Comments on Evo-Factor proposal

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Session 8b Decision Models -- Prof. Juran.
Advertisements

WLTP drive trace normalization
M. George Physics Dept. Southwestern College
WLTP Number of Tests Different Options And Their Consequences IWG in Stockholm, Christoph Lueginger, BMW WLTP-10-26e.
WLTP rev1e BMW, Christoph Lueginger WLTP Road Load Family
WLTP normalization rotational Mass
WLTP-11-12e Christoph Lueginger (BMW), Céline Vallaude (UTAC), Folko Rohde (VW) on behalf of Annex 4 taskforce wind tunnel method road load.
WLTP-08-19e BMW, Christoph Lueginger WLTP Road Load Family
WLTP Phase 1B Main Open Issues Road and Dyno Load Presentation at WLTP IG Meeting Geneva Open Issues Road and Dyno Load- K. Kolesa Working paper.
WLTP DRAFTING TF, "RECORDED" BMW, Christoph Lueginger DISTINGUISH BETWEEN MEASURED AND RECORDED.
Inferential Statistics
Experimental Statistics - week 2
Hans-Martin Gerhard28. April 2010 Seite 1Dr. Ing. h. c. F. Porsche AG Pedestrian Safety - Quiet Cars Hans-Martin Gerhard Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG Quiet.
1 Today Null and alternative hypotheses 1- and 2-tailed tests Regions of rejection Sampling distributions The Central Limit Theorem Standard errors z-tests.
Proposal for a new UNECE regulation on recyclability of motor vehicles Informal Document GRPE Reply to the Comments of the Russian Federation Informal.
WLTP wind tunnel concept
Statistical Analysis Mean, Standard deviation, Standard deviation of the sample means, t-test.
WLTP, RESULT CALCULATION, V4 MEASURED RESULT IS CORRECTED BY RCB, KI, 14° TEST AND INTERPOLATION. BMW, Christoph Lueginger WLTP-12-08e.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. 10 Inferences Involving Two Populations.
1 STATISTICAL HYPOTHESIS Two-sided hypothesis: H 0 :  = 50H 1 :   only here H 0 is valid all other possibilities are H 1 One-sided hypothesis:
6/3/2016 SCIENTIFIC METHOD PROCESSES OF SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY.
Aim: How can we assign experimental units to treatments in a way that is fair to all of the treatments?
Renault statements and questions: Page Autor/Abt.: ACEA WLTP EV Group /Samarendra Tripathy 1] Phase specific calculation (appendix YYY of attached.
Lecture 16 Section 8.1 Objectives: Testing Statistical Hypotheses − Stating hypotheses statements − Type I and II errors − Conducting a hypothesis test.
Do Now : In 1911, the fastest aircraft could travel approximately 90 mph and the fastest cars could do a little more than 100 mph. One hundred years later,
© Copyright McGraw-Hill 2000
BPS - 3rd Ed. Chapter 161 Inference about a Population Mean.
Analysis of Normalization Report With Focus On Rotational Masses Geneva, 14 th of January 2015 Christoph Lueginger BMW WLTP-09-25e.
ACEA comments on EU WLTP issues EU WLTP, 30 TH OF NOVEMBER November 2015.
STEP BY STEP Critical Value Approach to Hypothesis Testing 1- State H o and H 1 2- Choose level of significance, α Choose the sample size, n 3- Determine.
WLTP ANNEX 4 AND 7, DELTA CD*A BMW, Christoph Lueginger, Thomas Schütz ALTERNATIVE DETERMINATION METHODS WLTP-10-21e.
NEDC/WLTP correlation process Meeting of TCMV on 17 November 2015
ILUTE A Tour-Based Mode Choice Model Incorporating Inter-Personal Interactions Within the Household Matthew J. Roorda Eric J. Miller UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO.
UNCERTAINTY OF MEASUREMENT Andrew Pascall Technical Director Integral Laboratories (Pty) Ltd
By Raphael Medang,& Dr Gbaguidi Emmanuel Availability of Condoms in the context of Social Marketing in Central Africa: Analysis of sales volumes before.
Some Terminology experiment vs. correlational study IV vs. DV descriptive vs. inferential statistics sample vs. population statistic vs. parameter H 0.
Virtual University of Pakistan
RURAL DRIVING True or false
PROCESSES OF SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY
The use of AVM’s in the Netherlands:
System Control based Renewable Energy Resources in Smart Grid Consumer
RDE Regulation Commission Meeting
Status Januar Verification of test normality
CLEAR Graz Stefan Hausberger, Nikolaus Furian
RDE Task Force Meeting, 28th November 2013, Brussels
28th of November 2013, Brussels
Proposal for a mid vehicle concept
Input on wind tunnel criteria discussions
BRAKE PARTICLE EMISSIONS
Draft WLTP Phase 2 – carryover from 1b – Annex 4 Starting note on split runs in coast down testing WLTP-14-18e Within phase 1b, practically all tolerances.
Reasoning in Psychology Using Statistics
COP statistic proposal for UN-WLTP
Hypothesis Testing A hypothesis is a claim or statement about the value of either a single population parameter or about the values of several population.
Reasoning in Psychology Using Statistics
Passenger Mobility Statistics 10 April 2014
Multivariate Analysis of a Carbonate Chemistry Time-Series Study
HDV CO2 certification CoP provisions
Revision of the technical annexes of the BPR
16th of November 2013, Brussels
WLTP Correlation measurement
Reason for performance difference between LVW and GVW
Reasoning in Psychology Using Statistics
WLTP Annex 4 and 7, delta cd*A
Psychological Research Methods and Statistics
Analysis for WLTP UF development
COP statistic for UN-WLTP ACEA comments on JRC proposal presented April 8,2019 May 2019.
WLTP CoP Procedure for CO2/FC
IWG Worn tyres Tyre Industry work status July 17th 2019
IWG Worn tyres Tyre Industry work status July 17th 2019
IWG Worn tyres Tyre Industry work status July 17th 2019
Presentation transcript:

Comments on Evo-Factor proposal draft BMW, 27.05.2015 Christoph Lueginger Comments on Evo-Factor proposal difficulties, requirements and dependencies

Comments on evolution factor proposal Break-In of a vehicle draft Comments on evolution factor proposal Break-In of a vehicle  Effect is large within the first few kilometers and reduces over time.  Only the complete delta between "0 km" and the run-in vehicle is a valid delta.  It can only be measured at a lab, and such, that the "0 km" measurement is matching the COP-process (dyno setting, pre, test). Any more kilometers will be unrepresentative. Run-in situation is obviously less critical. Comments On Evolution Factor Proposal, BMW, Lueginger, 27.05.2015

Comments on evolution factor proposal draft Comments on evolution factor proposal Sales and Registrations within a year  Sales / registrations are not equally distributed within a year and not equal between different years.  This disturbs an analysis which just takes an average. Comments On Evolution Factor Proposal, BMW, Lueginger, 27.05.2015

Comments on evolution factor proposal draft Comments on evolution factor proposal Process of a scientific statistical analysis pre- selection find distribution of age, sex, company car share  select subjects accordingly pre-study considers driving style and vehicle usage  make groups and ensure statistical requirements for each group study measurement via calibrated loggers over a sufficient period (considers real distance and real consumption and covers all seasons) analysis find and delete outliers and invalid data weight result of the groups according to their distribution Dipl.-Ing. Christian Reiser, et.al.: Kundenfahrverhalten im Fokus der Fahrzeugentwicklung, ATZ 07-08 2008 Jahrgang 110 Without obeying the rules for a statistical analysis which are there for many good reasons, any conclusion drawn from a result deviating from that will be invalid or will be valid only by chance. Allow for a certain period of familiarization. Drivers will try out functions at the beginning and are not used to the vehicle. An analysis with real driving can only start, after the driver is familiar with the vehicle, and therefore cannot cover brand-new vehicles. Measurement should not start from beginning, if vehicle is provided for the study. Comments On Evolution Factor Proposal, BMW, Lueginger, 27.05.2015

using average in real world draft Comments on evolution factor proposal Conclusion lab-testing using average in real world considers total break-in delta   no influence of driver group no influence of environmental conditions or seasons no influence of familiarization effects An evolution factor can only be derived from measurements in a lab ("0 km" demand). A realistic evolution factor, that covers the majority of the vehicles, is needed in order to avoid unnecessary test burden. Decision should be taken on the basis of a technically correct assessment in combination with available experience and data and shall be balanced with the resulting effort. Comments On Evolution Factor Proposal, BMW, Lueginger, 27.05.2015