Y Cai and K. Ohmi HF2014@Beijing Summary of WG2 Y Cai and K. Ohmi HF2014@Beijing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SuperKEKB Lattice and Dynamic Aperture H. Koiso Apr. 20, 2005 Super B Factory Workshop in Hawaii.
Advertisements

Working Group 3 Summary M. Sullivan / Y. Funakoshi.
FCC-ee - Lepton Collider For the TLEP Lattice and Optics Design Team: B. Haerer, R. Martin, H. Garcia, R. Tomas, Y. Cai and many colleagues Optics Challenges.
Y. Ohnishi / KEK KEKB-LER for ILC Damping Ring Study Simulation of low emittance lattice includes machine errors and optics corrections. Y. Ohnishi / KEK.
Update of 3.2 km ILC DR design (DMC3) Dou Wang, Jie Gao, Gang Xu, Yiwei Wang (IHEP) IWLC2010 Monday 18 October - Friday 22 October 2010 Geneva, Switzerland.
The IR lattice design and optimization of the dynamic aperture for the ring Yiwei Wang, Huiping Geng, Yuan Zhang, Sha Bai, Dou Wang, Tianjian, Jie Gao.
Partial summary of WG3 M. Sullivan and Y. Funakoshi.
SuperB Lattice Studies M. Biagini LNF-INFN ILCDR07 Workshop, LNF-Frascati Mar. 5-7, 2007.
Plan for Review of FCC- ee Optics and Beam Dynamics Frank Zimmermann FCC-ee Design Meeting 31 August 2015.
Lattice design for CEPC main ring H. Geng, G. Xu, W. Chou, Y. Guo, N. Wang, Y. Peng, X. Cui, Y. Zhang, T. Yue, Z. Duan, Y. Wang, D. Wang, S. Bai, Q. Qin,
Lattice design for FCC-ee Bastian Haerer (CERN BE-ABP-LAT, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)) 1 8 th Gentner Day, 28 October 2015.
Present MEIC IR Design Status Vasiliy Morozov, Yaroslav Derbenev MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Optics with Large Momentum Acceptance for Higgs Factory Yunhai Cai SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Future Circular Collider Kick-off Meeting, February.
CEPC Interaction Region design and Dynamic Aperture Optimization Yiwei Wang, Yuan Zhang, Dou Wang, Huiping Geng, Xiaohao Cui, Sha Bai, Tianjian Bian, Feng.
HF2014 Workshop, Beijing, China 9-12 October 2014 Challenges and Status of the FCC-ee lattice design Bastian Haerer Challenges.
News from the interaction region study Bernhard Holzer, Anton Bogomyagkov, Bastian Harer, Rogelio Tomas Garcia, Roman Martin, Luis Eduardo Medina Presented.
CEPC parameter choice and partial double ring design
MDI and head-on collision option for electron-positron Higgs factories
Interaction region design for the partial double ring scheme
FCC-ee - Lepton Collider
100km CEPC parameter and lattice design
The Studies of Dynamic Aperture on CEPC
CEPC parameter optimization and lattice design
NSLS-II Lattice Design Strategies Weiming Guo 07/10/08
Large Booster and Collider Ring
The 13th Symposium on Accelerator Physics
Summary of CEPC pretzel scheme design
Non-linear Beam Dynamics Studies for JLEIC Electron Collider Ring
Issues in CEPC pretzel and partial double ring scheme design
CEPC pretzel scheme study
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
Pretzel scheme of CEPC H. Geng, G. Xu, Y. Zhang, Q. Qin, J. Gao, W. Chou, Y. Guo, N. Wang, Y. Peng, X. Cui, T. Yue, Z. Duan, Y. Wang, D. Wang, S. Bai,
Optimization of CEPC Dynamic Aperture
Electron collider ring Chromaticity Compensation and dynamic aperture
Status of CEPC lattice design
Analysis of Nonlinear Dynamics
DA study for CEPC Main Ring
DA Study for the CEPC Partial Double Ring Scheme
XII SuperB Project Workshop LAPP, Annecy, France, March 16-19, 2010
CEPC partial double ring scheme and crab-waist parameters
CEPC parameter optimization and lattice design
Interaction region design for the partial double ring scheme
Comparison of the final focus design
CEPC main ring magnets’ error effect on DA and MDI issues
Lattice design for the CEPC collider ring
SuperB CDR Machine P. Raimondi for the SuperB Team Paris, May 9, 2007.
Beam-Beam Effects in the CEPC
CEPC APDR and PDR scheme
Optics Design of the CEPC Interaction Region
Lattice design for the CEPC collider ring
CEPC parameter optimization and lattice design
Design study of CEPC Alternating Magnetic Field Booster
Design study of CEPC Alternating Magnetic Field Booster
Update of DA Study for the CEPC Partial Double Ring Scheme
Overall Considerations, Main Challenges and Goals
CEPC parameter and DA optimization
CEPC Partial Double Ring Parameter Update
Update of lattice design for CEPC main ring
M. E. Biagini, LNF-INFN SuperB IRC Meeting Frascati, Nov , 2007
Update on CEPC pretzel scheme design
Lattice design and dynamic aperture optimization for CEPC main ring
Lattice Design of the Collider Ring toward TDR
Lattice design for CEPC
Sawtooth effect in CEPC PDR/APDR
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Progress on Non-linear Beam Dynamic Study
Update on MEIC Nonlinear Dynamics Work
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
A TME-like Lattice for DA Studies
Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting Work summary Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting
Presentation transcript:

Y Cai and K. Ohmi HF2014@Beijing Summary of WG2 Y Cai and K. Ohmi HF2014@Beijing

Thanks to all speakers (1) Overall consideration, main challenges and goals, Yunhai Cai (SLAC) (2) Single ring multi-bunch operation and beam separation, Richard Talman (Cornell U.) (3) Challenges and status of the FCC-ee lattice design, Bastian Harer (CERN) (4) Status of the CEPC lattice design, Huiping Geng (IHEP) (5) Analysis of nonlinear dynamics, Yunhai Cai (SLAC) (6) Dynamic aperture optimization in SuperKEKB, Yukiyoshi Ohnishi (KEK) (7) The effect of IR imperfection on dynamic aperture in SuperKEKB / dynamic aperture study of CEPC, Hiroshi Sugimoto (KEK) (8) Beam lifetime and Injection consideration, Cui Xiaohao (IHEP) (9) CEPC IR optics, Yiwei Wang (IHEP) (10) Status of the FCC-ee interaction region design, Roman Martin (CERN) (11) Crab waist interaction region, Anton Bogomyagkov (BINP) (12) Beamstrahlung and energy acceptance, Kazuhito Ohmi (KEK) (13) Interaction region magnets, Eugenio Paoloni (INF) (14) Beam-beam effects in the CEPC, Yuan Zhang (IHEP) (15) Wide-band long-focus optics for detection systems infrared synchrotron accelerator diagnostics, Marina Maltseva (TENZOR)

Main challenges and goals Yunhai Cai I is limited by synchrotron radiation power. Small by and high xy. Large r for more I. Low emittance lattice at high energy High packing factor of magnets Strong final focusing Large momentum acceptance Short bunches

Important Questions for Optics Is FODO better for high packing factor, or any other possibility? Is the emittance hard to achieve in the reasonable sextupole strength? How is the degree of freedom in the design of final focus system? How is chromaticity correction well done mainly in IR design? Possibility for wider momentum acceptance and dynamic aperture. 1/18/2019 Yunhai Cai, SLAC and Kazuhito Ohmi, KEK

FCC-ee arc lattice design Bastian Harer Design Compatible lattice for Z, W, H and t. Lattices for H and t are compatible without changes.

Emittance control is necessary for Z and W. Change cell length 50->150m Change phase advance per cell. W(80 GeV) and Z(45.5GeV)

FCC-ee IR design Roman Martin, Anton Bogomyagkov L*=2m CERN deign BINP design 30mrad crossing crab waist for Z and W

Layout of IR Momentum acceptance FCC-hh FCC-ee BINP FCC-ee CERN CERN: highest Momentum acceptance from −0.6% to 0.9% BINP: from −0.6% to 1.2%

BINP design for FCC-ee Optimize b,h at sextupoles Db/b is also corrected. A version of interaction region with crab waist is ready. Synchrotron radiation is low. Beam lines are symmetrical, making tunnel straight.

CEPC arc lattice design Huiping Geng Sufficient dynamic aperture for lattice only arc.

CEPC IR optics Yiwei Wang L*=1.5m Chromaticity correction ; Wx=7, Wy=6(IP)

Dynamic aperture for CEPC whole lattice need a lot of optimization to get a reasonable dynamic aperture for the whole ring optimize dynamic aperture for on momentum particles Optimize the strength of the additional sextupoles One more sextupole to cancel x and px simultaneously need efforts to achieve bandwidth ±2% Match W function and its phase between FFS and the ARC with more families of sextupoles in the ARC with octupoles aberration analysis for the whole ring need to be carried out

Dynamic aperture studies for CEPC H. Sugimoto Possible lattice structure except FODO? Keeping packing factor Which is better Dfx(IP,XLCC)=3p or 2p. Optimization of b and h at LCC sextupoles.

Nonlinear dynamics Yunhai Cai Order by order analysis 2nx-2ny, Jx2 JxJy , Jy2 ….

Design Issues Tune shits vs. amplitudes are very large due to interlaced sextupoles in the arcs. “Second-order dispersion” in the interaction region leads out to the arcs. Second-order chromatic optics is not yet well matched between the arcs and the interaction region. Huge geometric-chromatic aberration seen in 5th-order Lie operators in the interaction region. They may well be the bottle neck of the lattice. 1/18/2019 Yunhai Cai, SLAC

Effects of Pretzel orbit Huiping Geng Pretzel scheme Effect of pretzel orbit, interference with sextupoles Optimizaton of pretzel orbit Effect and correction of sawtooth orbit due to beam energy variation. Dynamic aperture with the pretzel and sawtooth orbit is being studied.

Multibunch beam separation R. Talman Betatron phase advance(60/60)/cell length and bunch separation. The scheme used 8 primary separators and 2 trim separators with the separation bumps continuing through the 4 IP’s

Beam lifetime of CEPC Cui Xiaohao Beam-Gas Scattering: 10 nTor, 80% H2, 20% CO, 15h quantum lifetime 2218h Radiative BhaBha 51min Beamstrahlung 80min Touschek lifetime >530h

Injection consideration of CEPC Cui Xiaohao Betatron injection Designing kicker and septum Bump height s=4mm bump height > 12mm Acceptance length > 15 mm

Beamstrahlung and momentum acceptance requirement K. Ohmi Beam-beam simulation with beamstrahlung Energy distribution and lifetime is calculated. CEPC Control of dynamic beta/emittance may result better lifetime. dmax~2% is preferable for H. TLEP

Code benchmark for lifetime, Lifetrack and BBWS Yuang Zhang Lifetime for Energy tail Lifetiem for Transverse tail dmax=2% Lifetrack 222 (85: w Gauss fit) BBWS 250 ymax=40sy Lifetrack 202 (22: w Gauss fit) BBWS 250 Good agreement without Gaussian fit

Beam-beam simulation for CEPC Y. Zhang Choice of Tune, (0.54,0.61) Dynamic beam-beam effects b* dependence, possibility of by*=1.2-> 2mm Current dependence Error tolerance for IP coupling and dispersion Beam tilt

Dynamic aperture optimization at SuperKEKB Y. Ohnishi X-LCC corrects QC2 chromaticity and Y-LCC corrects QC1 chromaticity locally.

Difficulty in Large Piwinski Angle scheme Dynamic aperture shrink due to Beam-beam force Crab waist helps this difficulty. However crab waist scheme makes shrink dynamic aperture due to nonlinearity in IR. BINP approach may help this difficulty.

How to manage IR multipoles H. Sugimoto recover dynamic aperture by correction coils

IR magnet design (SuperB & SuperKEKB) Euginio Paoloni IR magnet where two beams crosses SuperKEKB separate magnet, leakage of LER QC1 affects e- beam Direct winding of collector coil SuCanceling coils to null the terms B3,B4,B5 and B6 of the field leaking from the QC1RP: B1 and B2 are retained

SuperB approach Double Helix Coils A cold test is done by mod 2015 100T/m double bore

Broadband long-focusing mirror optical system for infrared diagnostics Marina Maltseva The system works in the UV and IR ranges of spectrum (Δλ~ 0.3-40 μ m). Photographic resolutions are: 7Photographic 7-1mm in the focal plane of the tract; 7–1 mm in points shifted at ±5 mm; 7–1mm, at ±10 mm; 7–1mm, at ±15 mm; and 5–1mm, at ±20 mm.

Conclusions of WG2 Many progresses have been made since the last meeting (Feb, 2014), but the momentum aperture of the collider with realistic arcs is still too small. Possible solutions: Add octupoles near the final focusing quadrupole like SuperKEKB Consider asymmetric dispersion at the paired sextupole in the interaction region Consider to increase circumference to accommodate other type of cells with non-interlace sextupoles in arcs Further to simplify the transition between CCX and CCY to reduce the phase advance from 3p to 2p 2) Consider to increase by* to 2-3 mm since the bunch length is already too long already 2.8 mm Not much loss of luminosity Help to solve the dynamic aperture problem Refinement of the momentum acceptance requirement 3) Technical issues: 300 T/m gradient of quadupole is feasible but may not easier Consider to make a thin septum (2 mm) Dipole in the interaction region may be still too strong Injected beam may be too large, especially with a pretzel scheme

Thank you for excellent talks and contributions