Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structural Basis of Substrate Methylation and Inhibition of SMYD2
Advertisements

Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages (September 2009)
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages (July 2002)
Mechanism and Substrate Recognition of Human Holo ACP Synthase
Conformational Change in an MFS Protein: MD Simulations of LacY
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Ping Wang, Katelyn A. Doxtader, Yunsun Nam  Molecular Cell 
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2001)
The Binding of Antibiotics in OmpF Porin
Structural Basis for Dimerization in DNA Recognition by Gal4
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
The Closing Mechanism of DNA Polymerase I at Atomic Resolution
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Allosteric Effects of the Oncogenic RasQ61L Mutant on Raf-RBD
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 21, Issue 8, Pages (August 2013)
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages e3 (May 2017)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
The Mechanism of E. coli RNA Polymerase Regulation by ppGpp Is Suggested by the Structure of their Complex  Yuhong Zuo, Yeming Wang, Thomas A. Steitz 
How Does a Voltage Sensor Interact with a Lipid Bilayer
Rong Shi, Laura McDonald, Miroslaw Cygler, Irena Ekiel  Structure 
Coupling of Retinal, Protein, and Water Dynamics in Squid Rhodopsin
Nadine Keller, Jiří Mareš, Oliver Zerbe, Markus G. Grütter  Structure 
Sunny D. Gilbert, Francis E. Reyes, Andrea L. Edwards, Robert T. Batey 
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages e3 (May 2017)
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Sebastiano Pasqualato, Jacqueline Cherfils  Structure 
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages (August 2007)
The Signaling Pathway of Rhodopsin
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 2000)
Volume 133, Issue 1, Pages (April 2008)
Regulation of the Protein-Conducting Channel by a Bound Ribosome
Structural Basis for Vertebrate Filamin Dimerization
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages e3 (May 2017)
Volume 96, Issue 7, Pages (April 2009)
Structural Basis of Prion Inhibition by Phenothiazine Compounds
RIα Subunit of PKA Structure
Elizabeth J. Little, Andrea C. Babic, Nancy C. Horton  Structure 
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 56, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (February 1999)
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
Crystal Structure of the Borna Disease Virus Nucleoprotein
Alemayehu A. Gorfe, Barry J. Grant, J. Andrew McCammon  Structure 
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (November 2013)
Investigating Lipid Composition Effects on the Mechanosensitive Channel of Large Conductance (MscL) Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations  Donald E. Elmore,
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 6, Issue 10, Pages (October 1998)
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 127, Issue 2, Pages (October 2006)
Structural Basis of Swinholide A Binding to Actin
Jue Wang, Jia-Wei Wu, Zhi-Xin Wang  Structure 
OmpT: Molecular Dynamics Simulations of an Outer Membrane Enzyme
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Gydo C.P. van Zundert, Adrien S.J. Melquiond, Alexandre M.J.J. Bonvin 
Structural and Thermodynamic Basis for Enhanced DNA Binding by a Promiscuous Mutant EcoRI Endonuclease  Paul J. Sapienza, John M. Rosenberg, Linda Jen-Jacobson 
Petra Hänzelmann, Hermann Schindelin  Structure 
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 34-43 (January 2015) A Hinge Migration Mechanism Unlocks the Evolution of Green-to-Red Photoconversion in GFP-like Proteins  Hanseong Kim, Taisong Zou, Chintan Modi, Katerina Dörner, Timothy J. Grunkemeyer, Liqing Chen, Raimund Fromme, Mikhail V. Matz, S. Banu Ozkan, Rebekka M. Wachter  Structure  Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 34-43 (January 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2014.11.011 Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Structure 2015 23, 34-43DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2014.11.011) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Thermostability and Active Site Structures of Ancestral and Evolved Variants (A) Thermostability of reconstructed ancestral proteins. Tm-app values were determined by irreversible loss of intrinsic fluorescence. Plotted is the average of duplicate determinations versus protein concentration. (B) 2Fo-Fc electron density map of the ALL-Q62H chromophore-bearing pocket contoured at 1.5 σ. (C) Overlay of the X-ray structures of ALL-Q62H (gray) and LEA (green). Yellow dashed lines, LEA H-bonds; red dashed line, close contact. See also Figures S1 and S2. Structure 2015 23, 34-43DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2014.11.011) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Core and C-Terminal Structures of Ancestral and Evolved Variants (A) Superimposition of the X-ray structures of ALL-Q62H (gray) and LEA (red and cyan), depicting the T69A substitution and Arg66 side chain reorientation. Residues with increased flexibility (elevated Δdfi) in LEA are colored red. (B and C) X-ray structural models of the C-termini of (b) ALL-Q62H and (c) LEA. Adjacent subunits are colored cyan and yellow (perpendicular interface). Dashed lines represent hydrogen or ionic bonds. See also Figure S3. Structure 2015 23, 34-43DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2014.11.011) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Dynamics of Ancestral and Evolved Variants (A) MD calculations of the average chromophore rmsf in ALL-Q62H and LEA, calculated for the last 100 ns with a sliding window of 5 ns. (B) The dynamics profile (%dfi) of ALL-Q62H and LEA (top and middle rows), and the difference between the two (Δdfi) (bottom row). Red, residues with increased flexibility in LEA; blue, residues with decreased flexibility in LEA; green, chromophore-forming residues 62, 63, and 64; vertical dashed lines, mutational sites; residues colored red, 67–71, 142, 187–193, and 213–215; residues colored blue, 19–22, 50, 97–98, 125, 127–129, 165, and 167. See also Figures S4 and S5. Structure 2015 23, 34-43DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2014.11.011) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Comparison of the Dynamics Profiles of ALL-Q62H and LEA Residues are rainbow-colored according to their %dfi values, with rigid regions in blue tones and flexible regions in red tones. Residues with significantly modified flexibility are shown as space-filling models (main-chain and side-chain atoms). (A) Side view of ALL-Q62H. (B) Side view of LEA. Structure 2015 23, 34-43DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2014.11.011) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Top-Scoring 15% of Residues with Large Δdfi Values Mapped onto the Structure of ALL-Q62H Red indicates elevated flexibility, and blue indicates decreased flexibility in LEA. Green indicates the chromophore. (A and B) Main-chain atoms of red and blue residues are shown as spheres. (C and D) Main-chain atoms of the mutational sites are shown as gray spheres. Structure 2015 23, 34-43DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2014.11.011) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Proposed Photoconversion Mechanism (A) Reverse protonation promotes light activation of Glu211 and His62 by allowing chromophore distortions (steps 1 and 2). His62 rotamer adjustments facilitate proton shuttling (steps 2 and 3), and Cβ deprotonation occurs in concert with leaving group ejection (step 4). (B) β barrel deformations proposed to occur during photoconversion. The charge states of Glu211 and His62 are shown as follows: blue, positive; red, negative; gray, neutral. Structure 2015 23, 34-43DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2014.11.011) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions