COSGC-Summer Internship 2010

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Martian Landing Craft A Modified Egg Drop.
Advertisements

Beth Francis, M.Ed., M.S. Gifted Intervention Specialist Felicity Franklin Schools.
Miniature Modular Rack Launcher Combo Senior Design Group 3 Casey Brown Cyril John Keith Kirkpatrick Bryan Rickards.
Preliminary Design Review. Rocket & Payload Schematic.
An Introduction to Water Rockets. At first, I just built rockets that had no recovery system at all, this makes things simple if the rocket survives the.
By: Anthony Romero, Jake Corgiat, Joshua Martinez.
Team K^3 + C Final Team Presentation Khin Oo, Kim Gleffe, Carlie Bolin, Katelyn Harder AEM /16/11.
Miniature Modular Rack Launcher Combo Senior Design Group 3 Casey Brown Cyril John Keith Kirkpatrick Bryan Rickards.
GPS Vehicle Tracking/Payload Release System For Small UAV Project Team
The Lander is at a 25 km Lunar altitude and an orbital period of approximately 110 minutes. After separation occurs the Lander is completely self sufficient.
UNC ROVERSAT IV University of Northern Colorado Critical Design Review Friday, June
Adam Archuleta Katie Cartee Logan Farley Patrick Klein Kamron Medina Catherine Villa TEAM INFINITY AND BEYOND LAUNCH READINESS REVIEW Fall 2011 Rev C
DemoSat III Launch Readiness Review - July 29, 2005 Presented by: David Gooding Erik Andersen Anna Vigil Matt Elsner Al Crawley.
User Interface (hardware). Overview  Translate user actions into electrical control signal which controls the robot movement  Be able to input and store.
2003 CSU RoverSat. RoverSat: Team Members Structures: Ehren Ehmann Christopher Mai Electronics: John Rhoades Jesse Wilson.
METEOR BACKGROUND This is a foundation project in an ambitious endeavor to provide the RIT research community with a means to conduct near space.
Launch Readiness Review 4/21/06 -David Gooding -Erik Andersen -Anna Vigil -Matt Elsner -Augustine Trujillo DemoSat IV.
Field Navigational GPS Robot Final Presentation & Review Chris Foley, Kris Horn, Richard Neil Pittman, Michael Willis.
Vehicle Tracking/Payload Release System For Small UAV Project Team
Critical Design Review of “Mach Shock Reduction” Phase II January 2008 Statesville, NC.
CDR Clear Lake's Team Rocket 2929 Bay Area Blvd. Houston, TX
Team Flying Camels Nawar Chaker Paul Savage Tim Jacobs Pete Dokter Adam Swartley Capstone Project January 22, 2005.
University at Buffalo GLADOS SHOT II Balloon Payload Presentation June 29, 2012 Andrew Dianetti, Alex Wende, Bryant Carlson, Joe Flannery 1.
Concept Design Review THE DUKES OF HAZARD CAMILLE LEGAULT, NEIL KENNEDY, OMAR ROJAS, FERNANDO QUIJANO, AND JIMMY BUFFI April 24, 2008.
LSU 05/13/2004Mechanical Design Guidelines1 Ballooning Unit, Lecture 4.
FRR Presentation IF AT FIRST YOU DON’T SUCCEED, TRY AGAIN… AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN.
Flight Readiness Review Student Launch Initiative SCS Rocket Team Statesville Christian School April 2, 2008.
4/18/2009ASGC Symposium Project Members: Bryce Fox Jessica Avitia Sara Daniella Eriksson Mary Begay ASGC Symposium April 18, 2009 at Arizona State University.
LUNAR ROVER Concept proposal meeting Dr. Ashish Dutta Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur Kanpur, INDIA ( *** for private circulation only)
Critical Design Review Presentation Jan. 20, 2011.
M E T ROVER MSCD Engineering Technology Critical Design Review Metropolitan State College of Denver April 2004.
Project: Weather Video Sat 4/2/04 Mesa State College, Grand Junction.
Team Parro Project HUSP. Team Members Jason Rollins – Project Manager / Electrical Design Jason Rollins – Project Manager / Electrical Design Shawn Mullins.
Robotic Sensor Network: Wireless Sensor Platform for Autonomous Topology Formation Project: Sponsored By: Advisor: Dr. S. Jay Yang, CEManager: Steven.
Parachute Design Unit. Design a parachute that will safely deliver its cargo to the ground according to the following constraints: * The parachute must.
The Balloon Launch “Spacecraft” and Environment ACES Presentation T. Gregory Guzik February 20, 2003.
1 Robotics Challenge Overview. 2 Why? -Viking was tested at the Dunes -Develop intelligent robots -Explore Robotics.
Individual Subsystem Testing Report New Jersey Space Grant Consortium with Rutgers University Stevens Institute of Technology 2/13/2012.
Group Members Mike Svendsen – Computer Engineer Steve Towey – Computer Engineer Brian Walker – Architect Richard George – Industrial Technology Client.
General Robotics General Robotics LEGO Rover Design Workshop 2000 Michael Rosenblatt.
Mechanics of Materials. To determine the loading on a body Draw a free body diagram indicating – external loads and moments – reaction loads and moments.
LaACES High Altitude Ballooning Atmospheric Density By: Henry Hardee Sina Zarei Ian Walsdorf.
By Eric Greene RMS / I. S. 192 Q. Smart Start Question How would you get the robot to flirt with disaster by touching the edge of the “table” as many.
P07108: METEOR Instrumentation Recovery System. Team Bash Nanayakkara – Project Manager (ISE) Scott Defisher – Fuselage Design (ME) Mike Kochanski – Software.
DemoSat IV: RedRoverSat University of Colorado at Boulder Jaime Catchen, Chris Homolac, Emily Walters August 9, 2006.
Robot Project by Ahmad Shtaiyat Supervised by Dr. Salem Al-Agtash.
PIMA COMMUNITY COLLEGE ASCEND! 2009 ASGC Symposium April 18,
With. Project Overview  Introduction to Factory Automation Numerical Control  Build an autonomous robotic solution  Testing an autonomous robot build.
With. Project Overview  Introduction to Factory Automation Numerical Control  Build an autonomous robotic solution  Testing an autonomous robot build.
SOAREX VII Mission Design, construct, test, and fly an ultralight (
Planetary Lander PDR Team Name
Balloon Payload Launch
Preliminary Design Review
An Article Review by Matthew D. Schrieber
Using the Colour Sensor
Autonomous Robot Platform
Autonomous Robot Platform
CanSat Competition Competition Objectives Pre-Launch Launch
CSU-Pueblo Team: Paul Rael, Shae Anderson, Atilla Turkoz, Yudhi Paudel
RGS: Recovery Guidance System
CSU Robot Challenge 2010 Team: Ben Gindl, Katie Mantell, Sean Throckmorton, Tim Schneider, Travis Histed Advisors: Dr. Azer Yalin, Dr. Mark Lindsay, Grant.
Critical Design Review Presentation
Starting Student Space Hardware Programs IV
Creating Robotic Platforms
Sounding Rocket PDR Team Name
Sounding Rocket CDR Team Name
Mars Rover CDR Team Name
How to design a container that will protect an egg.
Lesson 1: What is Energy?.
COSGC-Summer Internship 2010
Presentation transcript:

