The utility of spatially explicit variables in watershed scale phosphorus water quality modeling Mark Breunig GEOG 681.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nutrient Retention Model Water Supply Model Precipitation Evapotranspiration Soil Depth and Plant available water Land cover Topography (slope/runoff)
Advertisements

Predicting the likelihood of water quality impaired stream reaches using landscape scale data and a hierarchical methodology Erin Peterson Geosciences.
©2003 Institute of Water Research, all rights reserved Water Quality Modeling for Ecological Services under Cropping and Grazing Systems Da Ouyang Jon.
Remote Sensing of Chlorophyll in Matagorda Bay and Surroundings Claire G. Griffin GIS in Water Resources Fall 2010.
NWS Calibration Workshop, LMRFC March, 2009 Slide 1 Sacramento Model Derivation of Initial Parameters.
Linking watershed characteristics and land use to lake water quality using GIS presented by Brian Block ESR Limnology instructed by Dr. Mark Sytsma.
Watershed Delineation and Characteristics on Alaska’s North Slope Matt Khosh University of Texas at Austin Department of Marne Science.
Watershed Characteristics and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Urban Lake Sediments EVAN DART.
Assessment of Flow Paths in Upland Areas and Vegetated Buffers August 2, 2004 I.J. Kim, S.L. Hutchinson, and J.M.S. Hutchinson* The department of Biological.
0 The National Hydrography Dataset Plus a tool for SPARROW Watershed Modeling Richard Moore (presented by Alan Rea)
Naikoa Aguilar-Amuchastegui  Forest Carbon Scientist  REDD+  Forest and Climate Initiative olutions/mitigation/Pages/climate_REDD.a.
KELLY HAYDEN Applying GIS to Watershed Pollution Management.
National Hydrography Data Use and Applications.
GIS-Data Sources Francisco Olivera, Ph.D., P.E. Srikanth Koka Department of Civil Engineering Texas A&M University.
Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 79, Issue 1Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 79, Issue 1, 15 January 2007, Pages Biological integrity in.
SPARROW Water- Quality Modeling: Application of the National Hydrography Dataset What is SPARROW? Use of NHD SPARROW results By Craig Johnston and Richard.
Hydrologic Model Preparation for EPA SWMM modeling Software Using a GIS Robert Farid CEE 424 GIS for Civil Engineers.
Victoria Naipal Max-Planck Institute for Meteorology Land Department; Vegetation Modelling Group Supervisor: Ch.Reick CO-Supervisor: J.Pongratz EGU,
Predicting Sediment and Phosphorus Delivery with a Geographic Information System and a Computer Model M.S. Richardson and A. Roa-Espinosa; Dane County.
1 Empirical Models Based on the Universal Soil Loss Equation Fail to Predict Discharges from Chesapeake Bay Catchments Boomer, Kathleen B. Weller, Donald.
The Utility of Spatially Explicit Parameters in Phosphorus Water Quality Monitoring Graduate Student: Mark Breunig Graduate Advisor: Dr. Paul McGinley.
How to stratify watersheds? For the regional-scale studies we need to identify the upper / middle / lower regions of each watershed. There are many ways.
The Collaborative Environmental Monitoring and Research Initiative (CEMRI) A Pilot in the Delaware River Basin Peter S. Murdoch, USGS Richard Birdsey,
Development and Land Use Change: Central Potomac River Watershed
SPARROW Surface Water Quality Workshop October 29-31, 2002 Reston, Virginia Section 5. Comparison of GIS Approaches, Data Sources and Management.
Soil Movement in West Virginia Watersheds A GIS Assessment Greg Hamons Dr. Michael Strager Dr. Jingxin Wang.
Patapsco/Back River SWMM Model Part I - Hydrology Maryland Department of the Environment.
David Nail USGS Geospatial Liaison to Indiana March 13 th, 2007 Update on National Hydrography Data.
Agricultural Subsurface Drainage USGS Staff: Nancy Baker, Wes Stone GIS Contact: Michael Wieczorek.
Brad Barber Project Manager for SCFA Texas Forest Service Brad Barber Project Manager for SCFA Texas Forest Service.
DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELING GEOG 421: DR. SHUNFU HU, SIUE Project One Steve Klaas Fall 2013.
ISPRS Congress 2000 Multidimensional Representation of Geographic Features E. Lynn Usery Research Geographer U.S. Geological Survey.
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R. Maidment, David G. Tarboton and Ayse Irmak GIS in Water Resources Fall 2009.
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R. Maidment, David G. Tarboton and Ayse Irmak GIS in Water Resources Fall 2011.
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R. Maidment, David G
Preparing input for the TOPKAPI (TOPographic Kinematic Approximation and Integration) model PRASANNA DAHAL.
Impacts of Flooding in the Johnson Creek Watershed Laura Read December 4, 2008.
David Rounce. Outline Why Erosion Potential RUSLE Model Process of Project Relevance.
Hurricane Irene in Connecticut River Milena Spirova CE 394 K 2015.
Land cover change in the Travis county GIS in Water Resources Fall 2015 University of Texas at austin Julie C Faure.
High Spatial Resolution Land Cover Development for the Coastal United States Eric Morris (Presenter) Chris Robinson The Baldwin Group at NOAA Office for.
Using the NHDPlus for drainage area delineation and site matching Kirsten Cassingham, NC Water Science Center Silvia Terziotti, NC Water Science Center.
Introduction to Spatial Information in Modeling Concepts and the GIS Weasel.
Soil Loss For Moody Creek, Idaho CEE 6440 GIS in Water Resources By: Ren Bagley.
Modeling Source-water Contributions to Streamflow
Phosphorous Transport in Surface Overland Flow
Rasters Peter Fox – based on materials from Steve Signell
Modified Rational Method for Texas Watersheds
Emma Gildesgame, Katie Lebling and Ian McCullough
Spatial Models – Raster Stacy Bogan
Hydrologic Modeling for Watershed Analysis and River Restoration
Best Management Practices Implemented in Lower Bear River
Emma Gildesgame, Katie Lebling and Ian McCullough
Find things on the map.
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R
Digital Elevation Models and Hydrology
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R
An Enhanced Canopy Cover Layer for Hydrologic Modeling
Hydrologic Analysis of the Hyrum Reservoir watershed
use of GIS to assess groundwater recharge in the Texas High Plains
Provo River Watershed Modeling with WMS Ryan Murdock.
Ratio of Water used by Agriculture to Discharge into the Great Salt Lake in the Bear River Basin Presented by: Timothy Shaffer.
Impact of Shoreline Septic Systems on Water Quality of Lake Lanier
Жирэмслэлт ба тархины харвалт
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources
Update from working group economic valuation & EMB
A connectionist model in action
Evaluation of Proposed Controls Over Baseflow Phosphorus Concentrations in Wadeable Streams in Wisconsin Graduate Student: Mark Breunig Graduate Advisor:
Naikoa Aguilar-Amuchastegui Forest Carbon Scientist REDD+ Forest and Climate Initiative
% Riparian Natural Cover
Presentation transcript:

