doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 January 2018

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Submission doc.: IEEE /XXXXr0 Month Year John Doe, Some CompanySlide 1 Insert Presentation Title Here Date: YYYY-MM-DD Authors: Notice: This document.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE sru Submission Nov 2013 Takashi Yamamoto, Sumitomo Electric IndustriesSlide 1 Simulation Methodology for SRU Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 SubmissionMukul Goyal, U Wisconsin MilwaukeeSlide 1 Impact of IEEE n Operation On IEEE Performance Notice: This.
Doc.: IEEE s Submission September 2015 Hidetoshi Yokota and Ruben Salazar, Landis&GyrSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for.
Doc.: IEEE < g Submission, Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title:
Doc.: IEEE /30r2 SubmissionMukul Goyal, U Wisconsin MilwaukeeSlide 1 Impact of IEEE n Operation On IEEE Performance Notice: This.
Doc.: IEEE sru Submission March 2013 Stefan Aust (NCOS)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
May 2016 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [PHY proposal for existing Sub 1-GHz bands in.
Bluetooth and WLAN coexistence in dense deployment scenarios
May 2016 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [PHY proposal for the Sub 1-GHz frequency bands]
Feb Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [The Potentials of IEEE CSMA/CA to.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
July 2009 doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 July 2009
November 2014 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [SRM related functions in ]
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [FHSS Neighborhood Area Network Communications Proposal]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
W-SUN Technical Requirements Discussion
August 2018 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [ w w Fraunhofer IIS proposal.
Submission Title: [FHSS Proposal] Date Submitted: [May 12, 2009]
IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
January 2016 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Sub-GHz proposal for ] Date Submitted:
<month year> November 2005
Coexistence of ah and g in the S1G Band
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> March 2011
Overview of IEEE s Date: Authors: Spt. 2018
Sept 2018 Sub 1 GHz Interest Group
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
January 2016 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [PHY proposal for the MHz Indian.
Nov Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Smart Grid with LPWAN Extension] Date Submitted:
September 2017 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposal for Recommendation to WG 15]
28 October, 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Beacon-based Multi-Channel MAC for.
Submission Title: [802.11n Liaison Report May 2009]
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Frequency channel selection] Date Submitted:
<January 2002> doc.: IEEE <02/139r0> 12/29/2018
Submission Title: [Reliable Multicast for PAC]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Project: IEEE P WG for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
January 2016 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Sub-GHz proposal for ] Date Submitted:
Oct Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Input for coexistence document discussion]
January 2016 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [PHY proposal for the MHz Indian.
24 February 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Issues with Beacon-Mode SuperFrame.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Resolutions to MR-FSK Comments on CSM Channel Spacing]
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> January 2013
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> January 2013
Impact of IEEE n Operation On IEEE Performance
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
WAC SG November 2016 Opening Report
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: Joint Filtered FSK PHY Proposal
Nov 2018 Sub 1 GHz Interest Group
4 May 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Issues with Beacon-Mode SuperFrame Structure.
Impact of IEEE n Operation On IEEE Performance
Discussion on Evaluation Metrics for
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [LECIM Coexistence Considerations] Date Submitted:
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
S1G Coexistence Simulation Update
<month year> doc.: IEEE <111> July doc.: IEEE q
Discussion on Evaluation Metrics for
January 2000 doc.: IEEE /189r0 January 2000
doc.: IEEE /XXXr0 Sep 19, 2007 Sept 2010
June, 2010 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [OFDM PHY Mode Representation] Date Submitted:
Nov 2018 Sub 1 GHz Study Group Date: Authors: Nov 2018
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 August 2019
IEEE Sub-1 GHz Band System Overview
Measurement of Radio Noise and Interference over 920 MHz band in Japan
S1G Coexistence Simulation Profile
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE 802.15.4-17/xxxxr0 January 2018 Reliability of Coexisting 802.15.4g and 802.11ah Networks in the Sub-1 GHz Band Date: 2018-01-15 Authors: Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE 802.19. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Jianlin Guo, Mitsubishi Electric Jianlin Guo, Mitsubishi Electric

Abstract Jianlin Guo, Mitsubishi Electric doc.: IEEE 802.15.4-17/xxxxr0 January 2018 Abstract Presentation to IEEE 802.19 Working Group to show network traffic and packet size impact on network reliability of coexisting IEEE 802.15.4g and IEEE 802.11ah networks in the Sub-1 GHz (S1G) Band Jianlin Guo, Mitsubishi Electric Jianlin Guo, Mitsubishi Electric

Motivation Jianlin Guo, Mitsubishi Electric doc.: IEEE 802.15.4-17/xxxxr0 January 2018 Motivation 802.15.4g based smart utility devices have been deployed Operate in the S1G band 802.11ah, LoRa and SigFox are also designed to operate in the S1G band Even LoRa and SigFox are narrowband technologies, 802.11ah channel is at least 1 MHz wide Spectrum allocation in S1G band can be narrow Japan allocates 5.6 MHz spectrum for smart meter system as specified in ARIB STD-T108, Version 1.0 (Feb 14 2012). Channel hopping can be limited Multiple systems may be deployed with high node density Therefore, 802.15.4g coexistence with other systems needs to be investigated and addressed Jianlin Guo, Mitsubishi Electric Jianlin Guo, Mitsubishi Electric

Coexistence Mechanisms of 802.15.4g and 802.11ah doc.: IEEE 802.15.4-17/xxxxr0 January 2018 Coexistence Mechanisms of 802.15.4g and 802.11ah 802.15.4g coexistence mechanism Define three PHY types MR-FSK MR-OFDM MR-O-QPSK Define common signaling mode (CSM) for coexistence between devices using different 802.15.4g PHYs 802.11ah coexistence mechanism An S1G STA uses energy detection (ED) based CCA with a threshold of -75 dBm per MHz to improve coexistence with other S1G systems including 802.15.4 and 802.15.4g If a S1G STA detects energy above that threshold on its channel, then the following mechanisms might be used to mitigate interference Change of operating channel Sectorized beamforming Change the schedule of restricted access windows, target wake time service periods, or subchannel selective transmission operating channels Defer transmission for a particular interval Jianlin Guo, Mitsubishi Electric Jianlin Guo, Mitsubishi Electric

802.11ah Interference Impact on 802.15.4g Network doc.: IEEE 802.15.4-17/xxxxr0 January 2018 802.11ah Interference Impact on 802.15.4g Network 802.11ah networks can severely interfere with 802.15.4g network See 19-17-0087-03-0000-802-11ah-and-802-15-4g-coexistence Interference cause 1: higher ED threshold of 802.11ah Interference cause 2: faster backoff mechanism of 802.11ah 802.11ah device may start packet transmission when 802.15.4g device performs CCA-to-TX turnaround, which causes data packet collision 802.11ah device may start packet transmission when 802.15.4g device is waiting for ACK packet, which causes ACK packet collision 62.5 ksymbols/s Jianlin Guo, Mitsubishi Electric Jianlin Guo, Mitsubishi Electric

Objectives of This Presentation doc.: IEEE 802.15.4-17/xxxxr0 January 2018 Objectives of This Presentation Show network traffic impact on network reliability Network reliability is defined as data packet delivery rate by a network Show packet size impact on network reliability 4-node network setup Minimum network size, minimum node density No interference/collision caused by node/STA within same network Interference/collision comes only from other network No channel access failure caused by node/STA within same network Channel access failure can only be caused by other network PHY data rate 802.15.4g: 100kbps 802.11ah: 3000kbps Simulator NS-3 Simulation time Each simulation runs 20 minutes Jianlin Guo, Mitsubishi Electric Jianlin Guo, Mitsubishi Electric

Jianlin Guo, Mitsubishi Electric doc.: IEEE 802.15.4-17/xxxxr0 January 2018 Propagation Model ITU-R P.1411-8 model for propagation between terminals from below roof-top height to near street level Lurban = 0 for suburban TX power: 13dBm 11ah Receiver Sensitivity: -87dBm 920 MHz band 15.4g Receiver Sensitivity: -88dBm 802.11ah: 42m 11ah ED Threshold: -75dBm 15.4g ED Threshold: -80dBm 802.15.4g: 56m Jianlin Guo, Mitsubishi Electric Jianlin Guo, Mitsubishi Electric