COSGC-Summer Internship 2010 Independent Project Sean Throckmorton, Luke Slominski Travis Histed , Ben Gindl

System Two Part: Lander – houses rover, delivers rover from altitude Rover - previous Robot Challenge contender, modified to interface to lander hardware, software modified for flight sequence

Project Goals Lander Rover 3kg including rover payload Minimum height drop of 100 feet Self contained power source Rover Less than 1.5 kg weight Fits into lander Complies with Robot Challenge guidelines and rules

Rover Modifications Created new sensor plate Improved sensor reading (different physical layout) Designed and manufactured a hitching system

Programming Programming Analog Sensors Bascom AVR programming Programmed rover with decision making Programmed lander with sequence of landing step Transceiver Compass Power

Lander How will lander and rover survive landing? How does the rover orient itself after landing?

Impact foam Conducted compressing testing of three types of foam

Avionics Built separate circuit board for Lander control Used to control motors, light chute charge and detect Sonar data

Testing Impact Testing Pin Testing Foam Testing Parachute testing

Reliability Main modes of failure: Free-fall: Concern-Initial drag force from chute could damage release mechanisms Release Concern-Pin release was not %100 reliable in testing Impact Impact angle was strongly dependent on a uniform pin release Considered increasing length, however was not feasible Rover would stay fastened during impact Compress as much as possible

First Test Sequence Attach lander to two weather balloons that are tethered to the ground Lander will rise to 500 feet After 8 minutes lander will be released Parachute deploys Sonar triggers lid release 10 feet from the ground Platform swivels until the rover is upright After 15 minutes from being turned on the Rover will drive out and operate autonomously

First Test Results Unforeseen elements… Weather balloons were destroyed before payload left surface ~ ¼ of our budget lost in the atmosphere

Second Test Adequate not able to drop from desired height Instead rigged to a boom and swung over edge of 4-story CSU parking garage Minus the failure of lid detachment; the Lander worked as designed

Lessons Learned Testing crucial to success Layout procedures for testing and define modes of success and failure Assume you will need to conduct your final test twice and set aside money for it

Questions?