The utility of spatially explicit variables in watershed scale phosphorus water quality modeling Mark Breunig GEOG 681

What?

The utility of spatially explicit variables in watershed scale phosphorus water quality modeling

Why? Although efforts are underway to set stream standards in Wisconsin and elsewhere, there is still controversy regarding the mechanisms that control stream phosphorous concentrations. This represents a collective misunderstanding of the fundamental processes that control water quality at the catchment scale (Boomer et al. 2008). It is a very common practice for researchers to attribute poor results to inadequate spatial data (Hunsaker et al. 1995; Soranno et al. 1996; Jain et al. 2000; Jones et al. 2001; Richards et al. 2006; Boomer et al. 2008).

WARNING: USLE & its derivatives used at the “field scale” =   USLE & its derivatives used at the “field scale” = USLE & its derivatives used at the “watershed scale” =

Purpose of Model: to increase the effectiveness of watershed-scale phosphorus water quality modeling Taxonomy of Model: Deterministic, empirical, inductive Data Inputs: Field Data collected by USGS 2001 NLCD (National Land Cover Database) - USGS 30 DEM – USGS SSURGO – NRCS

The Data

R2 = 43% p < 0.001 2001 – 157 sites 2002 – 78 sites 2003 – 5 sites Total: 240 sites

Σ(eFLag* β) Σ(eFLall* β) Pixel Value (proportion – no units)

Problems SSURGO !!! 30 m DEM!!! Model Conceptualization

Further Work CV Slope Cumulative Slope Ksat_r