Accumulation of oocytes: a new strategy for managing low-responder patients A. Cobo, Nicolás Garrido, Juana Crespo, Remohí José, Antonio Pellicer Reproductive BioMedicine Online Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages 424-432 (April 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.12.012 Copyright © 2012 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions
Figure 1 Distribution of stimulation cycles in the low response, accumulation of oocytes and vitrification group: 153 patients underwent two stimulation cycles, 63 patients underwent three stimulation cycles, 22 patients underwent four stimulation cycles and one patient underwent five stimulation cycles. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2012 24, 424-432DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.12.012) Copyright © 2012 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions
Figure 2 Cumulative live-birth rate in the low response, accumulation of oocytes and vitrification group (LR-Accu-Vit) versus low response, fresh oocytes group (LR-fresh), including embryo transfers and cryotransfers. Overall comparisons: Log rank (Mantel–Cox), P=0.03; Breslow (generalized Wilcoxon), P=0.010; Tarone–Ware, P<0.005. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2012 24, 424-432DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.12.012) Copyright © 2012 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions