Volume 118, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Small RNA Chaperone Hfq and Multiple Small RNAs Control Quorum Sensing in Vibrio harveyi and Vibrio cholerae Derrick H. Lenz, 1,3 Kenny C. Mok, Brendan.
Advertisements

MLANA/MART1 and SILV/PMEL17/GP100 Are Transcriptionally Regulated by MITF in Melanocytes and Melanoma  Jinyan Du, Arlo J. Miller, Hans R. Widlund, Martin.
Volume 107, Issue 7, Pages (December 2001)
Jun Zhu, John J. Mekalanos  Developmental Cell 
Regulatory RNA in Bacterial Pathogens
Regulatory RNA in Bacterial Pathogens
Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages (May 2010)
Global Mapping of Human RNA-RNA Interactions
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Stem-Loop Structures within mRNA Coding Sequences Activate Translation Initiation and Mediate Control by Small Regulatory RNAs  Jonathan Jagodnik, Claude.
Base-Pairing between Untranslated Regions Facilitates Translation of Uncapped, Nonpolyadenylated Viral RNA  Liang Guo, Edwards M. Allen, W.Allen Miller 
Volume 122, Issue 4, Pages (August 2005)
IFN-γ Upregulates Expression of the Mouse Complement C1rA Gene in Keratinocytes via IFN-Regulatory Factor-1  Sung June Byun, Ik-Soo Jeon, Hyangkyu Lee,
Steven J. Petesch, John T. Lis  Cell 
Targeted mRNA Degradation by Deadenylation-Independent Decapping
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (December 2004)
The Small RNA IstR Inhibits Synthesis of an SOS-Induced Toxic Peptide
Impulse Control: Temporal Dynamics in Gene Transcription
John T. Arigo, Kristina L. Carroll, Jessica M. Ames, Jeffry L. Corden 
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages (September 2004)
Volume 45, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 98, Issue 9, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 93, Issue 7, Pages (June 1998)
Volume 154, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
A Role for REP Sequences in Regulating Translation
Volume 37, Issue 4, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 58, Issue 3, Pages (May 2015)
Coordinated Regulation of Accessory Genetic Elements Produces Cyclic Di-Nucleotides for V. cholerae Virulence  Bryan W. Davies, Ryan W. Bogard, Travis S.
Edwards Allen, Zhixin Xie, Adam M. Gustafson, James C. Carrington  Cell 
Functional Dissection of sRNA Translational Regulators by Nonhomologous Random Recombination and In Vivo Selection  Jane M. Liu, Joshua A. Bittker, Maria.
Hiro-oki Iwakawa, Yukihide Tomari  Molecular Cell 
RRNA Modifications in an Intersubunit Bridge of the Ribosome Strongly Affect Both Ribosome Biogenesis and Activity  Xue-hai Liang, Qing Liu, Maurille.
A Novel MAP Kinase Regulates Flagellar Length in Chlamydomonas
Volume 12, Issue 12, Pages (December 2005)
Phosphorylation of Serine 2 within the RNA Polymerase II C-Terminal Domain Couples Transcription and 3′ End Processing  Seong Hoon Ahn, Minkyu Kim, Stephen.
Revisiting Global Gene Expression Analysis
Molecular Analysis of Mammalian Timeless
Naoko Kanda, Shinichi Watanabe  Journal of Investigative Dermatology 
Histone-like TAFs Are Essential for Transcription In Vivo
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 2000)
A Proteinaceous Gene Regulatory Thermometer in Salmonella
Keratinocyte growth factor promotes goblet cell differentiation through regulation of goblet cell silencer inhibitor  Dai Iwakiri, Daniel K. Podolsky 
LexA Cleavage Is Required for CTX Prophage Induction
William F Burkholder, Iren Kurtser, Alan D Grossman  Cell 
Genetic and molecular characterization of DicF-ftsZ mRNA interactions.
Volume 110, Issue 3, Pages (August 2002)
ADAR Regulates RNA Editing, Transcript Stability, and Gene Expression
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Regulatory RNAs in Bacteria
Both Natural and Designed Micro RNAs Can Inhibit the Expression of Cognate mRNAs When Expressed in Human Cells  Yan Zeng, Eric J Wagner, Bryan R Cullen 
Volume 58, Issue 3, Pages (May 2015)
Stress-Induced Phosphorylation of S
Jeremy E. Wilusz, Susan M. Freier, David L. Spector  Cell 
Volume 160, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (December 1997)
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (May 2009)
Targeted Stimulation of Meiotic Recombination
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 139, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages (October 2008)
Recognition of AT-Rich DNA Binding Sites by the MogR Repressor
Volume 107, Issue 4, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Promoting in Tandem: The Promoter for Telomere Transposon HeT-A and Implications for the Evolution of Retroviral LTRs  O.N Danilevskaya, I.R Arkhipova,
Schematic representation of the involvement of each of the four genes on virulence factor expression. Schematic representation of the involvement of each.
Volume 73, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
Mapping of Small RNAs in the Human ENCODE Regions
Volume 110, Issue 5, Pages (September 2002)
Transcriptional Regulation of the Elafin Gene in Human Keratinocytes
Volume 150, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 118, Issue 1, Pages 69-82 (July 2004) The Small RNA Chaperone Hfq and Multiple Small RNAs Control Quorum Sensing in Vibrio harveyi and Vibrio cholerae  Derrick H Lenz, Kenny C Mok, Brendan N Lilley, Rahul V Kulkarni, Ned S Wingreen, Bonnie L Bassler  Cell  Volume 118, Issue 1, Pages 69-82 (July 2004) DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.06.009

