Wayside Detection The Detroit Edison Experience

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Fall Messier Marathon Guide
Advertisements

Números.
Quality control tools
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
Railcar 101 The Basics of Railcars: Car Types, Components and Rules
TEA Systems Corp. Confidential LithoWorks PEB On-Wafer analysis of two wafers August 8, 2003 Thermal analysis of two PEB plates: _peb_bake7.csv _peb_bake8.csv.
EuroCondens SGB E.
Worksheets.
RWTÜV Fahrzeug Gmbh, Institute for Vehicle TechnologyTÜV Mitte Group 1 GRB Working Group Acceleration Pattern Results of pass-by noise measurements carried.
1 Changing Profile of Household Sector Credit and Deposits in Indian Banking System -Deepak Mathur November 30, 2010.
THE 2004 LIVING CONDITIONS MONITORING SURVEY : ZAMBIA EXTENT TO WHICH GENDER WAS INCORPORATED presented at the Global Forum on Gender Statistics, Accra.
Disability status in Ethiopia in 1984, 1994 & 2007 population and housing sensus Ehete Bekele Seyoum ESA/STAT/AC.219/25.
Motor Vehicle Fleet Performance Audit Jeff A. McMahan, CFE Oklahoma State Auditor & Inspector NSAA Annual Conference 2005 Wrightsville Beach, NC.
The Impact of Drug Benefit Caps Geoffrey Joyce, PhD.
12.3 – Analyzing Data.
Add Governors Discretionary (1G) Grants Chapter 6.
CALENDAR.
2007 ITBS/ ITED Results Cedar Rapids Community Schools.
CHAPTER 18 The Ankle and Lower Leg
Summative Math Test Algebra (28%) Geometry (29%)
CS1512 Foundations of Computing Science 2 Lecture 20 Probability and statistics (2) © J R W Hunter,
Agricultural Advisory Committee for the TY 2011 Current Agricultural Use Values Public Hearing Agricultural Advisory Committee February 25, 2011 Tax Equalization.
The 5S numbers game..
A Fractional Order (Proportional and Derivative) Motion Controller Design for A Class of Second-order Systems Center for Self-Organizing Intelligent.
Numerical Analysis 1 EE, NCKU Tien-Hao Chang (Darby Chang)
St. Edward’s University
1 1 Slide © 2003 South-Western/Thomson Learning TM Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edwards University.
The basics for simulations
Introduction to Cost Behavior and Cost-Volume Relationships
7.2 Hypothesis Testing for the Mean (Large Samples)
Aim: How do we organize and interpret statistical data?
Chapter 16 Goodness-of-Fit Tests and Contingency Tables
Figure 3–1 Standard logic symbols for the inverter (ANSI/IEEE Std
1 Slides revised The overwhelming majority of samples of n from a population of N can stand-in for the population.

CE 515 Railroad Engineering
Rail Sciences Inc. Fuel Efficient Bearing Systems Presented by Dave Shannon, Amsted Rail John Makinson, Rail Sciences Inc. Rail Sciences Inc.
TCCI Barometer March “Establishing a reliable tool for monitoring the financial, business and social activity in the Prefecture of Thessaloniki”
1 Prediction of electrical energy by photovoltaic devices in urban situations By. R.C. Ott July 2011.
TCCI Barometer March “Establishing a reliable tool for monitoring the financial, business and social activity in the Prefecture of Thessaloniki”
Statistics Review – Part I
Sprayer Economics Gary Schnitkey University of Illinois.
Progressive Aerobic Cardiovascular Endurance Run
Visual Highway Data Select a highway below... NORTH SOUTH Salisbury Southern Maryland Eastern Shore.
Quantitative Analysis (Statistics Week 8)
Facebook Pages 101: Your Organization’s Foothold on the Social Web A Volunteer Leader Webinar Sponsored by CACO December 1, 2010 Andrew Gossen, Senior.
TCCI Barometer September “Establishing a reliable tool for monitoring the financial, business and social activity in the Prefecture of Thessaloniki”
2011 WINNISQUAM COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=1021.
Before Between After.
2011 FRANKLIN COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=332.
1 Non Deterministic Automata. 2 Alphabet = Nondeterministic Finite Accepter (NFA)
Static Equilibrium; Elasticity and Fracture
Resistência dos Materiais, 5ª ed.
Lial/Hungerford/Holcomb/Mullins: Mathematics with Applications 11e Finite Mathematics with Applications 11e Copyright ©2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
Fowler Distributing Company
A Data Warehouse Mining Tool Stephen Turner Chris Frala
Chart Deception Main Source: How to Lie with Charts, by Gerald E. Jones Dr. Michael R. Hyman, NMSU.
1 Non Deterministic Automata. 2 Alphabet = Nondeterministic Finite Accepter (NFA)
Commonly Used Distributions
Schutzvermerk nach DIN 34 beachten 05/04/15 Seite 1 Training EPAM and CANopen Basic Solution: Password * * Level 1 Level 2 * Level 3 Password2 IP-Adr.
Railcar 101 The Basics of Railcars: Car Types, Components and Rules
DTE Seminar Constant Contact Side Bearings Paul Aspengren.
Framework for Maintenance Management Railcar Maintenance Management Tools Carol Scarborough.
1 DTE Rail Services, Inc. Railcar Maintenance Management Seminar Wheel Sets and Wheel Shop Practices May 23, 2008 Greenbrier Rail Services.
Premium Reduction & Delivery Improvement
Presentation to Association of Car Accounting and Car Service Officers.
Rail Vehicle Defect, Condition and Performance Monitoring: 2015 Update
Presentation transcript:

Wayside Detection The Detroit Edison Experience Dennis J. Buda Detroit Edison Railroad Engineering Program University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, ILL December 2006

Discussion Topics The Detroit Edison Strategy WILD Issues Financial Issues Conclusions and Recommendations

Introduction 36” Wheels Heavy Haul High Mileage Service Comparison of DTE and AAR CRB Data 2002 and 2003 Data - CRB Limitations DTE - Michigan Publicly Traded Utility 2.1 Million Customers - $17.0 Billion Assets 7,000 Aluminum Rotary Railcars Average Car Mileage 100,000/Year Fuel Source from PRB and Appalachian Mines

Wheel Failures and WM Codes WM 66, Flange Cracked or Broken WM 68, Cracked Rim WM 71, Shattered Rim WM 72, Spread Rim WM 83, Cracked Plate WM 75, Shelling, Spalling, Thermal-Mechanical WM 65 and 67, Out of Round (WILD or Gage) WM 76, Built-Up Tread WM 78, Slid Flat

Recent AAR Rule Changes WM 65 Wheel Impact Load Detector Removal at Impact Greater Than 90 Kips 97% of the Benefit Falls to Class I RR’s Rim Thickness Credit – Removed Window of Opportunity - Stress State

DTE vs. CRB Comparison Why Made Codes 66, 72, 74, 83 2002 - DTE = 0, AAR CRB = 4,197 total 2003 - DTE = 0, AAR CRB = 4,841 total DTE = 1 shattered rim in 2002, 0 in 2003 AAR CRB = 174 in 2002, 143 in 2003 Chi-square was then used to determine if there is a statistically significant difference for various Why Made Codes…..

Chi-square Comparisons There is a statistically significant difference in wheel removal performance for DTE vs. AAR CRB - DTE has fewer than expected removals for the following Why Made Codes: 65, 67, 75, 76, 78, 68 + 71 This is true despite heavy haul, high mileage coal train operations….

The Detroit Edison Strategy The Theory The WILD Program 50+ Kip Maintenance Strategy

The Theory The private car owner can effectively manage the life and performance of heavy haul-high mileage wheel sets, by developing a proactive maintenance strategy based upon way-side detection methodologies in combination with Class I Railroads, private railcar maintenance providers, and railway suppliers.

The WILD Program Data Purchased from TTCI By Train By Railcar By Wheel Location By Graph Proactive Maintenance Strategy

WILD Data

90 70 50

50+ Kip Maintenance Strategy Wheels Replaced Above 85 kips (3Pt. MA) 50+ Kips - Complete Visual Inspection Install Cobra Tread Guard Brake Shoes Computerized SCAT and Date Stencil Constant Contact Measurement

50+ Kip Maintenance Strategy Brake Beam & Polymer Slides Springs & Truck Mechanisms Re-torque Bolts - Air Valve & Structural Inspect Relief on Bearing Adaptors AAR Condemnable Criteria (1/8 WM 64) Modified NCTA Wheel Specification

Wheel Life Trend Analysis 50+ Kip Strategy Began Nov. 2003 1,500 Mile Inspection on Western Class I 35 Trains Completed 33,600 Wheels YTD

Wheel Life Trend Analysis Without 50+ Kip Strategy 01/01/03…11/14/03 80 Randomly Selected Wheel Sets With 50+ Kip Strategy 11/15/03…12/31/03 102 Randomly Selected Wheel Sets

194.77 days (avg.) 90 70 50

Targeted Considerations Rail Maintenance Management Forum Continue Investigative Wheel Failure Analysis Equipment Health Monitoring TAG Component Performance Within AAR Rulings Railcar Capacity and Loading Criteria Break Even Point: Railroad vs. Private Shop WILD Site and Software Performance The PUR Owner Requires a Rule Making Vote

DTE Wheel Removals With Brake System Repairs DTE wheel changes that also had a brake system repair within previous year Data for 1/03 to 7/04, Job Codes Analyzed 21,035 wheel changes - 1,738 also w/brake repair Air hose (1,182) Emergency portion (380) Service portion (125) Hand brake related (51)

Wheel Removals With Brake System Repairs By Why Made Code (Data 1/03-7/04)

Wheel Removals With Brake System Repairs By Why Made Code - 75, 65, 78, 67 (1/03-7/04)

2003 Removals with Brake Repairs Chi-Square Analysis 2003 - DTE 21,035 removals - 1,185 also with air brake system repair within previous year WM 75 - 1,156 removals - 295 w/brake repair WM 65 - 906 removals - 271 w/brake repair WM 78 - 94 removals - 30 w/brake repair Compared WM 65, 75, 78 with brake repairs to all 2003 DTE removals with brake repairs - statistically significant difference - “Worse”

WILD Issues WILD Calibration: Frequency & Uniformity Effects of Train Speed Effects of Track Structure & Sub-grade Effects of Concrete Ties WILD Reading Variation Etc.

Conclusions DTE Wheel Removals Wayside Detectors are Useful Tools Better vs. AAR CRB for WM 65, 67, 75, 76, 78 Also Better Failure Performance Than AAR CRB Wayside Detectors are Useful Tools Variation is a Concern DTE 50+ Kip Strategy Lengthens Wheel Life Brake System Repairs Linked to Wheel Life WM 65, 67, 75 Appear to be Affected

Wild sites

Pareto of whymade since 2003

Life span since 2002

Whymade 65 life span

3 pt mavg & kips

Scatter plot of kips variation vs. train date

Grahical summary of sample pool

Distribution of kips variation

Hypothesis Kips variation vs. Speed change? Kips variation vs. Car weight? Kips variation vs. Site change?

Kips vs. spd correlation

Kips vs. weight correlation

Scatter plot of kips var by site-comb

Observations Kips variation vs. Speed variation – small correlation. Kips variation vs. Weight variation – none. Kips variation vs. different sites – small correlation.

MSA – precise & accurate

Scatter plot of kips var vs. train date

Graphical variation vs. upper and lower control limits

Measuring system variation vs. process tolerance

Measuring gage tolerance vs. Process tolerance example Process Tolerance = +/- 7.5 kips, 70 – 85 kips. Measurement Tolerance is 1/10th of Process Tolerance, = +/-.75 kips.

Scatter plot of kips variation vs. train date

Financial Impact WM 65, 67 and WM 75 Wheel Changes 2002, 2003 and 2004 2002 65-0 67-490 75-1,279 Total - 1,769 2003 65-938 67-80 75-1,179 Total - 2,179 2004 65-973 67-19 75-1,013 Total - 2,005 AAR Labor Rates per wheel switch $1,000.00 Total Cost 2002 - $1,769,000 Total Cost 2003 - $2,179,000 Total Cost 2004 - $2,005,000

Financial Impact Train days lost equals number of wheels pulled. One train cycle equals seven days (52 cycles per train per year Total number of cycles lost 2002 - 253 (5 sets) 2003 – 311 (6 sets) 2004 – 286 (5.5 sets) At current lease rates ($500 pcpm), cost to Detroit Edison is approximately $3,600,000.00

Summary The 50+ Kip Strategy Extends Wheel Life. WM65 Exhibits Shortest Life Span. What’s the contribution of variation by the measuring system? - What are the variation contributions from the Repeatability & Reproducibility tests of the measuring devices?

Recommendations Root Cause of Wheel Defects WM 65 & WM 75 Computerized SCAT at All Repair Tracks Rail Maintenance Management Forum WILD Calibration Should be Standardized and Meet AAR M-1003 Quality System Improved Efforts to Share Costs and Benefits Within the Railroad Industry Private Railcar Owner - Voting AAR Member

The Final Thought Our greatest challenge as an industry is to get the departments responsible for the vehicle performance and the track maintenance to work together and define a wheel rail interaction strategy to obtain synergy between the vehicles, track and the long term profitability of the heavy haul operation. Source: International Heavy Haul Association (2001)