W. Bartmann, M. Benedikt, E. Métral, D. Möhl, G. Rumolo and B. Salvant

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
March 14-15, 2007ECloud Feedback, IUCF1 Electron-Cloud Effects in Fermilab Booster K.Y. Ng Fermilab Electron-Cloud Feedback Workshop IUCF, Indiana March.
Advertisements

Helmholtz International Center for Oliver Boine-Frankenheim GSI mbH and TU Darmstadt/TEMF FAIR accelerator theory (FAIR-AT) division Helmholtz International.
E-Cloud Effects in the Proposed CERN PS2 Synchrotron M. Venturini, M. Furman, and J-L Vay (LBNL) ECLOUD10 Workshshop, Oct Cornell University Work.
Longitudinal motion: The basic synchrotron equations. What is Transition ? RF systems. Motion of low & high energy particles. Acceleration. What are Adiabatic.
Thomas Roser Muon collaboration meeting February 8-10, 2002 AGS beam intensity upgrades What has been achieved Sextupole power supply upgrades Bunch manipulation.
Introduction Status of SC simulations at CERN
Elias Métral, 1st ICE meeting, 14/07/2010 /191 STATUS OF THE LHC INSTABILITIES E. Métral, N. Mounet and B. Salvant E. Métral, N. Mounet and B. Salvant.
High Intensity Beams Issues in the CERN Proton Synchrotron S. Aumon EPFL-CERN Aumon Sandra -PhD Defense1.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
First measurements of longitudinal impedance and single-bunch effects in LHC E. Shaposhnikova for BE/RF Thanks: P. Baudrenghien, A. Butterworth, T. Bohl,
H. Bartosik, K. Cornelis, A. Guerrero, B. Mikulek, G. Rumolo, Y. Papaphilippou, B. Salvant, E. Shaposhnikova June 16 th, 2011.
PS (electron cloud?!) instability at flat top Mauro Pivi Gianni Iadarola, Giovanni Rumolo, Simone Gilardoni, Hannes Bartosik, Sandra Aumon 27/06/2012 ICE.
Elias Métral, APC meeting, 02/02/2006 1/35 E. Métral, G. Arduini and G. Rumolo u Observations of fast instabilities in the SPS (1988 and 2002/3) and PS.
Beam observation and Introduction to Collective Beam Instabilities Observation of collective beam instability Collective modes Wake fields and coupling.
Agenda: General kickers analysis Wang-Tsutsui method for computing impedances Benchmarks Conclusions Bibliography Acknowledgments: E.Métral, M.Migliorati,
Oliver Boine-Frankenheim, High Current Beam Physics Group Simulation of space charge and impedance effects Funded through the EU-design study ‘DIRACsecondary.
Update of the SPS transverse impedance model Benoit for the impedance team.
Elias Métral, LHC Beam Commissioning Working Group meeting, 08/06/2010 /191 SINGLE-BUNCH INSTABILITY STUDIES IN THE LHC AT 3.5 TeV/c Elias Métral, N. Mounet.
Lecture 25 - E. Wilson - 12/15/ Slide 1 Lecture 6 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS HT E. J. N. Wilson
Status from the collimator impedance MD in the LHC Collimation team:R. Assmann, R. Bruce, A. Rossi. Operation team:G.H. Hemelsoet, W. Venturini, V. Kain,
Injection Energy Review D. Schulte. Introduction Will review the injection energy So could answer the following questions: Which injection energy can.
Elias Métral, ICFA-HB2004, Bensheim, Germany, 18-22/10/ E. Métral TRANSVERSE MODE-COUPLING INSTABILITY IN THE CERN SUPER PROTON SYNCHROTRON G. Arduini,
Instability rise-time far above the TMCI threshold: Comparison between simple theory, MOSES and HEADTAIL E. Benedetto, E. Metral Acknowledgements: G. Rumolo,
Elias Métral, SPSU Study Group and Task Force on SPS Upgrade meeting, 25/03/2010 /311 TMCI Intensity Threshold for LHC Bunch(es) in the SPS u Executive.
CERN F. Ruggiero Univ. “La Sapienza”, Rome, 20–24 March 2006 Measurements, ideas, curiosities beam diagnostics and fundamental limitations to the performance.
News on TMCI in the SPS: Injecting high intensity bunches Benoit for the MD team: T. Bohl, K. Cornelis, H. Damerau, W. Hofle, E. Metral, G. Rumolo, B.
Elias Métral, LHC Beam Commissioning Working Group meeting, 30/11/2010 /241 PRELIMINARY FINDINGS FROM INSTABILITY MEASUREMENTS DURING THE 75ns AND 50ns.
1 Update on the impedance of the SPS kickers E. Métral, G. Rumolo, B. Salvant, C. Zannini SPS impedance meeting - Oct. 16 th 2009 Acknowledgments: F. Caspers,
Update on TMCI measurements March 5, 2008 G. Arduini, R. Jones, E. Métral, G. Papotti, G. Rumolo, B. Salvant, R Tomas, R. Steinhagen Many thanks to the.
LER Workshop, Oct 11, 2006Intensity Increase in the LER – T. Sen1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac  Motivation  Slip stacking in the.
2 February 8th - 10th, 2016 TWIICE 2 Workshop Instability studies in the CLIC Damping Rings including radiation damping A.Passarelli, H.Bartosik, O.Boine-Fankenheim,
Pushing the space charge limit in the CERN LHC injectors H. Bartosik for the CERN space charge team with contributions from S. Gilardoni, A. Huschauer,
Elias Métral, LIS meeting, 29/01/2008 1/26 GAMMA TRANSITION JUMP FOR PS2 W. Bartmann, M. Benedikt, E. Métral and D. Möhl u Introduction with the case of.
Benchmarking Headtail with e-cloud observations with LHC 25ns beam H. Bartosik, W. Höfle, G. Iadarola, Y. Papaphilippou, G. Rumolo.
AB-ABP/LHC Injector Synchrotrons Section CERN, Giovanni Rumolo 1 Preliminary results of the E-Cloud Instability MDs at the SPS G. Rumolo, in.
HEADTAIL simulation during the accelerating ramp in the PS S. Aumon - EPFL & CERN Acknowledgement to B. Salvant, G. Rumolo.
Elias Métral, CERN-GSI bi-lateral working meeting on Collective Effects – Coordination of Theory and Experiments, GSI, 30-31/03/06 1/15 TRANSVERSE LANDAU.
Collective Effect II Giuliano Franchetti, GSI CERN Accelerator – School Prague 11/9/14G. Franchetti1.
LIU Day 2014 – M.Bodendorfer - LEIR model. LEIR model A plan for understanding/upgrading the LEIR performance limitations M.Bodendorfer BE/ABP & LEIR.
Beam Instability in High Energy Hadron Accelerators and its Challenge for SPPC Liu Yu Dong.
Loss of Landau damping for reactive impedance and a double RF system
Longitudinal impedance of the SPS
LEIR IMPEDANCE AND INSTABILITY MEASUREMENTS
Follow up on SPS transverse impedance
Proposals for 2015 impedance-related MD requests for PSB and SPS
Sergey Antipov, Nicolo Biancacci, and david amorim
A. Al-khateeb, O. Chorniy, R. Hasse, V. Kornilov, O. Boine-F
Benchmarking the SPS transverse impedance model: headtail growth rates
LHC at 7 TeV/c: comparison phase 1 / IR3MBC
E. Métral, N. Mounet and B. Salvant
Invited talk TOAC001 ( min, 21 slides)
LHC COLLIMATOR IMPEDANCE
G. Arduini, R. Calaga, E. Metral, G. Papotti, G. Rumolo, B. Salvant, R
E. Métral, G. Rumolo, R. Tomás (CERN Switzerland), B
Status from the collimator impedance MD in the LHC
NEWS ABOUT COLLIMATOR IMPEDANCE
STABILITY OF THE LONGITUDINAL BUNCHED-BEAM COHERENT MODES
Tune shifts in LHC from collimators impedance
CERN / GSI Meeting on Collective Effects in CARE-HHH APD BEAM’07
Explanation of the comment I made at the 06/07/06 APC
LHC impedance: Comparison between phase 1 and IR3MBC – follow-up
News on TMCI in the SPS: Injecting high intensity bunches
Beam dynamics requirements after LS2
Simulating transition crossing in the PS with HeadTail
STABILISING INTENSE BEAMS
Observation of Transverse Mode Coupling Instability at the PS and SPS
Lecture 6 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS HT E. J. N. Wilson
CERN-SPS horizontal instability
SPPC Longitudinal Dynamics
LHC collimation review follow-up Impedance with IR3MBC option & comparison with phase 1 tight settings N. Mounet, B. Salvant and E. Métral Acknowledgements:
Presentation transcript:

W. Bartmann, M. Benedikt, E. Métral, D. Möhl, G. Rumolo and B. Salvant TRANSITION CROSSING REQUIREMENTS FOR PS2 W. Bartmann, M. Benedikt, E. Métral, D. Möhl, G. Rumolo and B. Salvant Space Charge Broad-Band Introduction with the case of the PS Equations in the case with NO SC (or BB imp.) and NO t jump re-derived and solved analytically + HEADTAIL simulations Equations in the case with both SC (and/or BB imp.) and t jump re-derived and solved numerically + some HEADTAIL simulations Application (and comparison with Dieter’s theory of 1969!  CERN-ISR/300/GS/69-62) to the cases below: nTOF in the present PS and in (PS2, 10 MHz) FT in (PS2, 10 MHz) and (PS2, 40 MHz) LHC in (PS2, 10 MHz) and (PS2, 40 MHz) Conclusions and outlooks + proposed solution + work missing for the review Elias Métral, PS2 WG meeting, 15/05/2008

Introduction with the case of the PS (1/9) Thanks to M. Martini for the data!  t = - 1.24 in tjump = 500 s (see also next slides) Elias Métral, PS2 WG meeting, 15/05/2008

Introduction with the case of the PS (2/9) Zoom Zoom Elias Métral, PS2 WG meeting, 15/05/2008

Introduction with the case of the PS (3/9) Courtesy of M. Martini Elias Métral, PS2 WG meeting, 15/05/2008

Introduction with the case of the PS (4/9)  Currently, the nTOF bunch is the most critical at transition due to a TMCI which develops near transition crossing Simulation by Giovanni with HEADTAIL (ICAP06) Without space charge Measurements in 2000 With space charge  > 2.1 eVs are needed for ~ 71012 p/b (PS/RF Note 2002-198) Elias Métral, PS2 WG meeting, 15/05/2008

Introduction with the case of the PS (5/9) BB only Introduction with the case of the PS (5/9) HEADTAIL SIMULATION Flat chamber Head Tail - Constant energy - Bunch in the centre of the PU 1st trace = turn 1 Last trace = turn 130 Every turn shown Elias Métral, PS2 WG meeting, 15/05/2008

Introduction with the case of the PS (6/9) Δz  120 cm  f  250 MHz Δz  40 cm  f  750 MHz HEADTAIL SIMULATION Turn 130 shown Elias Métral, PS2 WG meeting, 15/05/2008

Introduction with the case of the PS (7/9) BB + SC Introduction with the case of the PS (7/9) HEADTAIL SIMULATION Flat chamber Head Tail 1st trace = turn 1 Last trace = turn 200 Every turn shown Elias Métral, PS2 WG meeting, 15/05/2008

Introduction with the case of the PS (8/9)  Measurements from Rende in 2007 on the AD beam with low longitudinal emittance (no precise beam parameters) Elias Métral, PS2 WG meeting, 15/05/2008

Introduction with the case of the PS (9/9) nTOF 10 MHz FT LHC 40 MHz R [m] 100 214.3  [m] 70 Bdot [T/s] 2.2 1.5 Vrf [kV] 200 500 1500 h 8 15 45 180 p 0.027 0.0076 L [eVs] 2/2.3/2.5 2.5 0.4 0.6 Nb [1010 p/b] 800 1000 320 190 80 48 t (1, norm.) [m] 5 6 t average [m] 16* 15* Pipe [cm  cm] 3.5 / 7 Qt 6.25 11.25** * R / Qt Elias Métral, PS2 WG meeting, 15/05/2008 ** Assumption: Qt ~ t = 1 /  p = 11.47

is tilted near transition General analytical result for the nonadiabatic transition region (with neither SC, or BB imp., nor t jump)  The bunch is tilted near transition Transition Nonadiabatic time  Same picture as the one obtained by K.Y. Ng in his book “Physics of Intensity Dependent Beam Instabilities” (2006), p. 707 Elias Métral, PS2 WG meeting, 15/05/2008

… Confirmed by HEADTAIL simulations Residual mismatch Elias Métral, PS2 WG meeting, 15/05/2008

Case of the nTOF bunch in the PS WITHOUT space charge (1/3) Tc  1.9 ms Elias Métral, PS2 WG meeting, 15/05/2008

Case of the nTOF bunch in the PS WITHOUT space charge (2/3) Analytical result for the evolution of the longitudinal ellipse when crossing transition Elias Métral, PS2 WG meeting, 15/05/2008

Case of the nTOF bunch in the PS WITHOUT space charge (3/3) … Confirmed by HEADTAIL simulations Only the blue particles are displayed to assess the tilt of the ellipse Elias Métral, PS2 WG meeting, 15/05/2008

Case of the nTOF bunch in the PS WITH space charge (1/5) STATIC (MATCHED) CASE Elias Métral, PS2 WG meeting, 15/05/2008

Case of the nTOF bunch in the PS WITH space charge (2/5) DYNAMIC (“REAL”) CASE WHEN TRANSITION IS CROSSED Elias Métral, PS2 WG meeting, 15/05/2008

Case of the nTOF bunch in the PS WITH space charge (3/5) DYNAMIC (“REAL”) CASE WHEN TRANSITION IS CROSSED Elias Métral, PS2 WG meeting, 15/05/2008

Case of the nTOF bunch in the PS WITH space charge (4/5) EVOLUTION OF THE DYNAMIC CASE WHEN SPACE CHARGE IS INCREASED THROUGH INTENSITY Elias Métral, PS2 WG meeting, 15/05/2008

Case of the nTOF bunch in the PS WITH space charge (5/5) EVOLUTION OF THE DYNAMIC CASE WHEN SPACE CHARGE IS DECREASED THROUGH LONGITUDINAL EMITTANCE Elias Métral, PS2 WG meeting, 15/05/2008

(Asymmetric) t jump for nTOF in the PS (considering SC and TMCI) Tc  1.9 ms Elias Métral, PS2 WG meeting, 15/05/2008

Summary table for PS and PS2 (considering SC and TMCI) nTOF (2 eVs) (2.3 eVs) (2.5 eVs) (10 MHz) FT LHC (40 MHz) Tc [ms] 1.86 4.29 2.97 1.27 g0 3.85 3.73 4.6 SC imp. [] - 19.85  j - 5.36  j - 6.62  j t SC from x = - 2 -0.72 -0.65 -0.61 -1.50 -0.88 -0.79 -0.50 -0.34 t with SC & TMCI -1.58 -1.35 -1.23 -6.85 -2.91 -2.97 -2.68 -1.08 It is the t of the present PS = -1.50 if PS2 BB imp. ~ 6 times smaller than PS Elias Métral, PS2 WG meeting, 15/05/2008

 In this case, the asymmetry of the t jump is in the other direction Case of the nTOF bunch in the PS with longitudinal inductive BB impedance (neglecting SC)  In this case, the asymmetry of the t jump is in the other direction Elias Métral, PS2 WG meeting, 15/05/2008

Case of the nTOF bunch in the PS with both longitudinal inductive BB impedance and SC  Caution: Here the long. BB impedance cancels the SC for the bunch length matching but will lead to a more critical long. microwave instability! Elias Métral, PS2 WG meeting, 15/05/2008

Case of the nTOF bunch in the PS with both longitudinal inductive BB impedance and SC and 2 times bigger transverse emittance Elias Métral, PS2 WG meeting, 15/05/2008

Longitudinal negative mass (SC) instability rise time (1/4) PS nTOF (2 eVs) Using coasting-beam formalism with peak values (constant energy) Keil-Schnell Elias Métral, PS2 WG meeting, 15/05/2008

Longitudinal negative mass (SC) instability rise time (2/4) PS nTOF (2 eVs) PS nTOF (2.5 eVs) PS2 nTOF (10 MHz) PS2 nTOF (10 MHz) Elias Métral, PS2 WG meeting, 15/05/2008

Longitudinal negative mass (SC) instability rise time (3/4) PS2 LHC (10 MHz) PS2 FT (10 MHz) PS2 LHC (40 MHz) PS2 FT (40 MHz) Elias Métral, PS2 WG meeting, 15/05/2008

Longitudinal negative mass (SC) instability rise time (4/4) PS2 LHC (10 MHz) PS2 FT (10 MHz) PS2 LHC (40 MHz) PS2 FT (40 MHz) Elias Métral, PS2 WG meeting, 15/05/2008

Vertical microwave (BB) instability rise-time (1/4) PS nTOF (2 eVs) Using coasting-beam formalism with peak values (constant energy) Keil-Schnell (transverse) HEADTAIL simulations Elias Métral, PS2 WG meeting, 15/05/2008

Vertical microwave (BB) instability rise-time (2/4) th (Coasting-beam formalism with peak values )  12.5  10-3 More on PS nTOF (2 eVs) ? HEADTAIL simulations  th (HEADTAIL)  8.5  10-3 th (TMCI)  6  10-3. This formula was used to obtain the summary table of page 22  Slightly optimistic! Elias Métral, PS2 WG meeting, 15/05/2008

Vertical microwave (BB) instability rise-time (3/4) PS nTOF (2 eVs) PS nTOF (2.5 eVs) PS2 nTOF (10 MHz) Elias Métral, PS2 WG meeting, 15/05/2008

Vertical microwave (BB) instability rise-time (4/4) PS2 LHC (10 MHz) PS2 FT (10 MHz) PS2 LHC (40 MHz) PS2 FT (40 MHz) Elias Métral, PS2 WG meeting, 15/05/2008

Conclusions and outlooks (1/7) Transition crossing with a t jump looks possible in PS2 for the densities foreseen with the FT and LHC beams It its more difficult for conditions corresponding to the present nTOF bunch. In this case a strong reduction of the Broad-Band impedance is necessary to keep the required t jump  ~ - 2 * Further improvement of the longitudinal density beyond that of nTOF seems excluded, even if only the (unavoidable!) space-charge impedance of the beam is taken into account * - It is believed that t until ~ - 2 can be performed - It should be done with Qt  0 - During the t jump the dispersion has the tendency to increase  This can lead to an increase of the horizontal beam size and subsequent beam losses Elias Métral, PS2 WG meeting, 15/05/2008

Conclusions and outlooks (2/7) Reminder on the BB in the PS and SPS (measured from coherent vertical tune shift vs. intensity): PS: ~ 3 M/m SPS: ~ 22 M/m in 2007 (i.e. ~ 7 times higher for a machine 11 times bigger) The PS2 will be more than 2 times bigger than the present PS and will operate at higher energy (more powerful kickers needed etc.)  Will be challenging to build the PS2 machine within the required (transverse) impedance budget (~ 6 times smaller than the present PS!) Elias Métral, PS2 WG meeting, 15/05/2008

Conclusions and outlooks (3/7) Concerning the time needed to perform the t jump in PS2 Longitudinal negative-mass (SC) instability rise-times are larger in the PS2 compared to the present PS Vertical microwave (BB) instability rise-times are larger in the PS2 compared to the present PS  The time needed to perform the t jump of the present PS (i.e. ~ 500 s) should be enough for the PS2 Elias Métral, PS2 WG meeting, 15/05/2008

Conclusions and outlooks (4/7) Proposed MDs in the PS in 2008 to check our estimates (fast analog signals are available in the CCC since the end of 2007): Movie of the TMCI to compare with the HEADTAIL simulations (same data as the ones taken by Rende in 2007) Remove the t jump and measure the evolution of the longitudinal, horizontal and vertical signals vs. transverse bunch emittance (to see the relative effect of the SC impedance, which is emittance-dependent, and the BB impedance, which is constant Same measurements scanning the amplitude of the t jump Same measurements scanning the transition timing (symmetric vs asymmetric jump…) for different transverse bunch emittances … S. Aumon and W. Bartmann will be the contact persons for these studies Elias Métral, PS2 WG meeting, 15/05/2008

Conclusions and outlooks (5/7) Perspectives with HEADTAIL (which was upgraded recently for these studies) Possibility to compute the transverse instability rise-time with acceleration Possibility to include a t jump Possibility to include the transverse and longitudinal space charge Possibility to take into account the nonlinear momentum factors  It should be possible to benchmark all the measurements (which will be performed in 2008) against HEADTAIL Elias Métral, PS2 WG meeting, 15/05/2008

Conclusions and outlooks (6/7) Proposition to increase the intensity threshold when transition crossing is limited by TMCI as in the PS (see for instance RLC meeting of 19/09/2006) Since the work of Pellegrini&Sands1969 on the (low-intensity) Head-Tail instability, the sign of the H and V chromaticities is changed when the transition is crossed (i.e. when the sign of the slip-factor  changes)  The chromatic frequency is kept positive Before, the Head-Tail instability above transition was damped (e.g. in the PS) using Landau octupoles It is proposed now not only to change the sign of the chromaticity when the transition is crossed but to correlate its variation with the one of the slip-factor (due to TMCI reason)  Could/should be checked first with HEADTAIL… Elias Métral, PS2 WG meeting, 15/05/2008

Conclusions and outlooks (7/7) TMCI intensity threshold Consider the case below transition ( < 0 and  < 0) where a TMCI is stabilized by decreasing  and let’s call  = 0 in the stable situation below transition During transition crossing (and after), one wants to keep   0 Increasing the longitudinal emittance (e.g. in the PS) would not be required anymore  = 0  Elias Métral, PS2 WG meeting, 15/05/2008

Still to be done for the review (1/3) M. Benedikt sent us new beam parameters on 12/05/08  Re-do some computations for the new beam parameters (see next slides in red) Elias Métral, PS2 WG meeting, 15/05/2008

Still to be done for the review (2/3) Elias Métral, PS2 WG meeting, 15/05/2008

Still to be done for the review (3/3) Elias Métral, PS2 WG meeting, 15/05/2008