Head Tracking and Action Recognition in a Smart Meeting Room

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Data-Assimilation Research Centre
Advertisements

Jose-Luis Blanco, Javier González, Juan-Antonio Fernández-Madrigal University of Málaga (Spain) Dpt. of System Engineering and Automation May Pasadena,
CSCE643: Computer Vision Bayesian Tracking & Particle Filtering Jinxiang Chai Some slides from Stephen Roth.
Biointelligence Laboratory, Seoul National University
1 Approximated tracking of multiple non-rigid objects using adaptive quantization and resampling techniques. J. M. Sotoca 1, F.J. Ferri 1, J. Gutierrez.
Monte Carlo Localization for Mobile Robots Karan M. Gupta 03/10/2004
Lab 2 Lab 3 Homework Labs 4-6 Final Project Late No Videos Write up
Visual Tracking CMPUT 615 Nilanjan Ray. What is Visual Tracking Following objects through image sequences or videos Sometimes we need to track a single.
Foreground Modeling The Shape of Things that Came Nathan Jacobs Advisor: Robert Pless Computer Science Washington University in St. Louis.
Tracking Multiple Occluding People by Localizing on Multiple Scene Planes Professor :王聖智 教授 Student :周節.
Benny Neeman Leon Ribinik 27/01/2009. Our Goal – People Tracking We would like to be able to track and distinguish the different people in a movie.
Multiple People Detection and Tracking with Occlusion Presenter: Feifei Huo Supervisor: Dr. Emile A. Hendriks Dr. A. H. J. Stijn Oomes Information and.
PHD Approach for Multi-target Tracking
Visual Recognition Tutorial
Centre for Autonomous Systems SWAR Sept 8, 2009 © 2009 Omid Aghazadeh Model Adaptation in Monte Carlo Localization Omid Aghazadeh.
TOWARD DYNAMIC GRASP ACQUISITION: THE G-SLAM PROBLEM Li (Emma) Zhang and Jeff Trinkle Department of Computer Science, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
Particle Filters Pieter Abbeel UC Berkeley EECS Many slides adapted from Thrun, Burgard and Fox, Probabilistic Robotics TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read.
1 Face Tracking in Videos Gaurav Aggarwal, Ashok Veeraraghavan, Rama Chellappa.
Sérgio Pequito Phd Student
Navigation Jeremy Wyatt School of Computer Science University of Birmingham.
Nonlinear and Non-Gaussian Estimation with A Focus on Particle Filters Prasanth Jeevan Mary Knox May 12, 2006.
Particle Filters for Mobile Robot Localization 11/24/2006 Aliakbar Gorji Roborics Instructor: Dr. Shiri Amirkabir University of Technology.
Consolidating Information Participants Participants –H. Burkom- Barbara Spratkes-Wilkins –J. Coberly - Stella Tsai –K. Cox Questions Questions –How do.
Particle Filtering for Non- Linear/Non-Gaussian System Bohyung Han
Particle Filtering. Sensors and Uncertainty Real world sensors are noisy and suffer from missing data (e.g., occlusions, GPS blackouts) Use sensor models.
Particle Filters++ TexPoint fonts used in EMF.
Tracking Pedestrians Using Local Spatio- Temporal Motion Patterns in Extremely Crowded Scenes Louis Kratz and Ko Nishino IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS.
Particle Filtering in Network Tomography
BraMBLe: The Bayesian Multiple-BLob Tracker By Michael Isard and John MacCormick Presented by Kristin Branson CSE 252C, Fall 2003.
Tracking with focus on the particle filter (part II) Michael Rubinstein IDC.
Human-Computer Interaction Human-Computer Interaction Tracking Hanyang University Jong-Il Park.
Visual Object Tracking Xu Yan Quantitative Imaging Laboratory 1 Xu Yan Advisor: Shishir K. Shah Quantitative Imaging Laboratory Computer Science Department.
A General Framework for Tracking Multiple People from a Moving Camera
Lecture 19: Free Energies in Modern Computational Statistical Thermodynamics: WHAM and Related Methods Dr. Ronald M. Levy Statistical.
Jamal Saboune - CRV10 Tutorial Day 1 Bayesian state estimation and application to tracking Jamal Saboune VIVA Lab - SITE - University.
Person detection, tracking and human body analysis in multi-camera scenarios Montse Pardàs (UPC) ACV, Bilkent University, MTA-SZTAKI, Technion-ML, University.
ECE 8443 – Pattern Recognition Objectives: Bagging and Boosting Cross-Validation ML and Bayesian Model Comparison Combining Classifiers Resources: MN:
Particle Filters.
