University of Rochester, Department of Physics and Astronomy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NSF Site Visit Madison, May 1-2, 2006 Magnetic Helicity Conservation and Transport R. Kulsrud and H. Ji for participants of the Center for Magnetic Self-organization.
Advertisements

Spectrum of MHD turbulence
Madison 2006 Dynamo Fausto Cattaneo ANL - University of Chicago Stewart Prager University of Wisconsin.
Hall-MHD simulations of counter- helicity spheromak merging by E. Belova PPPL October 6, 2005 CMSO General Meeting.
Global Simulations of Astrophysical Jets in Poynting Flux Dominated Regime Hui Li S. Colgate, J. Finn, G. Lapenta, S. Li Engine; Injection; Collimation;
Supernova Remnants Shell-type versus Crab-like Phases of shell-type SNR.
Clumps With External Magnetic Fields, Their Interaction With Shocks, and the Effect of Magnetic Thermal Conduction Shule Li, Adam Frank, Eric Blackman.
Pre-existing Turbulence, Magnetic Fields and Particle Acceleration at a Supernova Blast Wave J. R. Jokipii University of Arizona Presented at the meeting:
“Physics at the End of the Galactic Cosmic-Ray Spectrum” Aspen, CO 4/28/05 Diffusive Shock Acceleration of High-Energy Cosmic Rays The origin of the very-highest-energy.
3-D Simulations of Magnetized Super Bubbles J. M. Stil N. D. Wityk R. Ouyed A. R. Taylor Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Calgary,
Molecular Tracers of Turbulent Shocks in Molecular Clouds Andy Pon, Doug Johnstone, Michael J. Kaufman ApJ, submitted May 2011.
ASCI/Alliances Center for Astrophysical Thermonuclear Flashes Simulating Self-Gravitating Flows with FLASH P. M. Ricker, K. Olson, and F. X. Timmes Motivation:
Joe Giacalone and Randy Jokipii University of Arizona
Returning to the Source* MHD Disk Winds, Binaries and Jets as Agents of PN Shaping Adam Frank University of Rochester F. Garcia-Arredondo, E. Blackman.
Seed Population for Particle Acceleration... Anywhere in the Universe Shock heating based on many factors: v shock : shock speed  Bn : magnetic.
Cosmological MHD Hui Li Collaborators: S. Li, M. Nakamura, S. Diehl, B. Oshea, P. Kronberg, S. Colgate (LANL) H. Xu, M. Norman (UCSD), R. Cen (Princeton)
APNe Conference, Seattle, July 2003 Clumpy Flows in Protoplanetary and Planetary Nebulae Alexei Poludnenko, Adam Frank University of Rochester, Laboratory.
MHD Modeling of the Large Scale Solar Corona & Progress Toward Coupling with the Heliospheric Model.
Computational Astrophysics: Research to Teaching and Beyond Adam Frank University of Rochester.
Flux Tube Retraction Following Multiple Simultaneous Reconnection Events Daniel Gordon Supervisor: Dana Longcope Simulating Shocks in Solar Flares:
Subgrid models of active galactic nuclei in clusters of galaxies Paul Matthew Sutter Paul M. Ricker Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Frontiers in.
6 th Japan-Korea Workshop on Theory and Simulation of Magnetic Fusion Plasmas Hyunsun Han, G. Park, Sumin Yi, and J.Y. Kim 3D MHD SIMULATIONS.
Jonathan Carroll-Nellenback University of Rochester.
Relativistic MHD Jets in GRB Steady State Rarefaction K. Sapountzis National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Kyoto 2013.
Jonathan Carroll-Nellenback University of Rochester.
ASCI/Alliances Center for Astrophysical Thermonuclear Flashes Evaporation of Clouds in Thermally Conducting, Radiative Supernova Remnants S. Orlando (1),
Crushing of interstellar gas clouds Part I - Thermal Conduction and Radiative Losses - Equations: Heat Flux: Initial conditions Cloud Mass Fraction: choose.
1 Does AGN “Feedback” in Galaxy Clusters Work? Dave De Young NOAO Girdwood AK May 2007.
Simulations of Compressible MHD Turbulence in Molecular Clouds Lucy Liuxuan Zhang, CITA / University of Toronto, Chris Matzner,
High Performance Computing on the GRID Infrastructure of COMETA S. Orlando 1,2, G. Peres 3,1,2, F. Reale 3,1,2, F. Bocchino 1,2, G.G. Sacco 2, M. Miceli.
Stability Properties of Field-Reversed Configurations (FRC) E. V. Belova PPPL 2003 International Sherwood Fusion Theory Conference Corpus Christi, TX,
Magnetized Stars in the Heterogeneous ISM Olga Toropina Space Research Institute, Moscow M.M. Romanova and R. V. E. Lovelace Cornel University, Ithaca,
Conical Flow induced by Quenched QCD Jets Jorge Casalderrey-Solana, Edward Shuryak and Derek Teaney, hep- ph/ SUNY Stony Brook.
Reconnection rates in Hall MHD and Collisionless plasmas
Dynamics of ITG driven turbulence in the presence of a large spatial scale vortex flow Zheng-Xiong Wang, 1 J. Q. Li, 1 J. Q. Dong, 2 and Y. Kishimoto 1.
Department of Physics and Astronomy Rice University From the Omega facility to the Hubble Space Telescope: Experiments and Observations of Supersonic Fluid.
Nonlinear interactions between micro-turbulence and macro-scale MHD A. Ishizawa, N. Nakajima, M. Okamoto, J. Ramos* National Institute for Fusion Science.
The Physics of Jet Dissipation The Physics of Jet Dissipation D. S. De Young National Optical Astronomy Observatory 5 February 2004 X-Ray and Radio Connections.
Three-Dimensional MHD Simulation of Astrophysical Jet by CIP-MOCCT Method Hiromitsu Kigure (Kyoto U.), Kazunari Shibata (Kyoto U.), Seiichi Kato (Osaka.
Simulation Study of Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetotail and Solar Corona Zhi-Wei Ma Zhejiang University & Institute of Plasma Physics Beijing,
Comparing Poynting flux dominated magnetic towers with kinetic-energy dominated jets Martín Huarte-Espinosa, Adam Frank and Eric Blackman, U. of Rochester.
Barrel or Bilateral-shaped SNRs Jiangtao Li May 6th 2009.
MHD wave propagation in the neighbourhood of a two-dimensional null point James McLaughlin Cambridge 9 August 2004.
Turbulence and Magnetic Field Amplification in the Supernova Remnants Tsuyoshi Inoue (NAOJ) Ryo Yamazaki (Hiroshima Univ.) Shu-ichiro Inutsuka (Kyoto Univ.)
November 1 - 3, nd East Asia Numerical Astrophysics Meeting KASI, Korea Shock Waves and Cosmic Rays in the Large Scale Structure of the Universe.
Some slides on UCLA LM-MHD capabilities and Preliminary Incompressible LM Jet Simulations in Muon Collider Fields Neil Morley and Manmeet Narula Fusion.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy MERIT Project Review December 12, 2005, BNL, Upton NY MHD Studies of Mercury Jet Target Roman Samulyak.
The Power Spectra and Point Distribution Functions of Density Fields in Isothermal, HD Turbulent Flows Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute Jongsoo.
Statistical Properties (PS, PDF) of Density Fields in Isothermal Hydrodynamic Turbulent Flows Jongsoo Kim Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute Collaborators:
Relativistic MHD Simulations of jets Relativistic MHD Simulations of jets Abstract We have performed 3D RMHD simulations to investigate the stability and.
MHD Turbulence driven by low frequency waves and reflection from inhomogeneities: Theory, simulation and application to coronal heating W H Matthaeus Bartol.
Magnetic field structure of relativistic jets in AGN M. Roca-Sogorb 1, M. Perucho 2, J.L. Gómez 1, J.M. Martí 3, L. Antón 3, M.A. Aloy 3 & I. Agudo 1 1.
27 April, 2005PPPL:Jets/disks/lobes 1 A Quick Overview of RG Jet Simulations: Tom Jones University of Minnesota (Sean O’Neill, Ian Tregillis, Dongsu Ryu)
A Global Hybrid Simulation Study of the Solar Wind Interaction with the Moon David Schriver ESS 265 – June 2, 2005.
Evolution of the poloidal Alfven waves in 3D dipole geometry Jiwon Choi and Dong-Hun Lee School of Space Research, Kyung Hee University 5 th East-Asia.
GEM Student Tutorial: GGCM Modeling (MHD Backbone)
Modeling Astrophysical Turbulence
The effect of magnetic fields on the survival of high-velocity clouds
Project 8: Development and Validation of Bleed Models for Control of Supersonic Shock-Wave Interactions with Boundary Layers.
D. Odstrcil1,2, V.J. Pizzo2, C.N. Arge3, B.V.Jackson4, P.P. Hick4
Particle Acceleration at Coronal Shocks: the Effect of Large-scale Streamer-like Magnetic Field Structures Fan Guo (Los Alamos National Lab), Xiangliang.
Using AGN as Probes of the ICM
Steven R. Spangler University of Iowa
YSO Jets: Feedback from Mesoscopic to Macroscopic scales
X-ray and Radio Connections
Shule Li, Adam Frank, Eric Blackman
The Bow Shock and Magnetosheath
AstroBEAR is a parallelized hydrodynamic/MHD simulation code suitable for a variety of astrophysical problems. AstroBEAR is designed for 2D and 3D adaptive.
Contents Introduction Force-Free Approximation Analytical Solutions
A Mach Number Behind a Slow Shock (Ahead a Fast
Presentation transcript:

University of Rochester, Department of Physics and Astronomy. Clumps With Self Contained Magnetic Field And Their Interaction With Shocks Shule Li, Adam Frank, Eric Blackman University of Rochester, Department of Physics and Astronomy. Rochester, New York 14627 HEDLA 2012, Tallahassee, FL 1

Introduction Problem of clumps and their interaction with shocks is crucial in understanding interstellar medium, supernova remnants etc. Magnetic field often plays an important role in such an interaction. Most previous numerical studies focus on clumps immersed in a uniform background magnetic field. However, realistic clumps usually contain tangled magnetic field inside them. Our study focus on clump's shocked behavior when there is a tangled magnetic field contained. The field's spatial distribution can be either ordered or random. wind ambient clump Problem Description 2

Previous Works Field aligned with shock Magnetic field is amplified at the top of and behind the clump. The top of the shocked clump is streamlined but there is no significant suppression on the fragmentation of the clump even for low initial β cases. Field perpendicular with shock Magnetic field is wrapping around the clump and gets greatly amplified due to stretching. The shocked clump is highly streamlined and the fragmentation can be greatly suppressed even for high initial β cases. Jones, T.W., Ryu, Dongsu, Tregillis, I.L. 1996 ApJ, 473, 365 Adding radiative cooling into the simulation can further change the shocked behavior: more thin fragments, confined boundary flows, etc. (Fragile et al, 2005 ApJ 619, 327) 3

Lab Efforts NLUF, Pat Hartigan et al. 4

AstroBEAR is a parallelized hydrodynamic/MHD simulation code suitable for a variety of astrophysical problems. AstroBEAR is designed for 2D and 3D adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) simulations, the current versioncode shows good scaling above thousands of processors. In addition, AstroBEAR comes with a number of multiphysical processes such as self gravity, thermal conduction and resistivity. 5

Simulation Setup Density Contrast Wind Mach Alfvenic Mach Magnetic Beta Crushing Time Toroidal. Aligned Poloidal. Perp. Poloidal. Aligned The simulation is set up so that the wind crossing time is shorter than the Alfvenic crossing time, the latter is shorter than the sound crossing time. We investigate the case when the contained field is ordered, as well as the case when the contained field is random. Radiative cooling is included in the simulation. 6

Discussion I: Clump Morphology When the toroidal field is aligned with the shock, the clump material are compressed into a “nose cone”shape bounded by strong toroidal field. This phenomenon is similar to the “nose cone”shapes seen in MHD jet simulations. If we add a weak poloidal field to the above toroidal field, we see a much thicker “nose cone” with a ring shaped head. It is because even a weak added poloidal field can break the axisymmetry. 7

Discussion I: Clump Morphology The direction of field pinch will affect the clump's morphological evolution. 8

Discussion II: Mixing Ratio 9

Discussion II: Mixing Ratio 10

Discussion II: Kinetic Energy Transfer 11

Discussion II: Kinetic Energy Transfer 12

Mathematical Model We developed a that can explain the evolution of global variables. The following expression can be used to describe how much the contained magnetic field is amplified during the compression of the shock. EB: total magnetic energy after compression EH: total magnetic energy after compression as if the contained field has no repelling response. η: ratio of initial magnetic energy contained in the “perpendicular”component. e: ratio of length on and perpendicular to the shock propagation direction. α: ratio between contained field magnetic energy density and the shock's kinetic energy density. μ: dimensionless factor that describes how strong the repelling force is from the contained field. *For details, see Li et al 2012 ApJ (in preparation). 13

Summary Shocked clumps with "internal" fields show rich behavior not seen in external only field simulations. Post-shock evolution depends strongly on internal field morphology We see sharp distinction between Toroidal/Poloidal evolution depending on alignment with shock propagation The kinetic energy transfer and the mixing ratio depend on contained field geometry. Simulations may provide morphological links to astrophysical clumpy environments. 14

Thank You ! 15