Christiane M Thiel, Karl J Friston, Raymond J Dolan  Neuron 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 63, Issue 3, Pages (August 2009)
Advertisements

Volume 60, Issue 4, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 75, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 75, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Lior Shmuelof, Ehud Zohary  Neuron 
The Nose Smells What the Eye Sees
Volume 87, Issue 4, Pages (August 2015)
Michael S Beauchamp, Kathryn E Lee, Brenna D Argall, Alex Martin 
Analysis of the Neuronal Selectivity Underlying Low fMRI Signals
Volume 95, Issue 5, Pages e5 (August 2017)
Two Cortical Systems for Reaching in Central and Peripheral Vision
Volume 23, Issue 18, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 92, Issue 5, Pages (December 2016)
Christian Grefkes, Peter H. Weiss, Karl Zilles, Gereon R. Fink  Neuron 
Michael T. Rogan, Kam Sam Leon, David L. Perez, Eric R. Kandel  Neuron 
Cognitive Modulation of Olfactory Processing
Learning to Simulate Others' Decisions
Predicting Value of Pain and Analgesia: Nucleus Accumbens Response to Noxious Stimuli Changes in the Presence of Chronic Pain  Marwan N. Baliki, Paul.
Volume 63, Issue 3, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 53, Issue 6, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 65, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Vincent B. McGinty, Antonio Rangel, William T. Newsome  Neuron 
Volume 38, Issue 2, Pages (April 2003)
Fear Conditioning in Humans
Selective Entrainment of Theta Oscillations in the Dorsal Stream Causally Enhances Auditory Working Memory Performance  Philippe Albouy, Aurélien Weiss,
Aryeh Hai Taub, Rita Perets, Eilat Kahana, Rony Paz  Neuron 
The Generality of Parietal Involvement in Visual Attention
Benedikt Zoefel, Alan Archer-Boyd, Matthew H. Davis  Current Biology 
Contrast Adaptation and Representation in Human Early Visual Cortex
Volume 45, Issue 4, Pages (February 2005)
Peter Kok, Janneke F.M. Jehee, Floris P. de Lange  Neuron 
Michael S Beauchamp, Kathryn E Lee, Brenna D Argall, Alex Martin 
Effects of Attention and Emotion on Face Processing in the Human Brain
Theresa M. Desrochers, Christopher H. Chatham, David Badre  Neuron 
Behavioral and Neural Mechanisms of Overgeneralization in Anxiety
Volume 75, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Lior Shmuelof, Ehud Zohary  Neuron 
The Future of Memory: Remembering, Imagining, and the Brain
Volume 87, Issue 2, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages (April 2004)
Integration of Local Features into Global Shapes
Volume 92, Issue 5, Pages (December 2016)
Visual Feature-Tolerance in the Reading Network
Christian Büchel, Jond Morris, Raymond J Dolan, Karl J Friston  Neuron 
Learning to Simulate Others' Decisions
The Neural Correlates of Third-Party Punishment
Brain Mechanisms for Extracting Spatial Information from Smell
Vahe Poghosyan, Andreas A. Ioannides  Neuron 
Two Directions of Plasticity in the Sensory-Deprived Adult Cortex
Volume 69, Issue 3, Pages (February 2011)
Predictive Neural Coding of Reward Preference Involves Dissociable Responses in Human Ventral Midbrain and Ventral Striatum  John P. O'Doherty, Tony W.
Arielle Tambini, Nicholas Ketz, Lila Davachi  Neuron 
Encoding of Stimulus Probability in Macaque Inferior Temporal Cortex
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Role of the Cerebellum in Adaptation to Delayed Action Effects
Laurie S. Glezer, Xiong Jiang, Maximilian Riesenhuber  Neuron 
Neural Responses during Anticipation of a Primary Taste Reward
Volume 18, Issue 20, Pages (October 2008)
Under-Recruitment and Nonselective Recruitment
Predicting Value of Pain and Analgesia: Nucleus Accumbens Response to Noxious Stimuli Changes in the Presence of Chronic Pain  Marwan N. Baliki, Paul.
Two Cortical Systems for Reaching in Central and Peripheral Vision
Impaired Associative Learning with Food Rewards in Obese Women
Striatal Activity Underlies Novelty-Based Choice in Humans
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (May 2002)
Volume 50, Issue 4, Pages (May 2006)
Pairing-Induced Changes of Orientation Maps in Cat Visual Cortex
Remembrance of Odors Past
Visual Feature-Tolerance in the Reading Network
Volume 75, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
A Supramodal Number Representation in Human Intraparietal Cortex
Presentation transcript:

Cholinergic Modulation of Experience-Dependent Plasticity in Human Auditory Cortex  Christiane M Thiel, Karl J Friston, Raymond J Dolan  Neuron  Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages 567-574 (August 2002) DOI: 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00801-2

Figure 1 Illustration of Experimental Paradigm and Contrast for Investigation of Experience-Dependent Plasticity We used a partial reinforcement schedule where only 50% of CS+ trials were paired with a shock (CS+p), and the other 50% were not paired (CS+u). Partial reinforcement schedules allowed us to assess evoked hemodynamic responses to the CS+ in the absence of the US. CS− is the conditioned stimulus that is never paired with shock during conditioning phase; eCS+ and eCS− are the conditioned stimuli during extinction phase. In half of the subjects, the low tone was the CS+ and the high tone was the CS−; in the other half, the low tone was the CS−, and the high tone was the CS+. Abbreviations: SOA, stimulus onset asynchrony; NE, nullevent; pCS+ and pCS−, the to-be-conditioned stimuli during the preconditioning phase; CS+, conditioned stimulus that is paired with shock during conditioning phase. Neuron 2002 35, 567-574DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00801-2)

Figure 2 Behavioral Data Mean response times and standard errors to CS+ (gray bars) and CS− (white bars) for placebo and scopolamine group. Two subjects were false alarming in the scopolamine group and are shown separately (right graph). Neuron 2002 35, 567-574DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00801-2)

Figure 3 Tones Preconditioning (A–C) Auditory cortical regions showing activations to low and high tones relative to a baseline, as identified by random effects analysis in (A) placebo and (B) scopolamine groups, respectively. In (C), the differences image (Placebo-Scopolamine) is shown. The image shows that activations in auditory cortex preconditioning are not significantly different between placebo and scopolamine subjects. All activations are thresholded at p < 0.01 (uncorrected for purposes of comparison) and are rendered on a transverse individual T1-weighted MRI. Neuron 2002 35, 567-574DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00801-2)

Figure 4 Experience-Dependent Plasticity in Auditory Cortex (A) Auditory regions showing a time (preconditioning versus conditioning) × conditioning (unpaired CS+ versus CS−) interaction in the placebo group when a low tone (n = 6; left) or high tone (n = 6; right) CS+ was used. Experience-dependent plasticity was evident bilaterally in auditory cortex (x = 54, y = −15, z = 6, Z = 3.50; x = −57, y = −9, z = 6, Z = 3.47) for the low-tone group and left auditory cortex (x = −63, y = −42, z = 6, Z = 4.71) for the high-tone group. For the high-tone group, a right auditory cortex activation was only observed at a reduced threshold (x = 66, y = −27, z = 6, Z = 2.39, p = 0.009). (B) No significant time × conditioning interaction in auditory cortex was found with scopolamine for either the low- (n = 6; left) or the high- (n = 6; right) tone group. (C) Auditory regions showing a group (placebo versus scopolamine) × time × conditioning interaction. Significant differences indicating a higher time × conditioning interaction in placebo compared to scopolamine subjects was found for low- and high-tone groups in the right auditory cortex (low: x = 57, y = −15, z = 6, Z = 3.31; high: x = 66, y = −27, z = 6, Z = 3.65). Additionally, for the high-tone group, a left auditory region showed a group × time × conditioning interaction at a reduced threshold (x = −63, y = −39, z = 0, Z = 2.55; p = 0.005). All activations (thresholded at p < 0.01, uncorrected for purposes of illustration) were identified by random effects analysis. (D) Plots of percent signal change. Mean and SEM as a function of group, time, and conditioning. The plots are derived from the most significant voxel in right auditory cortex, showing a group × time × conditioning interaction as identified by a random effects analysis as shown in (C). Voxel: x = 57, y = −15, z = 6 for the group where the low tone was used as CS+ and voxel: x = 66, y = −27, z = 6 for the group where the high tone was used as CS+. Note the increase in right auditory cortex activation to the CS+ (gray symbols) when comparing preconditioning with the conditioning phases and the decrease in activation for the CS− (white symbols) in the placebo group while scopolamine subjects showed decreases in activations for the CS+. Abbreviations: L, low tone; H, high tone; pre, preconditioning; cond, conditioning; ext, extinction. Neuron 2002 35, 567-574DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00801-2)