Network Traffic Impact on Network Reliability doc.: IEEE 802.15.4-17/xxxxr0 January 2018 Network Traffic Impact on Network Reliability Packet size = 256 bytes for both 802.15.4g and 802.11ah 802.11ah network packet delivery rate 97.8% for 800 kbps traffic rate and near 100% for the rest of traffic rates Observations 802.11ah traffic can severely impact 802.15.4g network reliability 802.15.4g traffic has no impact on 802.11ah reliability When 802.11ah traffic is higher, lowing 802.15.4g traffic does not always help 802.15.4g Network Traffic Rate (kbps) 50 40 30 20 10 1 0.1 200 99.8% 98.9% 99.9% 100% 300 99.1% 99.2% 99.5% 400 96.6% 96.9% 97.1% 97.3% 96.2% 96.7% 500 73.7% 89.4% 89.3% 89.0% 87.4% 88.5% 600 48.6% 60.2% 72.5% 69.4% 68.9% 700 36.6% 43.7% 56.4% 58.3% 57.9% 55.7% 42.6% 800 26.1% 30.1% 38.7% 41.6% 41.9% 39.4% 37.7% 802.15.4g Network Packet Delivery Rate 802.11ah Network Traffic Rate (kbps) Jianlin Guo, Mitsubishi Electric Jianlin Guo, Mitsubishi Electric

802.11ah Packet Size Impact on Network Reliability doc.: IEEE 802.15.4-17/xxxxr0 January 2018 802.11ah Packet Size Impact on Network Reliability Constant 802.11ah traffic rate 600 kbps Constant 802.15.4g traffic rate 50 kbps Constant 802.15.4g packet size 256 bytes Observations As 802.11ah packet size increases, number of 802.11ah packets, overhead and channel access demand decrease. Therefore, 802.11ah packet delivery rate increases 802.15.4g packet delivery rate increases Large 802.11ah packet size can improve network reliability 802.15.4g Packet Delivery Rate 802.11ah Packet Size (byte) 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 28.3% 60.7% 86.0% 95.1% 96.7% 98.4% 98.6% 100% 802.11ah Packet Delivery Rate Jianlin Guo, Mitsubishi Electric Jianlin Guo, Mitsubishi Electric

802.11ah Packet Size Impact on Network Reliability doc.: IEEE 802.15.4-17/xxxxr0 January 2018 802.11ah Packet Size Impact on Network Reliability Constant 802.11ah traffic rate 800 kbps Constant 802.15.4g traffic rate 50 kbps Constant 802.15.4g packet size 256 bytes Observations As 802.11ah packet size increases, number of 802.11ah packets, overhead and channel access demand decrease. Therefore, 802.11ah packet delivery rate increases 802.15.4g packet delivery rate increases Large 802.11ah packet size can improve network reliability 802.15.4g Packet Delivery Rate 802.11ah Packet Size (byte) 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 13.7% 24.7% 45.9% 63.3% 72.5% 83.7% 85.4% 89.1% 93.9% 81.6% 100% 99.9% 802.11ah Packet Delivery Rate Jianlin Guo, Mitsubishi Electric Jianlin Guo, Mitsubishi Electric

Simulation Result Indication doc.: IEEE 802.15.4-17/xxxxr0 January 2018 Simulation Result Indication Consider a use case scenario Medium density network 500 nodes for 802.15.4g 500 STAs for 802.11ah Network traffic rate 50 kbps for 802.15.4g network 600 kbps for 802.11ah network Packet size 256 bytes of 802.15.4g packet 256 bytes payload for 802.11ah packet Number of packets transmitted by each node/STA per minute (60s) 2.9 packets by an 802.15.4g node 35.2 packets by an 802.11ah STA Optimal packet delivery rate 48.6% for 802.15.4g 99.9997% for 802.11ah Under normal network condition, 802.15.4g network can be severely interfered by other S1G systems Jianlin Guo, Mitsubishi Electric Jianlin Guo, Mitsubishi Electric