Research Misconduct Procedures

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

WBS PLAGIARISM PROCEDURE

Advertisements

ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT PROCEDURE Lynn Jones Regulations, Assessment and Awards Manager.

1 Structured Inquiry 2 Guided Inquiry 3 Open Inquiry 4 Verification Inquiry.

What’s coming down the road? (or: “You’ll never know what hit you”)

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN Old and New A & P Grievance Procedures.

OVERVIEW OF THE FLORIDA BAR DISCIPLINE SYSTEM November 30, 2006.

Mission Statement 2 We are dedicated to a single purpose: Empowering veterans to lead high-quality lives with respect and dignity. We accomplish this.

Administrative Procedures for Allegations of Research Misconduct Executive Summary (see WSU Policy 2101 for Details)

The Disciplinary Procedure Presented by Paula Fisher Practical HR Ltd.

Copyright © 2009 by the Actuarial Board for Counseling and Discipline Actuarial Board for Counseling and Discipline 2009 PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS SEMINAR.

Michael Scian, MBA, JD Assistant Director of Compliance University of Florida.

The Adjudication Process Virginia Department of Health Professions New Board Member Training October 2008.

1 AGENDA I.Background II.Overview of VHA Handbook * III.Handling Allegations of Research Misconduct* IV.Q & A * Refer to VHA Handbook for.

Research Integrity & Misconduct

WU Research Integrity Policy 2010 Revision Presentation for the Committee on Research Integrity for the School of Medicine December 1, 2010 Attachment.

DEFINING A NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTION

CUMC IRB Investigator Meeting Human Subjects Research Non-Compliance September 15, 2005.

Policy on Misconduct in Research. Why Do We Need It? Misconduct in research has significant impact on university reputation and credibility. It should.

Columbia University Institutional Policy on Research Misconduct Naomi J. Schrag, J.D. Director of Research Compliance & Training Office of the Executive.

STATISTICS Results of Working Group Discussion.

AS /AA Clarification of the Formation, Dissolution, Merger or Movement of an Academic Department- Resubmission.

2012 Annual Pupil Transportation Conference June 20, 2012 Roanoke, Virginia.

DEALING WITH HARASSMENT AND ABUSE COMPLAINTS Lt (NL) James Smith VANCOUVER ISLAND DIVISION.

1 WHAT IS A NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTION? THE PARIS PRINCIPLES Chris Sidoti ppt 1.

1 Research Integrity Policies: An Evaluation of Accessibility & Usefulness Rebecca Ann Lind, Ginnifer L. Mastarone, Nathan Earixson, Korin Isotalo Hunt,

Internal Investigations: A primer Bob Cooper May 30, 2007.

Misconduct Investigations: the Elements Christine Boesz, Dr. PH Inspector General National Science Foundation OECD Global Science Forum Workshop on Best.

Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. 2 Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due.

The online Member Admin area: appointment process [Event – Date] [Presenter]

How to conduct an Academic Misconduct investigation in the FOA New policies and procedures effective September 2007 (Adapted for use in the FOA by Michael.

EDSE 539 Special Education Leadership in Schools Parent Rights and Relationships Dispute Resolution Remedies.

Research Integrity & Misconduct Research Ethics, Education, and Policy Office of Research Administration.

1 General Structure of a System Dealing with Research Misconduct - General Remarks on its diversity - Makoto Misono National Institute of Technology and.

DPW STRATEGY AGAINST FRAUD AND CORRUPTION PRESENTATION TO SCOPA 18 September

1 Katzman v. Ontario College of Pharmacists. 2 The Facts Complaint received about a dispensing error Information gathered related to –the error –other.

“CONSENT AGREEMENTS:LET US SHOW YOU HOW IT CAN WORK” Rhonda O’Hagan Competence Assurance Coordinator, SASKATCHEWAN REGISTERED NURSES ASSOCIATION Presented.

Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due to.

Scientific Inquiry. SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY Refers to the diverse ways in which scientists investigate the natural world and propose explanations based on.

Disciplinary Procedures

Subcommittee Review a.k.a. DMR after FCR D – designated M – member R – review What we do by … F – full C – committee R – review What we do at meetings.

Types of Teams and Team Member Roles and Responsibilities Resource Network Information Resource Office, 2010 Written by, Cate Buchanan and Dr. Frank Flanders.

OECD Global Science Forum Session 4a The first link in the chain: receiving and initial processing of an allegation Complexes of question which we want.

Performance Management of Staff Disciplinary Process Richard Walsh Manager – Human Resources.

Faculty Senate Shared Governance Committee (ad hoc) Proposed Elections System College Constitution Template Committee Status.

The TJU Human Research Protection Program (HRPP): Part I – Which Entities/Offices are Involved ? J. Bruce Smith, MD, CIP.

Non-compliance with Human Subjects Research Regulations J. Bruce Smith, MD, CIP November 2014 Continuing Education for IRB Members.

Your Rights! An overview of Special Education Laws Presented by: The Individual Needs Department.

The TJU Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) Part II, Conflict of Interest and IRB Noncompliance J. Bruce Smith, MD, CIP.

Unit : Scientific inquiry Unit : Scientific inquiry.

Safeguarding the public: Through ensuring Fitness to Practise.

Handling Research Misconduct Allegations & Promoting Research Integrity Scott J. Moore, Ph.D., J.D. Investigative Scientist National Science Foundation.

What Does Every Graduate Student Need to Know about RCR Jo Ann Smith, PhD, CRA Griselle Báez-Muñoz University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commericalization.

US System for Addressing Research Misconduct OECD Global Science Forum Workshop on Best Practices Christine Boesz, Dr. PH Inspector General National Science.

LSU Faculty Grievance Committee What it can do (and what it cannot do)

Allegations & Investigations

Paper Airplanes Scientific Method.

HANDLING PEOPLE PROBLEMS

UAB Office of the Provost

Research Misconduct Michael Scian, MBA, JD Assistant Director of Compliance University of Florida.

Community buildings in a changing landscape

Science-based decision making: Options for increasing the impact of UN decision making and scientific support to the political process Lynn Wagner IISD.

SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY Life Science 1.3 Mrs. Senese.

JTC1 Chair’s Closing Report

The Not-So-Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

Mandate, governance and name of the Committee

Legal Aspects of Investigations & International Cooperation

conflicts of interest to report.

Conducting an Investigation- lessons from AIRC decisions.

Parliamentary Committees

OECD Global Science Forum February, 2007

Presentation transcript:

Research Misconduct Procedures Stage 1 RIO: Receive and Assess Allegation Stage 2 Inquiry Committee (Appointed ad hoc by RIO) (Scientific expertise, no COI) Stage 3 Investigate (Can be same members as Inquiry Committee) Meet definition? Written report to Deciding Official (Provost) Custody of all research records Is it misconduct and does it have substance? DO Decision Credible and specific? Written report to Deciding Official (Provost) Dismiss & Respond Return report for further fact-finding Accept findings and take action DO Decision Continue Dismiss Continue Points of Contact DRIC: Dr. Gene Hines (ghines@olemiss.edu) & CRO/RIO: Dr. Josh Gladden (jgladden@olemiss.edu)