Source Selection Process Value Adjusted Total Evaluated Price (VATEP)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Florida Gulf Coast University Small Business Development Center (SBDC) Procurement Technical Assistance Center (PTAC) Reading Solicitations.
Advertisements

ASARECA Procurement guidelines Goods and Works. PROCUREMENT OF GOODS By P rocurement and C ontracting Officer ITAZA MUHIIRWA.
Acquisition Process Step 1 - Requirements Definition
Source Selection and Contract Award
Writing Proposals for Oak Ridge National Laboratory Women-Owned Small Business Day Sonny Rogers Contract Services Group Manager Oak Ridge, TN August 24,
March 9,  HISTORY ◦ NASA HQ & JSC Lean 6 Sigma Teams  Recommended various ways to streamline process  JSC STREAMLINED TEAM CHARTER ◦ Document.
APAT, October 29, Acronym Legend 2 SEB - Source Evaluation Board SLPT - Streamlined Procurement Team (2 Methods)  PPT - Price and Past Performance.
How To Do Business With The Defense Energy Support Center Presented by David Christy Procurement Analyst Acquisition Policy & Oversight Office.
Contract Financing Theresa A. Stevens March 12, 2007 Part 2 Non-Commercial Item Purchase Financing FAR Subpart 32.1 PIP Level II Presentation.
Project Management Education
Source Selection. What is Source Selection? Source Selection is the process of conducting competitive negotiations. Source Selection allows the Government.
Educating Customers Simplified Acquisition Process Russellyn Rogers.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Networking & Teaming Conference Fort Bliss Replacement Hospital Projects Jim Bales & John Rodgers Fort Worth.
Don Mansfield Professor of Contract Management Defense Acquisition University.
Implementing the Regulatory Flexibility Act. 2 Background The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612) requires Federal agencies to— –Consider the.
2.2 Acquisition Methodology. “Acquisition methodology” – the processes employed and the means used to solicit, request, or invite offers that will normally.
Policies and procedures for developing acquisition plans; determining whether to use commercial or Government resources; whether it is more economical.
1 DVBE Incentive Workshop To meet or exceed the 3% DVBE goal in State contracting.
FAR Part 8.4 – Federal Supply Schedule Process Map1 of 2 Obtain required solicitation reviews and approvals in accordance with agency procedure: NOAA AGO.
1 DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY AMERICA’S COMBAT LOGISTICS SUPPORT AGENCY DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY AMERICA’S COMBAT LOGISTICS SUPPORT AGENCY WARFIGHTER SUPPORT.
1 Comprehensive Tactical Infrastructure Maintenance and Repair (CTIMR) Area 3 Pre-Proposal Site Visit HSBP1015R0040 Sectors EL PASO / BIG BEND, TX
Guidelines for Simplified Acquisitions Keisha Eldridge March 7, 2007 Level I PIP Presentation.
Introduction to Procurement for Public Housing Authorities Sealed Bids Unit 5.
Research Resources Defining Best Value Procurement Types: ●Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) ●Trade-Off ●Faux Trade-Off Conclusions.
12/11/20071 Indirect Cost Study Facilities and Administrative (F&A) Costs Indiana University Sally Link Cost Accounting Manager Financial Management Services.
Federal Acquisition Service U.S. General Services Administration Area Facility Operation Specialist (aFOS) 88 th Regional Support Command Pre-Bid Meeting.
Small Business and Subcontracting. Subcontracting for Small Business 6 steps to successful subcontracting 6. Report Contractor performance 1. Consider.
1. 2 Cost & Price Analysis Breakout Session # 312 Beverly Arviso, CPA, Fellow, CPCM, CFCM, Arviso, Inc. Melanie Burgess, CPA, CFCM, Burgess Consulting,
Best Practices for a FAR 15 Procurement PART 1 – DEVELOPING THE SOLICITATION.
DoD Source Selection Procedures Source Selection Support Center of Excellence July 12, 2016.
Presented by NAVSEA, NSWC, for NAVSUP
PhD at CSE: Overview CSE department offers Doctoral degree in the Computer Science (CS) or Computer Engineering areas (CpE) at both MS to PhD and BS to.
CIMA P2 Advanced Management Accounting
Evaluating Small Business Participation
Green Line Extension Project
Contracting in a Changing Environment
Consent to Subcontract
What is Contract Financing?
James Thomas Director of Legislative Policy March 3, 2016
Pilot Project Concept 30-Minute Emergency Response Service (ERS)
Pilot Project Concept 30-Minute Emergency Response Service (ERS)
Contracting Officer Podcast Slides
FAR Part 2 - Definitions of Words and Terms
Skyway Insight© Webinar
CON 280: Source Selection and the Administration of Service Contracts
CON 280: Source Selection and the Administration of Service Contracts
Small Business and Subcontracting.
Subcontracting SBP 210 Lesson 1: Introduction
Managing Fixed Price Development Programs
Michelle M. Currier, DAU Professor of Contract Management
FIVE PROJECT PHASES 5C-3 Sun. 8:00-10:00am 21/ 2/2016.
Contracting by Negotiation Process Map – Part 15 (1 of 3)
First Article Test (FAT) / Production Lot Test (PLT)
Cost or pricing data John Cancellara 7 March 2018.
THIS IS A GENERAL REFERENCE ONLY – SEE NOAA APG CHAPTERS for specific guidance and references to applicable statute, regulation, DOC policy, and NOAA policy.
LPTA – The impact of LPTA is not fruitful to the Government or to Industry. We have seen multiple times where the lowest price won, but could not be executed,
Procurement.
Source Selection Procedures
MDA OSBP BEST PRACTICES FOR MAXIMIZING SB PARTICIPATION
A Pricing Perspective on Contract Cost/Price Analyst
Source Selection Training
A Evaluation Factors D Pass/Fail 85% Weight S GRADES A- 67% B 93%
Omnibus IV Procurement Overview Michael D’Alessandro
Industry-Government Engagement Workshop A-E Cost Engineering Challenges Tulsa, OK 19 March 2019.
U.S. Army Contracting Command
Omnibus IV Contracting Strategy Michael D’Alessandro
Certified Cost or Pricing Data vs
Post-Government Service Employment Restriction Counseling
AGED 570: Teaching H.S. Agricultural Economics
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES AB 1600 UPDATE
Presentation transcript:

Source Selection Process Value Adjusted Total Evaluated Price (VATEP) 09.06.2018 Presented by: Carole Green Professor of Contract Management Defense Acquisition University - South

Source selection process DoD Source Selection Procedures (31 March 2016) Best Value Continuum Subjective Trade-off Lowest Priced Technically Acceptable (LPTA) Value Adjusted Total Evaluated Price (VATEP)

What is source selection? Subjective Trade-off What is source selection? Obtaining the best value for the Government in negotiated acquisitions, depending on the relative importance of cost or price and the level of performance risk. Subjective Trade-off – Subjective evaluation when the requirement is less defined and the performance risk is moderate to high

Lowest price technically acceptable (LPTA) Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) – Objective evaluation when the requirement is clearly defined and the risk of unsuccessful performance is minimal

Value adjusted total evaluated price (vatep) VATEP Trade-off – A structured technique that objectivizes how some of the requirements would be treated in the tradeoff process

What is vatep? A tradeoff source selection process where the offeror’s total proposed price may be adjusted based on the “value” placed on better performance as identified in the solicitation. How is the value of better performance determined? What are the components of VATEP? How is the VATEP process identified in the solicitation?

How is the value of better performance determined? The requirements owner (e.g. program management office) determines which above threshold (minimum) capability requirements are truly of substantial benefit and how they are valued relative to each other and in absolute terms.

What are the vatep components? Threshold – Minimum acceptable value of an attribute that is considered achievable with the available cost, schedule and technology at low-to-moderate risk. Objective – The desired operational value of an attribute that is achievable but may be at a higher risk in cost, schedule, and technology. Value – Absolute (monetary) worth of achieving more than the threshold (minimum) performance capability Affordability Cap – The approved cost constraints for major system acquisitions or approved funding allocated for a given acquisition.

Vatep Example The offeror’s total evaluated price for CLIN X001AA will be adjusted, for evaluation purposes only, in accordance with the chart below where above-threshold performance has been achieved for any of the three objectives identified. VATEP Objectives Performance Work Statement (PWS) Paragraph Maximum VATEP (% Reduction in proposed CLIN price) Calculation* Payload 6.2.7 3% (Offerors proposed payload less the threshold of 2,100)/600*3% Self-Deployment 6.2.9 2% Objective is binary. The proposal will either meet or fail to meet the objective. Airspeed 6.2.15 1% (Offerors proposed airspeed less the threshold of 250)/150*1% *Payload: 2,100 is the threshold and 600 is the delta between threshold & objective Airspeed: 250 is the threshold and 150 is the delta between threshold & objective

Vatep Example - Payload Offeror A Offeror B Offeror C Payload (3%) 2,250 2,180 2,200 Price $14,000,000 $12,500,000 $13,750,000 VATEP Calculation (2,250-2,100)/ 600)*420,000 = (2,180-2,100)/ 600*375,000 = (2,200-2,100)/ 600*412,500= VATEP Adjustment $105,000 $50,000 $68,750 *Payload: 2,100 is the threshold and 600 is the delta between threshold & objective

Vatep Example – Self-Deploy Offeror A Offeror B Offeror C Self-deployment (2%) YES Price $14,000,000 $12,500,000 $13,750,000 VATEP Adjustment $280,000 $250,000 $275,000

Vatep Example - airspeed Offeror A Offeror B Offeror C Airspeed (1%) 275 260 300 Price $14,000,000 $12,500,000 $13,750,000 VATEP Calculation (275-250)/150)* 140,000 = (260-250)/ 150*125,000 = (300-250)/150* 137,500 = VATEP Adjustment $28,333 $8,333 $45,833 * Airspeed: 250 is the threshold and 150 is the delta between threshold & objective

VATEP Trade-off Example cont’d Offeror A Offeror B Offeror C Payload $105,000 $50,000 $68,750 Self-Deployment $280,000 $250,000 $275,000 Airspeed $28,333 $8,333 $45,833 Proposed Price $14,000,000 $12,500,000 $13,750,000 VATEP Adjustment $413,333 $308,333 $389,583 VATEP $13,586,678 $12,191,667 $13,360,417 And the winner is: ??? The Award Price is: ???

HOUSE BUYING EXERCISE

LPTA Exercise: Buying a house Minimum Requirements: 4 bed/2 bath No more than 1-hour commute Schools must be at rated at least 3 for both middle and high schools (NOTE: One child is in 5th grade and one child is in 10th grade) Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Bed/Bath 4/3.5 4/2.5 4/3 Commute 45 Minutes 1 Hour 30 Minutes School Rating Middle 4/High 3 Middle 3/High 4 Middle 3/High 3 Price $675,000 $610,000 $620,000 And the winner is: Option 2

Trade-off exercise – buying a house Factors: Technical Bed/Bath Commute School system Price Technical is significantly more important than price. All technical sub-factors are in descending order of importance.

Trade-off Exercise cont’d Minimum Requirements: 4 bed/2 bath No more than 1-hour commute Schools must be rated at least 3 for both middle and high schools Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Bed/Bath 4/3.5 4/2.5 4/3 Commute 45 Minutes 1 Hour 30 Minutes Schools Middle 4/High 3 Middle 3/High 4 Middle 3/High 3 Price $675,000 $610,000 $620,000 And the winner is: ???

VATEP Trade-off exercise – buying a house If you meet the minimum requirements: 4 bed/2 bath No more than 1-hour commute Schools must be rated at least 3 for both middle and high schools A VATEP adjustment will be made when: Square footage of the house is between 2,500-3,000 SF House has a basement House has attic space for conversion

VATEP Trade-off Exercise cont’D VATEP Objective PWS Paragraph Maximum VATEP adjustment Calculation of VATEP* Sq Footage PWS 6.2.5 3% of Proposed Price (SF proposed less the threshold (minimum) of 2,500)/500*3% Basement PWS 6.2.8 $3,000 Objective is binary. Offeror will either meet or fail to meet the objective. Attic Space PWS 6.2.12 $2,000 *Square Footage: 2,500 is the threshold and 500 is the delta between threshold & objective

VATEP Trade-off Exercise – Square footage Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Square Footage 2,900 2,700 2,500 Price $675,000 $610,000 $620,000 VATEP Calculation (2,900-2,500)/ 500*20,250= (2,700-2,500)/ 500*18,300= (2,500-2,500)/ 500*18,600= VATEP Adjustment $16,200 $7,320 $0 *Square Footage: 2,500 is the threshold and 500 is the delta between threshold & objective

VATEP Trade-off Exercise – basement Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Basement NO YES Price $675,000 $610,000 $620,000 VATEP Adjustment $3,000 $0 $0

VATEP Trade-off Exercise – attic space Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Attic Space NO YES Price $675,000 $610,000 $620,000 VATEP Adjustment $2,000 $0 $0

VATEP Trade-off Exercise cont’d Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Square Footage $16,200 $7,320 $0 Basement $3,000 Attic Space $2,000 Proposed Price $675,000 $610,000 $620,000 VATEP Adjustments VATEP $16,200 $7,320 $5,000 $658,800 $602,680 $615,000 And the winner is: ??? The Award Price is: ??? The Affordability Cap is $610,000: Option 2

VATEP Solicitation Requirements How is VATEP incorporated into the solicitation? Performance Work Statement – Must identify the threshold and objective performance capabilities Section M – Evaluation Factors for Award Must state that VATEP will be used as part of the proposal evaluation Section L – Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors Must identify how VATEP will be used during the evaluation process. Must advise offerors that the contract will reflect all above-minimum performance capabilities for which evaluation credit was given in the source selection

VATEP overview Threshold Objective What are four things you must know before VATEP can be employed in an acquisition? Threshold Objective Value of added performance capability Affordability cap

QUESTIONS?