Mixture Models, Monte Carlo, Bayesian Updating and Dynamic Models Mike West Computing Science and Statistics, Vol. 24, pp , 1993.
Discriminative Training and Acoustic Modeling for Automatic Speech Recognition - Chap. 4 Discriminative Training Wolfgang Macherey Von der Fakult¨at f¨ur.
CLASSIFICATION: Ensemble Methods
Head Tracking in Meeting Scenarios Sascha Schreiber.
-Arnaud Doucet, Nando de Freitas et al, UAI
Maximum a posteriori sequence estimation using Monte Carlo particle filters S. J. Godsill, A. Doucet, and M. West Annals of the Institute of Statistical.
Twenty Second Conference on Artificial Intelligence AAAI 2007 Improved State Estimation in Multiagent Settings with Continuous or Large Discrete State.
Boosted Particle Filter: Multitarget Detection and Tracking Fayin Li.
Effective Automatic Image Annotation Via A Coherent Language Model and Active Learning Rong Jin, Joyce Y. Chai Michigan State University Luo Si Carnegie.
Sequential Monte-Carlo Method -Introduction, implementation and application Fan, Xin
CSE-473 Project 2 Monte Carlo Localization. Localization as state estimation.
Short Introduction to Particle Filtering by Arthur Pece [ follows my Introduction to Kalman filtering ]
Particle Filtering. Sensors and Uncertainty Real world sensors are noisy and suffer from missing data (e.g., occlusions, GPS blackouts) Use dynamics models.
Progressive Sampling Instance Selection and Construction for Data Mining Ch 9. F. Provost, D. Jensen, and T. Oates 신수용.
Model Fusion and its Use in Earth Sciences R. Romero, O. Ochoa, A. A. Velasco, and V. Kreinovich Joint Annual Meeting NSF Division of Human Resource Development.
Particle Filtering. Sensors and Uncertainty Real world sensors are noisy and suffer from missing data (e.g., occlusions, GPS blackouts) Use sensor models.
The Unscented Particle Filter 2000/09/29 이 시은. Introduction Filtering –estimate the states(parameters or hidden variable) as a set of observations becomes.
Face Detection and Head Tracking Ying Wu Electrical Engineering & Computer Science Northwestern University, Evanston, IL
Date of download: 5/29/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. From left to right are camera views 1,2,3,5 of surveillance videos in TRECVid benchmarking.
C. Canton1, J.R. Casas1, A.M.Tekalp2, M.Pardàs1
Kalman Filter Results Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers Shall We Dance, MGM 1941 J. M. Rehg © 2003.
Introduction to particle filter
Visual Tracking CMPUT 615 Nilanjan Ray.
Auxiliary particle filtering: recent developments
PRAKASH CHOCKALINGAM, NALIN PRADEEP, AND STAN BIRCHFIELD
Introduction to particle filter
Particle Filtering.
6.891 Computer Experiments for Particle Filtering
Ch 3. Linear Models for Regression (2/2) Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, C. M. Bishop, Previously summarized by Yung-Kyun Noh Updated.
Joseph K. Pickrell  The American Journal of Human Genetics 
Overview: Chapter 2 Localization and Tracking
Nome Sobrenome. Time time time time time time..
Presentation transcript:

Head Tracking and Action Recognition in a Smart Meeting Room Hammadi Nait-Charif & Stephen J. McKenna

Objectives Simultaneously track multiple people Perform automatic initialization Handle Person-Person Occlusion Combine data from the 2 cameras to annotate the activity of all 6 participants

SIS Algorithm

SIS Algorithm Solutions to degeneracy problem Good Choice of Important Density sub-optimal solution => 2. Resampling

SIR Algorithm

Drawbacks of SIR Algorithm Particles with high weight a statistically selected many times which leads to the loss of diversity of the particles Prior is not the optimal choice for the importance function because it does not take into account the latest observation 3. SIR tends to be less accurate with smaller sample sets

ILW Algorithm

How ILW is Better Half of the particles migrate to the high likelihood regions (because they take into account the latest measurement) in the state-space while the other half are sampled from the prior So even if the prior is poor the estimate is better due the use of the other half of the particles in the high likelihood regions

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Figure 5

Figure 6

Figure 7

Figure 8