph Rodriguez, Jerome S. Menet, Michael Rosbash  Molecular Cell 
A Combinatorial Kin Discrimination System in Bacillus subtilis
Whole-Genome Hitchhiking on an Organelle Mutation
Ribosome Evolution for Two Artificial Amino Acids in E. coli
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 22, Issue 15, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 21, Issue 16, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 19, Issue 10, Pages (May 2009)
Luis Sanchez-Pulido, John F.X. Diffley, Chris P. Ponting 
The PHANTASTICA Gene Encodes a MYB Transcription Factor Involved in Growth and Dorsoventrality of Lateral Organs in Antirrhinum  Richard Waites, Harinee.
Nicolas Arnaud, Tom Lawrenson, Lars Østergaard, Robert Sablowski 
Paramutation: From Maize to Mice
Volume 26, Issue 24, Pages (December 2016)
Whorl-Specific Expression of the SUPERMAN Gene of Arabidopsis Is Mediated by cis Elements in the Transcribed Region  Toshiro Ito, Hajime Sakai, Elliot.
A Novel Class of MYB Factors Controls Sperm-Cell Formation in Plants
Developmental Basis of Phallus Reduction during Bird Evolution
Pericycle Current Biology
Volume 17, Issue 19, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 13, Issue 20, Pages (October 2003)
Volume 26, Issue 17, Pages (September 2016)
Posttranscriptional Gene Silencing Is Not Compromised in the Arabidopsis CARPEL FACTORY (DICER-LIKE1) Mutant, a Homolog of Dicer-1 from Drosophila  E.Jean.
Repression of MYBL2 by Both microRNA858a and HY5 Leads to the Activation of Anthocyanin Biosynthetic Pathway in Arabidopsis  Yulong Wang, Yiqing Wang,
Speciation Genetics: Reinforcement by Shades and Hues
Ezequiel Alvarez-Saavedra, H. Robert Horvitz  Current Biology 
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 158, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 23, Issue 17, Pages (September 2013)
Matthew A. Campbell, Piotr Łukasik, Chris Simon, John P. McCutcheon 
Volume 22, Issue 15, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 26, Issue 17, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 17, Issue 16, Pages (August 2007)
Johannes Mathieu, Norman Warthmann, Frank Küttner, Markus Schmid 
Horizontal gene transfer and the evolution of cnidarian stinging cells
Volume 21, Issue 23, Pages (December 2011)
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages (May 2013)
Clark Fisher, Winrich A. Freiwald  Current Biology 
CRISPR Immunological Memory Requires a Host Factor for Specificity
Laura A. Moody, Steven Kelly, Ester Rabbinowitsch, Jane A. Langdale 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 21, Issue 8, Pages 700-704 (April 2011) Gene Duplication in Mimulus Underlies Parallel Floral Evolution via Independent trans- Regulatory Changes  Arielle M. Cooley, Jennifer L. Modliszewski, Megan L. Rommel, John H. Willis  Current Biology  Volume 21, Issue 8, Pages 700-704 (April 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.03.028 Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Spatial Distribution of Cyanidin Has Diversified in the luteus Group of Mimulus (A) Within the luteus group (black branches), increased anthocyanin production yields the orange of M. cupreus (in combination with yellow carotenoids) and the purple of M. l. variegatus and M. naiandinus (on a white, carotenoid-free background). The M. guttatus and M. glabratus species complexes (gray branches) are speciose but have constant floral pigmentation, in which anthocyanin pigment is restricted to the throat and lower central petal. See Figure S1 for possible paths to the evolution of petal lobe anthocyanin (PLA) in M. cupreus, M. l. variegatus, and M. naiandinus. Genotype at pla1 is sufficient to explain PLA presence versus absence between the orange and yellow morphs of M. cupreus, whereas genotype at pla2 controls PLA presence versus absence between M. l. variegatus and M. l. luteus [4]. (B) The red pigment in the luteus group is caused by cyanidin, one of several types of red anthocyanin pigment [20]. Cyanidin is the product of the precursor compounds listed in regular type, acted on by the six enzymes shown in boldface. Current Biology 2011 21, 700-704DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2011.03.028) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Flower Color Cosegregates with Expression of Anthocyanin Enzyme-Encoding Genes mRNA expression is higher in +PLA than in −PLA plants for all eight assayed genes in M. cupreus (A) and for all three assayed genes in M. l. luteus, M. l. variegatus, and their F2 hybrid progeny (B). Black columns indicate the mean of +PLA F2 progeny; white columns indicate the mean of the −PLA parent and F2 progeny; error bars show standard error. “h1” (homeolog 1) and “h2” (homeolog 2) were arbitrarily assigned based on order of discovery. Asterisks indicate significance of the gene expression difference between +PLA and −PLA phenotypes: ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001. The +PLA parent was used as the reference. Sample sizes for M. cupreus were n = 6 (+PLA F2s) and n = 7 (−PLA F2s plus the −PLA parent). Sample sizes for M. l. luteus × M. l. variegatus were n = 6 (+PLA F2s) and n = 6 (−PLA F2s plus the −PLA parent). Assays were performed on early-stage floral buds. See Figure S2 for a time course of gene expression during bud development and Tables S1 and S2 for additional qPCR details. Current Biology 2011 21, 700-704DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2011.03.028) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Five Anthocyanin-Related R2R3 MYBs Are Found in M. guttatus (A) Neighbor-joining tree of amino acid data, including all 57 R2R3 MYBs from M. guttatus as well as MYBs from other angiosperm species, constructed to reveal the R2R3 MYBs involved in anthocyanin pigmentation. Branches are labeled with bootstrap support values > 50%. The clade containing R2R3 MYBs known to regulate anthocyanin biosynthesis is shown in red. (B) Expanded view of the anthocyanin-related R2R3 MYBs. Bootstrap support values > 50% are shown. Species are indicated by the following two-letter abbreviations: Am, Antirrhinum majus; At, Arabidopsis thaliana; In, Ipomoea nil; Ip, Ipomoea purpurea; Le, Lycopersicon esculentum; Ma, Mimulus aurantiacus; Mg, Mimulus guttatus; Ph, Petunia hybrida; Vv, Vitis vinifera. Abbreviated gene names as listed in GenBank are given following each species designation. See Figure S3 for gene trees of MYBs 1–5 from M. guttatus, M. cupreus, M. l. variegatus, and M. l. luteus. Current Biology 2011 21, 700-704DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2011.03.028) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Candidate Genes in M. guttatus that Surround Markers Linked to Flower Color (A) The pla1 locus on scaffold 11 of M. guttatus. (B) The pla2 locus on scaffold 132 of M. guttatus. MYB genes are shown in black; numbers 1–5 indicate MgMYB1–MgMYB5. The coding sequence of each MYB is represented as an arrow pointing toward the 3′ end, with spaces representing the two introns. Two truncated MYBs are labeled as “partial.” Other candidate genes are shown as gray arrows; gene size and orientation are indicated but exon/intron boundaries are not. Numbers above each hash mark indicate nucleotide position along each scaffold. Although 1 Mb regions were scanned for gene sequences, only 300 kb of each scaffold are shown here, because no likely candidates were discovered outside of this section. See Figure S4 for MYB homologs and homeologs from M. cupreus, M. l. variegatus, and M. l luteus and Table S3 for preliminary functional tests of the MYBs. Current Biology 2011 21, 700-704DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2011.03.028) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions