Management of the Partial Foot Amputee Gait Workshop at Biomechanics Laboratory, U of Sydney July 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Effect of an Unstable Shoe Construction on Lower Extremity Gait Characteristics Nigg, Benno M. Ferber, Reed Gormley Tim Human Performance Laboratory University.
Advertisements

Chapter 18 Review The Ankle and Lower Leg.
Abdominal Muscle Activity and Lower Limb Forces When Walking With Nordic Walking Poles Valerie Sparkes, Lucy Warren Katie Whitehouse.
KINETIC ANALYSIS OF GAIT INITIATION D. Gordon E. Robertson, PhD, FCSB 1 Richard Smith, PhD 2 Nick ODwyer, PhD 2 1 Biomechanics Laboratory, School of Human.
Midfoot Fractures Jenny Jefferis.
Prosthetic Gait Deviations
The Ankle and Foot Joints
Ankle-Foot Orthoses (AFOs)
Biomechanical Examination Parameters
ASSESSMENT CHAPTER 6. Physical assessment PHYSIOTHERAPY ASSESSMENT session CHAPTER 6 PART
Kinetic Analysis of the Lower Limb during the Pirouette in Ballet D. Gordon E. Robertson, PhD, FCSB Cristina Fulop Tama Davis Courtney Timm Biomechanics,
Renee Kitto Port Macquarie Base Hospital
Normal Gait.
Pathological Gait. Excessive Plantarflexion Causes Triceps surae contracture Triceps surae spasticity Pre-tibial weakness Voluntary/compensatory 2 0 weak.
Biomechanics of Locomotion D. Gordon E. Robertson, PhD, FCSB Biomechanics, Laboratory, School of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada D.
Phases of the Gait Cycle And Determinants of Gait
Walking Analysis … the process A gait cycle consists of “the activities that occur from the point of initial contact of one lower extremity to the point.
Stair Gait Lecture Notes.
Gait.
Biomechanics of Walking for People with Lower Extremity Amputations
Thornbers Podiatry “Promoting optimum health and performance”
Biomechanics- Gait.
Progression: The basic objective of the locomotor system is to move the body forward from the current site to a new location so the hands and head can.
Segmental Power Analysis of Walking
Gait Analysis Study of human locomotion Walking and running
Marie Bamer.  Those fractures involving the great toe or any of the lesser toes, metatarsals, or sesamoid bones.
Analysis of a continuous skill – walking and running (gait)
Muscles of the Foot and Lower Leg
Biomechanics of Gait Walking
Determinants of Gait Determinants of Gait.
Results Table 1: Muscle force and relative difference to control Fig. 2: Muscle force during stance phase for a) m.tibialis posterior; b) m. tibialis anterior;
Kinetics versus Kinematics for Analyzing Locomotor Coordination D. Gordon E. Robertson, Ph.D. School of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, CANADA.
1 Gait Analysis – Objectives To learn and understand: –The general descriptive and temporal elements of the normal walking movement –The important features.
Gait Analysis – Objectives
Gait Analysis – Objectives
The foot complex Three major articulations within the foot: Sub-talar, Mid- tarsals, MTPs. Sub-talar joint lies within the vertical weight bearing line.
Gait analysis.
inferior tibiofibular jnt. tibiotalar jnt. lateral
Ankle & Foot (2).
Walking Gait Cycle Swing Phase: begins with TO and ends w/ IC
POSTECH H uman S ystem D esign Lab oratory Stair ascent and descent at different inclinations Robert Riener et al. (2002, Italy and Germany) Gait and Posture.
footscan ® Course 2006 Welcome. footscan ® Course 2006 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced,
Gait development in children. The prerequisite for Gait development Adequate motor control. C.N.S. maturation. Adequate R.O.M. Muscle strength. Appropriate.
Ms. Bowman. 26 bones Phalanges-toes; proximal, middle, and distal Metatarsals-5; between phalanges and tarsals Tarsals-calcaneus, talus, navicular, cuboid,
COMPARISON OF KINETICS OF RAMP AND STAIR DESCENT Andrew Post, B.Sc. and D.G.E. Robertson, Ph.D., FCSB School of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa,
Chapter 9 Evaluation of Gait. Introduction Gait Analysis – functional evaluation of a person’s walking or running style Systematic method of identifying.
Comparison of Loaded and Unloaded Ramp Descent Jordan Thornley, B.Sc. and D. Gordon E. Robertson, Ph.D., FCSB School of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa,
Myology Myology of the Ankle.
Discussion Figure 3 shows data from the same subject’s lead leg during planned gait termination. The lead leg arrived first at the quiet stance position.
Biomechanics of Walking
Three-dimensional analyses of gait initiation in a healthy, young population Drew Smith 1 and Del P. Wong 2 1 Motion Analysis Research Center (MARC), Samuel.
The right foot forward, or the right shoe?
Gait Analysis – Objectives
 Support Events  Foot (Heel) Strike  Foot Flat  Midstance  Heel Off  Foot (Toe) Off  Swing Events  Pre swing  Midswing  Terminal swing.
KINETIC ANALYSIS OF THE LOWER LIMBS DURING FORWARD AND BACKWARD STAIR DESCENT WITH AND WITHOUT A FRONT LOAD Olinda Habib Perez & D. Gordon E. Robertson.
Gait (3) Sagittal Plane Analysis Lecture Notes. Example To Make Things Clear  If during gait knee flexion is necessary, & a flexion moment is acting.
The Ankle.
Stretches for the Lower Extremity Chapter 4. Hip Extensors: Hamstrings and Gluteus Maximus Anatomy: Chronically shortened hamstrings can contribute to.
Date of download: 6/23/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Optimization of Prosthetic Foot Stiffness to Reduce Metabolic Cost and Intact.
1 Gait Analysis – Objectives To learn and understand: –The general descriptive and temporal elements of the normal walking movement –The important features.
COMPARISON OF ANKLE, KNEE AND HIP MOMENT POWERS DURING STAIR DESCENT VERSUS LEVEL WALKING François G. D.Beaulieu, M.A.; Lucie Pelland, Ph.D. and Gordon.
Prosthetics & Orthotics 단국대학교 일반대학원 물리 · 작업치료전공 강권영.
2) Knee.
Presentation by: Wan Nur Athirah Bt Wan Mohd Zanudin P74093
COMPARISON OF LOADED AND UNLOADED STAIR DESCENT Joe Lynch, B.Sc. and D.G.E. Robertson, Ph.D., FCSB School of Human Kinetics,University of Ottawa, Ottawa,
Running Gait.
Transtibial Amputee Human Motion Analysis
Energy expenditure and gait characteristics of a bilateral amputee walking with C-leg prostheses compared with stubby and conventional articulating prostheses 
Internal forces during gait
Presentation transcript:

Management of the Partial Foot Amputee Gait Workshop at Biomechanics Laboratory, U of Sydney July 2005

Figure 1 - Lines of standard forefoot/midfoot amputations (From Vitali, et al., 1978, pp. 128) SURGICAL GOALS 'To remove the pathologic condition which interferes with function, causes disability or threatens life so that rehabilitation can be instituted' (Mueller and Sinacore, 1994).

Biomechanical Complications An equinus deformity often results from forefoot amputations, especially the Lisfranc (metatarsocuneiform joint) and the Chopart (talonavicular and calcaneocubiod joints) amputation (Chang, et al., 1995). In a TMA the tendons of extensor hallucis longus, extensor digitorum longus and peroneus tertius muscles are sectioned. These muscles act to dorsiflex the foot at the ankle, if they are sectioned, an imbalance between the anterior and posterior muscle groups exists. This leads to the Achilles tendon working unopposed, thus creating an equinus deformity (Barry, et al., 1993). To overcome this, an Achilles tendon lengthening procedure is performed. This loss of dorsiflexion range of motion can lead to excessive loading at the distal edge of the residuum during gait and lead to skin breakdown (Chang, et al., 1994).

3.2.5 SURGICAL TECHNIQUE The following surgical technique is summarised from Gregory, Peters and Harkless, Figure 5 illustrates a transmetatarsal amputation procedure. Figure 5 - Transmetatarsal amputation procedure (From Sanders, 1986, pp. 102).

Partial Foot Gait Dr Michael Dillon Clinical observation suggests Residuum rotates within shoe/prosthesis Prostheses do not have a socket Prostheses do not have a stiff toe lever Triceps surae atrophy Reduced plantarflexion Amputees cant stand on their toes

Literature suggests Prostheses restore the lost foot length or lever-arm (Condie 1970, Rubin 1984, Pullen 1987, Stills 1987, Weber 1991, Mueller and Sinacore 1994, Saunders 1997, Sobel 2000) Function is improved by maintaining residual foot length and ankle motion (Wagner 1985, Mueller et al1986, Barry etal 1993, Helm 1994, Pinzur at al 1997, Sobel 2000) MYTHS??

Method Amputee subjects (n=8), 5 unilat (TMT, Lisfranc, Chopart) 3 bilat (MTP, Lisfranc, Chopart) Aetiology: trauma or gangrene Normal subjects (n=8), age, ht, wt, sex matched Apparatus: Peak Motus 3D motion analysis system, AMTI force platform

Partial Foot Gait For all conditions the motion is biased towards DF. The forefoot should contribute 10 degrees of plantarflexion relative to rearfoot. There is none in barefoot PFA in preparation for toe-off and closer to normal with boot and CTO. Knee is held at >10 degrees F throughout the gait cycle. Knee F is delayed, amplitude diminished in barefoot. Over stance phase the hip moved from a flexed position to extended position, and returns to flexion during swing phase. Amplitude is diminished in barefoot.

Moment Is the rotational version of force. It is the turning effect around the centre of rotation. It is generated by muscles or an external force acting on the segment. Magnitude of a moment depends on size of the force and the distance from the centre of rotation. (Newton.metres)

Partial Foot Gait Ankle moment in barefoot is toward plantarflexion throughout stance. VGRF vector remained posterior to the ankle joint centre. Traditional and CTO bring ankle jt moment in sagittal plane closer to normal, but only at 30% stance. Knee has F moment to 20% stance, E moment to 50% stance, F moment again to 80%, then E to toe off. Boot is more normal, CTO is further towards normal. Hip has extensor moment in first half of stance and flexor in the second half. Moments increase from barefoot to Traditional to CTO. F moment in barefoot is delayed to after toe-off, but before toe-off for traditional and CTO.

Power Is the rate at which work is done. The moment multiplied by the angular velocity of the joint. The area under the power curve is the work done for that period.

Joint Power Is an indication of how hard the muscles around that joint are working. Is the rate at which energy is expended or absorbed Area under the graph Negative power means muscles are absorbing energy. Positive power means energy is generated by the muscles around the joint.

Partial Foot Gait In barefoot, ankle jt power is (+) generating from 20 – 90% of stance. The traditional has periods of absorption and generation. CTO has large absorbing periods early in stance and generation prior to toe-off. Knee jt powers are near normal. Hip jt power have increasing amounts in traditional and CTO.

Results Once the MT heads had been amputated, the GRF did not continue to progress distally along the length of the residuum but remained well behind the distal end throughout most of stance phase In the TMT and Lisfranc Amputees fitted with toe fillers, foot orthoses or slipper sockets, the distal end of the residuum was located at 58-65% of shoe length. The largest VGRF occurred at 45% of the gait cycle and did not progress past the distal end of the residuum until after contralateral heel contact in double limb support.

Significant reduction in peak power generation across the ankle were observed on the affected limbs of all amputees except the bilat MTP amp. Bilat MTP amp: small reductions in power generation, COP excursion, but not joint angular velocity or ankle ROM. TMT amp: power generation 0.72W/kg Lisfranc amp: power generation 0.91W/kg Chopart amp: 0.78W/kg (unilat), 0.32W/kg (bilat) due to elimination of joint range rather than COP. Normal: 2.56 to 5.06W/kg Reduced due to diminished ankle moment coupled with reduced joint angular velocity.

Results Reductions in work across the affected ankles were compensated for by increased power generation at the hip joint (ipsilateral or contralateral). The kinetic patterns observed were variable.

Results In the Chopart amputees fitted with clamshell devices demonstrated the COP was able to progress well beyond the distal end of the residual limb shoe length commensurate with the 2 nd peak VGRF.

Discussion The COP remained proximal to the distal end of the residuum until contralateral heel contact It is difficult to determine why these amputees adopted this gait pattern Spare the distal residuum from extreme forces Reduce the requirement of the triceps surae Toe fillers, foot orthoses, AFOs and slipper sockets seemed unable to restore the effective foot length The clamshell PTB prosthesis incorporated a substantial socket Toe levers were made from carbon fibre plates or prosthetic feet

Discussion One of the primary functions of the ankle is to generate power necessary to walk. Once the metatarsal heads were affected, power generation was negligible irrespective of residual foot length Lisfranc and TMT amputees, performed as much work across the ankle as did the Chopart amputees who had no ankle motion. The primary reason for partial foot amputation is to capitalize on the ankles contribution to walking. There is little benefit to be gained by striving to maintain residual foot length and ankle motion.

Discussion Once amputation has compromised the metatarsal heads, maintaining foot length should no longer be the primary surgical objective. Aim for residuum that has good distal skin coverage and primary intention healing. Given that the ankle did not contribute greatly to the work required to walk and the likelihood of complications with fitting most amputees, abandon below ankle designs and go for a clamshell design where risks are minimized.

Conclusion Gait analysis on normals provided foundation for our understanding of PFA Gait analysis was used to provide more accurate description of gait and prosthetic fitting. Insights from gait analysis challenged misconceptions and forced reflection on clinical practice Improved understanding of what didnt work has led clinicians to pursue advancements in design.