Figure 1 Models of the V. harveyi and V. cholerae Quorum-Sensing Circuits (A) Two quorum-sensing systems function in parallel to regulate gene expression in V. harveyi. Pentagons and triangles represent AI-1 and AI-2, respectively. (B) Three quorum-sensing systems function in parallel to regulate gene expression in V. cholerae. The functions making up the third circuit (denoted System 3) remain to be identified. Diamonds and triangles represent CAI-1 and AI-2, respectively. In both circuits, phosphate flows in the direction indicated by the arrows at low cell density and in the opposite direction at high cell density. Cell 2004 118, 69-82DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2004.06.009)

Figure 2 Hfq Is Required for Quorum-Sensing Repression in V. harveyi and V. cholerae (A) The hfq locus in V. harveyi. miaA and hflC were not fully sequenced (unsequenced regions are denoted by light-colored shading). (B) Bioluminescence assays for V. harveyi strains are: BB120 (WT, squares), JAF78 (ΔluxO::cmr, diamonds), JAF548 (luxO D47E, open triangles), BNL258 (hfq::Tn5lacZ, circles), and BNL211 (luxO D47E, hfq::Mini-MulacZ, closed triangles). Relative light units for V. harveyi are defined as counts min−1 ml−1 × 103/cfu ml−1. (C) Bioluminescence assays for V. cholerae strains are: MM227 (WT, squares), MM349 (ΔluxO, diamonds), BH48 (luxO D47E, open triangles), DL2078 (Δhfq, circles), and DL2378 (luxO D47E, Δhfq, closed triangles). Relative light units for V. cholerae are defined as counts min−1 ml−1/OD600nm. In (B) and (C), the dotted lines represent the limit of detection for light. (D) V. cholerae strains analyzed for TcpA production by Western blot are: C6706str2 (WT), MM307 (ΔluxO), BH38 (luxO D47E), MM194 (ΔhapR), DL2066 (Δhfq), DL2146 (luxO D47E, Δhfq), and DL2607 (ΔhapR, Δhfq). Cell 2004 118, 69-82DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2004.06.009)

Figure 3 Hfq Regulates the Expression of luxR and hapR Posttranscriptionally Non-steady-state Northern blots were used to analyze luxR/hapR transcript stability in the following: (A) V. harveyi JAF548 (luxO D47E) and BNL211 (luxO D47E, hfq::Mini-MulacZ); and (B) V. cholerae BH38 (luxO D47E) and DL2146 (luxO D47E, Δhfq). (C) Western blots on lysates of V. harveyi BB120 (WT), JAF548 (luxO D47E), BNL258 (hfq::Tn5lacZ), BNL211 (luxO D47E, hfq::Mini-MulacZ), and (D) V. cholerae C6706str2 (WT), BH38 (luxO D47E), DL2066 (Δhfq), DL2146 (luxO D47E, Δhfq) measured LuxR and HapR protein, respectively. Cell 2004 118, 69-82DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2004.06.009)

Figure 4 LuxO-P and Hfq Regulate hapR Posttranscriptionally β-galactosidase activity of (A) hapR-lacZ transcription in V. cholerae DL2106 (WT, ΔlacZ), DL2099 (luxO D47E, ΔlacZ), DL2523 (Δhfq, ΔlacZ), and DL2441 (luxO D47E, Δhfq, ΔlacZ). (B) hapR-lacZ translation in V. cholerae DL2543 (WT, ΔlacZ), DL2542 (luxO D47E, ΔlacZ), DL2531 (Δhfq, ΔlacZ), and DL2533 (luxO D47E, Δhfq, ΔlacZ). (C) hapR-lacZ promoter activity in V. cholerae DL2748 (WT, ΔlacZ), DL2771 (luxO D47E, ΔlacZ), DL2703 (Δhfq, ΔlacZ), and DL2698 (luxO D47E, Δhfq, ΔlacZ). Cell 2004 118, 69-82DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2004.06.009)

Figure 5 Bioinformatic Analysis of the Qrr sRNAs in V. cholerae, V. parahaemolyticus, V. vulnificus, and V. harveyi (A) Multiple sequence alignment of the qrr genes encoding the sRNAs identified in V. cholerae, V. parahaemolyticus, V. vulnificus, and V. harveyi. Annotations for the genes flanking each sRNA are given in the brackets. Numbering of sRNAs is based on orthology of flanking genes. Nucleotides in black indicate perfect alignment. The putative σ54 binding site is marked as −12 and −24, the predicted start of transcription is labeled as +1, and the terminator is noted by the line over the sequence. (B) Lowest-energy secondary-structural predictions for the Qrr sRNAs identified in V. cholerae. Bold typeface indicates the regions conserved across all sRNAs in V. cholerae, V. parahaemolyticus, and V. vulnificus. (C) Alignment of the complement of the hapR UTR with a portion of the Qrr sRNAs identified in V. cholerae. (D) Alignment of the complement of the luxR UTR with a portion of sRNA Qrr1 identified in V. harveyi. In (C) and (D), the translational start site (Start), the ribosome binding site (RBS), and the transcriptional start site (+1) are indicated. (A), (C), and (D) were produced using CLUSTALW (Thompson et al., 1994) and ESPript (Gouet et al., 1999). Cell 2004 118, 69-82DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2004.06.009)

Figure 6 Regulation of Expression of the sRNAs by Quorum Sensing RNA isolated from (A) V. cholerae C6706str2 (WT), MM307 (ΔluxO), BH38 (luxO D47E), BH76 (ΔrpoN) was probed for sRNAs Qrr1, Qrr2, Qrr3, and Qrr4, and V. cholerae rpsL is shown as the loading control. (B) RNA isolated from V. harveyi BB120 (WT), BB721 (luxO::Tn5lacZ), JAF548 (luxO D47E), and BNL240 (rpoN::cmr) was probed for sRNA Qrr1 with a probe made against V. harveyi qrr1 and for sRNA Qrr4 with a probe made against V. cholerae qrr4. V. harveyi rpsL is shown as the loading control. (C) Single time point RLU for V. cholerae strains DL3212 (luxO) and DL3213 (luxO D47E) containing the qrr1-lux transcriptional fusion in trans. Cell 2004 118, 69-82DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2004.06.009)

Figure 7 Simultaneous Deletion of the Four sRNAs Is Required to Affect Quorum-Sensing in V. cholerae (A) Bioluminescence assays were performed on V. cholerae: MM227 (WT, open squares), MM349 (ΔluxO, open diamonds), DL2998 (Δqrr2, Δqrr3, Δqrr4, closed squares), DL2996 (Δqrr1, Δqrr3, Δqrr4, closed diamonds), DL2955 (Δqrr1, Δqrr2, Δqrr4, closed triangles), DL2997 (Δqrr1, Δqrr2, Δqrr3, closed circles), DL2956 (Δqrr1, Δqrr2, Δqrr3, Δqrr4, open circles). (B) Single time point RLU for V. cholerae strains MM227 (WT), MM349 (ΔluxO), BH48 (luxO D47E), DL2956 (Δqrr1, Δqrr2, Δqrr3, Δqrr4), and DL3024 (luxO D47E, Δqrr1, Δqrr2, Δqrr3, Δqrr4). Western blots probed for HapR and TcpA from V. cholerae strains C6706str2 (WT), MM307 (ΔluxO), BH38 (luxO D47E), DL2953 (Δqrr1, Δqrr2, Δqrr3, Δqrr4), and DL3020 (luxO D47E, Δqrr1, Δqrr2, Δqrr3, Δqrr4). Cell 2004 118, 69-82DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2004.06.009)

Figure 8 Mutual Destruction of sRNA and Target mRNA Produces an Ultrasensitive Response to the Rate of sRNA Synthesis. If the rate of sRNA synthesis, kx, drops below the rate of target mRNA synthesis, ky, the steady-state pool of target message rises abruptly. In the quorum-sensing circuit, this implies that an ultrasensitive increase in hapR/luxR mRNA levels occurs with decreasing levels of LuxO-P as cell density increases. The curves are generated from Equation 7 of Elf et al. (2003), which describes the production of two chemical species (the sRNA and the mRNA) that undergo mutual destruction with a second-order rate constant kmd (= vmax/Kx Ky) and also undergo intrinsic, first-order degradation at a rate μ. In the curves shown, we have set the one adjustable parameter kmd ky/μ2 to equal 5 × 107, which is in the regime where degradation of the minority species is primarily due to mutual-destruction processes. Concentrations are given in units of ky/μ. Cell 2004 118, 69-82DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2004.06.009)